Microsoft News July 2016 Enhancing Office and Outlook
Microsoft News July 2016 Enhancing Office and Outlook
In the video below I review several recent annoucements from Microsoft around Office and Outlook.

Future of Work
In the video below I review several recent annoucements from Microsoft around Office and Outlook.

Future of Work
I was asked recently on a briefing call how to effectively track Marketing versus Sales generated leads. My response - stop separating them! The key is facilitating buyer engagement, and not create division over who gets “credit" for the lead. To manage this effectively, companies need to first understand the differences between lead source and contact source.
Many companies use the term “lead source” as a catchall for both, and measure it as a Key Performance Indicator (KPI) to determine Marketing or Sales effectiveness. Unfortunately, this method often leads to more confusion around what specific program/tactic actually resulted in the qualification and unproductive credit claims on “who" provided the contact information. With the digital era, buyers don’t become interested or qualified through how their information was obtained, so why measure that way?
Throughout my career working with sales and marketing teams, I've recommended separating contact source from lead source. What has become more important, and how companies should measure program ROI, is looking at the quality and quantity of buyer engagement. Whether that was an article that captured their interest, attended a webinar after receiving an invite, or an inside sales follow-up phone call after a booth visit (see my prior article on the importance of follow-up). Effective engagement requires marketing and sales to partner to create an experience along every point of the buyer’s interaction. The contact source simply doesn’t provide the insight needed to truly determine interest level. It’s at this point that I’ll usually get the question from sales, “Why should I give up my personal contact list if I don’t get any credit for it?” Of course the sales rep should. Create a separate field to track contact source as your company could tie other incentives like rewards or contests for adding the most contacts, the most amount of buyer engagement, etc.
If your company leverages Marketing Automation or CRM systems, this process is simple to implement:
Today Salesforce announced they are acquiring document collaboration and group chat vendor Quip for $582M USD.

In the video below I discuss why this is a great move for Salesforce, as it will add richer content creation to Chatter and Communities, leverage Salesforce business objects, embed Salesforce Files, and provide Salesforce customers with persistent chat.
Summary:

Deutsche Bank estimates AWS derives about 15% of its total revenue mix or has attained a $1.5B revenue run rate in Europe.These and other insights are from the research note published earlier this month by Deutsche Bank Markets Research titled AWS/Cloud Adoption in Europe and the Brexit Impact written by Karl Keirstead, Alex Tout, Ross Sandler, Taylor McGinnis and Jobin Mathew. The research note is based on discussions the research team had with 20 Amazon Web Services (AWS) customers and partners at the recent AWS user conference held in London earlier this month, combined with their accumulated research on public cloud adoption globally.
These are the five ways Brexit will accelerate AWS and public cloud adoption:
![]()
Workday HR and financial analyses stand to benefit, but Platfora customers will lose the on-premises software option in the wake of the pending acquisition.
Workday customers stand to gain a deeper understanding of employees, recruits, customers, suppliers, business units and locations, but existing Platfora customers will soon lose the on-premises and public cloud software deployment option.
That’s the upshot of Workday’s planned acquisition of Platfora, a deal announced last week that left questions about the fit between the two companies and the future of the acquired big data analysis vendor. To answer some of the lingering questions, Workday executive Mike Frandsen, EVP of Products, Support & Delivery, and Platfora executive Peter Schlampp, VP of Products, briefed Constellation Research on what the deal will bring. Here are a few of the highlights:

On Platfora’s future: Platfora’s current version will be the last to be offered as on-premises software, said Frandsen. Workday will continue to support Platfora’s existing software on all currently supported versions of Hadoop and Spark into 2018 and will honor all contracts. A future product based on Platfora’s technology will be a SaaS service on Workday’s cloud platform. That offering will not be marketed as a stand-alone big data analysis service; rather, it will enhance Workday’s current analytical capabilities, as detailed below.
On blending Workday and Platfora capabilities: Workday has more than 40 customers using its Hadoop-based Workday Big Data Analytics Platform, introduced in 2013 and based on Datameer technology. That service enables customers to import and analyze third-party data in aggregate alongside Workday data, but the company says it does not give them the ability to drill down or slice into that data. Tapping Platfora’s in-memory Data Lenses, “non-Workday data will be a first class citizen” and users will be able to “drill down and slice that data into different pivots or dimensions.”
Platfora self-service data-prep and data visualization capabilities will also figure in Workday’s enhanced offering, said Schlampp. But it won’t be a complete “reboot” of Workday Big Data Analytics, said Frandsen. Rather, Workday will rationalize functionality for different user personas drawing from “an abundance of great tools” for preparation and analysis of data on Hadoop.
On supporting deeper Workday analyses: Platfora’s expertise in behavioral analysis is not limited to customer analysis. That has been a focus area for the company, but behavior analysis will be equally applicable to HR and financial analyses. For example, in the HR arena, behavioral analysis will help companies understand the behaviors, strengths, motivations and likelihood to retain employees and potential employees. Further, Workday said it’s contemplating cohort analysis of employees based on hire date, compensation, manager, organization, work location, or any combination of these attributes.
On the finance side Platfora will help Workday better understand the profitability and value of customers and prospective customers, their satisfaction, their likelihood to remain customers and their likelihood to pay their bills in a timely way. Current and potential partners and suppliers might be evaluated in the same way, and all of the above would advance insights on the profitability of business units and locations.
MyPOV on the Workday-Platfora Plans
I stand by my initial take on this deal in seeing it as a boon for Workday customers, but it’s now clear that change is ahead for existing Platfora customers. Schlampp said he expects customers will continue to use Platfora “for many years to come,” but I think that’s optimistic. I expect customers to look to competing products as their subscription-based licenses to use Platfora expire (whether it’s used on-premises or with cloud-based Hadoop deployments on AWS, Google or Azure).
About one third of Platfora customers (I don’t have an exact count, but it’s said to be “dozens”) are also Workday customers. I would expect few if any of these customers to abandon existing Hadoop deployments and move all their data and analyses onto Workday. That said, these joint customers may well use and appreciate Workday’s Platfora-enhanced HR and financial analyses. And if that’s the case, they would surely load more HR- and finance-relevant data and third-party data onto Workday’s platform as a result.
Related reading:
Workday Deal For Platfora Leaves Questions
Democratize the Data Lake: Make Big Data Accessible
Hadoop Summit 2016 Spotlights Enterprise Innovation, IoT Use Cases
Data to Decisions Chief Information Officer Chief Digital Officer
Oracle (NYSE: ORCL) today announced that it has entered into a definitive agreement to acquire NetSuite (NYSE: N), the very first cloud company. The transaction is valued at $109.00 per share in cash, or approximately $9.3 billion.MyPOV – Now we know why Oracle likes to grow cash reserves, it makes it Oracle’s second largest acquisition (after PeopleSoft in 2004, which turned out to be ‘just’ 1 billion more.
“Oracle and NetSuite cloud applications are complementary, and will coexist in the marketplace forever,” said Mark Hurd, Chief Executive Officer, Oracle. “We intend to invest heavily in both products—engineering and distribution.”MyPOV – 2 CEOs, two quotes, 1 CEO and 1 founder, also two quotes. Hurd’s quote is important in regards of stopping all rumors that Oracle may discontinue NetSuite products and stating the opposite in regards of Oracle planning to invest into product and go to market. Catz quote is all about CFO, nota bene the first full fiscal year (after expected closing in this CY) is June 1st 2017 till May 30th 2018 – so quite a bit out. Goldberg’s quote is the usual positive one on the merger, ok and Nelson’s is all along Hurd’s line of further investment in product and broader reach for the NetSuite products courtesy of Oracle.
“We expect this acquisition to be immediately accretive to Oracle’s earnings on a non-GAAP basis in the first full fiscal year after closing,” said Safra Catz, Chief Executive Officer, Oracle.
“NetSuite has been working for 18 years to develop a single system for running a business in the cloud,” said Evan Goldberg, Founder, Chief Technology Officer and Chairman, NetSuite. “This combination is a winner for NetSuite’s customers, employees and partners.”
“NetSuite will benefit from Oracle’s global scale and reach to accelerate the availability of our cloud solutions in more industries and more countries,” said Zach Nelson, Chief Executive Officer, NetSuite. “We are excited to join Oracle and accelerate our pace of innovation.”
The evaluation and negotiation of the transaction was led by a Special Committee of Oracle’s Board of Directors consisting solely of independent directors. The Special Committee unanimously approved the transaction on behalf of Oracle and its Board of Directors.MyPOV – Key to mention... because of the double ownership of Ellison in both Oracle and NetSuite.
The transaction is expected to close in 2016. The closing of the transaction is subject to receiving certain regulatory approvals and satisfying other closing conditions including NetSuite stockholders tendering a majority of NetSuite’s outstanding shares in the tender offer. In addition, the closing is subject to a condition that a majority of NetSuite’s outstanding shares not owned by executive officers or directors of NetSuite, or persons affiliated with Larry Ellison, his family members and any affiliated entities, be tendered in the tender offer.MyPOV – Another key piece of information, making sure that this transaction is not turning into a management or Ellison ‘left pocket to right pocket’ transaction. It is certainly unusual to find in a press release, but then there are no other software vendors out there where double ownership of that scale is part of a transaction (at least that I know of).
Tech Optimization netsuite Oracle Chief Information Officer

Oracle’s 9.3B acquisition of Netsuite came as no surprise to valley insiders. The rumors have surfaced for weeks. The surprise came as how badly Oracle sought cloud revenue and to bring a friendly partner back into the family. Constellation sees the following for the buy side:
Were you expecting Oracle to buy out Netsuite? What do you think will happen to you as a customer? As an Oracle customer will you consider Netsuite for Two-Tier ERP deployments?
Add your comments to the blog or reach me via email: R (at) ConstellationR (dot) com or R (at) SoftwareInsider (dot) org.
Please let us know if you need help with your Digital Business transformation efforts. Here’s how we can assist:
Reprints can be purchased through Constellation Research, Inc. To request official reprints in PDF format, please contact Sales .
Although we work closely with many mega software vendors, we want you to trust us. For the full disclosure policy,stay tuned for the full client list on the Constellation Research website.
* Not responsible for any factual errors or omissions. However, happy to correct any errors upon email receipt.
Copyright © 2001 -2016 R Wang and Insider Associates, LLC All rights reserved.
Contact the Sales team to purchase this report on a a la carte basis or join the Constellation Customer Experience
The post News Analysis: Oracle’s $9.3B Acquisition Of Netsuite Is About Cloud Consolidation appeared first on A Software Insider's Point of View.
In less than two years Satya Nadella has transformed Microsoft from incumbent under siege to tech pioneer, on multiple fronts. The change in stance since Steve Ballmer has been nothing short of remarkable.
One of Satya’s signature moves has been to open up Microsoft Office to other platforms, including Apple iOS, Google Android and Google Chrome. It was diametrically opposed to Ballmer’s approach of using Office as a drawcard for Microsoft Windows OS.
At first this seemed like a masterstroke. Extend the franchise by making it universal.
Now, however, Google is moving full pelt into hardware and preparing a global assault on the SME and enterprise PC fleet market. The Chrome for Work initiative will send masses of low-cost devices running Chrome OS into Microsoft’s home territory in an attempt to dethrone Windows for good.
And if the stats from IDC are to be believed, businesses will have plenty of reasons to switch to what is, in effect, a thin client environment for SaaS.
Three-year total cost of ownership is 61% lower than alternate PCs and tablets, a 49% lower device cost, a 74% lower device management and support cost, and a 53% lower deployment cost, according to an IDC white paper on Chrome in the education market.
The stats are similarly impressive for IT management. A 68% reduction in staff time managing devices, 93% less time deploying devices, 75% less time in managing security and a 92% reduction in time to troubleshoot, the paper found.
The prices for Chromebooks are insane. Samsung’s cheapest model, an 11-inch weighing 1.1kg and a battery life of 11 hours, costs US$189. And it runs Office.
Google Apps partners report reductions to IT costs of 40 percent to 70 percent for businesses that move to Google Apps in a PC environment. The savings of a combined Google Apps and Chrome shift would be even higher.
Sales reports reinforce the analysts’ findings. Chromebooks outsold Macs in the US education market for the first time in May this year, according to IDC.
“IDC estimates Apple's US Mac shipments to be around 1.76 million in the latest quarter, meaning Dell, HP, and Lenovo sold nearly 2 million Chromebooks in Q1 combined,” the Verge reported.
That was before Google announced that apps on the Android mobile platform – all 2.2 million – would be coming to Chromebooks too. Any app on your Android phone will sync to your Chromebook (or ChromeBox, the desktop unit).
The Verge shot a video of a Chromebook editing photos using Photoshop Express (for Android); pasting that photo into a Word document from Microsoft Office (for Android); and playing shoot-em-up space games (for Android) on the Chromebook’s touchscreen.
The photo file, Word doc and gaming data ran locally and natively on the Chromebook, the Verge claimed.
Microsoft is not the only one in Google’s sights. Tony Chadwick, a dyed-in-the-wool Apple fan who has started a Google services company called Chromeworx, believes it’s time to switch allegiances.
“The innovation mantra after Steve (Jobs) died has been taken up by Google. Apple’s model of cloud in the enterprise or business is just not workable,” Chadwick says. “Microsoft are coming at (cloud) at a million miles an hour but Google is still way ahead.”
Is Apple, with its focus on tech as luxury, really vulnerable to a tsunami of low-cost Chrome devices?
“I’ve been an Apple person for 30 years and I don’t want or need any Apple products. That sort of says it all to me,” says Chadwick.
Apple tends to run its own race. Microsoft vs Google will be the battle to watch – Satya versus Google’s Sundar Pichai. Two duelling, Indian-born CEOs determined to lead America’s greatest tech giants to glory.
Does Satya have a comeback? How will he protect the heartland? Microsoft’s awakened interest in hardware could hold the answers.
A version of this story first appeared on CRN.com.au.
The need for customer experience to improve is not a myth. In fact, here’s why. Noted psychology researcher and writer Mihaly Csíkszentmihályi observed in 1998 that people who perform seamless, sequence-based activities on a regular basis are happier than people who don’t[i]. He coined the term “flow” to describe this behavior. With the advent of CoIT, we’ve actually imposed a new set of demands on our customer’s brains. But instead of offering a series of smoothly sequential flows, websites and mobile applications are characterized by lag, downtime, and restarts. And at the same time customer’s flow-oriented brains simply aren’t wired to deal with poor digital experience interactions. Science has shown the business need for great customer experiences is a fact, not a myth.
And it can be tempting to label customers picky and impatient. But there’s a wealth of research on what happens to customers at a neurological level when they are forced to deal with slow or interrupted processes.[i] Their impatience is an indelible part of their human circuitry. Brands must recognize that customers’ hardwiring of the brain’s and their neurological desire for flow and easy of use as part of the cost of doing business. Companies must come to terms with the economic imperative of the customer experience or drive customers to their competitors because of their poor focus on customer experiences.
Fast websites and mobile experience create happier users. Those happier users are more likely to follow “calls to action” to register, download, subscribe, request information, or purchase. Unhappy users, which could include those who experience a mere two-second slowdown in how a web page loads, make almost two percent fewer queries, three point seven-five percent click less often, and report being significantly less satisfied with their overall experience[i]. Worse, they tell their friends about their negative experience. With the word-of-mouth social networks provide, brands need to heed the seriousness of differentiating their brand’s customer experience or be left in the dust.
Response Times have been consistent for 45 years. Based on neuroscience, the facts about human perception and response times have been consistent for more than forty-five years[i]. In fact, these numbers are hard-wired in human brains. And they are consistent regardless of the type of device, application, or connection a customer is using. In fact, that’s key to where customer expectations come from thus important to capitalize on. And what’s critical is determining where a brand’ web / mobile sites compare to customer expectations as well as benchmarking against CoIT applications or competitors or even non-competitors who have a great customer experience.
Response Time Has Not changed Much. In Robert B. Miller’s 1968 paper, “Response Time in Man-Computer Conversational Transactions[ii]“, found people have always been most comfortable, most efficient and most productive with response times of less than two seconds. Since 2006, what has changed slightly is the average online shopper expects pages to load in four seconds or less. Today, forty-nine percent expect page load times of two seconds or less, and eighteen percent expect pages to load instantly[iii]. And while optimizing every aspect of a brand’s digital assets to meet an “instant” expectation is a laudable goal, organizations simply may not have initially budgeted the resources to achieve these goals. Digital experience maturity, however, provides teams the ability to identify the interaction points in the digital customer journey most sensitive to improvement so they can maximize return on performance investment and include this in the budget and resource planning activities. Here’s the results of the Walmart study on page load times and conversion rates:
Businesses can keep arguing that customer experience doesn’t matter, it’s a touchy-feely construct or get it directly affects the bottom-line and start by designing and measuring customer experience performance management. For more on this see my report, here.
@drnatalie petouhoff, VP and Principal Analyst
Covering Customer-Facing Applications
[i] http://www.webperformancetoday.com/2014/07/16/eight-tricks-improve-perceived-web-performance/
[ii]Robert B. Miller’s 1968 paper, “Response Time in Man-Computer Conversational Transactions, https://www.computer.org/csdl/proceedings/afips/1968/5072/00/50720267.pdf
[iii]http://insights.wired.com/profiles/blogs/47-of-consumers-expect-a-web-page-to-load-in-2-seconds-or-less#axzz498kHSokj
[i] http://www.webperformancetoday.com/2010/06/15/everything-you-wanted-to-know-about-web-performance/.
[i]Dual-task interference in simple tasks: Data and theory. Pashler, Harold Psychological Bulletin, Vol. 116(2), Sep 1994, 220-244. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.116.2.220
[i] The Concept of Flow: Handbook of Positive Psychology, Nakamura, J. and Csikszentmihayi, M. 2002.
In this short video, I share my some thoughts on the recent data breach scandals rocking the US political scene, blaming tools, and taking accountability for the things you say and share.
Future of Work