Work Coordination Vendor Smartsheet Acquires Slope
Work Coordination Vendor Smartsheet Acquires Slope
On Jan 15, 2019 Smartsheet acquired Slope
Future of Work
On Jan 15, 2019 Smartsheet acquired Slope
Future of Work
On Monday, January 14, 2019, Salesforce.org, the philanthropic arm of Salesforce, announced its acquisition of roundCorner, a software vendor focused on CRM for the nonprofit sector. Salesforce.org, formerly known as the Salesforce Foundation, is responsible for managing Salesforce’s 1-1-1 initiative. That entails donating 1% of profits, 1% of employee time, and 1% of technology to nonprofits.
In many ways, this acquisition is the logical next step in the long-standing relationship between roundCorner and Salesforce. A Salesforce platinum ISV partner, roundCorner has also received investment from Salesforce in the past. roundCorner’s products, particularly NGO Connect, have formed a core part of Salesforce.org’s offerings for in this space.
Constellation POV
We see two main take-aways from this acquisition:
As a for-profit company, roundCorner was competing in a narrow but competitive market. Though bolstered by the partnership with Salesforce, it lacked the market presence of publicly-traded Blackbaud, for example. (For a view on the key players in the nonprofit CRM space, as well as the do’s and don’ts of nonprofit CRM, check out the excellent blog by the folks at Build Consulting.)
Coming officially under the umbrella of Salesforce.org ensures that roundCorner’s technology will continue to play a leading role in Salesforce’s nonprofit offerings. It also secures the long-term investment required to continue to innovate and build out these capabilities.
More importantly, this acquisition points squarely to the crucial role of specialist knowledge. Enterprise systems are only really effective when they are design to address the distinct needs of a given type of business, non-profit or otherwise. The tremendous power of Salesforce’s platform, applications, and ecosystem lies in a customer’s ability to configure those elements to meet their unique needs (while maintaining things like standard data structures and interoperability). The big drawback is that many customers who lack the capabilities and resources (read: most nonprofits) to do this on their own need something adapted to their needs out of the box.
Salesforce.org has been at this long enough to recognize that managing constituents and donors, administering grant processes, and organizing volunteers and events don’t have direct analogues in for-profit business operations. Bringing the specialist capabilities of roundCorner directly under the purview of Salesforce.org should accelerate the ongoing development of a Salesforce offering better tailored to the particular requirements of nonprofits.
Meanwhile, we’ll be watching to see if lessons learned about the value of specialist knowledge in the nonprofit sector influence other aspects of Salesforce’s core business as well.
Photo courtesy of Care International
Marketing Transformation Next-Generation Customer Experience Tech Optimization Data to Decisions Future of Work Innovation & Product-led Growth New C-Suite Digital Safety, Privacy & Cybersecurity Chief Customer Officer Chief Information Officer Chief Marketing Officer Chief Digital Officer Chief Revenue OfficerBy now we know that Open Source has won for platform software and possibly even more... Time to look how it all happened and what the trends going forward are going to be.
| Why Open Source has won |
| Why Open Source Will keep Winning |
It will be another interesting and eventful year in 2019, both in terms of opportunities as well as significant challenges, for Chief Information Officers (CIOs) around the world as they attempt to navigate an increasingly turbulent digital operating environment. It's an environment that's very much in the midst of major and ongoing systemic change in the collective technology and business landscape, both internally and externally to their organizations.
There's also no question that these market dynamics must be successfully navigated and exploited, yet only if the CIO has the resources and sufficient organizational posture. We'll get to the exact nature of the changes below, as well as what we think CIOs will do about them this year.
Making the overall task more complex is that these shifts are taking place on a backdrop of rather confounding forces: Ever-faster tech change, profound cybersecurity concerns, substantial regulatory changes, rapidly evolving customer preferences, and an overarching scarcity of talent that's ready and able to help cope with these shifts.
Currently, I see that the confluence of these issues is making it extraordinarily difficult for IT leaders to focus on a) longer term initiatives like effective digital transformation, b) delivering on projects with less than immediate payoff, c) taking time to explore the strategic possibilities of emerging technology, or even d) remediation of basic technical debt (the largest ongoing, slow burn headwind in many organizations.)
This means coping with immediate fires and obstacles has often resulted in an epic struggle to adequately deliver on key strategic multi-year objectives, vital to the attaining the largest payoffs in IT. The inability to do so is perhaps one of the main indicators of an organization that has become reactive to the forces that affect it. Instead, CIO success more than ever today means proactively setting the agenda and driving the business as well as the broader industry forward with an integrated and disruptive business vision based on effective new digital capabilities.
What then is in store for the CIO in 2019? The real choice is stark: The top IT executives in today's rapidly evolving organizations must match the pace of change, fall behind, or lead the pack. That's the existential issue at stake in today's digitally-infused times, where bold action must be actively supported by out-of-the-box experimentation and pathfinding. Ths must be done while managing the inexorable daily drumbeat of operational issues, service delivery, and the distracting vagaries of the unpredictable, such as a major cyberattack or information breach. The CIO this year must be both a supremely masterful priority juggler and an effective digital leader from the front.
Here are my predictions for what CIOs will encounter this year, and how they will respond:
Any single predictions list is likely going to leave out some interesting ideas. For example, I don't see CIOs engaged much in culture change for digital and so it's not listed here, but that is clearly one of the main obstacles to successful digital modernization and transformation. So please leave your own CIO predictions in comments for discussion below, or on LinkedIn or Twitter.
Related Reading:
Six Trends Affecting the Innovation-Led CIO
The Digital Transformation of Back-End Customer Experience
Constellation Research 2018 Digital Transformation Study
The Business Transformation 150 for 2019: Our global list of top digital leaders, including many top CIOs to follow
New C-Suite Innovation & Product-led Growth Tech Optimization Future of Work Leadership AI ML Machine Learning LLMs Agentic AI Generative AI Analytics Automation B2B B2C CX EX Employee Experience HR HCM business Marketing SaaS PaaS IaaS Supply Chain Growth Cloud Digital Transformation Disruptive Technology eCommerce Enterprise IT Enterprise Acceleration Enterprise Software Next Gen Apps IoT Blockchain CRM ERP finance Customer Service Content Management Collaboration M&A Enterprise Service Chief Executive Officer Chief Information Officer Chief Digital Officer Chief Experience Officer Chief Technology Officer Chief Data Officer Chief Analytics Officer Chief Information Security Officer Chief Operating OfficerAfter the gentle lift-off of a mid-week start to 2019, it’s time to focus on the year ahead. Here are a few predictions of what’s to come based on signals we started to see by the end of 2018.
1. More Market Mashups
Companies are realizing that in order to become truly customer-centric, they have to do things differently. Software vendors are one step ahead of them. Anyone and everyone who thinks they have a better way of managing customer interactions or building customer insights will get into the action. Some already have. For the most part, this is blurring the lines between existing markets rather than creating new ones, but that could change.
Customer service meets sales and marketing. In November 2018, Zendesk announced new offerings in CRM and marketing automation, expanding beyond its stronghold in service desk. Expect others to follow their lead. While the jury is out on the strength of these capabilities and how successful Zendesk will be, the move represents an important addition to the market mix.
Service desk is inherently customer centric, so vendors coming from this space bring a fundamentally different philosophy to managing sales and marketing activities. This is good news for companies trying to build consistent customer experiences across marketing, sales, and service. Tools that provide a consistent view of customers but the flexibility to adapt to specific business practices across all three have tremendous potential.
Customer experience becomes just another enterprise app. SAP’s acquisition of Qualtrics offers more than an example of the multiples to be paid for expertise in assessing customer and employee experience. Perhaps most significantly, it’s an indication of the potential value of incorporating these insights into operations throughout an enterprise. That’s a very good thing. Marketing, sales, and customer service most obviously benefit, but insights straight from customers can (and should) influence just about everything a business does.
The full impact of tracking customer experiences (tracking is not the same as “experience management,” more on that here) lies in consistently operationalizing those insights. The first step is gathering them. The second is disseminating them appropriately. The third is doing something with them.
Workflows get specific. This is where things get interesting—and complicated. To design compelling and consistent experiences, especially across departmental silos, you need to create workflows. Those workflows, with customers the central focus, cut across departments, teams, and types of work.
While most of the large enterprise suite vendors would argue (with varying degrees of justification), that they already make such workflows possible, this isn’t their heartland. A wide range of vendors with different origins and backgrounds are tackling the challenge with various approaches. One example, Totango, describes itself as a customer success software provider. Using a data-driven, customer-centric approach, Totango provides the tools for analyzing customer data flows and building workflows to enable “success blocks.” These blocks are designed around specific outcomes and KPIs that describe success for both customers and the companies working with them.
Ring Central comes at the challenge from a different perspective. The call center vendor is building on its background in customer service and collaboration to unite (the theme of its 2018 event) customer experience and employee experience. In principle, by reducing the number of tools that employees use to work together and manage various channels of customer interaction, companies can significantly increase both employee engagement and customer satisfaction simultaneously.
Yet another example comes from robotic process automation (RPA). Ushur has built a system to combine workflow automation with engagement automation. The vendor offers a templatized approach and AI tools to analyze unstructured text and automate conversations based on content. Workflows address different types of conversations, such as customer service, claims processing, and billing, and can be tailored for specific requirements.
The scope and scale of workflows that impact customer experience are vast. They range from specific types of conversations on a micro level to customer lifecycles on the macro level. Some technology vendors will have the flexibility to address both. The biggest question is on what level companies will choose to tackle the workflow challenge first and where they go from there. As a result, expect this to emerge as an increasingly crowded (and confusing) market in 2019.
2. Specialists Rise to the Top and Bring the Biggest Value
Workflows provide a great segue to another important prediction for 2019: the rise of specialists. If you’re trying to achieve specific objectives, generic workflows and generic data management systems won’t cut it. Objectives and priorities vary from sector to sector and business to business. They’re integral to competitive differentiators.
As best practices get further baked into technology tools and automated workflows, it’s important to make sure they’re the right practices for you and your organization. Increasingly, that means going to vendors who really understand the particular challenges you face. The advantages included better tailored solutions and significantly faster time to results. That’s true across a broad range of technology areas, but here are just a few examples of specialists that are proving their worth.
MakerSights focuses on “decision-enablement” for the fashion sector of retail. They support the unique needs of fashion brands with a structured approach and process to product testing. Through a combination of the brands’ own customer contacts and a proprietary respondent community, MakerSights helps to close the gap between what brands think customers value and what customers really want. The vendor effectively combines data collection and analysis tools with forecasting that's accessible to a range of employee roles and genuine market expertise. The team at MakerSights is keenly aware of the financial risks of accumulating debt inventory, the need to align to the retail calendar, and how to streamline decades-old decision processes for testing and launching merchandise. Though the company’s customer base started with online retailers, established fashion retailers navigating brick and mortar and online are its fastest-growing segment.
Kahuna has tailored marketing automation for the distinct requirements of online marketplaces. Managing both sides of a market requires different approaches for buyers and for sellers, as well as a recognition that it’s possible to be both at the same time. Kahuna provides both the technology platform and AI tools to manage both audiences. The vendor also brings expert knowledge of managing the lifecycle of a healthy marketplace—the priorities during initial launch and growth aren’t the same once a marketplace is mature.
Mindtickle, a software and services company, specializes in sales onboarding and training—what it calls “sales readiness.” Through a combination of tools, including AI, and expertise in effective training techniques, Mindtickle works with sales organizations to make sales teams more productive. Beyond providing the most effective materials, approaches, and tools, the company tracks individuals and teams. By assessing their currency and proficiency—their readiness—Mindtickle believes it can help companies understand their capacity to sell as a predictor of revenue, not just assign sales targets.
All of these examples illustrate that the real benefit is in solving specific problems—and that’s where specialist knowledge is invaluable. As companies of all ilk reset their focus on understanding customers, expect them to turn to specialists for help.
3. The Scythe Comes Out for MarTech
Exciting as it is to find new providers of useful tools, there are way too many MarTech vendors out there for any reasonable marketing organization to come anywhere close to evaluating. Close to 7,000 at last count, according to Scott Brinker and Anand Thacker. And though the last several years have brought even more expansion in the competitive landscape, this might just be the year that the Grim Reaper sets his sights on all that fodder.
The possibility of a recession in 2019 will drive (much needed) consolidation in the MarTech sector. At a macro level, recession or reasonable fears thereof will put pressure on marketing budgets, reducing available spend on new technology tools. Simultaneously, marketing departments will more closely examine the comparative return on all of the tools they use. Those that don’t deliver meaningful value will be cut.
Companies will evaluate where specific tools provide critical capabilities and deliver measurable returns across KPIs tied to customer engagement and understanding. Technologies that address multiple areas and integrate easily are more likely to make the cut. So are the ones that—wait for it—provide specialist capabilities that incorporate relevant best practices.
Yes, we’ll undoubtedly see a fair bit of merger and acquisition activity. But if fears of recession prove concrete, many vendors simply won’t find a reasonable exit. That should worry the thousands and thousands of MarTech vendors out there.
What's your view? What do you anticipate in 2019?
Data to Decisions Marketing Transformation Next-Generation Customer Experience Innovation & Product-led Growth Tech Optimization Future of Work AI ML Machine Learning Generative AI Analytics Automation B2B B2C CX EX Employee Experience business Marketing SaaS PaaS Growth Cloud Digital Transformation eCommerce Enterprise Software CRM ERP Leadership Social Customer Service Content Management Collaboration Chief Customer Officer Chief Information Officer Chief Marketing Officer Chief Digital Officer Chief Revenue OfficerIt’s a new year, and while I don’t like setting unobtainable resolutions, I do take the opportunity to reset and create a clear path for the next 6-12 months. This week on DisrupTV, a solid theme arose from our interviews that we should all consider as we set off to find success in this new year.
Embrace Change.
“Today will be the slowest things will ever be moving,” explained Stuart Miniman, host & senior analyst at theCUBE. Let that sink in…
The speed in which technology is disrupting business processes is daunting. We adopt these new tools with the purpose of easing a pain points, but they sometimes make our work lives much more complicated (just ask your IT guy/gal!). And while we spent some time on the show geeking out on the techy topics, such as multi-clouds, SaaS, serverless, AI, containers and IoT, this theme translates to all parts of an organization. You can’t stand still and get stuck in “this is how we do things.” That’s exactly how you get left behind.
Augment Humanity.
Rachel Happe, co-founder & principal at The Community Roundtable, expanded upon the sentiments. She was trained to do better than technology. Times are changing; we need to train people to complement technology. We need to do what AI and other technologies can’t, she explained.
We, as humans, provide creativity and the authentic connections needed to build strong communities. Our value lives in the true personalization at each touchpoint that technology can’t offer. We are the weakest link if we don’t change our mindsets and build our skillsets in a new way. She expressed the need to truly engage, build relationships, and learn, alongside the tools available to us.
Meet Without Distractions.
Embracing change is a good focal point for 2019. The end goal will still be there, but if we can stay nimble through the constant state of change, we can meet that end destination in maybe a better way than we imagined.
So how do we cut out the noise, manage the chaos and get a solid standing in the ever-evolving world around us? Technology has and will continue to accelerate how we conduct business. We must change WITH technology but also learn there’s time to grow and change WITHOUT it.
Here’s a place to start: Set up meetings without distractions. This may mean pulling out the trusty notepads and leaving phones/computers turned off (Gasp!). Visual Strategist Heather Willems discussed the importance of focusing your attention in meetings. Using visual strategy to draw up what is being said helps focus the conversation, heighten engagement and capture the essence of sometimes complete chaos. The final product helps illustrate goals, action plans and direction for the team. You can then present it visually to create a constant reminder for everyone, keeping the team focused and honest.
I used to doodle in every tedious meeting I was dragged into early in my career. Little did I know that I was actually focusing my energy into the conversation and learning!
To really keep up with the competition, build a stronger team, grow professionally, tackle market shifts and just keep sane day to day, accept today’s reality, continue to learn, and embrace change. These small steps will kick off 2019 strong and help set a solid path for growth personally and professionally.
I’ve only just skimmed the top of the great advice! Please check out the full discussions in the video replay here or the podcast. The knowledge shared during the three interviews is invaluable! Tune in every week for DisrupTV on Fridays 11 AM PT/2 PM ET. Continuous learning is the best path to instill change.
Future of Work Chief Customer Officer Chief Executive Officer Chief People Officer Chief Marketing Officer Chief Digital Officer



Source: Accenture
Source: Capgemini


![]()

It was a surprise when Oracle product leader and President, Thomas Kurian, switched his commute exit to a few exits south on US 101 from Ralston Road to Mathilda Avenue for Google Cloud. Since his hiring, Kurian has not rested as he expanded on the vision of Google Cloud way beyond the original vision of previously leader Diane Greene. No longer is AI / ML and security are the key value propositions, but Google Cloud has aggressively pursued next gen compute load, with Google Anthos. A bigger focus on GSuite for the future of work and a vertical apps agenda (e.g. in M=media) give Google Cloud a new and better shot at moving up from its current #3 position. A more ISV and open source friendly approach makes Google an attractive cloud provider for vendors that are worried to be squeezed out by larger IaaS players. An executive team overhaul, a bigger focus on go-to-market capacity and commitment to enterprise requirments round up the increased potential of Google Cloud in 2020.
This category recognizes the best new enterprise category that made an impact to the market.
This category of tools pulls data from CRM systems, productivity tools (e.g. email, phone, collaboration, etc.), and other sources of customer information to organize, prioritize, and automate sales activities to improve close rates and deal sizes. In effect, Sales Engagement Platforms deliver a type of low-code workflow management tool (with a dash of ML and AI). Purpose built for sales people, the systems encapsulate best practices gleaned from actual results. With over 60+ sales engagement solutions in the market, this new category separates the wheat from the chaff. Key vendors embracing this category include: Clearslide, Dealhub, Groove, MixMax, Outreach, Reply.io, RevenueGrid, SalesLoft. Scaura, and Xant.
GigEconomy for the enterprise recognizes the ability to bring just in-time skills and resources and crowdsourcing platforms together in the future of work. The blending of free-lancers and full timers enable the best talent to be applied to the right engagement and project at all times. Vendors such as Gigster's PeopleCloud and Wipro's TopCoder exemplify this category.
Data-Driven Digital Networks apply disruptive and exponential tech such as Cloud, 5G, IOT, Blockchain, and AI to craft new businesses models with a subscription commerce, smart services, cross value chains, or joint venture approaches. The value of the network comes from the insight, not the transactions. These digital feedback loops power next best action, recommendations, and contextual decisions. IBM FoodTrust won this year's SuperNova Awards in this new enterprise category.

Constellation's latest report, the Constellation 2018 Digital Transformation Study, examines the state of digital transformation among the first movers, early adopters and fast followers that constitute Constellation Research’s subscriber base.
This report is based on findings from the Constellation Research 2018 Digital Transformation Survey, in which Constellation asked survey respondents to identify the major priorities of their digital transformation efforts today, who is leading digital transformation, impediments to digital transformation, challenges that particularly vex executives, the state of implementation of emerging technologies, the state of investment in maturing digital technologies, workforce issues and digital transformation’s impact on innovation in the enterprise.
While organizations’ digital transformation strategies may have varied goals and challenges, one thing is clear: with 68 percent of respondents reporting positive ROI for digital transformation strategies, digital transformation is now a profitable endeavor, and many are enjoying its results (Figure 1).
Figure 1. Return on Digital Transformation Investment

Constellation asked respondents to identify the three most important goals of their organization’s digital transformation strategy.
Collectively, the top five goals of respondents’ digital transformation are as follows: reaching and engaging customers more effectively, at 50 percent; building a competitive advantage in the current market, 46 percent; implementing new, data-driven business models, 36 percent; increasing revenue, 35 percent; and modernizing legacy IT systems and processes and reducing costs, 31 percent (Figure 2).
Figure 2. Digital Transformation Goals in 2018

Read about leadership trends, impediments, investment in emerging technologies and more in the full-length study.
This report is part of Constellation's open research library. Download a free copy of the report here: Constellation Research 2018 Digital Transformation Study
If you’ve read my recent blog post on Customer Understanding (more on this soon), it will come as no surprise that my major concern is that far too many businesses are missing the boat when it comes to understanding their customers and anticipating their needs.
So, I’ve been watching the growing buzz on Experience Management (XM) with particular interest. The term has been catapulted into the headlines, most notably of late with SAP’s acquisition of Qualtrics, a digital research and survey company that built much of its business on customer, brand, and employee experience management.
The Good
The concept of XM, however, is much broader than this deal alone would suggest. XM requires harnessing all of your knowledge about a particular group—say, customers or employees—to shape everything from what you offer them to how you communicate and interact with them. In principle, providing them with experiences and offerings that better meet their needs makes them more valuable customers or more dedicated employees.
This isn’t a new idea. Marketers have always attempted to track customer behaviors, online and elsewhere. They’ve conducted brand equity surveys to determine where their companies ranks in customer perception. For years, human resource departments in large companies have run regular personnel surveys to track employee engagement.
What’s different now is formalizing those inputs and making them part of regular, consistent feedback loops that can inform all kinds of activities and interactions. In the case of customers, XM extends that feedback beyond passive data collection—tracking website traffic patterns or email opens, for example—to actively seeking input from individual customers. This provides an invaluable source of insights into customer priorities and preferences.
Asking customers for their views and input provides a much clearer understanding of their intentions. It tells you far more about their expectations and preferences—the reasons why they do something—than simply identifying what they do. It offers a powerful means of improving customer experience so that every interaction feels as if it were tailored to that individual. (Of course, doing this well requires both qualitative as well as quantitative input, but that’s another subject for another blog post.)
Yes, there are lots of things to like about XM. The label, unfortunately, is not one of them.
The Bad
The first black mark against Experience Management is that it is a misnomer. You simply cannot manage something over which you do not have control. Let’s be clear: companies absolutely can and should shape the experiences of their customers (and their employees) as thoughtfully and effectively as they can. But if you think you can manage them, think again. Experience is in the eye of the beholder. Until you can manage what side of the bed a customer (or employee) got up on in the morning, you won’t be managing their experience. (Seriously, please don’t even try to manage what side of the bed anybody but you gets up on.)
Call me a pedant if you will, but what we’re really talking about here is not Experience Management but proactively seeking customer (or employee) input to better shape their experiences. That holds tremendous value.
The Ugly
The second strike against XM comes from its common usage. Most of the time, the term XM describes a set of capabilities to survey customers or employees and build those insights into a knowledge base. I cannot understate the value in these inputs, especially when combined with other sources of insight such as behavioral analysis.
Yet seeking and analyzing inputs is only half the XM equation. In order to shape an experience (much less manage it!), you need to do something with those insights. That means taking action and making decisions—and not just in corporate headquarters. To do that, you must find a way to put the relevant insights and analysis into the hands of employees so that they can do their jobs more effectively. Even better if you can do so at the most appropriate moment in time.
In the case of customer experience, that could mean giving product managers better feedback on their designs, empowering agents to change customer service policies, helping marketers hone their messages, or providing salespeople with more compelling value propositions and commercial terms. Preferably, all of the above and more.
Applying insights to improve the myriad interactions that form an experience is no trivial task. Interpreting customer feedback is not the same as knowing what to do with it. A given set of insights may fuel different kinds of decision-making in different contexts. Using them effectively requires asking the right questions to determine how and where they provide useful answers.
An airline, for example, might use the same customer feedback to help the marketing team determine what messaging to develop for the next set of campaigns on one hand and the airport staff modify the process for checking luggage on the other. Each of those teams uses different elements of that knowledge base in different forms to do its job.
The tools and processes to apply customer or employee insights are not the same one used to gather and analyze them. Identifying and implementing the former is a much bigger topic—one we’ll address further in detail.
Bottom Line
Contemplating the Pacific from my window, I’m not crazy enough to think that I can overcome the rising tide behind an increasingly popular term. All I ask is that as we use it, we do so with open eyes about what XM really means—and what it doesn’t.
Data to Decisions Marketing Transformation Next-Generation Customer Experience Chief Customer Officer Chief Information Officer Chief Marketing Officer Chief Digital Officer Chief Revenue Officer