This list celebrates changemakers creating meaningful impact through leadership, innovation, fresh perspectives, transformative mindsets, and lessons that resonate far beyond the workplace.
Vice President and Principal Analyst
Constellation Research
Holger Mueller is VP and Principal Analyst for Constellation Research for the fundamental enablers of the cloud, IaaS, PaaS and next generation Applications, with forays up the tech stack into BigData and Analytics, HR Tech, and sometimes SaaS. Holger provides strategy and counsel to key clients, including Chief Information Officers, Chief Technology Officers, Chief Product Officers, Chief HR Officers, investment analysts, venture capitalists, sell-side firms, and technology buyers.
Coverage Areas:
Future of Work
Tech Optimization & Innovation
Background:
Before joining Constellation Research, Mueller was VP of Products for NorthgateArinso, a KKR company. There, he led the transformation of products to the cloud and laid the foundation for new Business Process as a…...
There can be no question that the ‘cloud’ is transforming the way enterprise applications are created, operated and consumed. It affects the results of established players - see e.g. IBM CEO Rometty talking about 'unprecedented path in our industry' (see here).
Due to the innovative nature of cloud computing, smaller, often simpler applications have found their realization as cloud applications earlier than traditional enterprise apps. It is for instance very hard to find a mobile application that does NOT have a cloud backend. Or find a Talent Management product that was recently built and does NOT run in the cloud (only).
The story is different in the enterprise software space, where vendors that existed before the cloud computing era, had to find ways to leverage their existing investments into millions of lines of code and make them available in reasonable cloud architectures. ‘Born in the cloud’ vendors like e.g. Salesforce.com and Workday had a considerable time to market advantage over the vendors that ran their application portfolio on the previously en vogue internet architecture. But being a pioneer has its costs, too – and both mentioned companies had to build their own, proprietary cloud architectures. There was no off the shelf cloud architecture and infrastructure to use back when Salesforce.com started in 1999 and Workday in 2004.
Fast forward to 2014 and we see a number of cloud infrastructures than can and could be used, starting with Amazon’s AWS, Microsoft’s Azure, Google’s Google Cloud Platform, IBM’s SoftLayer, Rackspace, VMWare, CenturyLink etc. etc. not all of them will have the following qualities that in my view will define an enterprise cloud.
So here are the seven characteristics that define an enterprise cloud:
Notice Period - Short term notice periods, the longest acceptable being 3 months.
Data Ownership – Enterprises own their data and can use and retrieve it as they wish, with no penalties.
Glocal Coverage – both the ability to deploy global and local capabilities – depending on data governance requirements and enterprise preference.
Server Physicality – Enterprises may abstract resources, and maybe fine with a certain degree of virtualization, but there must be also the option for certain loads to see, touch, run the servers the application runs on (aka knows as bare metal).
Physical Separation – As required enterprise cloud providers may have to offer the physical separation of network, storage and compute resources (managed cage).
SLAs & Optional Services – The vendors must be ready to support the service levels that enterprises use today for their on premise loads and be able to support a premium on top of that in order to motivate the switch to cloud and dissolve the concerns around loss of control when moving to the cloud. Optional Services help enterprises to move, run, monitor and operate the cloud environment.
Cost Transparency – Enterprises need to pay their bills and they do that through budget allocation. If they cannot plan budgets, analyze consumption, cross charge for services – they will look for cloud vendors that enable that.
I am still pondering on the need of an enterprise cloud to support hybrid cloud. It will certainly help enterprise cloud vendors to support hybrid deployment. Enterprises usually have large on premise computing and facility capabilities. They are unlikely to give these up quickly, but wait for them to be written down. So in the transition period of computing into public clouds, enterprise cloud vendors that can help use local capabilities and transition to the public cloud, will have an advantage over those vendors that cannot (or don’t want to – e.g. Amazon AWS and Google Cloud Platform). Longer term the verdict is still out how much enterprises will run their loads between the public and private (local, on premise) cloud infrastructures. Again vendors with hybrid capabilities will have an advantage, as long as they can create large enough public cloud capacities, and their public cloud efforts are seen as genuine (and not as a stop gap or selection tick mark for selling more on premise cloud infrastructure and services).
Your POV
Do we see the rise of the enterprise cloud? What are key enterprise cloud capabilities that are needed? Please comment – thanks!
----------
More Musings
Musings - What are 'true' analytics? A manifesto - read here
Musings - Is Transboarding the future of People Talent Management - read here
Musings - How technology innovation fuels recruiting and disrupts the laggards - read here
Musings - The era of the No Design Database - read here
Musings - What is the future of Recruiting? Read here
Musings - Future of Work - is Voice part of it? Post Cortana debut reflections - read here
Musings - Can a HANA cloud be elastic? Tough - read here
Vice President and Principal Analyst
Constellation Research
Holger Mueller is VP and Principal Analyst for Constellation Research for the fundamental enablers of the cloud, IaaS, PaaS and next generation Applications, with forays up the tech stack into BigData and Analytics, HR Tech, and sometimes SaaS. Holger provides strategy and counsel to key clients, including Chief Information Officers, Chief Technology Officers, Chief Product Officers, Chief HR Officers, investment analysts, venture capitalists, sell-side firms, and technology buyers.
Coverage Areas:
Future of Work
Tech Optimization & Innovation
Background:
Before joining Constellation Research, Mueller was VP of Products for NorthgateArinso, a KKR company. There, he led the transformation of products to the cloud and laid the foundation for new Business Process as a…...
My weekly video recap of the week ending October 17th 2014 - enjoy:
Here is what I am talking about in the recap:
Time to look what analytics really means - a manifesto - read here
Alan Lepofsky's (@alanlepo) presentation at Dreamforce - see it on slideshare here
IBM and SAP partner, put the HANA Enterprise Cloud (HEC) on top of IBM Cloud (CMS & SoftLayer) - read here
My event report of Salesforce's Dreamforce conference, all about customer success, Analytics (no real ones - see above) Cloud and Lighting framework - read here
The Dreamforce Takeaways Hangout with Natalie Petouhoff (@drnatalie), Alan Lepofsky and Ray Wang (@rwang0 - via email) - see it here
My HR Tech 2014 takeaways Hangout - see it here (with my highlights of 29 vendor briefings + reminders on where I see Oracle, SAP & Workday).
Other key events / I have missed to attend / blog about:
EMC acquires Cloudscaling by Ben Kepes (@benkepes) (and congrats to 100 half marathons in 2014!)
And a few press clippings
Wall Street Journal - IBM, SAP Team up to deliver SaaS over the internet - read here
New York Times - IBM and SAP: A cloud pact that solves problems and holds promise - read here
CIO - Expect more 'mega partnerships' among technology vendors - read here
firstbiz - SAP and IBM join hands to take on Oracle and Amazon - read here
Business Spectator - SAP turns to IBM to expand cloud reach - read here
HR Executive Online - Predictitve Analytics dominates my first HR Tech Conference - read here
Fashion Observation of the week
Brian Sommer in Jeans (again!), and more remarkably no tie (!)
Next week I will be Las Vegas for SAP Teched && dCode and then in Amsterdam for HR Tech Europe, it will be a busy but fun week.
2012, 2013 & 2014 (C) Holger Mueller - All Rights Reserved
Vice President and Principal Analyst, Constellation Research
Constellation Research
Andy Mulholland is Vice President and Principal Analyst focusing on cloud business models. Formerly the Global Chief Technology Officer for the Capgemini Group from 2001 to 2011, Mulholland successfully led the organization through a period of mass disruption. Mulholland brings this experience to Constellation’s clients seeking to understand how Digital Business models will be built and deployed in conjunction with existing IT systems.
Coverage Areas
Consumerization of IT & The New C-Suite: BYOD,
Internet of Things, IoT, technology and business use
Previous experience:
Mulholland co authored four major books that chronicled the change and its impact on Enterprises starting in 2006 with the well-recognised book ‘Mashup Corporations’ with Chris Thomas of Intel. This was followed in…...
Do your new, and exciting, moves into Digital Business make money? Well of course they do, or you wouldn’t be doing them, but is it really that simple? Many first steps don’t seem to be making as much money as expected, and do you really feel in full financial control of this new business activity with all its new technology based components? At the heart of this is a simple fact; I have yet to meet, or even hear of, a CFO from a traditional Enterprise who could put together a really accurate spreadsheet for a Digital Business unit.
That’s quite a challenge, and I would like to hear that I am wrong, but why would an experienced CFO, be able to do this? It is an accepted fact that Digital Business is a giant game changer so why would the majority of the factors in the new Digital Business model spreadsheet be the same as the old business model? Sure, at a head line level there are all the common factors for any business, but lets dig down below starting with the question are you using the same basic spreadsheet as for the rest of the business as a starting point?
Probably, after all it has been built up over the years in increasing detail and accuracy to reflect your enterprise and its Business. However simple aspects like the apportionment of the overheads are quite likely to be wrong, does the new Digital Business really make use of the same elements as the older traditional business? Has the Finance Department carried out a realistic reappraisal, or is it a case of more revenue spreads the load and helps the whole business? These are all understandable issues and as the Digital Business grows the CFO and Finance department will get round to investigating them in line with normal management of costs.
Dig deeper and two key differences emerge; the first is that Digital Business models are usually based on Operational Expenditure, or OPEX, and the traditional business model is based on Capital Expenditure, or CAPEX; the second is that OPEX means buying in ‘Services’ to support a variable trading model, an entirely new business activity and set of costs.
The Board is full of enthusiasm for the shift from CAPEX to OPEX, in the IT department the shift in ownership of expensive IT assets is looking good, may be even the overheads are getting adjusted too. But the Sales and Marketing departments pressing ahead into Digital Business are into using OPEX based services in a far deeper and wider manner than the IT Department simply because this is what Digital Business is built upon. New Technologies used in a new and innovative manner to create a Business dependent on external suppliers of OPEX services. There is not too much of the old IT operating model here, nor of the old business model, and yet where is the corresponding change in the Financial management?
So back to my opening paragraph; Its very difficult for a CFO to itemize exactly what these new, usually technology based services are, together with correct benchmarks for budgeting. Now add the further complication of how you link the purchased services to the revenue producing activities to ensure accurate financial reporting with the ability to have genuine financial management. This is new, complex territory that requires the newly constructed Digital Business plan to be matched by an in depth technology review of functionality provisioning and linkages.
An Enterprise Board will have built a sophisticated set of Financial Controls for its existing business, but in its Digital Business most of the major operational factors are technology based, in a completely new and different set of costs!
The Technology Industry is already experiencing this, with two visible results, the obvious moves to introduce new products, no, not so much products, but ‘services’, and the headline grabbing rearrangement of their own businesses. The latter often makes more sense if viewed against this point of two different business models leading to two different financial, management and even shareholder returns. Thinking in this way can make it more interesting and instructive to look more closely at these changes.
But it’s the first point about changing what they are selling, and how they are delivering it, that really needs careful examination in the context of your own enterprise as these ‘services’ will be entering your business. The question is visibly and managed, or, invisibly and building up hidden distortions in financial management.
My colleagues at Constellation Research have done a great job of analyzing Oracle, Salesforce.com, et al as the ‘customer events’ season reaches a climax, and I suggest reading their reports on the technology suppliers your enterprise is using with the points of this blog in mind. In my own case I reported on Cisco InterCloud service being a potential game changer in how Business and Financial Management could be brought to use of external cloud services.
Former Vice President and Principal Analyst
Constellation Research
Steve Wilson is former VP and Principal Analyst at Constellation Research, leading the business theme Digital Safety and Privacy. His coverage includes digital identity, data protection, data privacy, cryptography, and trust. His advisory services to CIOs, CISOs, CPOs and IT architects include identity product strategy, security practice benchmarking, Privacy by Design (PbD), privacy engineering and Privacy [or Data Protection] Impact Assessments (PIA, DPIA).
Coverage Areas:
- Identity management, frameworks & governance- Digital identity technologies- Privacy by Design
- Big Data; “Big Privacy”- Identity & privacy innovation
Previous experience:
Wilson has worked in ICT innovation, research, development and analysis for over 25 years. With double…...
A repeated refrain of cynics and "infomopolists" alike is that privacy is dead. People are supposed to know that anything on the Internet is up for grabs.
In some circles this thinking turns into digital apartheid; some say if you're so precious about your privacy, just stay offline.
But socialising and privacy are hardly mutually exclusive; we don't walk around in public with our names tattooed on our foreheads. Why can't we participate in online social networks in a measured, controlled way without submitting to the operators' rampant X-ray vision? There is nothing inevitable about trading off privacy for conviviality.
The privacy dangers in Facebook and the like run much deeper than the self-harm done by some peoples' overly enthusiastic sharing. Promiscuity is actually not the worst problem, neither is the difficulty of navigating complex and ever changing privacy settings.
The advent of facial recognition presents far more serious and subtle privacy challenges.
Facebook has invested heavily in face recognition technology, and not just for fun. Facebook uses it in effect to crowd-source the identification and surveillance of its members. With facial recognition, Facebook is building up detailed pictures of what people do, when, where and with whom.
You can be tagged without consent in a photo taken and uploaded by a total stranger.
The majority of photos uploaded to personal albums over the years were not intended for anything other than private viewing.
Under the privacy law of Australia and data protection regulations in dozens of other jurisdictions, what matters is whether data is personally identifiable. The Commonwealth Privacy Act 1988 defines "personal Information" as: "information or an opinion (including information or an opinion forming part of a database), whether true or not, and whether recorded in a material form or not, about an individual whose identity is apparent, or can reasonably be ascertained from the information or opinion".
Whenever Facebook attaches a member's name to a photo, they are converting hitherto anonymous data into personal information, and in so doing, they become subject to privacy law.
And yet too many people still underestimate the privacy implications of face recognition. Some technologists naively claim that faces are "public" and that people can have no expectation of privacy. And yet the words "public" and "private" don't even figure in the Privacy Act.
If a government was stealing into our photo albums, labelling people and profiling them, there would be riots.
Vice President and Principal Analyst
Constellation Research
Holger Mueller is VP and Principal Analyst for Constellation Research for the fundamental enablers of the cloud, IaaS, PaaS and next generation Applications, with forays up the tech stack into BigData and Analytics, HR Tech, and sometimes SaaS. Holger provides strategy and counsel to key clients, including Chief Information Officers, Chief Technology Officers, Chief Product Officers, Chief HR Officers, investment analysts, venture capitalists, sell-side firms, and technology buyers.
Coverage Areas:
Future of Work
Tech Optimization & Innovation
Background:
Before joining Constellation Research, Mueller was VP of Products for NorthgateArinso, a KKR company. There, he led the transformation of products to the cloud and laid the foundation for new Business Process as a…...
I attended this year's HR Tech Conference in Las Vegas - and as usual the show was massive. Tons of vendors, too many announcements to keep the overview, etc. and a lot of briefings - so instead of typing it all up, I tried to sum it all up in a video / webcast.
The vendors I cover in the video are (in alphabetical order):
Constellation Research Video Takeaways from Salesforce Dreamforce 2014
Vice President and Principal Analyst, Constellation Research
Constellation Research
Role: Vice President and Principal Analyst focusing on the IOT of Customer Experience and how the cloud is driving more flexible, agile, and robust customer service and customer experiences. In-app or in device customer service is the future.
Coverage Areas: Next Generation Customer, Digital Marketing Transformation
Bio: As a Vice President and Principal Analyst at Constellation Research, Inc, Petouhoff works with Fortune 100 and 500’s Senior Leadership teams to create strategic customer experience (marketing, sales and service) solutions which engage customers, build brands and grow businesses. Combining her experience as a former Forrester software analyst, PWC systems integrator and change management consultant, Petouhoff leads executive workshops to discuss to not only…...
Vice President and Principal Analyst
Constellation Research
Holger Mueller is VP and Principal Analyst for Constellation Research for the fundamental enablers of the cloud, IaaS, PaaS and next generation Applications, with forays up the tech stack into BigData and Analytics, HR Tech, and sometimes SaaS. Holger provides strategy and counsel to key clients, including Chief Information Officers, Chief Technology Officers, Chief Product Officers, Chief HR Officers, investment analysts, venture capitalists, sell-side firms, and technology buyers.
Coverage Areas:
Future of Work
Tech Optimization & Innovation
Background:
Before joining Constellation Research, Mueller was VP of Products for NorthgateArinso, a KKR company. There, he led the transformation of products to the cloud and laid the foundation for new Business Process as a…...
Vice President & Principal Analyst
Constellation Research
Alan Lepofsky - VP and Principal Analyst, Constellation Research. With almost two decades of experience in the collaboration software industry, Lepofsky helps organizations improve the way their employees work together to get their jobs done. Lepofsky’s primary research area The Future of Work, focuses on: integrating collaboration and business processes (Purposeful Collaboration), structuring work via Social Task Management, leveraging analytics and digital assistants to work more productively, the strategic impact of mobile computing on business transformation, and measuring workforce culture based on Digital Proficiency instead of age.
Twitter: @alanlepoLinkedIn: https://ca.linkedin.com/in/alanlepo
, Title: Big IdeasIntelligent Collaboration: The Intersection of…...
Distilling the important information out of the bulk of announcements made at Dreamforce is tough. Don't worry-- Holger Mueller, Dr. Natalie Petouhoff and Alan Lepofsky have absorbed, analyzed, and laid out everything you need to know about the Customer Success Platform, Analytics Cloud, and Lightning. If you're a CIO, CMO, HR technology buyer, or customer officer you can't afford to miss this Dreamforce rundown.
Here is what we talk about:
Salesforce positions as the Customer Success Platform
Salesforce launches its 6th cloud (after Sales, Marketing, Service, Communities and Apps) - it is the Analytics Cloud
Salesforce announces the Lightning framework to build applications faster.
Takeaways for technology buyers:
Look at Analytics Cloud value proposition - The Analytics cloud with $125 for a regular user and $250 for a professional user comes with a steep (list) price. What is the value / cost relationship for your enterprise, start from here.
Consider (existing) alternatives - It is very likely your enterprise has already a place where 3rd party information is brought together for insights, so have a look at that and compare it with Salesforce's Analytics Cloud.
Take stock and plan for 2015 - Look at what systems you have, but also look larger and include people and training and then start planning for 2015.
Revisit Collaboration - Don't look at Chatter and Collaboration as stand alone, but bring them into business processes across sales, marketing and engineering (and more) to make them more efficient.
2012, 2013 & 2014 (C) Holger Mueller - All Rights Reserved
Vice President and Principal Analyst
Constellation Research
Holger Mueller is VP and Principal Analyst for Constellation Research for the fundamental enablers of the cloud, IaaS, PaaS and next generation Applications, with forays up the tech stack into BigData and Analytics, HR Tech, and sometimes SaaS. Holger provides strategy and counsel to key clients, including Chief Information Officers, Chief Technology Officers, Chief Product Officers, Chief HR Officers, investment analysts, venture capitalists, sell-side firms, and technology buyers.
Coverage Areas:
Future of Work
Tech Optimization & Innovation
Background:
Before joining Constellation Research, Mueller was VP of Products for NorthgateArinso, a KKR company. There, he led the transformation of products to the cloud and laid the foundation for new Business Process as a…...
I had the opportunity to attend the Dreamforce conference in San Francisco this week. The conference has only gotten bigger, and probably better. There are more Salesforce customers, developers and partners than ever before and the force multiplier was visible and palpable all across the conference.
So let’s take a look at the top 3 takeaways, which was not a too difficult a task as Salesforce did not announce too much, but more about that later.
1. The Customer Success Platform – Slogan or Credo? – The leitmotiv of this year’s Dreamforce is (the conference is not over as I blog this) and was all about Salesforce positioning its offerings as a Customer Success Platform. Last year it was the customer customer pitch. Some time ago it was Social Business. So every year Benioff and team need to come out with something new (and ideally bigger) – but as an analyst covering next generation applications – platform matters. And Salesforce thinks that with its 6 clouds (Sales, Marketing, Service, Communities, Apps and Analytics (new see below) it has all the ingredients to ensure customer success from a platform perspective. And certainly Salesforce has a formidable collection and market share of CRM capabilities, I leave it to my colleague Alan Lepovsky to comment on the attractiveness of the Community cloud, and I will comment below on the (new) Analytics cloud.
As far as the vehicle of a customer success platform I’d say there are many more business functions that need to fall in place to make a customer successful, notably the ‘back office’ functions that Salesforce does not have but partners for. And more importantly, in my view, people make the difference – they are part of the equation of customer success, too. But let’s give Salesforce the benefit of the doubt, it would be great to see one of the yearly leitmotivs stick more than 12 months for the vendor, and platform should be to a certain point timeless and always matter.
The Customer Success Platform - Intro Video of Dreamforce 2014
2. The Analytics Cloud – This is the 6th cloud that Salesforce has added – and was the most substantial product announcement of the conference. From a minimalist point of view one could say that this is the next generation of the existing reporting capabilities of Salesforce. And these were by no means bad, did the job, were included in the license and were (and are) good enough to power millions of users in their reporting needs every day. But one key challenge for Salesforce’s existing reporting has been the addition of 3rd party data and most of CRM information becomes only meaningful when put into context of all information the enterprise produces and uses (incl. the ‘back office’ – see above).
The Wave technology that powers the Analytics Cloud puts that concern away, it’s easy now to import 3rd party data, put it into context and visualize it. For the latter, visualization, Salesforce has done a superb job – the graphical rendering of data is fast, smooth, responsive and almost dazzling. Not sure how much of that performance was demo – especially on the mobile devices (yes it was again build mobile first – what else) – but if performance will be only half as good in real life than what it was a Dreamforce – then kudos to the Salesforce engineering team behind the Analytics cloud.
On the flipside, the Analytics cloud is not ‘true’ analytics, those class of software that takes actions or at least recommends them in a priority sequence (more here). As a matter of fact – following that definition – it is not analytics at all, but visualizations and reporting. Nothing wrong with that and it certainly creates value for Salesforce customers. Critical is the high list price of $125 for a regular and $250 for a power user per month – that is a lot of money for a first version product, but we all understand it’s before discount.
Salesforce was also very uptight on the technology behind Analytics Cloud, the versions going from open source (Cassandra, Riak, HBase), to existing platform (Oracle) all the way to proprietary (a row format store with flexible pointers). Not sure why Salesforce has been so secretive in this area – the product launch is imminent and the cat fill be out of the bag soon. It’s a first version, and by default capabilities will only be upgraded. Talk about dimension tables wakes up good old Data Warehouse memories – and the product is not ready to handle large amounts of non-SQL data. Equally predictive analytics capabilities are missing, but I was repeatedly was assured they are on the roadmap.
Finally Salesforce is leaving all the ‘heavy’ lifting to partners, and with that I mean the ETL functions to get data from 3rd party systems. Using the OData protocol opens the Analytics Cloud well for SAP and Microsoft applications, not so much for Oracle applications, but it’s a good start. Involving all these partners make the Analytics Cloud powerful and allows to move it to market fast, but in day to day life it will make it hard to purchase license wise and operate complexity wise. But then Salesforce realistically did not have a chance to build 3rd party interfaces themselves – so partnering is a good and smart (short to medium term) strategy.
The Salesforce Analytics Demo
3. The Lightning framework – Once you have a new platform like Salesforce has with Salesforce1 – then you need to work on getting developers more productive. Enters Lighting, which allows to easily build mobile, tablet and desktop applications on Salesforce1. As a matter of fact it is so easy, that Salesforce has probably empowered business users and system administrators to build some Salesforce applications. If Salesforce can really make this user community productive building applications, it has achieved a breakthrough in the industry and re-invented how (simple) business applications can be build. And though the demos have that potential and Salesforce has realized that – we will have to see in real life how many non-programmers are up to the task. But certainly there is a lot of potential here.
The Lightning Frameowork Overview
On the flipside out of briefings with the relevant development execs – it has become clear, that Salesforce has not thought (yet) about layering access in Lightning. Usually you see vendor proprietary, vendor vertical, ISV and then customer customization layers. In this version one, users will copy components, which quickly can become an oversight and code maintenance problem. But it is early days, first version and Lighting starts out with a lot of promise.
The Salesforce Industries Vision Video
Tidbits
Industries – Salesforce has launched a common industry product group under the leadership of enterprise software veteran John Wookey. We attended a briefing on the new effort and Wookey and team can hit all the vertical messages well (we heard healthcare, finance and government) but it is not clear how all will be build (consider the layering concern from above) but a roadmap will come soon.
Europe – It is clear that Salesforce needs to grow beyond North America and Europe seems to be the prime target, with European customers being show cased in the keynotes and even executives from the German Coca-Cola bottler on main stage. And we heard that the UK data center is coming very soon, the German one later, all good moves to overcome the European cloud angst.
Developers – Developers were central users Salesforce needs to woo in 2013, but that was less a topic this year. Nonetheless the developer zone in Moscone West is vibrant, developers are excited, another hackathon is under way and I had a chance to see Adam Seligman launching the new Trailhead know how transfer tool. As with any new platform - training and education are crucial.
More platform innovation that helps attract developers
Work.com – With Wookey off in charge of verticals, work.com has become part of the ‘platform’ which is managed by Linda Crawford. We had the chance to meet with Crawford and it is clear that if Salesforce ever had any larger Talent Management ambitions, they are gone by now. The focus now is to improve CRM user performance, natively embedded into their transactional applications. The quid pro quo argument would be, that Salesforce needs to build or acquire learning capabilities – something to be seen. And it is certainly a worthy and valuable cause to improve sales performance while not reducing sales active time for CRM users.
MyPOV
It all fits well where Salesforce is right now, as we have seen it many times in enterprise software history: First you need the platform (Salesforce1), then you build reporting on it (Analytics Cloud) and then (or in parallel) you think of developer productivity (Lightning), next comes horizontal product (in 2015) and verticals (roadmap coming soon, see above).
The cookie cutter approach of re-platforming, something Salesforce (and most other vendors) does not talk about publicly, but that’s what is happening behind the scenes at Salesforce in my view. As such Salesforce is going through a building year with little new and additional business functionality to show, but that should change in 2015 and 2016. As usual roadmaps would be good to have, once the cat is out of the bag (it almost is). And a little more transparency how things are build would also be good, being in the ‘cloud’ is not a good enough answer for technical architecture details anymore.
It’s 2014 by now, not 2004 anymore.
Earlier today Alan, Natalie and me recorded our takeaways in a hangout - watch it here:
More on Salesforce.com:
Constellation Research Summary of Salesforce Dreamforce 2014 - read here
Research Summary - An in depth look at Salesforce1 - Better packaging or new offerng? Read here.
Dreamforce 2013 Platform Takeaways - All about the mobile platform - or more? Read here.
Platform ecosystems are hard - Salesforce grows it - FinancialForce shrinks it - read here.
Our take on Salesforce.com Identity Connect - from three angles - Identity, CRM and PaaS - read here.
Takeaways from the Salesforce and Workday Strategic Partnership - read here.
Act II - The Cloud changes everything - Oracle and Salesforce.com - read here.
How many Pivots make a Pirouette? Salesforce's last Pivot - read here.
2012, 2013 & 2014 (C) Holger Mueller - All Rights Reserved
Vice President and Principal Analyst, Constellation Research
Constellation Research
Role: Vice President and Principal Analyst focusing on the IOT of Customer Experience and how the cloud is driving more flexible, agile, and robust customer service and customer experiences. In-app or in device customer service is the future.
Coverage Areas: Next Generation Customer, Digital Marketing Transformation
Bio: As a Vice President and Principal Analyst at Constellation Research, Inc, Petouhoff works with Fortune 100 and 500’s Senior Leadership teams to create strategic customer experience (marketing, sales and service) solutions which engage customers, build brands and grow businesses. Combining her experience as a former Forrester software analyst, PWC systems integrator and change management consultant, Petouhoff leads executive workshops to discuss to not only…...
One of the many scoops at Dreamforce this year is the announcement of the Customer Success Platform. The idea behind what Salesforce is offering is that companies and brands need a way to connect with their customers in new ways. There are nearly trillions of devices, apps, cars, cameras, watches, etc… that could be connected. The thought being that– if everything was connected, brands could deliver better experiences that were more relevant. The result of that is to drive customer loyalty, advocacy and referrals and long-term customer lifetime value.
Salesforce has 6 core technologies: mobile, connected products, 1 to 1 capabilities for the marketing customer journey, social, data and apps. And they want brands to be able to manage it all on one platform- theirs. They showed several difference examples: GE for analytics, Coke for building mobile applications and Honeywell for sales, marketing, service, community and engagement.
Salesforce is also taking about the data divide and wants to put an end to it by making it easier to for the business people and the people who manage data to see it visualized. While that is empowering to the business users to be able to create applications, it could be an issue for IT to maintain it… and security, and… So we’ll see if things get better or worse. It will help IT get more relevant and perhaps end the cycle of departments like Customer Service suffering from the Rodney Dangerfield Affect… they just don’t get enough respect so their requests end up at the end of the IT list… Something’s gotta give… to make business run better and make customers return.
Wondering what to do once you have sold a SaaS product? Customer Success Platforms are there to help you make sure you maintain the relationship throughout the customer lifecycle so that renewals are easier. And what will be interesting is to see how the various players in the Customer Success Management field fair. If you are looking at this area there’s some of the companies you’ll want to consider: GainSight, ServiceSource and Totango… to mention a few.
What is confusing to many is what does the term “Customer Success Platform” mean? To some it means a platform to build your customer journey on and have all apps, data, devices, etc connect. To others it means managed services and/or a platform to manage a SaaS software sale after the sale – i.e., during its whole customer lifetime- way before renewal time…
It’s important for vendors to do the work to make sure the messaging is not confusing, to understand who they are selling to and very deliberately show their benefits. This means doing the persona selling buying exercise – i.e., for each persona you are selling to, know what keeps them up at night and how does your solution or platform solve that. The benefits are very different for various roles, CIOs, CEOs, CMOs, SVP of Customer Service, etc…
I’ve been writing about Customer Experience for nearly 20 years and while the technology has gotten much better, exactly what technology one needs and for what department has gotten more confusing each year. The idea of serving your customer has not changed. It’s needed and wanted more than ever. It’s important to distinguish what each vendor brings to the table for what roles and why they should be considered. It’s not an easy thing to sort out all the “very” similar marketing messaging.
I will be creating some Vendor Profiles to help our end users figure what the best choice is for their company.
@DrNatalie
VP and Principal Analyst Covering Marketing, Sales and Service to Deliver Better Customer Experiences.
Vice President and Principal Analyst, Constellation Research
Constellation Research
Andy Mulholland is Vice President and Principal Analyst focusing on cloud business models. Formerly the Global Chief Technology Officer for the Capgemini Group from 2001 to 2011, Mulholland successfully led the organization through a period of mass disruption. Mulholland brings this experience to Constellation’s clients seeking to understand how Digital Business models will be built and deployed in conjunction with existing IT systems.
Coverage Areas
Consumerization of IT & The New C-Suite: BYOD,
Internet of Things, IoT, technology and business use
Previous experience:
Mulholland co authored four major books that chronicled the change and its impact on Enterprises starting in 2006 with the well-recognised book ‘Mashup Corporations’ with Chris Thomas of Intel. This was followed in…...
Another week, another security breach, or so it seems as the weeks go by, with each breach highlighting the importance of security, or the inadequacy of current security practices? Clearly Enterprises need to do better and as with operating and strategic issues it is an Executive Board who has the responsibility to lead on this. So are we approaching the whole question of ‘Security’ the right way?
Should we be talking about 'Security' at all? The word and associated practices impart the implication that there is a definable environment to be made secure. Substitute the term 'Risk' and there is a wider sense of commercial forces that any enterprise and its partners including customers are subjected to. To trade any Enterprise and its management must accept a series of risks, the question is how to identify and quantify these risks.
Maybe I am wrong to say this, but I feel that currently for many Boards the issue of 'security' is neatly parked under the CTO as a defined task involving the IT department and its operations. Defining Security in this manner as a technology matter means it is not seen as part of the Executive Boards ongoing duties to define and manage as part of the Enterprises trading risks. It is off the agenda and ignored at Board Meetings with the exception of an occasional agenda item for budget purposes, or as a result of external publicity.
This state of affairs may be good for ‘Plausible Deniability’ allowing the Executive Board members to express shock and bewilderment in the face of a 'security breach', and maybe in the non Digital Business world it was okay. But what about now and into the future when all Industries are becoming increasingly online trading organizations? As the role of technology is continually expanding across their industry, market, and enterprise it's not just the IT department involved, nor is it only internal IT operations that traditional security is designed to address, now it’s the whole business model. A business model dependent on new and still changing technologies deployed in new ways, all of which involve increasing online connectivity on demand to the market place for the success.
Digital Business is a game changer in every sense for the Enterprise, and its Executive Board needs to change its game in response or be held to account for failure to discharge their duties to shareholders.
So how does an Executive Board go beyond the current security of internal IT to embrace the necessary wider mandate required by online Digital Business without trying to become technology wizards? Having defined what we currently think of and expect from Security in its current role let’s consider Risk Management within the Enterprise. 'Risk' is usually understood to encompass a wide range of potential threats across all aspects of the Enterprise. Risk management is concerned with the identification, assessment as to the level and impact, even in selected Risk cases contingency planning. All of which would normally form a Risk Register for the Board to supervise, monitor, and call for further actions as and when needed.
As Digital Business evolves there are a lot of new potential risks, and some very real short term risks, not just in hacking breaches, other areas too. Extending the Risk Register, and Executive Board monitoring to understand and direct expert attention is a very necessary move. One that Auditors should equally be calling for as well, after all not knowing exactly what risks your new and growing online Digital Business is creating for your enterprise in all aspects is pretty obviously a rather disturbing operational oversight!
The Challenge in extending the Enterprise Risk Register lies as much in finding experts with the experience to identify and assess.
Creating new revenue streams, gaining market share, capturing new customers are all the reasons why Digital Business is growing and will continue to grow. But it is a huge game change in the way business is conducted through opening up online relationships, transactions, and models in a manner that introduces new commercial risks. Security is one of them, but as all the recent failures show its not possible to partition the topic off as a simple technical challenge to the IT department, instead it is up to the Executive Board to start to firmly lead the way in gaining recognition of what is at Risk across the whole enterprise in a manner the Executives can understand.
A full Risk Register of Digital Business will initially paint a disturbing picture, but that’s to be expected, and allows structured actions. Failure to identify Risks and act can only lead to questions about competency when the inevitable happens. Executive Board leadership of the Digital Business elements is required every bit as much as for the traditional Business!
Director of Customer Programs, Constellation Research
Constellation Research
Carole oversees the Constellation Executive Network, an executive community for innovative senior leaders who value strategic guidance from trusted advisors who understand the power of disruptive technologies. Carole brings over 15 years of marketing, strategic account management, and operations experience, specializing in high technology and professional services. She holds a BA from Santa Clara University and a MBA from Thunderbird, School of Global Management.
...
Join Alan Lepofsky, Holger Mueller, and Dr. Natalie Petouhoff for a Google Hangout to hear their analysis of the announcements at Dreamforce 2014! You'll catch the latest developments on platform, Future of Work, collaboration, and customer experience live from San Francisco, while the conference is still going strong.