Results

Periscope Captures from the ADMA Global Forum

Periscope Captures from the ADMA Global Forum

1
 

Live streaming using apps like Periscope and Meerkat have revolutionised conferences of all kinds. No matter whether you are hosting a small lunchtime gathering of friends, colleagues or experts, or attending a massive conference, these easy-to-use apps allow you to share what you are seeing with the wider world. Or at least those who follow you on social media.

With this in mind, I thought I’d put both Meerkat and Periscope through their paces at the ADMA Global Forum. The ADMA Global Forum brings the world’s leading data driven marketers together to share insights, best and emerging practices, case studies and strategies. This year, there is strong representation from technology firms with good stories to tell. Oracle, IBM and Marketo are represented. Facebook is too. I also dropped by the stands of IVE, Minfo, and others. This year is an improvement on last, but there’s more work to be done on their exhibition stands and their ability to talk to marketers on their own terms. If you have a tech brand needing to talk “marketing”, then maybe we should talk too.

I live streamed and recorded a number of sessions and embedded them below. Tomorrow I will go deeper. Do some interviews. Chat with the teams on the exhibition stands and some of the audience. Let me know what you’re interested in and I will see who I can talk to.

@AndyVen from TheOutNet

Marketing Automation with @Missguided

Case study from @Missguided

Case study from Bosch

Case study from Regions Bank

Content Strategy from @TheOutNet

Case study from Getty Images

Personalisation strategy from Sitecore ANZ

Marketing Transformation Chief Marketing Officer

Avoid Mixed Messages Around Dynamic Pricing

Avoid Mixed Messages Around Dynamic Pricing

1

On Friday, July 31st, I received an email from a particular college athletic department (left anonymous below) encouraging me to buy season tickets. The value proposition highlighted in the subject line as to why I should buy immediately was:

“Beat Dynamic Pricing- Purchase XXX Season Tickets Today” (XXX = the school’s name)

When I saw this, I tweeted that it felt like they are marketing against themselves, making dynamic pricing sound scary.

 

So what happened this morning? This school put their single game tickets on sale, with the following subject and image as part of their email:

“XXX Individual Football Tickets on sale NOW!!!”

dynamictickets

So on Friday, dynamic pricing was a tactic to push me towards season tickets, and now they want me to buy single game tickets via that same dynamic pricing. Isn’t this a bit of a mixed message?

Dynamic pricing is an overall change in approach to keep primary ticket pricing more in line with how the market values the product. As such, there are some benefits to fans that want to attend multiple games and not be subject to the ups and downs of buying single games tickets. So talk about the benefits of a locked in location at the best price possible for the full season, not trying to “beat” the system. For single game buyers, there is still value in predictability of buying directly from the school, and the chance to find games and locations for every budget.

I understand that dynamic pricing is still somewhat new, especially in football where the volume of games is so much smaller, and probably even more so in the world of college athletics. But because it’s new, it’s even more important to explain it properly. It’s good that they’re transparent with the potential single game buyer that they’ve moved to a dynamic pricing model, but they need to educate fans so it doesn’t feel negative in one situation and positive in another. Tactics like creating a video or FAQ to explain what’s different when considering various ticket options will help the customer see all the benefits and make an informed purchase decision.

Next-Generation Customer Experience Data to Decisions Future of Work Innovation & Product-led Growth New C-Suite Marketing Transformation Digital Safety, Privacy & Cybersecurity Chief Customer Officer

Five Insights into the Psychology of Twitter

Five Insights into the Psychology of Twitter

1
Statistics and sampling are an amazing thing. Even if, like me, you have a healthy scepticism about the way that data is analysed and interpreted, it is difficult – if not foolhardy – to downplay the inevitability of data. Just look at the various disputes around the veracity of climate change – where statistically irrelevant interpretations have derailed important decisions, changes and commitments. Eventually, even the hardiest data curmudgeon will need to yield to the truth of the climate science data – perhaps only as their seaside apartment is swept into the arms of the sea. For though there may be outliers and anomalies in the data, sampling – where carried out correctly – can yield tremendously accurate insight. As Margaret Rouse explains on the TechTarget website:

Sampling allows data scientists, predictive modelers and other data analysts to work with a small, manageable amount of data in order to build and run analytical models more quickly, while still producing accurate findings. Sampling can be particularly useful with data sets that are too large to efficiently analyze in full — for example, in big data analytics applications.

And it is sampling that makes Twitter one of the more fascinating social networks and big data stores of our time. While Facebook grows its membership into the billions, its underlying data store, its connection and interaction architecture and its focus on first tier networks also limits its capacity to operate efficiently as a news source and distribution network. Twitter on the other hand, with its 200+ million members, provides a different and more expansive member engagement model.

During our recent forum presentations on the voice of the customer, Twitter’s Fred Funke explained the view that Twitter was “the pulse of the planet”. Using tools as simple as Twitter search or Trending Topics, Twitter users can quickly identify topics that important to them – or to the broader local, regional and global communities. And, of course, with the new IBM-Twitter partnership, there are a raft of tools that allow businesses to go much deeper into these trends and topics.

In doing so, however, we have to ask. What are we looking for? What information will create a new insight? Which data points will reveal a behaviour? And how can this be framed in a way that is useful?

Five Buyer Insights that Drive Engagement

Just because interactions are taking place online doesn’t mean that they occur in isolation. In fact, our online and offline personalities are intricately linked. And as the majority of our digital interactions take place via text, linguistic analysis will reveal not only the meaning of our words but also our intention. Some things to look out for and understand include:

  1. Buying is an impulse: As much as the economists would like to believe we act logically, we know that buyers are emotional creatures. We buy on whim. On appeal. On impulse. And there is no greater impulse these days to share an experience (good or bad) via Twitter. Look particularly at the stream for comments tagged with #fail. It is full of opportunity for the responsive marketer keen to pick up a churning customer having a bad customer experience.
  2. The customer journey is visible: While we are researching our next purchase, digital consumers leave a trail of digital breadcrumbs that can be spotted using analytics software. For example, we may tweet out links of videos that we are viewing on YouTube, share blog posts related to our pre-purchase research and even ask directly whether a particular product lives up to the hype. Just take a look at the #lazyweb stream around the topic of Windows10.
  3. Understand the pain to optimise the opportunity: When engaging via social media, it is important to understand the challenges or “pain points” that your customers (or potential customers) are facing. Rather than spruiking the benefits of your own products, focusing on an empathetic understanding of your customer’s needs more quickly builds trust and is grounded in a sense of reality. The opportunity with social media is to guide the journey, not short cut it.
  4. Case studies build vital social proof: No one wants to be the first to try your new product. Showing that the path to customer satisfaction is well worn is vital. Use case studies to pave the way.
  5. We buy in herds: Mark Earls was right. Not only do we want social proof, we prefer that proof to reflect on our own sense of belonging to a group or movement. Remember that we go where the other cows go, and structure your social media interactions accordingly.

The folks over at eLearners.com have put together this infographic on the psychology of Twitter. They suggest that we tweet for love, affection and belonging. It may be true, but sometimes we just also want to vent. And every vent is a market opportunity.

psychology of twitter

Marketing Transformation Next-Generation Customer Experience Innovation & Product-led Growth Future of Work New C-Suite Digital Safety, Privacy & Cybersecurity Revenue & Growth Effectiveness X Chief Customer Officer Chief Marketing Officer Chief People Officer Chief Human Resources Officer Chief Revenue Officer

Getting (More of) What You Want

Getting (More of) What You Want

1

Getting (More of) What You Want: How the Secrets of Economics and Psychology Can Help You Negotiate Anything, in Business and in Life is Margaret Neale and Thomas Lys' valuable new book. I've known Maggie and Tom for decades, but friendship isn't needed to motivate this review. I need this book. I bought both electronic and hardcover versions because this is a book I'll use in my work -- and you should too.

If You Are a Negotiation Novice

You should read this book because is provides an accessible foundation. I cover negotiation as part of my Plugged-In Management workshops and this will be the book I offer (at the end!) of the sessions I teach. The preface gives you a clear perspective on the power of a disciplined approach to negotiation. By the end of Chapter 4 you'll already have the ability to to get more of what you want. If you've been trying out the techniques as you read these chapters, you'll have already paid for the book and the time it took you to read them. Neale and Lys also have done a wonderful job distilling the material from their consulting and courses into clear frameworks and tables to support your preparation.

If You Are A Self-Taught Negotiator

This book will take experienced, self-taught negotiators to the next level. You’ll discover why your good techniques are working and how to improve on your results. I expect that even the most experienced negotiators will be interested in the results from recent research on negotiation and the connections across psychological and economic perspectives. Neale is the Adams Distinguished Professor of Management at Stanford’s Graduate School of Business. Lys is the Eric L. Kohler Chair in Accounting at Northwestern’s Kellogg School of Management. Have no fear, this isn’t a textbook nor is it heavy statistics. What it is heavy with are solid examples and eye opening results. I've read the foundational research on whether or not to make the first offer -- and the systematic review provided in the book both extended what I knew and put it into actionable terms.

If You’ve Already Had a Great Negotiation Class

I suspect that even Neale & Lys’ students will find significant value in the summaries following each chapter. As soon as my hardcover arrives (this review is based on the Kindle version), I’ll be adding tabs so I can quickly flip to the summaries as preparation for any upcoming negotiation. No doubt you learned in your negotiation course that preparation and high expectations are critical to getting more of what you want. Use these summaries to kick off your preparations and problem solving efforts. Chapter 8, Managing the Negotiation: Supplementing and Verifying What You (Think You) Know will get special attention as it describes how to learn from the responses of the person you're negotiating with - a topic I know I need to give more attention.

If You Don’t Negotiate

Perhaps you don’t negotiate in a traditional sense -- but you do negotiate. Change management, technology implementations, teamwork, and social settings are all full of negotiations. In my book, The Plugged-In Manager, I rely on negotiation to help people leverage their human, technical, and organizational resources. I learned the basics and more from Maggie Neale and our colleague, Greg Northcraft. I recall feeling, and being, far more powerful once I understood the problem-solving nature of their negotiation practices.

Conclusion

Getting (More of) What You Want: How the Secrets of Economics and Psychology Can Help You Negotiate Anything, in Business and in Life is a book you should use, not just read. It’s also the kind of book that you should share with your colleagues. The last practice of a a plugged-in manager is sharing. The idea is that if others understand the same language you do, you’ll find new value in your day to day work. This is a language you want to know.

Future of Work Chief Executive Officer

Nominate your Chief HR Exec for a SuperNova Award

Nominate your Chief HR Exec for a SuperNova Award

Honor your organization's Chief HR Officer or innovative business leader by nominating them for a SuperNova Award. The SuperNova Awards honor leaders that demonstrate excellence in the application and adoption of new and emerging technologies. 

The application deadline is August 7, 2015. 

Apply for a SuperNova Award by filling out the application here: 

APPLY NOW


SuperNova Award Winner: Director IT, Social and Collaborative Innovation, UnitedHealth Group

When a company with 137,000 employees and more than $100 billion in annual revenue wants to foster a culture of innovation and begin generating its own innovative solutions organically, how does it engage all of its employees across the U.S. and abroad? Greg Hicks launched a social and collaborative innovation initiative powered by an ideation platform (Spigit Engage) to drive innovation at UnitedHealth Group. 

In 2013, UnitedHealth Group launched the 3rd annual Hemsley Challenge. More than 8,500 employees cast 386,000 votes, helping to narrow 680 employee-generated ideas down to the “Hemsley 16,” a group of innovative concepts slatted to be featured at UnitedHealth Group’s annual Innovation Day. In total, more than 19,000 employees engaged in the Hemsley Challenge by ideating, commenting, voting, and collaborating. 

By 2013, three employee-generated concepts identified by the 2012 Hemsley challenge were developed into projects. In total, those three concepts had the potential to reduce annual operating costs by $30 million, and radically improve the health care experience for millions of consumers and thousands of health care providers.

Greg Hicks won the 2013 SuperNova Award for Future of Work


 

5 reasons to apply for a SuperNova Award:

Learn more about the SuperNova Awards. 

What to expect when applying for a SuperNova Award. Tips and sample application.  

APPLY NOW


Data to Decisions Digital Safety, Privacy & Cybersecurity Future of Work Marketing Transformation Matrix Commerce New C-Suite Next-Generation Customer Experience Tech Optimization Innovation & Product-led Growth Chief Customer Officer Chief Digital Officer Chief Executive Officer Chief Financial Officer Chief Information Officer Chief Marketing Officer Chief People Officer Chief Procurement Officer Chief Supply Chain Officer

The State of Identity

The State of Identity

Steve Wilson discusses the state of identity with respect to borderless identity, user experience, and the role of the security officer in the digital age. 

Digital Safety, Privacy & Cybersecurity Chief Information Officer On <iframe src="https://player.vimeo.com/video/135076575" width="500" height="281" frameborder="0" webkitallowfullscreen mozallowfullscreen allowfullscreen></iframe>
Media Name: swilson-state-identity-thumb.png

My Recap of SEAT 2015

My Recap of SEAT 2015

1

SEATlogo_website

Last week, I attended the 9th Annual SEAT Conference (Sports & Entertainment Alliance in Technology), which is always one of my favorite events of the year. I’ve been an active member of the CRM/Analytics Track Steering Committee since that track was added back in 2012, so every year we have 2-3 days of “geeking out” around all sorts of data and digital related topics.

Sometimes at these events, it’s hard to keep track of all the great examples and insights being shared, but I try to use some of my “live-tweeting” as a digital notebook. So I’m going to pull out some of my tweets from last week to use as the basis for my conference recap!

The conference kicked off (pun intended) at Levi’s Stadium, with three different technology related tours. I went to the Fan Engagement themed tour and came away very impressed with what the team has done with their gameday programming, mobile experience and fan loyalty program. It was clear that technology was on everyone’s mind as that venue was being developed. They also did an incredible job with their team museum, providing another way to deliver a great fan experience independent of what happens on the field each game.

 

A big theme this year was collaboration, which can take all forms: across different departments, between seniority levels, and even between partners on behalf of a team’s overall goals. The first tweet shows how technology partners can all interact within a single team’s ecosystem, and the second tweet (both the original content and my RT notes) emphasizes how open communication by the Golden State Warriors helped them take full advantage of the team’s success via digital, sponsorship, media and more.

 

This is VERY important advice and another important theme. Before you focus on the data itself, you need to identify what your goals are. This way you can collect the RIGHT data that can answer the RIGHT questions. Otherwise you end up with lots of data and lots of questions without many answers. (To hear more about this, make sure to download the upcoming Sports Geek podcast I recorded with Sean Callanan.)

 

 

I put these two tweets together because they address the same fundamental issue – who owns the data and do our fans want us to use it? Clearly we have more ways to learn about fans than ever before, but just because you can do something doesn’t mean you should. We always need to keep the fans’ interests in mind – find out if the benefits to them are worth what they have to share to get them. Transparency and permission are key!

 

It is absolutely critical that we focus not just on collecting data, but how we report on and communicate that data so we can make better decisions about it. In this sessions, the panelists were able to show how they took key questions from management and designed visualizations that made the relevant data easier to consume and understand.

Finally, I couldn’t tweet during the panel I moderated on CRM Best Practices, but in that session we talked about the “Crawl, Walk, Run” approach to how your CRM strategy evolves over time within an organization. We had great examples such as how one team documented every part of the sales process and identified how some steps could be streamlined as a way to improve adoption, and another team pre-populated simple, key customer data points in the optimal locations so that the right data was used in the right conversations.

Big thanks to Christine Stoffel and the entire SEAT Conference team for all their hard work last week!

Next-Generation Customer Experience Data to Decisions Future of Work Innovation & Product-led Growth New C-Suite Marketing Transformation Digital Safety, Privacy & Cybersecurity Event Report Executive Events Chief Customer Officer

Jive Software Introduces Circle, Mobile Corporate Directory Application

Jive Software Introduces Circle, Mobile Corporate Directory Application

Today Jive Software announced Jive Circle (Circle), the latest edition to their portfolio of single purpose mobile applications, named Jive-w, for “work-style” applications. Circle is a corporate directory application that allows iOS and Android users to quickly lookup information about their colleagues. Circle joins Jive Chime (Chime), a mobile messaging application that was launched earlier this year, and Jive Daily, a future application focused on sharing content and conversations. Early Access to Jive Circle begins August 31.
Pricing information is currently not available.


Getting To Know You

Circle has an attractive mobile interface, filled with the common “circle avatars” found in most of today’s applications. Clicking on a person’s picture brings up their profile page, filled with standard contact information that can be pulled from active directory. From there you can see where a person fits into the corporate organizational chart, initiate a conversation with them via Jive Chime (if you have it installed) or email, or phone them. Long pressing on an avatar pulls up shortcut icons for each of those actions saving you a few clicks. These features make it simple to discover and connect with colleagues, something that is often a challenge in companies today.

One of the most useful features of Circle is the ability to filter the directory based on several different faccets, allowing you to easily find the people you are looking for.

While Circle’s contact features are useful, I’d like to see it provide more detailed contextual relationship information such as a history of messages, phone calls or meetings, groups you have in common, content you’ve shared, etc. Circle is also limited to internal colleagues, it does not import/sync with connections in other tools the way a product like Nimble does. I’d also like to see integration within device’s native applications like email, phone and contacts, but that is limited by what the OS allows, not something Jive can control.


Expanding Jive’s Reach

Jive has been one of the leaders in social business for many years, providing community software to over 1000 customers. However, that success has created an image for the company that they (and their shareholders) don’t want to be restricted to. To help remove the typecast of “web based community software”, the Jive-w line of applications are designed to help Jive reach new customers thus providing additional revenue streams.  Jive Chime, Circle and (the upcoming) Daily are designed for the mobile centric world, and don’t require users to be existing customers of Jive-n or Jive-x.


Don’t Forget Your Base

While the Jive-w applications are designed to reach new customers, Jive needs to be careful not to alienate their existing (paying) customers. The features of Jive Chime and Circle are ones that existing customers may also want, so I’m unsure of why Jive created them as separate applications versus deconstructing the existing product into smaller (mobile) components. For example, conversations in Chime do not carry over to Jive-n or Jive-x communities and profile information from Circle such as favourites and groups are not carried over to the full Jive directory. Compare that to Facebook, where they removed messaging functionality from the core Facebook mobile application and created a separate FB Messenger. This allows people to quickly and easily send chat messages without having to look at the entire Facebook stream… but if you access the full Facebook experience on the web, the FB Messenger conversations are there, it’s not a separate expereince. 

Not Standing Still

Jive is doing the right thing embracing mobile and expanding their portfolio. Jive Chime provides the short, causal messaging style that is gaining popularity as a communiation channel at work. Circle provides a nice set of features that will allow people to easily engage with their colleagues while on the go from their mobile devices. Long term, I believe Jive needs to reconcile the current divide between the Jive-w applications and their Jive-n/x community software or they will face several challenges with data integration, licensing, business partner eco-system and more.
 

Future of Work

Shifting from Products to Services; Technology Vendors and IT may have a different path to the next generation use of Technology in the Enterprise

Shifting from Products to Services; Technology Vendors and IT may have a different path to the next generation use of Technology in the Enterprise

Astute CEOs, with their Boards, are increasingly recognizing, re organizing and transforming their Enterprises in response to new competitors and markets emerging from ongoing Digital Disruption. Competitive survival is becoming the issue; as Internet based technology disrupts traditional customer, and market, relationships. At the heart of this is the ‘Services’ based Business model, but it is unlikely to mean Services provided on the basis IT recognises.

Research report now available: The Foundational Elements for the Internet of Things (IoT)

The new Enterprise business model may be built on Internet provided ‘Services’, but in a wholly different manner, in the type and use of ‘Services’ than the deploy and operate model of IT. The sheer numbers involved, the granularity of consumption introduce new management requirements both by Business and Technology management. Operating a true ‘Services’ based Enterprise is a new game to be mastered by both sides!

Currently Internet connected Services, or Cloud based Applications, are now an established method to deploy/deliver current IT Applications and Infrastructure, offering cost challenged CIOs some excellent opportunities to ‘do more for less’. The major Enterprise Technology Vendors have at various speeds moved to answer this demand by converting their previous generation of enterprise application products into Software as a Service, Infrastructure as a Service, etc. However, moving to support the enterprise through these ‘Services’ does not fundamentally change the use and management of traditional IT capabilities by the Enterprise.

Running traditional Applications, SaaS, or Infrastructure, IaaS, ‘as a Service’ certainly helps the costs of the IT department, but it’s not the Business game changer in the manner that Clouds, Apps, Mobility and Social Tools, have combined  to become Digital Disruptors of Business models.

For the Enterprise IT vendor shifting their existing Applications from a License agreement to Services agreements maintains the revenues from their current products and installed base. Whilst for the IT department the knowledge and expertise in the Business use, the stability of operations, even the management tools and reporting metrics remain broadly similar as well. In reality the adoption of Services to support the existing IT model has been more of a budgetary and risk management issue than a true innovation in the business capabilities provided by Technology.

The Digital Disruption to Business markets that is driving Enterprise reorganization is based on using new technologies as Services/Apps in areas not covered by existing IT operations.  The new Business requirements need a very different ‘Services’ model, one that is alien to most IT operational practices. In fact its key deploy and operate model is directly contra to traditional IT best practices, and is directly aligned to new transformed Business organization model.

It pays to remind ourselves that the existing IT model was developed to support the internal transformation of Business models introduced by Business Process Re-Engineering, BPR. All of this came together to make for the last great transformation of Business in the early nineties as Business organization models required the creation of the CIO role, and the IT department itself, with an aligned mission to support the transformed Enterprise. (It may surprise some readers to know that IT, as we define it today, only dates from around 1993, prior to this Enterprise Computing Services provided the then Business organizational structures with a very different set of Computing Services).

The advent of a further change in Business organizational models to take competitive advantage of the new generation of technology   moves operations into new external areas. Introducing, as before, an entirely new Business organizational structures with a new aligned, and different, Technology deploy and operate model. Yes, it’s based on Internet connected and provided Services, but not in a similar manner to those Services that support the existing IT model.

De centralization, with end user empowerment, are key factors at the heart of the new competitive Business organization designed for the fast moving online, well informed, marketplace. Add the massive use/scale of small Services, or Apps, applied in an infinite number of combinations, on multiple devices used by both employees and customers, or suppliers. In contrast to carefully created best practices IT organizations around controlled, optimized, processes with strictly managed data, and it’s a picture of their worse nightmare.

Relax, this isn’t about replacing the enterprise applications and existing IT operations, the fulfillment operations of an Enterprise with the tight control for compliance etc. remain vital. Instead it’s about extending, the use of technology into new areas supporting new Business organizational structures targeting interacting with the external market. The requirement is to support techno Savvy workers in ‘choosing and using’ a wide range of capabilities to turn their current market or customer opportunity into a successful business ‘outcome’. The Business organizational model reflects, therefore the technology deployment and management requirement has to change as well to align.

To understand what is required to deploy and operate Technology in support of ‘Digital Disruption’ its necessary to grasp why business models are themselves becoming de centralized and dynamically driven into frequent change.

This month The McKinsey Review republished the article ‘Unbundling the Corporation’ written by the well-respected Business Management expert John Hagel with Marc Singer as co-author. Though written in June 2000 in response to the foreseeable impact of the Internet and its technologies on business, it’s an absolutely valid definition of the organizational drivers and changes taking place today. Around the same date Roger Camrass published his book ‘The Atomic Corporation’, since revised and updated, but again a remarkably clear definition of the new Internet enable Enterprise organizational model using of Services. Both should be on the recommended reading list of CIOs and IT people to grasp the new business drivers, and for a practical example of a large Enterprise Business re-organization of this type see the example of Philips Industries in the previous blog.

Today the factors quoted in ‘Unbundling the Corporation’, or the ‘Atomic Corporation’ have become powerful forces that are driving, more than merely than enabling, change as we individually, and collectively, adopt Internet based technology and tools. Both cite the challenge of constraining internal Enterprise optimization processes that the current business models based on BPR and ERP inevitably create, versus the external market opportunity factors that innovative use of Internet based Business is creating.

The themes of both ‘Unbundling the Enterprise’ and ‘Atomic Corporation’ is the identification of how Internet based technology allows an Enterprise to selectively choose where, and how, to organize its response to operational opportunities. The granularity of the organizational elements being large enough to for business management to access the bigger, less constrained set of opportunities found by a new generation of real time data analysis; versus the granularity of the resulting actions being supported by Technology providing small enough ‘elements’ to allow optimized assembly of the right response to the right opportunity.

The granularity of actions that these new Business models require needs the assembly of Services, with the use of Apps, at a previously unimagined scale. Simultaneously with user driven selection of the appropriate tools for their manipulation of the insight into a successful business outcome.

In the Smart Business organizational model Technology deployment and Business management shifts from controlled access via the supply side of a finite number of enterprise applications delivered in a ring fenced environment to the management of a massive number of ‘Services’ and Apps used by the Enterprise employees in an infinite number of ways that are defined by their business role.

This represents an inversion of what, and how, Technology is deployed and managed to the new Business objectives of an Enterprise from current IT, hence the title of this blog. The management of these new organizational business models, incorporating many more end points of connectivity, (IoT, etc.), and functionality, (Services and Apps), is a complex challenge complete unlike the first generation of ‘Services’ in use by IT today.

It lies at the heart of CIO versus CMO debate about the difference between the two roles, and solving it by understanding how the two sides must work coherently in support of the Enterprise is key to successful navigating through Digital Disruption. This blog series will explore this topic in more detail over the coming months to endeavor to assist all parties in understanding the full picture and nature of the changes.

Innovation & Product-led Growth Tech Optimization Future of Work AI ML Machine Learning LLMs Agentic AI Generative AI Analytics Automation B2B B2C CX EX Employee Experience HR HCM business Marketing SaaS PaaS IaaS Supply Chain Growth Cloud Digital Transformation Disruptive Technology eCommerce Enterprise IT Enterprise Acceleration Enterprise Software Next Gen Apps IoT Blockchain CRM ERP Leadership finance Customer Service Content Management Collaboration M&A Enterprise Service Chief Information Officer Chief Technology Officer Chief Digital Officer Chief Data Officer Chief Analytics Officer Chief Information Security Officer Chief Executive Officer Chief Operating Officer

How to Make a Privacy Complaint

How to Make a Privacy Complaint

1
When Disruptor’s Handbook and Constellation Research hosted an evening meetup recently for the Australian launch of Ray Wang’s Disrupting Digital Business book, we were hoping to get some conversation going amongst the audience. We talked all manner of disruption – from innovation to technology, big data to marketing – and everywhere in between. But it wasn’t until we hit the topic of Privacy that debate really kicked off.

It was all in. Twenty or thirty of Australia’s leading business innovators held forth in open debate. And after an hour or so, we realised we’d only scratched the surface. There was plenty more work to be done.

And while there were contrasting views and concerns, one thing was clear. We are all now subject to much greater openness – and therefore at risk of some part of our privacy being compromised. So what are we to do?

The Office of the Australian Information Commissioner has created a great video to explain.

Next-Generation Customer Experience Innovation & Product-led Growth Tech Optimization Future of Work Digital Safety, Privacy & Cybersecurity Distillation Aftershots Security Zero Trust AI ML Machine Learning LLMs Agentic AI Generative AI Analytics Automation B2B B2C CX EX Employee Experience HR HCM business Marketing SaaS PaaS IaaS Supply Chain Growth Cloud Digital Transformation Disruptive Technology eCommerce Enterprise IT Enterprise Acceleration Enterprise Software Next Gen Apps IoT Blockchain CRM ERP Leadership finance Customer Service Content Management Collaboration M&A Enterprise Service Chief Customer Officer Chief Information Officer Chief Technology Officer Chief Digital Officer Chief Data Officer Chief Analytics Officer Chief Information Security Officer Chief Executive Officer Chief Operating Officer Chief Privacy Officer