Results

Analyst Event Best Practices - A year in review

Analyst Event Best Practices - A year in review

As an analyst you attend a lot of events every year, user conferences and analyst briefings being the most prominent event types. So looking at the year in review – let me comment on some Dos and Don’ts and as well offer some suggestions for 2015.

But before that – my disclaimer: I know organizing these events is a lot of work. User conferences are the highlight of the year for many marketing departments, and a huge chunk of budget is spend on these. Careful considerations on agenda, speakers, location, and appreciation event need to be balanced with budgets. Not an easy task and as analysts we all appreciate to be invited to these events – this post is in the spirit to make these events (even) better.

So let’s start with some general suggestions:

Analyst schedules are almost always busy. We often don’t know from when and where we are flying in to the event until the last minute. Especially March to May and September till November are ‘crazy’ months when regular work (advisories, consulting, speaking etc.) collide with the conference schedule. So the earlier you can get your event schedule shared, the better, including the days and times for the analyst track. Then vendors should understand that analysts often don’t know till a few weeks before the event from where they will be flying to and back from.

Monday starts are popular for conferences, which mostly means Sunday travel to get there. It may seem little to vendors as this happens a few times a year, for analyst it means a few dozen times in the year (32 times for me in 2014). So travelling to the conference on Mondays will not only be appreciated by analysts – but also customers, who often attend more events than most of the vendor personnel.

For better coverage, it helps if you can share – under NDA as needed – the key announcements for the event beforehand. Some vendors do a very good job to brief analysts ahead of the event on key announcements and events, e.g. IBM and Informatica stuck out in 2014. You certainly get more coverage and a more attentive analyst crowd if you brief us ahead of time.

Analysts need the conference content to blog, report and advise shared customers and prospects about it. Ideally vendors would share that before – under NDA is fine – or as real time as possible. In 2014 one vendor shared documents of the conference 20 days later… needless to say the trains had left the station. And I would not play the silly game of giving feedback and in return getting the materials. Personally I am happy to play it as long as reasonable, but first priority for an analyst is to understand, tweet, blog, report on the event – not to provide feedback on it.

Events are exhausting, for all participants. But the follow up in the next 3-5 days with the analyst community is crucial, the faster questions can be answered, the better. Bringing the executives together at the end of the analyst track is a great best practice, e.g. done so by e.g. Amazon, Ceridian, IBM and Kronos in 2014. Providing high quality pictures of keynotes and slides is ensuring a vendor’s content looks great in blogs and reports. Otherwise it will be missed completely on the visual side or the best effort of an analyst taking his best picture…

Next – how do you seat analyst and press in keynotes… Tables and multiple power plugs are a must. Even though you get a first row seat but you need to balance smartphones (for tweets with pictures) and a notebook on your lap with two colleagues sitting next to you and trying to do the same – it definitively does not make our life easy. And is certainly detrimental to coverage. So it does not have to be the personal LazyBoy (as some of us were joking in fall) – but a decent table, power outlets and an ok chair will go a long way. And bio breaks are needed, too – so don’t do 4 hour keynote sessions as one vendor did in 2014.

And lastly – always a challenge – if you want the analysts to cover live / tweet from the keynotes - make sure that they have a working Wifi network. I realize that is a huge challenge, but with more regular attendees being active on social media – it is better to err on the side of spending more for Wifi than less. Providing a separate media / press / analyst network is a good practice, though I don’t like the two class society… a tweet is a tweet from anyone attending and using your conference hashtag. And the work around with wired connections is certainly a good one, but let us know ahead of time as not all of us carry the needed network adapter cables most of our devices require these days…. Lastly columns in the line of sight don’t help attention and visual coverage either.

On the subject of covering the event, in case you stream it – make it even easier to do so. I am waiting for streaming clients to have the respective social media buttons to share the slide / picture that is currently streamed right away to the social network. If a vendor wants more social coverage of the event, that is the biggest trick in the trade for 2015.

And then comes the bigger picture. We understand that vendors don’t want to share / cannot share information early some times. But give us a hint that major things are happening. Last year we had the case that a vendor announced very major new products – when all analysts were either already in the air or at the airport. Not only do vendors miss on the coverage, the previously written takeaways are obsolete or need a massive change. It’s ok not to give away the news, put tell us to pay attention at a certain time or day. Or not be on a plane at the time. Wink, wink.

Next comes the event coverage. Analysts understand that most vendor staff is exhausted, for you it’s a big event vs. for us analysts it is just one of many. I’d recommend vendors to keep some spare capacity for factual reviews and inquiries during and right after the event – as you want to stay in the news cycle. Often analysts are off to the next event and if their blog / report is not out quickly, things start piling up. The result is less, later and less accurate coverage, all things you don’t want as a vendor.

And after the even it is expense time. Making the expense process easy will be welcome by all analysts. Some vendors have given analyst ‘carte blanche’ for flight booking, setting limits to what they will approve amount wise. Giving the analyst the freedom to book their own flight is a win / win – so certainly a best practice to consider. One vendor has gone so far to do so for the whole event, setting limits for hotels, airport transfers, taxis etc. – a very good step all other vendors should take note of and ideally imitate. Bonus to consider for 2015: Do an expense drop when the analyst leaves the event, credit same cost for return to airport and incidentals for the rest of the day – and vendor and analyst are done. With the bonus that analysts are likely to show up when they leave your event.

And lastly cookbooks and other large items and gifts are certainly appreciated, but offer the analysts a shipping option. Last year I came back with three cookbooks in a week…

MyPOV

It is always great to be invited to an event by a vendor. It gives analyst prime insight into the people and product as well as customers, prospect and the overall ecosystem. A lot of work and investment goes into them, we are aware of that. With this blog posts I tried to point out some areas where these events can be even made better. Hope it is helpful. 

If you are a vendor – let me know what you think – if you are an analyst – please do the same – and add what I have missed.
2012, 2013, 2014 & 2015 (C) Holger Mueller - All Rights Reserved

 

Marketing Transformation Tech Optimization Data to Decisions Digital Safety, Privacy & Cybersecurity Innovation & Product-led Growth Future of Work Openworld amazon SAP Chief Marketing Officer Chief Information Officer Chief Technology Officer Chief Information Security Officer Chief Data Officer

Research Preview: Digital Transformation Services Take Center Stage For 2015

Research Preview: Digital Transformation Services Take Center Stage For 2015

Constellation State Of The State Report: Digital Transformation Services Take Center Stage For 2015

State of IT Services

The latest Constellation Research state of enterprise technology report, Digital Transformation Services Take Center Stage for 2015, explores the impact of digital transformation on the services front. As so many different pieces of the digital transformation space come together, Constellation believes that the Digital Transformation Services category is set to explode in 2015, and we forecast it to surpass $100.7B in 2020.

Since the Digital Transformation Services have been poorly defined and often confused, in this state of the state report, Constellation defines the space, provides a high level overview of the seven key pillars, and notes various provider categories.

Digital Transformation Services Take Center Stage for 2015

Download Report Snapshot

At the core, this report is about a big shift that has occurred with customers.  When it comes to Digital Transformation Services, most customers seek turn-key solutions and no longer have time for extensive vendor selection efforts.  In fact, customers now prefer close knit partnerships between service providers and technology vendors versus an objective arm’s length relationship.

On the other hand, the pace of change coupled with customer desire for quick results will lead service providers to develop the last mile solutions, and technology vendors to partner with service providers to guarantee a successful outcome.  Constellation believes that this shift in digital transformation services will initiate the blurring of product and services for years to come. As with the core digital transformation market, neither technology vendors nor service providers will be selling products or services. In fact, they too will be delivering on outcomes and experiences.

This report sets the premise for Constellation’s forthcoming reports on the Digital Transformation Services category; and offers insights into five of Constellation’s business research themes — Data to Decisions, Digital Marketing, Matrix Commerce, Next generation customer experience, and Technology Optimization and Innovation.

Your POV.

Ready for digital disruption by starting with mobile?  Add your comments to the blog or reach me via email: R (at) ConstellationR (dot) com or R (at) SoftwareInsider (dot) org.

Please let us know if you need help with your Digital Business transformation efforts. Here’s how we can assist:

  • Developing your digital business strategy
  • Connecting with other pioneers
  • Sharing best practices
  • Vendor selection
  • Implementation partner selection
  • Providing contract negotiations and software licensing support
  • Demystifying software licensing

Resources

Reprints

Reprints can be purchased through Constellation Research, Inc. To request official reprints in PDF format, please contact Sales .

Disclosure

Although we work closely with many mega software vendors, we want you to trust us. For the full disclosure policy,stay tuned for the full client list on the Constellation Research website.

* Not responsible for any factual errors or omissions.  However, happy to correct any errors upon email receipt.

Copyright © 2001 -2015 R Wang and Insider Associates, LLC All rights reserved.
Contact the Sales team to purchase this report on a a la carte basis or join the Constellation Customer Experience

The post Research Preview: Digital Transformation Services Take Center Stage For 2015 appeared first on A Software Insider's Point of View.

 

Tech Optimization New C-Suite Data to Decisions Sales Marketing Innovation & Product-led Growth Leadership Chief Information Officer Chief Experience Officer

The state of the state: Privacy enters Adolescence

The state of the state: Privacy enters Adolescence

Constellation Research recently launched the "State of Enterprise Technology" series of research reports. The series assesses the current state of the enterprise technologies Constellation consider crucial to digital transformation, and provide snapshots of the future usage and evolution of these technologies. Constellation will continue to publish reports in our State of Enterprise Technology series throughout Q1.

My first contribution to this series, "Privacy Enters Adolescence", focuses on Safety and Privacy. I've looked at information data privacy in 2015, and identified seven trends of which you should be aware in order to protect your customer's information.

Here's an excerpt from the report:

Digital Safety and Privacy

Constellation's business theme of Digital Safety and Privacy is all about the art and science of maximizing the information assets of a business, including its most important assets – its people. Our research in this theme enables clients to capitalize on cloud, mobility, Big Data and the Internet of Things, without compromising the digital safety of the business, and the privacy and trust of your end users.

Seven Digital Safety and Privacy Trends for 2015

State of Digital Privacy

  • Consumers have not given up privacy - they've been tricked out of it. The impression is easily formed that people just don’t care about privacy anymore. Yet there is no proof that privacy is dead. In fact, a robust study of young adults has shown no major difference between them and older people on the importance of privacy.
  • Private sector surveillance is overshadowed by government intrusion, but is arguably just as bad. There is nothing inevitable about private sector surveillance. Consumers are waking up to the fact that digital business models are generating unprecedented fortunes on the back of the personal data they are giving away in loyalty programs, social networks, search, cloud email, and fitness trackers. Most people remain blissfully ignorant of what's being done with all that data, but we see budding signs of resentment from consumers whose every interaction is exploited without their consent. 
  • The U.S. is the Canary Islands of privacy. The United States remains the only major economy without broad-based information privacy laws.
  • Privacy is more about politics than technology. Privacy can be seen as a power play between individual rights and the interests of governments and businesses. 
  • The land grab for "public" data accelerates. Data is an immensely valuable raw material. More than data mining, Big Data is really about data refining. And unlike the stuff of traditional extraction industries, data seems inexhaustible, and the cost of extraction is near zero. Something akin to land rights for privacy may be the future.
  • Data literacy will be key to digital safety. Computer literacy is one thing, but data literacy is different and less well defined so far. When we go online, we don’t have the familiar social cues, so now we need to develop new ones. And we need to build up a common understanding of how data flows in the digital economy. Data literacy is more than being able to work an operating system, a device and umpteen apps: it means having meaningful mental models of what goes on in computers. 
  • Privacy will get worse before it gets better. Privacy is messy, even in jurisdictions where data protection rules are well entrenched. Consider the controversial new Right to Be Forgotten ruling of the European Court of Justice, which resulted in plenty of unintended consequences, and collisions with other jurisprudence, namely the United States' protection of free speech. 

A snapshot at my report "Privacy Enters Adolescence" is available for download. It expands on the points above, and sets out recommendations for improving awareness of how personal data flows in the digital economy, negotiating better deals in the data-for-value bargain, and the conduct of Privacy Impact Assessments.

Download Report Snapshot


Digital Safety, Privacy & Cybersecurity Chief Information Officer

Tuesday's Tip: How To Plan For SAP's S/4 HANA Upgrade And Contract Negotiations Strategy #SAPHANA

Tuesday's Tip: How To Plan For SAP's S/4 HANA Upgrade And Contract Negotiations Strategy #SAPHANA

Launch Of SAP S/4 Provides Catalyst For Organizations To Update Their Next Gen Apps Strategy

Screen Shot 2015-02-04 at 5.44.47 AM

The February 3rd, 2015 New York City SAP S/4 launch event brought a positive closure for customers seeking the next generation apps strategy from SAP.  At a high level, the SAP S/4 HANA offering offers:

  • a new suite of applications built only on top of SAP’s in memory database technology, also known as the SAP HANA platform
  • a  user experience built from the SAP Fiori technology that also starts with a mobile first paradigm
  • delivery in the cloud, on-premises, and hybrid

At launch date, the first set of  public SaaS offerings will include Simple Finance (SFIN), project delivery, and sales cloud for customer.  Constellation estimates that  the refactoring process of 400 million lines of code will take between 4 to 6 years.   Constellation estimates that the functional parity on the vertical and micro vertical industries will take even longer.

The Bottom Line: Now Is The Time To Rethink Your Apps Strategy With SAP

While determining where to go in the future, Constellation recommends the following strategies in determining a go forward strategy with not only SAP, but also legacy ERP vendors on the journey to digital business and digital transformation. (see Figure 2).

  • Ask for all copies of previous order docs and price lists
  • Itemize every unit of software and cost per unit
  • Use third party maintenance as a lever
  • Battle indirect licensing
  • Understand your license usage
  • Never, ever, bundle your contracts
  • Focus on designing SOA Principles
  • Stabilize the core, invest in cloud
  • Remember you are the boss of the relationship

Figure 2.  Four Paths Of Modernizing Your Legacy Apps

@rwang0 Four Paths To Legacy Apps Modernization

Your POV

How do you feel about your SAP investment?  Is SAP meeting your needs or are you going elsewhere? Add your comments to the blog or reach me via email: R (at) ConstellationR (dot) com or R (at) SoftwareInsider (dot) com.

Please let us know if you need help with vendor selection or contract negotiation efforts.  Here’s how we can assist:

  • Vendor selection
  • Implementation partner selection
  • Connecting with other pioneers
  • Sharing best practices
  • Designing a next gen apps strategy
  • Providing contract negotiations and software licensing support
  • Demystifying software licensing

Related Research

Reprints

Reprints can be purchased through Constellation Research, Inc. To request official reprints in PDF format, please contact Sales .

Disclosure

Although we work closely with many mega software vendors, we want you to trust us. For the full disclosure policy, stay tuned for the full client list on the Constellation Research website.

* Not responsible for any factual errors or omissions.  However, happy to correct any errors upon email receipt.

Copyright © 2001 – 2015 R Wang and Insider Associates, LLC All rights reserved.
Contact the Sales team to purchase this report on a a la carte basis or join the Constellation Customer Experience!

 

Data to Decisions Tech Optimization Future of Work Innovation & Product-led Growth Digital Safety, Privacy & Cybersecurity New C-Suite Event Report SAP SoftwareInsider Next Gen Apps Enterprise Software Enterprise Acceleration Cloud IoT Blockchain AI ML Machine Learning LLMs Agentic AI Generative AI Robotics Analytics Automation SaaS PaaS IaaS Quantum Computing Digital Transformation Disruptive Technology Enterprise IT CRM ERP CCaaS UCaaS Collaboration Enterprise Service developer Metaverse VR Healthcare Supply Chain Leadership Data to Decisions eCommerce finance HCM HR B2B B2C CX EX Employee Experience business Marketing Growth Social Customer Service Content Management M&A Executive Events Chief Information Officer Chief Digital Officer Chief Data Officer Chief Product Officer Chief Technology Officer Chief Information Security Officer Chief Executive Officer Chief Analytics Officer Chief Financial Officer Chief Operating Officer Chief Marketing Officer Chief Revenue Officer Chief Experience Officer

Will the Internet of Things Change When the FTC Changes the Internet Into A Public Utility? AT&T and Verizon May File Lawsuits

Will the Internet of Things Change When the FTC Changes the Internet Into A Public Utility? AT&T and Verizon May File Lawsuits

We in the tech world have been focused on the Internet of Things and how everything is connected or will be. What will be interesting to see is how the Internet of Things may change if the FTC changes the Internet to a Public Utility. The story in Venture Beat talks about the how the FTC,  Federal Communications Commissionchairman Tom Wheeler is going to release a new regulatory approach affecting the Internet. The change is set to be effective Feb 26. The source from Venture Beat suggests that after the Title II reclassification becomes official, AT&T and Verizon will file lawsuits almost immediately.

The reclassification of the Internet as a public utility-like telecommunications service as defined by Title II of the Communications Act of 1934. The Title II reclassification will apply to both wired and wireless broadband.

The bill is sponsored by a several Republicans — Sen. John Thune (R-S.D.) and Rep. Fred Upton (R-Mich.) and has almost no support from congressional Democrats. The Republicans will need a certain critical mass of Democratic support to make the bill progress and to apply pressure on the president to sign it. And from what we’ve seen in Washington D. C. the ability for the two parties to collaborate on anything is pretty iffy.

The reason the FCC was forced to create a new “Open Internet” regulatory plan was because Verizon sued the commission over its legal standing to regulate network neutrality — and won. In the Venture Beat article it said that Hank Hultquist, AT&T’s VP of federal regulatory set the tone for his brand’s positioning on the change in a blog post. He says that AT&T’s position that the broadband service it sells is actually an “information service” and not a telecommunication service as described in Title II. It also says that the FCC simply has no authority to reclassify broadband without first completing a complete study of the existing marketplace. When the FCC has to defend reclassification before an appellate court, it will have to grapple with these and other arguments,” Hultquist wrote.

The reclassification to Title II will give the commission the legal framework and the authority to enforce network neutrality rules on Internet service providers (ISPs) like Verizon, AT&T, and Comcast. The commission will be able to make sure no carrier gives priority to one Internet content provider’s data packets over those from another.

Those that are for the change for a Title II reclassification believe the move is necessary to permit the FCC to collect universal service fees on data service and to implement privacy regulations. The threat of the lawsuits, and prospect of months or years of legal wrangling, is making many people nervous. It will be interesting to see what happens. The Internet of Things has suddenly become the Internet of Controversy. Hopefully it won’t spoil the plans of all the people and tech companies that have built their dreams on the idea of the Internet of Things.

@drnatalie
VP and Principal Analyst, Constellation Research

 

Next-Generation Customer Experience Chief Customer Officer

What You Don’t Know About APIs Could Hurt Your Ability to Deliver Great Customer Experiences

What You Don’t Know About APIs Could Hurt Your Ability to Deliver Great Customer Experiences

What is the API Economy? Why not knowing about your APIs, could hurt your business? One of the issues is that the APIs you currently have may not be making that seamless, contextual transition in the ubiquitous channel / device world most customers live in daily. (Ubiquitous channel / device meaning customers don’t think about the channel or device they are going to use to interact with you- they just do.) This API issue can apply to many functional department’s software: Marketing, Advertising, Sales, Customer Service, Customer Success Management and can lead to the success or to the failure to meet customer expectations — i.e., to meet the brand’s promise, deliver products and services, as promised as, well as meet the business’s expectation on getting the interaction and engagement data so critical to knowing their customer’s behavioral patterns and creating mass systems of personalization, which has been promised by many a vendor.

With the enhanced capabilities of software and the automation of processes, transactions, and distribution across every industry and companies within those industries, the gap of effective APIs is widening.  APIs not only leverage software but also expose software interfaces to others. This includes, but is not limited to internal developers, partners, customers… and thus, APIs can help the brand get more information out of the interactions with their customers and also to work towards making interactions into engagements that are seamless.

The ability to making interactions into engagements that are seamless is really important  in the multi-channel, multi-device, omni-channel world – which doesn’t — in reality — always exist like the marketing by some vendors says it does. And with mobile driving ubiquitous channel and device engagement necessities, as customers don’t premeditate when and what channel or device they will reach out to you on or which device or channel they will continue that interaction on, businesses must move from the idea of multi-channel, multi-device, omni-channel world into the world of ubiquitous customer engagement and make sure their APIs are delivering all they possibly can.

As I was doing a briefing call with 3scale, as they put it, we are in The API Economy. It’s a new economy, that is beginning to boom as brands realize what that the software they bought doesn’t exactly work they way they thought it did / could / would.  And there are many things that companies need to learn in order to succeed.  To help ease the API process, 3scale, the San Francisco and Barcelona-based API Management solutions provider, released a comprehensive eBook about APIs entitled “Winning in the API Economy. The book is available for download free.

The ebook features commentary and insights from 3scale’s management team and a roadmap for using APIs to advance a business.  The book is designed for any business leader who is in charge of software strategy, or is contributing to it, and is looking to bring their organization gains through efficiency and new market opportunities. Many of today’s internal and external IT challenges have common roots in the need for a sound API strategy for supporting software systems. This can range from the evolution of platform strategies to accommodating mobile distribution channels.

“This book will appeal to leaders across multiple industries as software is becoming an indispensable part of almost every process, and software’s interfaces have the potential to drive a great deal of positive change,” said Steve Willmott, CEO of 3scale and author of “Winning in the API Economy.  “With the API industry expanding so quickly, it is important for organizations to understand the impact that APIs can have on their business and learn about how they can use APIs to grow their bottom line. ‘Winning in the API Economy helps make the world of APIs accessible through easy-to-understand examples and strategies.”

The eBook combines real-world case studies with clear explanations to give the reader an ‘API roadmap’ to guide them into this rapidly changing world. It is especially important to understand what you should be expecting from APIs and the differences between what you are getting and what you should be getting from them.

It is possible that software can drive new business opportunities presented by APIs and lead to success and innovation. But this again, may require that IT and the functional business units collaborate so that the external customer experiences turn into systems of engagement and mass personalization at scale.

@drnatalie

VP and Principal Analyst, Constellation Research Covering Customer Facing Applications To Create Great Customer Experiences

Marketing Transformation Next-Generation Customer Experience Chief Customer Officer

How SAP Missed An Opportunity

How SAP Missed An Opportunity

1

Hello, it’s me again.  Your Friendly SAP — foe?

If you follow me you know that I admire the technical prowess of SAP, but despise about twice as much their marketing “acumen” (there are no other words that are politically correct and fit nicely between quotation marks).

I wrote about it in more detail in my post talking about their Reverse Dichotomy.  They innovate in technology and throw it away in marketing.

The latest launch event, yesterday, of S4/HANA (S stands for simple, 4 is the release number, and HANA stands for — er, well… HANA #LeSigh) continued that trend, with a twist.

They were high points worth mentioning:

  • The reduced and centralized data model (finally, finally, finally — but wait, does that include SuccessFactors?  I don’t think so… we are still not there)
  • The use of metadata (I think they call it customization, but by any words the concept is to allow customers to customize services via the use of metadata – one of the very few companies to do that)
  • A complete rewrite of the platform (yay, yay, yay – 30+ years of spaghetti code base and band aids had seen its day – good riddance)
  • Performance improvements galore (yes, finally – but seriously, 8 seconds responses are not something I’d brag about – even if 4-6x better than what they offer today – and don’t even ask the SuccessFactors clients for their opinion of those “great response times”)
  • A better way to cloud (will discuss the downside of this later in the post; but there were steps forward).

All in all, a good evolution for SAP as it introduces the first major innovation in their product since version 3 (R/3).

Good – right?

Yes – but mostly no.

SAP had been late to the cloud, to platforms, and to offer what their customers demanded in the form of a platform.  Salesforce.com and Microsoft have already addressed this, Oracle is working some of their marketing magic to convince their customers they have it (although they don’t so much) but SAP had been very, very quiet.

Well, not really.

Marketing wise they have been playing marketing musical chairs for the past few years relabeling and renaming their products under different launches, names, and what-nots – but never with a centralized perspective.

This is why they were behind companies like Salesforce (who spent a good 4-5 years retooling to create the Salesforce1 platform, only to waste the opportunity with a mobile-client marketing message that was not so good… or as my iPhone auto-correct would say, ducking socks) and Microsoft (who recently launched XRM, but how long it took to build depends on who you ask).

It’s been several different incarnations and versions for CRM for cloud, HANA, on-premises, and on-demand with different names and mostly the same product or slightly repackaged for some time.  Same happened to other products in the lineup.

I was looking forward to this release as it had been touted to me as the centralized, all-in-one release that will unite all products, fix the platform, change their approach to cloud and platform, and overall drive adoption for the next generation.

They fell short.

They had an opportunity to do that (I liked HANA from the very early conversations about in-memory and improved performance, and each time they showed what it could do with analytics and data management my mouth watered at the possibilities; they had some very interesting architectural approaches for CRM and the acquisition of SuccessFactors brought top quality talent to help them move forward; and more) but they did not take advantage of that opportunity.

They let the opportunity to deliver a market-leading platform that would match their competitors languish.

They missed the opportunity for the same reason Oracle chose not to chase it (as I wrote before): the biggest worry was to move forward with their late-adopter customer base versus doing something innovative and changing the conversation – or worse, leading the market (the necessary components and thinking are widespread throughout the company, just not properly utilized or in some cases even recognized)

I get it, I am not going to chastise them for doing the safe: retaining revenue and ensuring it continues to trickle in for the foreseeable future.  Alas, they left behind the ability to both impress and capture new customers in exchange for servicing their existing ones.  A safe move.  A lost opportunity.

Some of the items that caused me to write this from their recent launch?

  • The admission that multitenancy may not all that’s cracked up to be (how i wish I’d’ve said that before…  wait, I did) but still being offered (mostly because after many years of saying it is essential you can just walk away – and because…)
  • The insistence of offering on-premises version of the solution in addition to public cloud (and won’t even stop to answer questions about private and hybrid clouds… sigh); worse was the reasoning – some verticals  cannot do it – which is antiquated and wrong, but that’s another thread/ topic/post.
  • Not building on the concept of three-tier public and open cloud in favor of retaining the “platform” in HANA with little ability to be replaced or to use supporting services from other vendors (yes, like any other vendor – they want to retain the “ownership” of the client via their platforms, old habits die hard for all of them)

Short version of the complaint? They stuck by the slow-moving, late-adopting mass of the majority of their customer base instead of using the  potential of HANA to create new and innovative.

Just like Oracle before, it sucks - but I guess it is they way they had to go.

Next!

Data to Decisions Marketing Transformation Digital Safety, Privacy & Cybersecurity Innovation & Product-led Growth Tech Optimization Future of Work SAP AI ML Machine Learning LLMs Agentic AI Generative AI Robotics Analytics Automation Cloud SaaS PaaS IaaS Quantum Computing Digital Transformation Disruptive Technology Enterprise IT Enterprise Acceleration Enterprise Software Next Gen Apps IoT Blockchain CRM ERP CCaaS UCaaS Collaboration Enterprise Service developer Metaverse VR Healthcare Supply Chain Leadership Chief Marketing Officer Chief Information Officer Chief Technology Officer Chief Information Security Officer Chief Data Officer

Oracle doubles down on the cloud

Oracle doubles down on the cloud

Last week I got out of Boston just ahead of the massive blizzard that covered much of the area with over 3 feet of snow (I was not so fortunate this week, as I watch another foot of snow fall). My destination? A much warmer and sunnier San Jose, where I spent a busy 2 days with Oracle at their annual Oracle Value Chain Summit. The main theme for the visit, similar to what was discussed at Oracle’s Open World conference at the end of the 2014 was the importance of cloud within the portfolio of Oracle solutions. Oracle also showcased the wide breadth of solutions and case studies they have in the supply chain space – a testament to the mega vendors solution portfolio.

Here are my take aways from the two days I spent on the west coast.

  • Oracle is doubling down on the cloud. The main stage sessions on Tuesday, January 27,placed a heavy emphasis on the efforts and growth of the Oracle cloud offerings. Both Oracle CEO Mark Hurd and Steve Miranda, EVP of Applications Development, spent extensive time discussing the success Oracle has seen with their cloud solutions and continuing to make the case for a greater number of solutions being moved to the cloud. Highlighting the success they have had with the cloud for their HCM (more than 950 new applications cloud customers), CX (more than 1100 new customers) and ERP solutions (more than 250 new customers), it is clear that Oracle is doubling down on the cloud for 2015. This next year should be interesting with regards to which solutions in the Oracle Value Chain portfolio get heavily invested into the cloud. Mr. Hurd has a vision of a few mega vendors providing a full suite of solutions that allow supply chain solutions to be fully stitched together. As we know, for the supply chain space that entails a complex and wide array of solutions. Oracle has already put many of these in the cloud, 2015 will be an interesting year to watch as this cloud push continues to pick up steam.
  • Oracle is happy to sell you the point supply chain solution you need. One strategy that has serviced Oracle well is their willingness and ability to sell some point solutions, which allow them to gain a foothold within accounts. Rather than always trying to push a larger suite solution sale, the point solution strategy gives Oracle great flexibility when it comes to account targeting. Organizations such as Mason Companies and Ricoh are leveraging the Oracle WMS offering to manage their distribution networks, but see this investment as a first step to address greater supply chain needs. Areas such as greater system optimization or after sale management could conceivably grow from this WMS foray. Oracle’s long running strategy of acquiring strong point solutions such as G-Log, Retek and Demantra to name a few, allows the flexibility to sell these solutions into accounts as opposed to have a “one mega size” fits all offering. Oracle will be well served to continue this tact.
  • However there remains room for best of breed providers. While Mr. Hurd argues for a handful, or fewer, of large vendors providing a one-stop shop, there will always remain room for best of breed vendors. Why? Because these mega vendors cannot service every solution and need of the user at the highest-level possible. That is no knock on these mega vendors. A recent article in the Economist pointed out that even in the world of mega vendors – such as Google in search – that smaller vendors still hold an important role. They are in existence to address specific areas that the larger vendors cannot properly address. For example, speaking with a manufacturer who looked to leverage Oracle’s global trade management (GTM) offering was disappointed in the level of maturity of the solution. They had to lean heavily on their solution integrator to fill in the gaps of the Oracle GTM offering. A candid story to say the least, but not surprising. These large vendors have such an extensive portfolio; across so many different industries that one cannot expect that each solution has received the same level of development and attention as one another. Customers need to keep this in mind when making vendor selections – sometimes a vendor that focuses on one specific supply chain problem offers the best solution.

As Mr. Hurd said from main stage “supply chain is hard,” there is no doubt about that! Oracle spent over two days giving us a host of case studies and presentations of how they are tackling these hard problems. The sessions I was able to attend provided a wide swath of stories about how companies from global automotive suppliers to General Electric Power & Water are leveraging Oracle to better manage their supply chains.

It will be interesting to watch how Mr. Hurd’s theory in the rise of the mega vendors plays out. Something to watch in 2015 and beyond.

Matrix Commerce Innovation & Product-led Growth Tech Optimization Event Report Oracle Executive Events SaaS PaaS IaaS Cloud Digital Transformation Disruptive Technology Enterprise IT Enterprise Acceleration Enterprise Software Next Gen Apps IoT Blockchain CRM ERP CCaaS UCaaS Collaboration Enterprise Service Chief Information Officer Chief Supply Chain Officer Chief Technology Officer Chief Information Security Officer Chief Data Officer Chief Executive Officer

Understanding your Digital Business Model by its Business Functional Requirements for Operational Technology

Understanding your Digital Business Model by its Business Functional Requirements for Operational Technology

Part 3; A Digital Business is more than the addition of e-commerce channels, instead it must embrace three distinct and different business functions. Digital Business models are defined as agile, dynamic, and responsive to external opportunities through sense and respond capabilities. This is the common terminology used in relation to the Front Office, with the external role winning of sales revenue. Yet without major changes it’s difficult to see how the Back Office internal activities delivered by optimized enterprise IT processes can support such a flexible business-operating model. Its time to re-examine and identify the revised business functions together with what and how technologies provide them.

Slowly but surely all enterprises have become dependent on technology to operate their internal processes, but Digital Business takes this a new level of integration with, and operation through, external Digital Markets. Buy practices are as much transformed as Sell methods, plus a slew of external business and technology Services must connect, and support, enterprise operations.

Part I of this series entitled ‘Why your IT Operation can’t run your Digital Business Operations, and in turn, why you Digital Operations can’t run your IT Operations’ defined the reality of the difference between the Front and Back Offices, their technology and operations. Part 2 re-examined, and updated, the best practices for the operation of the Back Office supporting the internal fulfillment processes of the enterprise under the title; ‘The role of existing business functions and technology provisioning in a Digital Business’.  

Part 2 also introduced the diagram below to illustrate the Back Office functions concentrating on the lower four blocks. In Part 3 the focus is on the top three blocks covering Front Office functions. Finally in Part 4 the last block covering the Business functions and Technologies of the Enterprise Business Platform and its role as the new integration engine will be defined.

Part 3 Business Functions and Technology alignment of the Front Office; The three blocks at the top of the diagram, Machines, Commerce and People, are generally seen as supporting the new externally focused Front Office by using the new wave technologies. It’s the combination of new technologies enabling new business capabilities that produce the business game change of Digital Business. The center block is called ‘Commerce’ rather than ‘online web sales’ or a similar description from the 2000 era of moving to offer the sales catalogue on an external webserver, to reflect the greatly expanded commercial role of true Digital Business.

Q; What is Digital Business?; A; When your Digital Sales model gains its opportunistic advantage through your Digital Procurement model exploiting supplier opportunities, and the majority of your standardized ‘book to bill’ processing is done in alignment through an external Business Process Outsourcing provider then an Enterprise can be said to be a true Digital Business.

This explanation supports the use of the broader term ‘Commerce’ to embrace both the Buy and Sell operations working together in Digital Business. (It’s hard to succeed in the Sell function without the support of the Buy function!) In a true Digital Business environment the administrative ‘paperwork’ flow will also be Digital and for good reasons, both commercial and technical, probably best serviced using an external Business Process Outsourcing, BPO, Service Provider. The BPO Service Provider can forward consolidated financial data through the Firewall in a secure manner, instead of the multiple accesses required for all the many, different participants in each buy/sell operation. Multiple penetration of the Firewall is always a security risk and leaving these operations to remain internally provided from behind the firewall is introducing an un-necessary risk.

This last point is especially important as a further principle of Digital Business models is that all activities are directly cost attributable to ensure ‘real-time’ financial management of these rapidly changing opportunistic operations.

Its worth remarking that SAP have created products, and ‘Services’ to integrate new Front Office Commerce into existing internal IT ERP systems and processes. As part of this SAP have added new business capabilities to embrace the data from the Machine functional block as well. The SAP drivers in providing new capabilities to connect to and enhance their installed ERP base means that their point of focus is different to that of Salesforce whose focus is on empowering people. This point will be expanded later.

Front Office Digital Business is made possible by two important differences from existing Back Office IT. The first is the common standardized nature of environment, or fabric, based on the Internet with associated technologies allowing any person, or computing device to successfully interact. The second is the use of Cloud, Apps and Services to provide the capability without having to be purchased as an investment using a Capital Expenditure, or CapEx, budget, (with the resulting difficult to allocate overhead charges). The agile, flexibility of the Digital Business model with its opportunistic, constantly changing requirements is made financially viable by this all-important shift in provisioning allow almost real-time understanding of operating profit, or loss, for a given business action, or activity.

Front Office functions should be deployed on an Operational Expenditure, or OpEx, budget with direct cost allocations against the function, user or business activity. Financial reporting and justifications from IT do not provide the necessary information to successfully manage a Digital Business.

The necessity to for Digital Business to be managed through very different financial controls to those used for IT was the subject of a previous blog.  With this point in mind the question of the functionality of the other two Front Office blocks, ‘People’ and ‘Machines’, can be defined in relationship to their role of supporting, and enhancing, the capabilities of ‘Commerce’. The use of Collaboration and Social Tools has been widely discussed as an aid to sales and marketing is well understood, but the question of the functionality requirements in an integrated Digital Business may not be so clear.

The Collaboration of ‘People’ is an unstructured series of interactions driven by reaction to events, as such it is more likely that it will be focus externally around reacting to market, sales, and customers issues rather than internally around the ‘structured’ processes and information of the enterprises own operations.

Salesforce has consistently focused on providing a highly integrated approach to supporting and empowering the business value the People can bring to the enterprise describing it as the ability to ‘connect every employee with the files, data, and experts they need — anywhere, anytime’.

The Salesforce white paper ‘taking action at the speed of social’ defines much of the Business capabilities required for the ‘People’ function though extra functions may be added to refer to a specific enterprise individual needs.  This is a fast reactive environment frequently driven by individuals, and groups, preferences for different tools and methods of working so it has to be provisioned accordingly. And that means by using fast, lightweight, quick to build and deploy ‘Services’ from external sources with attributable cost management.

‘Machines’, the third block, is more complicated to define as it introduces the topic of Internet of Things, or IoT, instrumentation, which is still a developing set of technologies and business functions. For more detailed information of IoT, which is a huge topic in its own right, please see the blogs posted on this site on alternative weeks.

The ‘Machine’ functions bring the ability to ‘sense’ as in monitoring for triggering actions and changes, or acquiring data as to norms and progressive change. This vastly extends an enterprises abilities to be ‘aware’ and decide, when and how, to opportunistically react in many different vertical industry sectors.

In comparison to the ‘People’ function which seeks to harness the tacit knowledge and experience of the Enterprise workforce as well as customers, suppliers, experts etc. externally, the  ‘Machine’ function is to produce straight forward data. It will be new Data from new sources that will add to an Enterprise overall picture of the environment in which it operates, but it is unlikely to be in the familiar forms of data aligned to the Data used in the internal IT systems. 

Sensors and sensing data is usually described as ‘Industrial Technology’ Data to differentiate from existing ‘Information Technology Data’, and it will increasingly come from other than in-house controlled sources too. Defining the functionality and aligning the manner of provisioning is the new challenge.

The key question with the functions of ‘Machine’ is with what do they interact to add value to the enterprise. It can be as part of the Front Office externally facing market activities, or the Back Office internal processes of fulfillment. In time it will be both and introduce new challenges of scale, risk and security.

As an example of ‘Machine’ functions supporting Back Office internal operations SAP has successfully deployed IoT sensing into internal manufacturing environments fully integrated with their Connected Manufacturing ERP suite. The Business value is clearly to monitor, and manage, previously unknown aspects of the manufacturing systems in order to extend, and improve, the current operations. In time this may extend to embrace an Enterprises suppliers and logistics companies making for new sources of data in unfamiliar formats. The makers of large Manufacturing plant have developed their own data formats and models that relate to the operations they believe should be monitored.

By contrast Salesforce is equally successfully deploying IoT to bring data into Front Office operations where subjective, high value, business decisions can be taken by people, even if the resulting actions then use particular Salesforce Front Office processes. Consider the difference between the type of data about a machine production rates etc., used in the Connected Manufacturing application, and, an experienced factory plant engineer interpreting a number of graphs showing continuous operating parameters to take the decision to plan preventative maintenance.

The Business function with technology alignment for the functions of ‘Machine’ are different from those of IT, and will almost certainly develop with time into a wholly new technology deployment environment.

The key question with the functions of ‘Machine’ is with what do they interact to add value to the enterprise? Is it part of the Front Office externally facing market activities, or the Back Office internal processes of fulfillment?  In time it will be both, and the Front Office will transform into a wholly different environment driven totally by technology to support Digital Business.

Connecting, processing, and adding value, to this complex new Front Office set of three functional blocks; Machine, People and Commerce, and to the existing Back office blocks of Core Competencies, BPO, Applications and Data Center calls for an Enterprise integration capability that is radically different from the IT Middleware of today. The last and eighth functional block; the Enterprise Digital Business Platform is the subject of Part 4 of this series, and is an entire set of functions and technologies integrated together to perform this role.

Innovation & Product-led Growth Tech Optimization Future of Work AI ML Machine Learning LLMs Agentic AI Generative AI Analytics Automation B2B B2C CX EX Employee Experience HR HCM business Marketing SaaS PaaS IaaS Supply Chain Growth Cloud Digital Transformation Disruptive Technology eCommerce Enterprise IT Enterprise Acceleration Enterprise Software Next Gen Apps IoT Blockchain CRM ERP Leadership finance Customer Service Content Management Collaboration M&A Enterprise Service Chief Information Officer Chief Technology Officer Chief Digital Officer Chief Data Officer Chief Analytics Officer Chief Information Security Officer Chief Executive Officer Chief Operating Officer

First Take - SAP launches S/4HANA - The good, the challenge & the concern

First Take - SAP launches S/4HANA - The good, the challenge & the concern

On February 3rd SAP announced what the vendor called its biggest product announcement since the launch of the venerable R/3 system back in 1992. It is always a pleasure to witness a product launch, with all the hard work, thought and preparations that has gone into it – and the S/4HANA one was certainly no exception.

SAP logoBut before presenting my Top 3 takeaways – let’s put things into perspective. Back in 1992 R/3 was a ‘gimmick’ in the eyes of most industry observers. It was Plattner’s project to run SAP enterprise software on a relational RDBMS in ‘client server’ mode, it was positioned to target the large German economy of Mittelstand businesses that could not afford the mainframe based flagship R/2. In hindsight it worked out all well for SAP – Moore’s Law made R/3 feasible and so affordable that large enterprises used it more than the SMBs. And Plattner was gets kudos for foresight – choosing Oracle was a winner on the RDBMS side (not that clear in the early 90ies) and SAP was years ahead of the competition on the USA, anyone remembers D&B as a software vendor, AMS etc.? And SAP’s desire to automate every corner of the enterprise was also exactly what enterprises caught in Hammer’s process re-engineering wanted. One common system to lay out new processes and best practices. That helped SAP to a leadership position in enterprise software that the vendor still has today.

 

sap software cd
R/3 CDs back then (from SAP website here)


Fast forward to 2015 and the launch of S/4HANA is different for a number of reasons:
 

  • While R/3 was a 2nd product to the main product R/2 – S/4HANA is SAP’s go to product that needs to evolve fast and carry revenue load quickly.
     
  • While SAP was ahead with ‘client / server’ architecture it is no longer ahead in terms of re-writing its applications for the 21st century. SAP has certainly innovated first with in memory / HANA – it has been busy for the longest to make its existing applications work with HANA – and not write its next generation applications. Oracle is 10 years into Fusion (one could argue even maybe too long), Infor announced rebuilding of Finance and HCM last year etc.
     
  • SAP stayed away from the database and partnered successfully with all hardware vendors. Its partner’s strategy for database, hardware and implementation was definitively a success ingredient. Today S/4HANA will only run on HANA – no surprise – but a big difference with ecosystem implications.
     
  • Open Source was nothing even thinkable or serious in the early 90ies. Today even the largest vendors (think IBM) need to embrace open source and use it in their next generation products. Building an architecture somewhere in a remote R&D location won’t happen anymore and come out with a big surprise – won’t happen anymore.
     
  • We are at the beginning of the BigData era – it is not guaranteed than in-memory columnar architectures will dominate the future of enterprise software as close as the relational database has in the past.
     
  • Most importantly R/3 was positioned as a TCO leader for enterprise software – cheaper and more affordable than the mainframe based solutions of the time. HANA and now S/4HANA had to justify investment as in memory is not intuitively a leading TCO option. 
 
A visibly proud Plattner presenting


With that in mind – here are my top 3 takeaways from what we understand S/4HANA is today:
 

  • A Fresh Start – For the first time SAP executives have openly stated that they are building a new product, on a new code line, with new unique capabilities and a (not discussed and likely not set yet) price / license point. SAP has been a victim of the R/3 architecture success that the vendor was able to salvage across the more recent architecture turmoil of internet and cloud architectures. Being able to keep running R/3 and R/3 related assets for such a long time is an accomplishment, but also forces the vendor now – 20+ years later – into a re-write. Most vendors did not have that much time to run on the same platform, they had to innovate (and potentially fail) earlier. But SAP is not starting with Line 1- but re-using assets from the R/3 world. E.g. the Document system that was one of the key success designs for R/3 finds itself again in S/4HANA. EmployeeCentral will become the core of HCM at some undisclosed point in the future. And there is certainly nothing wrong with re-using proven assets and re-implement and re-use them – but SAP will have to be careful to not go too far, especially when falling under time pressure to complete S/4HANA (anyone remember the R/3 ‘death marches’ to bring R/3 to functional parity with R/2 – something never intended originally. But a fresh start was (badly) needed and good for SAP to now talk about it publicly. It looks like the start for S/4HANA was about two years ago when work for Simple Finance started in earnest. 
SAP HANA S4
The three S/4HANA Design Principles
  • Best Practice Concerns - We live in exciting times. For the first time technology is capable and affordable to do more than what business best practice demands. We are moving fast to the barrier of what humans can comprehend. The underlying IT paradigm has switched forever from constrained systems that were ‘sized’ to their specific purpose. In the new (theoretically) infinite scalable new reality and completely different business best practices are emerging, Vendors like SAP need to be careful not to step into the traps of rebuilding what worked in the 20th century – only better / faster – and need to switch from following business practice to create and lead with best practices. A monumental challenge for the years to come. The good news is that the technology is there, the bad news is that it is hard to break old habits and keep asking the business users for best practices. They don’t know them in most places (yet). SAP will have to pay attention to this dilemma. As a former engineer I can only imagine the drawers full of product plans that were not possible then – but are now possible – though only automate the 20th century world that operated on the constrained IT paradigm. A risk not to underestimate.
 
SAP S4 HANA
S/4HANA Design Points and Differentiators
  • In Memory And In Memory Only - My biggest concern remains that SAP locks itself out of the transformation of the BigData era with an over reliance on HANA being RAM based. Yes we know all the DLM / Smart Data Access tools SAP has to mitigate them – but all vendors that preached a co-existence strategy with BigData had to fold that approach. Even the remote query option vendors are creating a risk to limit vital insights. When enterprises face the choice between an in memory platform that has to shuffle data insight it out of Hadoop clusters for insights – vs a SSD based Hadoop only project – they all pick the latter. Even enterprises that want and will use in memory databases still pursue the Hadoop on SSD path as they know they can decide to ‘dump’ their ERP data in the Hadoop clusters anyway later. Not a challenge from a pipe and storage perspective – even a lower cardinality problem for most BigData projects. The longer SAP ignores this situation, the more it risks to build a very good in memory solution, but risks to not ultimately win the enterprise software wars (again). And the same argument is there for the code, too – SAP should allow Hadoop processes in HANA – if customers have the use case, why not run Hadoop style processes in memory next to S/4HANA?

 

HANA Mobile SAP
S/4HANA Demo - Water Management in LA on an iPad

    Implications, Implications

    Implications for SAP customers

    S/4HANA is good news for SAP customers, as it (finally) makes a new start official. Deep down customer know SAP needed to re-invent – or to borrow form the slides re-imagine itself again – at some point. The attentive SAP customers will of course have heard that S/4HANA is a new product and as such SAP will try to make it a new license. SAP customers should look at contracts and prepare for the ‘return of maintenance’ conversation with their account manager. Customers will also note that with S/4HANA SAP gave up database independence, but that was a writing on the wall for quite some time.
      

    Implications for SAP partners

    New products always mean business for partners, as the ecosystem needs them to be successful on the new products. The only category that will not be happy are going to be the system integrators – already struggling with the shrinking implementation budgets caused by SaaS. But that is the course of things and SAP does right enabling customer and ideally business user self-service setup of the S/4HANA applications.
     

    Implications for SAP competitors

    We are off to the races – and in the meantime they can’t make fun of SAP running old, last century code on even older best practices. It is intriguing that what used to be a 5 year gap between SAP and Oracle is now more of a 10 year gap. Infor as vendor #3 somewhere in the middle. Assuming all vendors will succeed it sets a very interesting takt for the enterprise software market.
     

    MyPOV

    An important day for enterprise software. Good to see SAP innovating back at the core of its competencies, enterprise software, and making the effort official with S/4HANA. As with all product launches many questions remain and will have to be addressed in due course. I mentioned the risks I see that are common for all vendors in finding the 21st century business best practices. The in memory aspect of S/4HANA is a unique risk for SAP. But so was a bet on R/3 at the time. And who knows – with staunchly supporting in memory as the delivery platform for SAP – Plattner may be right one more time. Only the future can and will tell.

    ------------

    And more on overall SAP strategy and products:
    • First Take - SAP's IoT strategy becomes clearer - read here
    • SAP appoints a CTO - some musings - read here
    • Event Report - SAP's SAPtd - (Finally) more talk on PaaS, good progress and aligning with IBM and Oracle - read here
    • News Analysis - SAP and IBM partner for cloud success - good news - read here
    • Market Move - SAP strikes again - this time it is Concur and the spend into spend management - read here
    • Event Report - SAP SuccessFactors picks up speed - but there remains work to be done - read here
    • First Take - SAP SuccessFactors SuccessConnect - Top 3 Takeaways Day 1 Keynote - read here.
    • Event Report - Sapphire - SAP finds its (unique) path to cloud - read here
    • What I would like SAP to address this Sapphire - read here
    • News Analysis - SAP becomes more about applications - again - read here
    • Market Move - SAP acquires Fieldglass - off to the contingent workforce - early move or reaction? Read here.
    • SAP's startup program keep rolling – read here.
    • Why SAP acquired KXEN? Getting serious about Analytics – read here.
    • SAP steamlines organization further – the Danes are leaving – read here.
    • Reading between the lines… SAP Q2 Earnings – cloudy with potential structural changes – read here.
    • SAP wants to be a technology company, really – read here
    • Why SAP acquired hybris software – read here.
    • SAP gets serious about the cloud – organizationally – read here.
    • Taking stock – what SAP answered and it didn’t answer this Sapphire [2013] – read here.
    • Act III & Final Day – A tale of two conference – Sapphire & SuiteWorld13 – read here.
    • The middle day – 2 keynotes and press releases – Sapphire & SuiteWorld – read here.
    • A tale of 2 keynotes and press releases – Sapphire & SuiteWorld – read here.
    • What I would like SAP to address this Sapphire – read here.
    • Why 3rd party maintenance is key to SAP’s and Oracle’s success – read here.
    • Why SAP acquired Camillion – read here.
    • Why SAP acquired SmartOps – read here.
    • Next in your mall – SAP and Oracle? Read here.

     


    And more about SAP technology:
    • HANA Cloud Platform - Revisited - Improvements ahead and turning into a real PaaS - read here
    • News Analysis - SAP commits to CloudFoundry and OpenSource - key steps - but what is the direction? - Read here.
    • News Analysis - SAP moves Ariba Spend Visibility to HANA - Interesting first step in a long journey - read here
    • Launch Report - When BW 7.4 meets HANA it is like 2 + 2 = 5 - but is 5 enough - read here
    • Event Report - BI 2014 and HANA 2014 takeaways - it is all about HANA and Lumira - but is that enough? Read here.
    • News Analysis – SAP slices and dices into more Cloud, and of course more HANA – read here.
    • SAP gets serious about open source and courts developers – about time – read here.
    • My top 3 takeaways from the SAP TechEd keynote – read here.
    • SAP discovers elasticity for HANA – kind of – read here.
    • Can HANA Cloud be elastic? Tough – read here.
    • SAP’s Cloud plans get more cloudy – read here.
    • HANA Enterprise Cloud helps SAP discover the cloud (benefits) – read here.
     
    Find more coverage on the Constellation Research website here.
    2012, 2013, 2014 & 2015 (C) Holger Mueller - All Rights Reserved

     

    Data to Decisions Tech Optimization Digital Safety, Privacy & Cybersecurity Innovation & Product-led Growth Future of Work Next-Generation Customer Experience SAP Oracle softlayer infor workday Google salesforce IBM SaaS PaaS IaaS Cloud Digital Transformation Disruptive Technology Enterprise IT Enterprise Acceleration Enterprise Software Next Gen Apps IoT Blockchain CRM ERP CCaaS UCaaS Collaboration Enterprise Service Chief Information Officer Chief Technology Officer Chief Information Security Officer Chief Data Officer Chief Executive Officer