Results

NRF16 – The Store Strikes Back

NRF16 – The Store Strikes Back

Another cold January in New York City and another NRF Retail Big Show survived! As I have found with the countless times I have attended NRF the event is a whirlwind of insanity, but it is over before you know it. The insights, meetings and seeing old friends makes the entire adventure well worth it. So here are the take aways from the NRF16:

  • The STORE IS BACK – okay maybe that is a tad dramatic, the store never went away, but the store in recent years has been down played. No longer is that the case. Many vendors and retailers I met with made a point of discussing their plans and initiatives for transforming their stores. The store is no longer viewed, by most, as simply the physical location that I want to go to in order to transact for an item. It is taking on a host of new responsibilities in the new commerce environment. At the crux of these new characteristics is the focus on the customer experience. Salesforce took us on a two site visit at Design Within Reach and Suitsupply, both in the Soho part of New York City. Other than the “cool” factor of the stores, what was discussed was how each store had meticulously thought of how to maximize the real estate they had and more importantly how they could leverage technology to better address their customers’ needs and experience once in the store. That experience has to go beyond offering you free cappuccinos or coupons, but how to ensure that the customer needs and untapped wants are addressed at the right time and with the right product. Other examples were of how True Religion is working with Aptos to empower the store associates to provide consumers with better experiences when it comes to finding that right pair of jeans. Putting the entire inventory catalog on the wrist of the store associate (via an Apple Watch) allows True Religion to be able to meet that customers’ demand, literally at the touch of a finger. There was also Avanade that had a smart grocery store shelf on display. Customers could simply pick up items and the smart displays would provide a host of information from nutritional content to where the food was sourced from. These were some intriguing examples of how retailers were working with service providers to bring exciting new technologies into the store – allowing the store to find its voice in the new commerce landscape.
    Weather cooperated...albeit cold!
  • What is more important – perfect view of the order or the client? When we say perfect view of the order it really entails having a better understanding of your inventory levels across all channels. When it comes to the client is about truly understanding the context for the customer, what is driving their current, past and future demands. Having that 360 degree view of the customer has been all the rage recently, but are we missing the key element – the view of the order and of the inventory? This question kept ringing in my head as I went from meeting to meeting. What resonated with me was the need to address both, that the success of each was inevitably tied to the other. Service providers ranging from IBM to IFS are challenging the market on how to approach the need to have greater inventory and order visibility. It is not simply about the creative understanding of the customer, but also the ability to truly understand what products where and when that are available within the supply chain to fulfill the customers’ demands. Bottom line – regardless of how sophisticated and creative a retailer is in getting the customer to engage, if the product is not there at the moment of truth, then all those efforts are in vain.
     
  • Smarter and dynamic fulfillment is the key – A major component of modern retail, driven by the consumer, is the push towards accessing orders wherever and whenever they desire. We already see the variety of methods we can access our orders – order on line delivery in store, order on line deliver to home, buy in store deliver to home, browse on line ship to store to name a few. As these forms of delivery continue to take on new dimensions, the business processes and technologies that support these new forms of last mile fulfillment will have to keep pace. This is continuing to place a strain on retail supply chains to meet these demands. Companies like 1800Flower are looking at all the nodes in their supply chain to assist in fulfilling their customer needs, in particular how their warehouses can play a more active role in the customer journey. We are seeing a growing number of retailers looking to redefine how they can meet the last mile in the retail supply chain. 2016 will continue to see these parts of the supply chain being leaned on to meet growing customer demands.

    Great catching up with old friends - Netsuite dinner.
  • Cool technologies are the future: smart displays, IoT, virtual reality and robots – Last year there were lots of 3D printers on the floor, they seemed to have disappeared this year. Which I found surprising since in 2015 we have seen tangible examples of how retailers are leveraging 3D printers. For example Lowe’s is using the technology to offer customers the ability to procure items, such as door knobs and fixtures, that are no longer being produced. A great example of how retailers can expand their product offerings for their customers.  Of course there remained plenty of examples of disruptive technologies on display on the floor of the Javits Center. Vendors such as Zebra Technologies, IFS, Avanade, Aptos to name a few were showcasing smart displays and how their customers were leveraging the technology. From greater view into their inventory to displaying information or being able to transact view the monitors – these smart displays are only beginning to find an important role within the store. Robotics were on display from the likes of Wipro – assisting with store navigation and shelf maintenance. IoT also was a theme that ran throughout the meetings I attended – companies like Checkpoint are continuing to add increased sensors and beacons within the store. They highlighted a timely use case in leveraging RFID and readers within a meat department of a grocer to allow greater and more efficient monitoring of the high margin but perishable product. In light of the recent news with Chipotle the use case is addressing headline news. Look towards 2016 as a continuation of disruptive technology growth within the retail landscape.

Once again I survived NRF and the cold New York City weather…it was actually a great trip…albeit I am still fighting some germs I picked up from the trip. I am very excited with the prospects for 2016 in the retail and supply chain space. Evolution is continuing to emerge at a rapid pace. Retailers cannot afford to take their eyes off the ball, they have to look internally to ensure they have the right business processes and mentality to keep pace. Service providers and vendors must also strive to act as true partners for this journey.

It is not going to be any easier in 2016, but it will continue to be exciting times.

You can also view my video from the show – click here.

Matrix Commerce Next-Generation Customer Experience Sales Marketing Revenue & Growth Effectiveness Innovation & Product-led Growth Tech Optimization Data to Decisions B2B B2C CX Customer Experience EX Employee Experience business Marketing eCommerce Supply Chain Growth Cloud Digital Transformation Disruptive Technology Enterprise IT Enterprise Acceleration Enterprise Software Next Gen Apps IoT Blockchain CRM ERP Leadership finance Social Customer Service Content Management Collaboration M&A Enterprise Service AI Analytics Automation Machine Learning Generative AI Chief Customer Officer Chief Information Officer Chief Supply Chain Officer Chief Data Officer Chief Digital Officer Chief Executive Officer Chief Financial Officer Chief Growth Officer Chief Marketing Officer Chief Product Officer Chief Revenue Officer Chief Technology Officer

The 2016 Marketing & Tech Innovation Awards

The 2016 Marketing & Tech Innovation Awards

DMN and The Hub have combined forces this year to present the Marketing&Tech Innovation Awards, which honor the most innovative strategies, platforms, and people in marketing today. I was thrilled to be a judge in this year’s selection. The winners will be announced on March 10th, but take a peek at the finalists below and let me know who you think should win!

Case Study Categories

Analytics Innovation

evolve24
Sales Predictions Using Social Conversations

Experian Marketing Services and Golfsmith
Analytics for the Holidays

Grapeshot and Sawyer Studios
Lila & Eve

Merkle
Connected Attribution Solution

Visual IQ and BuildDirect
Marketing Attribution Solution Implementation

Content Marketing Innovation

Aflac
One Day Pay

gen.video
How Scalable UGC Video Content Catapulted Crest Pro-Health HD to #1

New York International Auto Show
Virtual Tour

Stein IAS
The Digital Marketing Maturity Campaign

Verifone Media and Aria Resort & Casino
Verifone Media helps Aria Resort & Casino Enhance Tourist Engagement on the Vegas Strip

Email Marketing Innovation

Experian Marketing Services and Finish Line
Finish Line: College Fleece Program

Experian Marketing Services and Delta Air Lines
Delta’s Flight Cycle Program

Merkle and Samsung
SUHD Product Launch

Merkle and Marriott
Marriott Drives App Engagement Through Email

netCORE Solutions Pvt. Ltd. and Reliance Life Insurance Company Ltd.
Connecting the Dots and Humanizing Email Experience See Faster Email-to-Sale Conversions

Mobile innovation

Event Marketing Strategies and Nationwide
Nationwide: Make Safe Happen Safety Experience

FORENSIQ
Mobile Ad Fraud Study – Mobile Device Hijacking

Harte Hanks and Samsung Mobile
Samsung Note 4 Product Launch with Harte Hanks  

Stein IAS and Key Technology
Mobile Virtual Reality Experience

Omnichannel marketing innovation

Experian Marketing Services and American Eagle Outfitters
Reserve, Try and Buy: An Omnichannel Shopping Experience

FordDirect
ConsumerConnection

RedPoint Global and Xanterra Parks & Resorts
Xanterra Parks & Resorts – A Journey to One-to-One Marketing Excellence

Belk Inc., iCrossing, and Kenshoo
Driving Triple-Digit Increase in Conversion Rates

WIT Strategy and Selligent and Extra Space Storage
Selligent/Extra Space Storage

Social innovation

Grey Global Group and Volvo Cars North America
Volvo Interception

LEWIS Pulse
#Trending: Raising the Bar on Cross-Channel Social Media Coverage for Events

Plat4orm PR and Metia
Microsoft in Health

Principal Financial Group
See Your Retirement

W2O Group
Nothing can be perfect

Platform Categories

Most Innovative Analytics Platform

Brandwatch
Brandwatch Analytics

Experian Marketing Services
The Intelligence Manager of the Experian Marketing Suite

Fluid PR, Inc.
AppsFlyer

Merkle
Citizens Big Data Platform

Origami Logic
Marketing Signal Measurement Platform

Most Innovative Customer Experience Management Platform

MaritzCX
MaritzCX Platform

Epsilon
Epsilon’s Agility Loyalty

Influitive

Kitewheel
The Kitewheel Customer Journey Hub

Qubit
Qubit Visitor Cloud

Most Innovative Integrated Marketing Suite

Act-On Software

Blanc & Otus
Oracle Marketing Cloud

Blueshift
Blueshift Segment-of-One Marketing Automation

Experian Marketing Services
The Experian Marketing Suite

Salesforce
Salesforce Marketing Cloud: Personalize and Optimize 1:1 Customer Journeys

Most Innovative Mobile Marketing Platform

BLANC & OTUS
DoubleDutch

Comunicano, Inc.
FollowAnaytics’ Enterprise Mobile Analytics Platform

HookLogic
The HookLogic Platform: Powering Mobile Ads with Attribution Data, Anti-Ad Blocking, and Awesome Results

Button
Button

Swirl Networks, Inc.
Swirl Network’s Beacon Marketing Solution

Most Innovative Social Media Platform

500px
500px, photo sharing’s underdog, swings big in 2015

Sprout Social

Tracx
Tracx Social Business Cloud

Stars of Martech Categories

Content Marketing Scribe
Cassandra Jowett, Senior Content Marketing Manager, Influitive

Craig Vore, Insights Manager, Strategy & Optimization, Outsell

Denice Surjan, Senior Marketing Manager, Experian Marketing Services

Dr. Maruthi Viswanathan, Managing Director, RxPrism Health Systems

Steve Sachs, CEO, OneSpot

Data Scientist

Christopher S. Penn, Vice President of Marketing Technology, SHIFT Communications

Jonathan Smalletz, Lead Analyst, Merkle

Stacey Hawes, Senior Vice President, Data Solutions, Epsilon

Digital Ace

Chad Blodgett, Senior Vice President of omnichannel, Rakuten Marketing

Tuomas Peltoniemi, President, Asia, Digital Arts Network

 

Marketing Technologist

Emad Georgy, SVP & Global Head of Software Development & Product, Experian Marketing Services

Francis Wallinger, Chairman, Alchemetrics Ltd

Gwendolyn Lefevre, Vice President, Marketing Operations & Digital Marketing, Bottomline Technologies

Programmatic Prognosticator

Amy Good, Adaptive Media Investment & Technology Lead, Nestle Purina Pet Care

Lewis Gersh, CEO, Founder and Chairman, PebblePost

Victor Wong, CEO and cofounder, PaperG

Social Strategist

Michael Rusten Gabriel, Marketing Manager, Envision Creative Group

Stephanie Capouch, Social Media Manager, WP Engine

 

For more information about the finalists and the event, click here.

 

@Drnatalie, VP and Principal Analyst, Constellation Research

Covering Customer-facing Customer Experience Capabilities – People, Process and Technology

Share

Next-Generation Customer Experience Chief Customer Officer

Oracle Cloud - More ready than ever, now needs adoption

Oracle Cloud - More ready than ever, now needs adoption

We had the opportunity to attend the third Oracle Cloud analyst summit earlier in the week, held in New York at the iconic Walldorf Astoria. One could wonder if Oracle executives know that the very founder of the Walldorf, a certain Mr. Astor came from Walldorf Germany, which happens to be the headquarters location of one of Oracle’s key rivals, SAP SE, but that’s another story…

 
 

As usual with these analyst days, we were inundated with slides and news, so very hard to distill the Top 3 – but take a look at the video I recorded (or for more details the Storify) below.
 

No time to watch, here are the top 3 takeaways:

Oracle is ready to push cloud – All cloud providers need load to utilize and grow their infrastructure. Oracle has a huge potential load sitting with its on premises run applications. Common market wisdom was that Oracle was tapping into that and ‘aggressively’ converting that load from on premises into cloud. But CEO Hurd was very adamant that this wasn’t the case. According to him cloud customers are mostly net new, and he used the very slowly dwindling on premises license sales as proof point (-2% YoY). So where will Oracle get more utilization in 2016? One strategy that was not explicitly mentioned, but the informed attendee could read between the lines, was Oracle’s push for exogenous load with its nested hypervisor capability. Not sure when / if I missed this before, but the nested hypervisor allows Oracle to take load from VMware, AWS and Google. On top of that, EVP Kurian mentioned support for Microsoft Hypervisor would be coming soon. All this means that Oracle will be able to pitch Oracle Cloud to CIOs / CTO’s running load on these hypervisors. It certainly introduces another dependency, but as discussed vividly, it’s an attractive outlet to e.g. running a native VMware load on premises. Assuming the nested hypervisor works well, Oracle needs salespeople to pitch the ability to prospects. Considering last week’s announcement that Oracle plans to hire 1400 salespeople for selling cloud into its EMEA region, one has to assume that Oracle executives are certain the cloud products are working and the vendor now wants to go for load much more aggressively than in the past.

IaaS ready for primetime!? – In the overall Oracle cloud offering, IaaS was the late comer. At Openworld Chairman Ellison even openly shared the Oracle learning steps, SaaS required PaaS, PaaS required IaaS. And Oracle’s offering follows that sequence in regards of maturity, market share and adoption. So all eyes on IaaS, and for the first time Oracle executives in their presentations got very close to both detail and comfort level that we see from e.g. public cloud rivals AWS and Google. Details on storage, networking and more were very abundant, more importantly the confidence with which the executives talked about the infrastructure allows the interpretation that execution has happened and Oracle has found its operational patterns for IaaS. But now comes the rollout of capabilities that takes time. Speaking to Oracle partners and ISVs outside of North America the other week in India, makes clear that new capabilities are first and foremost coming to the North American data centers. Nothing unusual, but the speed of creating a common worldwide platform will be key. And as tradition – I asked EVP Kurian in regards of the ‘bubble up / ripple’ effect of IaaS changing under the hood while operating a growing SaaS suite. The answer was same as at Openworld, standards, APIs, encapsulation shield the SaaS teams. Kurian also shared that SaaS teams are shielded by a dedicated cloud ops team, a good move. Still a considerate challenge, though a good problem to have.

DaaS remains a key differentiator – Oracle remains the only cloud vendor stressing DaaS – Data as a Service capabilities. The future of enterprise applications is more than running software, but also allowing access to data sources that power next generation applications. Oracle has been adamant of DaaS being part of xaaS – right from the first cloud summit 2 years ago. And Oracle plays this from a dual perspective, both offering the data consumption as a service (see the recent acquisition of Addthis) but also the tools to become a DaaS provider. As the reader knows, Constellation Research strongly recommends enterprises to look into DaaS monetization and to make DaaS a revenue stream. Oracle is well positioned to take advantage of this trend, but needs to expand its DaaS portfolio beyond marketing – into other areas of business automation. A generic DaaS offering allowing enterprises to monetize data will be a first step. And network effects e.g. in regards of benchmarking are something always of value to enterprises, understanding the network effects and benefits is an area where Oracle can e.g. learn from SAP.

 

Analyst Tidbits

  • UIX matters – User experience has not been what Oracle has been traditionally known for. The more surprising Oracle dedicated demos and presentations on the topic. And no surprise, the Oracle UIX team around VP Ashley has made good progress from a few years back. The new ‘Waterfall’ design does not fall behind any best efforts in the industry. It’s also good to see that Oracle has managed to propagate a common interaction paradigm across its products, not a trivial undertaking given the vast range or products and users. 
  • HCM shines – No surprise – the HCM suite shined one time more in regards of customer adoption, live customer numbers across the Oracle SaaS portfolio. It always helps to be early, and Oracle is pushing HCM on a worldwide base. The Oracle HCM suite has some interesting and unique differentiators as shared back at HCM World 2015 (reputation management, competitions etc.) – it now needs a new set of 2016 differentiators, EVP Miranda like all presenters was pressed for time, and my guess it they are reserved for the HCM World event in spring later this year. 
 

MyPOV

Oracle is making progress with its overall cloud offering. As a welcome change and sign of progress this was the first cloud summit with no mention of hardware and database beyond their relative importance to cloud, a good change. That said we lacked some details e.g. on how Oracle runs its cloud, e.g. I’d be very interested how many Oracle made machines are in the Oracle cloud footprint. Oracle’s CAPEX for cloud is behind that of key public cloud rivals, but then Oracle maintains it can run more Oracle on Oracle thanks to the ‘chip to click’ integrated tech stack. That would mean that more uptake of Oracle Cloud would mean more revenue for Exa-Machines and 2-socket servers (launched a little less than a year ago). But seeing the TCO comparisons would mean that one Oracle infrastructure $ can run 3-4 times more than e.g. an AWS infrastructure $ - for the same load. That will be a key and interesting area to watch, as if and when it materializes, it would be another explanation what makes Oracle executives so bullish on competing with the cost leaders. We have seen e.g. with Storage that Oracle can be an effective cost leader. I asked CEO Hurd if cloud for Oracle is more a product or a sales challenges. He responded with a diplomatic ‘cloud is a blessing for Oracle’ response, but the confidence with which Oracle executives spoke about cloud makes clear that the challenges have morphed from a product to a sales and marketing challenge. When I asked Hurd on who will be Oracle’s #1 competitor in 5 years he punted the question, it would have been an interesting insight. Where Hurd was very clear (he is a big tennis fan) that Nadal won’t win the Australian Open, and that Djokovic is he is favorite…

Back to Oracle’s cloud offering, getting the overall stack to work isn’t trivial, and there is always room for potential hiccups on the product side, always keep in mind that what Oracle is creating is very likely the largest software project out there, from my estimate is 25k+ product developers working up and down the integrated / engineered to work together tech stack. No easy undertaking. But a unique effort in the industry, now it’s up to Oracle to get customers to adopt. And here may lie Oracle’s biggest challenge – as mentioned in my OpenWorld takeaways, the vendor is well respected, but less ‘loved’ by its customers than other key players. Getting the ‘love’ and passion for Oracle into its customer base is emerging as the biggest challenge for Oracle in the medium term.


 

Recent blog posts on Oracle:
  • Event Report - Oracle Openworld 2015 - Top 3 Takeaways, Top 3 Positives & Concerns - read here
  • News Analysis - Quick Take on all 22 press releases of Oracle OpenWorld Day #1 - #3 - read here
  • First Take - Oracle OpenWorld - Day 1 Keynote - Top 3 Takeaways - read here
  • Event Preview - Oracle Openworld - watch here

Future of Work / HCM / SaaS research:
  • Event Report - Oracle HCM World - Full Steam ahead, a Learning surprise and potential growth challenges - read here
  • First Take - Oracle HCM World Day #1 Keynote - off to a good start - read here
  • Progress Report - Oracle HCM gathers momentum - now it needs to build on that - read here
  • Oracle pushes modern HR - there is more than technology - read here. (Takeaways from the recent HCMWorld conference).
  • Why Applications Unlimited is good a good strategy for Oracle customers and Oracle - read here.

Also worth a look for the full picture
 
 
  • Event Report - Oracle PaaS Event - 6 PaaS Services become available, many more announced - read here
  • Progress Report - Oracle Cloud makes progress - but key work remains in the cellar - read here
  • News Analysis - Oracle discovers the power of the two socket server - or: A pivot that wasn't one - TCO still rules - read here
  • Market Move - Oracle buys Datalogix - moves more into DaaS - read here
  • Event Report - Oracle Openworld - Oracle's vision and remaining work become clear - they are both big - read here
  • Constellation Research Video Takeaways of Oracle Openworld 2014 - watch here
  • Is it all coming together for Oracle in 2014? Read here
  • From the fences - Oracle AR Meeting takeaways - read here (this was the last analyst meeting in spring 2013)
  • Takeaways from Oracle CloudWorld LA - read here (this was one of the first cloud world events overall, in January 2013)

And if you want to read more of my findings on Oracle technology - I suggest:
  • Progress Report - Good cloud progress at Oracle and a two step program - read here.
  • Oracle integrates products to create its Foundation for Cloud Applications - read here.
  • Java grows up to the enterprise - read here.
  • 1st take - Oracle in memory option for its database - very organic - read here.
  • Oracle 12c makes the database elastic - read here.
  • How the cloud can make the unlikeliest bedfellows - read here.
  • Act I - Oracle and Microsoft partner for the cloud - read here.
  • Act II - The cloud changes everything - Oracle and Salesforce.com - read here.
  • Act III - The cloud changes everything - Oracle and Netsuite with a touch of Deloitte - read here

Finally find more coverage on the Constellation Research website here and checkout my magazine on Flipboard and my YouTube channel here.
 
 
Tech Optimization Data to Decisions Digital Safety, Privacy & Cybersecurity Innovation & Product-led Growth Future of Work Next-Generation Customer Experience New C-Suite Oracle SaaS PaaS IaaS Cloud Digital Transformation Disruptive Technology Enterprise IT Enterprise Acceleration Enterprise Software Next Gen Apps IoT Blockchain CRM ERP CCaaS UCaaS Collaboration Enterprise Service Chief Information Officer Chief Technology Officer Chief Information Security Officer Chief Data Officer Chief Digital Officer Chief Analytics Officer Chief Executive Officer Chief Operating Officer

Oracle Data Cloud: The Data-as-a-Service Differentiator

Oracle Data Cloud: The Data-as-a-Service Differentiator

Oracle is amassing an impressive collection of data and data-enrichment capabilities for marketing and more, but will analytics-as-a-service be the next battleground?

Oracle held its Oracle Cloud Summit (analyst) and Oracle CloudWorld (customer) events in New York this week at the Waldorf Astoria Hotel, and I must say I came away impressed. What got me really excited, however, was the burgeoning Oracle Data Cloud.

You have to be impressed with the breadth and depth of Oracle’s cloud offerings. The Software as a Service (SaaS) and Platform as a Service (PaaS) suites are comprehensive, and the newer Infrastructure as a Service portfolio is filling out quickly.

@Oracle, #analytics

The Oracle Data Cloud currently addresses marketing use cases, but the company plans to
address sales, service, commerce, loyalty and other data-enrichment opportunities.

As for Oracle SaaS, it’s not just the collection of apps that makes the suite attractive. The apps are all built on Oracle PaaS, so customers can use PaaS-based Identity, Integration, Process, Document, Sites and Social services to unify, customize and extend whatever collection of cloud-based apps they choose.

For now the Oracle Data Cloud is tied exclusively to marketing apps. The Data Cloud lets you bring in your CRM customer file and get a better understanding of what your customers do on other sites and on competitor’s sites based on insights from second-party and third-party data. You can also model and predict customer behavior based on this holistic view, not just the customer’s limited interactions with your company. Most importantly it helps you find lots of promising prospects that match the profile and behavior patterns of your best customers.

The Data Cloud stats are impressive. It offers demographic, social, online behavior and offline transactional data. That includes more than 1 billion global consumer profiles and data on 110 million U.S. households and 10 billion transactions worth more $3 trillion. That’s big.

I took note of Oracle Data Cloud and the company’s Data-as-a-Service (DaaS) strategy coming out of last year’s Oracle Open World. Earlier this month Oracle added yet more data with its acquisition of AddThis, which handles audience behavior tracking and content recommendations for websites.

Oracle made it clear this week that its ambitions for data enrichment extend beyond marketing. “Over time, applications will be differentiated based on richness of the data,” said Oracle’s President, Thomas Kurian. He specifically cited sales, service, commerce and loyalty management as future areas of interest for data enrichement.

So the long-term vision is broad and ambitious, but I don’t think we’ll see Oracle Data Cloud services moving much beyond marketing in 2016, as there’s much to do just in that domain. For starters, Oracle will have to digest the AddThis acquisition, brining that data into the Data Cloud. But beyond that, Oracle execs tell me they’re working on beefing up social data services and B2B data services, areas where Salesforce has strength. And there are new types of data that Oracle wants to bring into the mix, most likely before it gets into new application areas.

Oracle also has to keep its eyes on competitors including Amazon, IBM and Microsoft, among others, that are working on analytical services as well as data services. Given the scarcity of data-science talent and the pressure to act on data in a timely way, many companies may want to skip the challenge of data blending and in-house analysis and buy insights as a service.

 


Data to Decisions Marketing Transformation Tech Optimization Chief Customer Officer Chief Information Officer Chief Marketing Officer Chief Digital Officer

Atos completes acquisition of Unify - gets more into IP

Atos completes acquisition of Unify - gets more into IP

It seldom happens that an acquisition is being closed during an analyst event, but so it happened today – Atos completes the acquisition of Unify from Gores Group and Siemens.
So let’s take it apart in our custom style – the press release can be found here:
Bezons, January 20, 2016 Atos, an international leader in digital services, today announced that it has completed the acquisition from Gores Group and Siemens of Unify, the world number three in integrated communication solutions generating €1.2 billion annual revenue. The acquisition creates a unique integrated proposition for unified communications improving the social collaboration, digital transformation and business performance of its clients.

MyPOV – Sums it up well, as Atos’ Eric Grell made clear here in Bermuda, it’s all about for Atos to be in a good position to support business model change, namely Digital Transformation. And Atos sees Unify key in helping enterprises deal with new ways how consumers deal with enterprises, obviously on the communications side.
The transaction has been approved by employee representatives’ bodies and has received the required approvals of the regulatory and antitrust authorities in the European Union, United States, Russia and Brazil. Cash consideration for Atos was € 366 million (adjusted from working capital) to acquire 100% of Unify. Net debt was € 48 million at closing and the pension deficit was € 176 million. This leads to an Enterprise Value of € 590 million as disclosed on November 3rd, 2015 at the signing of the transaction.

MyPOV – That is probably close to record time for an acquisition of this scale, given it was only announced November 3rd 2015. But shows how all involved parties – Atos, Siemens and Gores Group wanted to move fast. Siemens and Gores Group wanted Unify off the books, and Atos wanted them on the books, and Unify wanted to move anyway. But getting employee body / worker council approval so fast is quite an achievement, considering at what (slow) speed these things can move in Europe.
As a reminder, in order to generate the expected costs savings by 2017 (€ 130 million on an annual basis), Unify is completing its current € 267 million restructuring plan. In addition, Unify is starting, as planned, its € 103 million further restructuring plan which is fully provisioned at closing. Both restructuring plans are funded by the sellers.

MyPOV – Interesting to see this paragraph as part of the press release – but a key reminder that Atos is acquiring a business that is in the midst of restructuring. What we see and hear currently in Bermuda is encouraging, but it needs to be understood that the restructuring at Unify isn’t over yet.
As of February 1st, 2016, the Services activity of Unify (c. € 0.4 billion annual revenue) is integrated in the Atos Service Line “Managed Services”.

MyPOV – Key reminder where the Unify revenue will go – from a Services perspective, which will reside in Eric Grall’s area of responsibility. It seems not be fully clear where the Unify product teams will report to at this point, but it is likely it will go to the current CTO and former Bull Executive Philip Vannier. But then other Atos owned Communications products - e.g. BlueKiwi are with Ursula Morgenstern, Head of Consulting & Systems Integration, Cloud & Enterprise. I am sure we will know soon. 
 

Overall MyPOV

Few industries are more affected by the move to cloud than professional services providers. Revenue streams, markets, skills etc. are all in turmoil due to the move of enterprises to less sophisticated, easier to setup and operate cloud based software. More or less all players know that they need to upgrade skills, increase global coverage and prepare themselves for the upcoming best practices and business model change. A number of player are take clearly product centric strategies – e.g. Infosys – and we count Atos by now in that category, too. Executing that strategy is full of challenges, images and branding changes, sales and marketing challenges, skills modulation – all not trivial DNA changes for a traditional services based vendor. But once embarked in the transformation, speed and execution are of the essence and Atos seems to be on a good course, with good speed. We will watch how the new Atos + Unify will unfold in the markets and with customers. Stay tuned.


For more on collaboration and communication - check out my colleagues' Alan Lepofsky blog here.
Tech Optimization Future of Work Innovation & Product-led Growth Next-Generation Customer Experience New C-Suite Data to Decisions Digital Safety, Privacy & Cybersecurity Chief Information Officer Chief Experience Officer

Event Report: The Future Of Jobs From #Davos16 #WEF

Event Report: The Future Of Jobs From #Davos16 #WEF

Will We Move Beyond Man Vs Machine In The Fourth Industrial Revolution?

The World Economic Forum released it’s Future of Jobs report.  As expected, the business model disruption across technology, societal, and economic forces have created urgency to understand the jobs and skills required for the next decade.   The survey and research design relied on interviews with global CHROs and other senior talent and strategy executives that impacted over 13,549,000 employees.

20160118 Future of Jobs Report Analysis #WEFTalks from Constellation Research on Vimeo.

Inside The Drivers Of Change

The confluence of new technologies, demographics, and socioeconomic shifts have created an impact in how jobs will be created and what skill sets will be required.  Success in the future of jobs may require a recalcuation in

The top five drivers of demographic and socioeconomic drivers of change include

  1. Changing work environments and flexible working arrangements (44%)
  2. Rise of the middle class in emerging markets (23%)
  3. Climate change, natural resource constraints and the transition to a greener economy (23%)
  4. Rising geopolitical volatility (21%)
  5. New consumer concerns about ethical and privacy issues (16%)

The top five technological drivers of change include:

  1. Mobile internet and cloud technology (34%)
  2. Advances in computing power and big data (26%)
  3. New energy supplies and technology (22%)
  4. The internet of things (14%)
  5. Crowdsourcing, the sharing economy and P2P platforms (12%)

Figure 1. Time Frame to Impact Industries and Business Models

@Rwang0 #WEF Future of Jobs Forces

Source: World Economic Forum

The Bottom Line: Drivers Of Change Hint At Larger Systemic Forces Impacting The Labor Market

The confluence of new technologies, demographics, and socioeconomic shifts have created an impact in how jobs will be created and what skill sets will be required.  Success in the future of jobs may require a new perspective on how growth should be calculated.  What if growth was measured by per capita?  The result would show the benefits of a decreasing population abetted by automation, robotics, and AI with a better quality of life.

Your POV.

Where do you see the future of jobs?  Should we aim for decreasing populations to improve quality per capita? What are your questions from the report?

Add your comments to the blog or reach me via email: R (at) ConstellationR (dot) com or R (at) SoftwareInsider (dot) org.

Please let us know if you need help with your Digital Business transformation efforts. Here’s how we can assist:

  • Developing your digital business strategy
  • Connecting with other pioneers
  • Sharing best practices
  • Vendor selection
  • Implementation partner selection
  • Providing contract negotiations and software licensing support
  • Demystifying software licensing

Resources

Reprints

Reprints can be purchased through Constellation Research, Inc. To request official reprints in PDF format, please contact Sales .

Disclosure

Although we work closely with many mega software vendors, we want you to trust us. For the full disclosure policy,stay tuned for the full client list on the Constellation Research website.

* Not responsible for any factual errors or omissions.  However, happy to correct any errors upon email receipt.

Copyright © 2001 -2016 R Wang and Insider Associates, LLC All rights reserved.
Contact the Sales team to purchase this report on a a la carte basis or join the Constellation Customer Experience

The post Event Report: The Future Of Jobs From #Davos16 #WEF appeared first on A Software Insider's Point of View.

Future of Work Innovation & Product-led Growth Tech Optimization Data to Decisions New C-Suite World Economic Forum Event Report SoftwareInsider Leadership Innovation AI ML Machine Learning LLMs Agentic AI Generative AI Analytics Automation B2B B2C CX EX Employee Experience HR HCM business Marketing SaaS PaaS IaaS Supply Chain Growth Cloud Digital Transformation Disruptive Technology eCommerce Enterprise IT Enterprise Acceleration Enterprise Software Next Gen Apps IoT Blockchain CRM ERP finance Customer Service Content Management Collaboration M&A Enterprise Service Metaverse developer Quantum Computing Social Healthcare VR CCaaS UCaaS Executive Events Chief People Officer Chief Information Officer Chief Technology Officer Chief Digital Officer Chief Data Officer Chief Analytics Officer Chief Information Security Officer Chief Executive Officer Chief Operating Officer Chief Experience Officer

Event Report: The @Wipro @FT Dinner, Man vs Machine, Does It Have To Be Either/Or? #Davos2016 #WEF #WEFTalks

Event Report: The @Wipro @FT Dinner, Man vs Machine, Does It Have To Be Either/Or? #Davos2016 #WEF #WEFTalks

Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep?

One of the big topics at Davos has been the role of artificial intelligence, machine learning, and robots. Discussions focus less on the technological advancements but more on the role humans and robots will play. At the Financial Times – Wipro Dinner, that topic was put to debate with six prominent guests including:

  • David Cheesewright, President and CEO of Walmart International
  • Erik Brynjolfsoon, Director of the MIT Initiative on the Digital Economy and co-author of best-selling book, The Second Machine Age
  • TK Kurien, Executive Vice-Chairman and Member of the Board of Wipro Ltd
  • Peter Brabeck-Letmathe, Chairman of Nestle Group
  • Illah R. Nourbaksh, Professor of Robotics at the Robotics Institute at Carnegie Mellon University
  • Tim Brown, CEO and President of IDEO

@FT @Wipro Executive Forum AI

Where Will Man vs Machine Take Us In This Era?

The discussion included answers to key topics such as:

  • What are the effects of digital disintermediation, advanced robotics and the sharing economy on productivity growth, job creation and purchasing power?
  • How are businesses harnessing AI and other technologies to lead the way in re-imagining the economics and dynamics of a machine age society
  • Redundancy vs. creation

The Hype Is Ahead Of The Science

Key points from the discussion include:

  • Jobs displacement by AI is not that simple a debate. If one job is taken, another is created.  The question is will that be a 1:1 pairing and what skill levels are required?
  • TK Kurien made a good point as to whether or not Neocortal intelligence would come too soon?
  • It doesn’t have to be either /or in the man v machine debate. We have to find how technology can help humans.
  • AI is changing the food industry & the value chain becoming more transparent

The Bottom Line: The Era Of Cognitive Computing Will Change How We Augment Humanity

Cognitive computing is more than a new category.  Cognitive systems represent a convergence of artificial intelligence, natural language processing, dynamic learning, and hypothesis generation to render vast quantities of data intelligible to help humans make better decisions. The ability to self-learn enables continuously reprogramming.  These advancements represent a new class of technology to enable human and machine-guided decisions. Cognitive computing drives augmented humanity, where the sum of our collective insights and data can be served up at the right time in the right context. Technologies include facial recognition, human APIs, machine learning, natural language processing and self-learning algorithms.  Moreover, a set of global digital ethics must be developed in parallel if we are to put forth machines that mimic humanity.

Your POV.

Who will win man or machine or will we coexist?  Will we have a set of digital ethics in time?  What are your thoughts from this session?

Add your comments to the blog or reach me via email: R (at) ConstellationR (dot) com or R (at) SoftwareInsider (dot) org.

Please let us know if you need help with your Digital Business transformation efforts. Here’s how we can assist:

  • Developing your digital business strategy
  • Connecting with other pioneers
  • Sharing best practices
  • Vendor selection
  • Implementation partner selection
  • Providing contract negotiations and software licensing support
  • Demystifying software licensing

Resources

Reprints

Reprints can be purchased through Constellation Research, Inc. To request official reprints in PDF format, please contact Sales .

Disclosure

Although we work closely with many mega software vendors, we want you to trust us. For the full disclosure policy,stay tuned for the full client list on the Constellation Research website.

* Not responsible for any factual errors or omissions.  However, happy to correct any errors upon email receipt.

Copyright © 2001 -2016 R Wang and Insider Associates, LLC All rights reserved.
Contact the Sales team to purchase this report on a a la carte basis or join the Constellation Customer Experience

The post Event Report: The @Wipro @FT Dinner, Man vs Machine, Does It Have To Be Either/Or? #Davos2016 #WEF #WEFTalks appeared first on A Software Insider's Point of View.

Tech Optimization Innovation & Product-led Growth Future of Work Data to Decisions Next-Generation Customer Experience Digital Safety, Privacy & Cybersecurity World Economic Forum wipro SoftwareInsider Leadership Innovation AI ML Machine Learning LLMs Agentic AI Generative AI Analytics Automation B2B B2C CX EX Employee Experience HR HCM business Marketing SaaS PaaS IaaS Supply Chain Growth Cloud Digital Transformation Disruptive Technology eCommerce Enterprise IT Enterprise Acceleration Enterprise Software Next Gen Apps IoT Blockchain CRM ERP finance Customer Service Content Management Collaboration M&A Enterprise Service Metaverse developer Quantum Computing Social Healthcare VR CCaaS UCaaS Chief Information Officer Chief Technology Officer Chief Digital Officer Chief Data Officer Chief Analytics Officer Chief Information Security Officer Chief Executive Officer Chief Operating Officer Chief AI Officer Chief Product Officer Chief Experience Officer

IOT-A for Architecture, a journey through the possibilities Arriving at a clear outcome with a recommendation

IOT-A for Architecture, a journey through the possibilities Arriving at a clear outcome with a recommendation

Enterprise Architecture is pretty well understood as to what it means in respect of IT application integration, and even has some industry wide methodologies like TOGAF. Talk about Architecture and the Web and there are more variations, but there are some strong underlying principles that are respected. Now reflect on IoT, supposedly a ‘any to any’ Internet environment of event driven connections and insightful outcomes. So where is the commonly stood architecture to support this? 

The IoT problem is not a lack of standards, even for Architectural approaches, its too many ‘standards’, as the ubiquitous nature of IoT has led to all standards bodies believing that they must extend their existing work to include IoT.

The result is the proverbial story of the person asking directions to a specific destination. Each successive person states that they don’t know the way from where they are both currently standing, and can only provide directions from another starting point. Currently with IoT standards generally and Architecture in particular each standards body is defining their new standard from the direction of their non-IoT existing focus. There is little, if anything that connects these efforts, currently.

The IEEE started well with an excellent definition of the requirement for an industry wide Architecture rather than the fragmentation of industry sector focus activities. The resulting working group contains many important players such as the Industrial Internet Consortium, security experts Kaspersky, as well as significant Enterprises such as Schneider Electric. Undoubtedly in time this will prove an important contribution, but reading the report from the last Working Parties meeting suggests there will be little to help those planning deployments in the next year.

Fortunately there are some more practical short-term reference definitions of the technology stacks being suggested, and that includes two presentations on Slideshare. A November 2014 presentation by the API solution director of the MuleSoft Open Source API project has some excellent technology stack diagrams that help to grasp conceptual level principles. The proposal there should be a ‘hub of hubs’ connecting everything makes sense to MuleSoft as an API hub provider. For immediate deployments API centric integration is necessary, but it will introduce longer term scaling questions.

As a side comment; It’s necessary to check dates on any paper, blog, or presentation, as the rapid development of IoT technology and products is quickly making anything over a year old potentially out of date.

An alternative, and frankly a thought provoking approach, as it focuses on an IoT architecture for services and distribution by invoking the BSS model popular in the telecoms industry comes from Charles Gibbon in December 2014. However the question that this presentation raises is should IoT be a Server side driven architecture? Certainly in the context of Mobility and Mobile phones this makes sense, but that assume all IoT devices are firmly ‘owned’ and ‘managed’ centrally.

Public service IoT devices as an example may need to be both promiscuous and allow ‘operational management’ by the event process. This suggests that the Event Service will be more important as the focal point in the architectural model.

There are plenty of initiatives working on Industry sector architectures that could be included in a general list of architectural developments. Oddly the focus always seems to be either the Network, or the Protocol, but not on the overall architecture. Any mention of integration architecture is always referred to as needing a Gateway or an API Hub.

Reading through the various Working Groups leaves the impression that every current approach to IoT architecture starts with a proposed technology answer and works backwards to define the necessary architecture. Strangely absence is any reference to the business requirement definition. What has happened to Enterprise Architecture methods such as TOGAF that start with a conceptual architecture related to the business requirements?

The basic challenge for IoT Architecture arises from its loose coupled, stateless and decentralized nature as befits an Internet based technology. Enterprise Architecture as used in the client-server IT environment reverses these statements being; close coupled, state-full and centralized. The two environments simply don’t resemble each other enough for any easy transfer of methods as the last few years of arguments about REST alone testify.

If you are currently contemplating a significant IoT deployment then none of the above offers very much help so just adopting a good basic architectural approach to work methodically seems best. The Bredemeyer ‘Visual Architecting Process’ for Software Architecting defines the stages of Architecting a solution with no dogma about technology or products. Populating the stage one Bredemeyer Meta Architecture with the technology stacks mentioned above from the SlideShare is a useful start.

Now comes the question of the Business Requirement and that’s the difficult part! Does the conceptual architecture work from an event or from the resulting insight service outcome? This hits the real question of IOT – defining what is a beneficial outcome!

The notion that future Enterprise architects will focus on outcomes was current this last summer, but unfortunately its not so easy to take this statement into reality.

The nearest approach to this was Service Oriented Architecture not new, but those who were most involved in SOA seem to be least involved in IoT. Back in 2007 Stefan Tilkov wrote a much-applauded article entitled ‘The Ten Principles of SOA’ in which he stressed the principles of Loose Coupled Services. Some eight years later and facing the challenges of a loose-coupled IoT architecture there are some strong similarities.

There is also one big difference that hits almost anything that was said before 2010 and lies right at the heart of the IoT architecture problem. IoT is about ‘Interactions’ more than Transactions, and most Architectural principles concentrate on Transactional data.

That’s a challenging statement and really should provoke some comment!  Yes, the value from IoT comes from a Business valuable outcome, but no that’s doesn’t make it a Transaction. But what changed around 2010 that makes this a turning point? The answer was arrival of Social Customer Relationship Management as the new Internet based Social Tools arrived supporting interactions with customers. Before this Customer Relationship Management was/is a traditional IT Enterprise Application focused on Transactional Data. The difference is hugely important and in 2010 the rise of Social CRM was causing similar challenges to those of IOT today.

Read the following from an article published in August 2010 entitled Interactions with Transactions; Understanding Social CRM and try substituting Enterprise IT for CRM and IoT for Social CRM.

CRM was focused on transactions; social CRM is focused on interactions with transactions oftentimes being a byproduct. Social CRM didn't come about because of technology, but as a result of cultural and behavioral shifts, technology simply allowed customers to have a much louder voice

Social CRM was as radical a change five years ago as IoT is today in it’s competitive impact on business models and of course technology. The result was the rise of Salesforce based on completely different principles and products. As Internet/Cloud based capabilities have become well established for a wider range of ‘new’ business valuable activities Salesforce has become a well recognized Enterprise enabler.

There are very strong similarities between deploying and operating Social CRM for Business Value, and at this stage of the development, deploying IoT for its Business Value.

Social CRM provided enterprises with an external visibility into their markets via actual and perspective customers using the ubiquitous connectivity and technologies of the Internet. IoT is in effect completing the external visibility of an enterprise by adding machine and event inputs to complete the view.

At this point the conclusion of this article must be obvious, if you use Salesforce for your Social CRM and other Internet/cloud based initiatives then use Salesforce for your IoT initiatives too. That’s a pretty major statement to make so the importance of this blog was to highlight exactly why this is the conclusion. In time standards will undoubtedly arrive, but it’s going to take a long time, and a large market presence of a defacto approach usually results in a role in the resulting standard.

Right now in some sectors there isn’t time to wait, a decision needs to be made as to the deployment approach in more than a few enterprises. Understanding the similarities as well as the ‘smart’ integration possibilities between Social CRM and IoT clarifies the options. Quietly, and effectively, Salesforce have been building a strong set of IoT capabilities complete with integration with their ‘action’ suites. It’s a good time to take advantage and quick business value from IoT.

A further article in this series on understanding and using IOT will introduce the topic of Business Requirement capture and definition for IoT Business value.

New C-Suite

#OracleCloud Summit 2016 Trends, Updates & News

#OracleCloud Summit 2016 Trends, Updates & News

I’m here with my colleagues, Holger Mueller and Doug Henschen @DHenschen, covering the #OracleCloud Summit 2016 in NYC at the Waldorf Astoria @WaldorfNYC. (BTW the Waldorf Astoria has great customer service!!!)

MY POV: My overall take away is that Oracle has built / are building the most comprehensive cloud offering – Data as a Service (DaaS), Software as a Service (SaaS), Platform as a Service (PaaS) and Infrastructure as a Service (Iaas).

Screen Shot 2016-01-19 at 10.55.56 AM

B2B Customer Experience: How does an application consume all this data – from service, sales, marketing, mobile… to result in a business outcome? That’s my focus- not as much on all the data or infrastructure – but rather what is the customer / business outcome that all this provides? Here’s an example…

Screen Shot 2016-01-19 at 10.57.27 AM
The person is coming close to the company and gets a notification to look to see more about how well the account is doing (Account Health.) I (as this sales person) sign-in and I find out that from service cloud, that this is not a “healthy” customer, so I can’t talk to them about adding services or products. I’m walking into a situation where there is an issue that has not been resolved. If I did log on and see there weren’t any issues, I might be able to start the conversation about what they might buy. Instead, I’d start by solving the unresolved issue. I can also see the opportunity for what they might buy if I can solve their issue.

Customer Service Is Mission Critical: This makes so much sense and why customer service needs to be a mission critical part of the overall business strategy. It is the canary in the coal mine. Everything you need to know about what your customers think and feel about your products and services can be found in customer service. It always has been. It’s only recently, by connecting marketing, sales, service, that we can actually use that information to make better business decisions. I like this a lot. It’s something I’ve been on a soapbox for years. I thank the cloud for bringing all these applications together so that we can have this integrated view of our companies.

Customer Success Management: What some of the conversation today reminds me of customer success management. I have written about this in separate reports for vendors that specialize in looking at how well an application has been deployed, used, by whom and for what. It seems this idea has been translated into the Platform as a Service by Oracle, to be able to know more about my customers and determine if they are happy and if not, and what I, as for example a salesperson, can do. It only makes sense. If you have the data, why not use it to know if your customer is happy? No customers, no business. It’s really that simple. This capability may not be as developed as the customer success management vendors, but it’s definitely in the right direction.

Customer Experience: Certainly it’s gotten more difficult to manage devices and channels and predict customer behavior. One of the TRENDS at  is to have all data in one place, analyzed to help brands to deliver the right message, at the right & real time, which results in much better customer experiences #cx for the customer and better business results for the brand.

Screen Shot 2016-01-19 at 11.13.30 AM

The message is that Oracle ID Graph can be used to connect customer behavior to get right message, to the right channel via modeling the data to discover the best decisions.
Screen Shot 2016-01-19 at 11.27.59 AM

From analyzing all this data, Oracle has found the best predictor of future purchases is past purchases. This shows that one of the real values of data is customer’s behavior. If businesses can understand “Say, Do, Buy” they will be able to target, personalize and measure the success of the customer experience across devices and channels via this Identity Graph.

Screen Shot 2016-01-19 at 11.24.53 AM

Oracle CX Cloud Differentiators: The CX Cloud Product Highlights include, because of the PaaS, DaaS, IaaS and SaaS, a unique customer experience cloud – including the ability to integrate the sales, marketing, service, commerce, social, mobile….to provide brands the ability to make the right business decisions, quickly.

Screen Shot 2016-01-19 at 11.29.05 AM

Screen Shot 2016-01-19 at 11.44.45 AM
Future of B2C and B2B
: If could measure TV ads, it could put end to guessing how much money and where to spend money on TV ads. This is a huge challenge that needs to be solved. That would be a service that would put an end to the huge amounts of money that lead to the famous quote – “Half the money I spend on advertising is wasted; the trouble is I don’t know which half.” by John Wannamaker.

Mark Hurd @MarkVHurd: He’s speaking to us about their need to shift to persona selling, which they are and have done. It used to be that the buyer was the CIO. But the cloud has brought new buyers to the table – CMO’s, Customer Experience Professionals, Customer Service… Smart. The line of business doesn’t have to wait in line for IT’s list of to do’s. Maybe IT still needs to stay focused on their list. Certainly much of what they do is needed. And maybe it was never realistic to think they could do all that is required in IT and to service the lines of business. Perhaps that is part of the beauty of the cloud. It puts the line of business in charge of their needs in software / hardware.

mark hurd

Mark is also talking to us about the idea that the focus of software as a service is interested in the business outcome, rather than what software companies used to focus on, which was the product. This is something that is so important. Software / Hardware for the sake of software / hardware is not enough, at least in my opinion. Until the cloud, the multiple customer personas didn’t have as much buying power and they didn’t have the weight they do now. Yes, hardware / software all needs to work, be secure, be fast, etc.. but at the end of the day, it has to provide a business owner capabilities that make their business run better. Period.

Great information. Great Summit.

@Dr Natalie Petouhoff, Constellation Research, VP and Principal Analyst, Covering Customer-facing Applications

 

Next-Generation Customer Experience Chief Customer Officer

Weak links in the Blockchain

Weak links in the Blockchain

One of the silliest things I've read yet about blockchain came out in Business Insider Australia recently. They said that the blockchain “in effect” lets the crowd police the monetary system.

In the rush to make bigger and grander claims for the disruptive potential of blockchain, too many commentators are neglecting the foundations. If they think blockchain is important, then it’s all the more important they understand what it does well, and what it just doesn’t do at all.

Blockchain has one very clever, very innovative trick: it polices the order of special events (namely Bitcoin spends) without needing a central authority. The main security aspect that blockchain provides is not tamper resistance or inviolability per se; you can get those any number of ways using standard cryptography. Rather it’s the process for a big network of nodes to reach agreement on the state of a distributed ledger, especially the order of updates to the ledger.

To say blockchain is “more secure” is a non sequitur. Security claims need context.

  • If what matters is agreeing ‘democratically’ on the order of events in a decentralised public ledger, without any central authority, then blockchain makes sense.
  • But if you don't care about the order of events, then blockchain is probably irrelevant or, at best, heavily over-engineered.
  • And if you do care about the order of events (like stock transactions) but you have some central authority in your system (like a stock exchange), then blockchain is not only over-engineered, but its much-admired maths is compromised by efforts to scale it down, into private chains and the like. You see, the the power of the original blockchain consensus algorithm lies in its vast network, and the Bitcoin rewards for the miners that power it. Scale it down and you sacrifice inviolability. 

A great thing about blockchain is the innovation it has inspired. But let’s remember that THE blockchain (the one underpinning Bitcoin) has been around for just seven years, and its spinoffs are barely out of the lab. Analysts and journalists are bound to be burnt if they over-reach at this early stage. 

The initiatives to build smaller, private or special purpose distributed ledgers, to get away from Bitcoin and payments, detract from the original innovation, in two important ways. Firstly, even if they replace the Bitcoin incentive for running the network (i.e. mining or “proof of work”) with some other economic model (like “proof of stake”), they compromise the tamper resistance of blockchain by shrinking the pool. And secondly, as soon as you fold some command and control (like permissioning) back into the original utopia, blockchain’s raison d'etre is no longer clear, and it starts to look very costly for the marginal security increment. 

Business journalists are supposed to be sceptical about technology, but many have apparently taken leave of their critical faculties, even talking up blockchain as a "trust machine". You don’t need to be a cryptographer to understand the essence of blockchain, you just have to be cautious with magic words like “open” and “decentralised”, and that old saw, "trust". What do they really mean? Blockchain does things that not all applications really need, and it doesn't do what many apps do need, like access control and confidentiality.

Didn't we learn from PKI that technology doesn't confer trust? It's been claimed that putting land titles on the blockchain will prevent government corruption. To which I say, please heed Bruce Schneier, who said only amateurs hack computers; professional criminals hack people.

Matrix Commerce Tech Optimization Digital Safety, Privacy & Cybersecurity Innovation & Product-led Growth Data to Decisions AI Blockchain Chief Executive Officer Chief Financial Officer Chief Information Officer Chief Digital Officer Chief Technology Officer Chief AI Officer Chief Data Officer Chief Analytics Officer Chief Information Security Officer Chief Product Officer