Results

10 Tips From The Chief Analytics Officer Forum

10 Tips From The Chief Analytics Officer Forum

Chief analytics officers should be grounded in the business and deeply familiar with customer experience. From there, use more data, test, test, test and make the case for data-driven decisions.

Chief analytics officers are (or should be) just one step away from chief strategy officers.

This was just one of many pearls of wisdom heard at the January 26-27 Chief Analytics Officer Forum in New York. The event was attended by a who’s who gathering of CAOs, chief intelligence officers, analytics directors and aspirants to these roles from companies including American Express, AXA, Charles Schwab, Delta Airlines, Disney, McGraw Hill, the New York Times and State Farm Insurance.

Tips from the Chief Analytics Officer Forum

I attended only the second day of the CAOForum, but I came away with plenty of notes and my own thoughts on these 10 best practices for analytics leaders.

  1. Deeply understand the customer experience to reduce friction. Keynote speaker Joe DeCosmo, CAO at global lender Enova International, said his team reviews customer website and call-center journeys on a regular basis to spot opportunities for improvement. The fix may not involve analytics, but in one instance Enova analysts found that a 50-percent reduction in page-load times led to 2.25-percent conversion-rate increase and a $1.5 million boost in incremental revenue for just one product. The lesson: great models can’t overcome bad processes.
  2. Develop a test-and-learn culture. Amazon, CapitolOne and other leading companies have proven the value of testing. Andy Pulkstenis, director of analytics at State Farm Insurance, said willingness to test has a direct correlation to innovation. He encouraged CAOs to view failed tests as steps toward success. He cited the example of the highly successful product WD-40, which was invented only after the failed tests of water displacement formulas 1 through 39. 
    Most companies never progress beyond A/B or one-factor-at-a-time (OFAT) testing, Pulkstenis said. These techniques are powerful on their own, but State Farm also uses more sophisticated techniques include multivariate testing and multivariate testing with covariate analysis. In one simple A/B test of two direct-mail pieces promoting life insurance to new parents, State Farm found that a plain-text letter generated 45% higher lift than the same message and offer surrounded by baby imagery.
  3. Abstract analytics from applications. In a rush to get to market, Enova built analytic models right into its transactional applications, but that’s not ideal, said DeCosmo. Removing analytics from the apps simplified ongoing analytical tuning and model swapping without disrupting the operational applications. In the bargain, Enova gained cloud-deliverable, real-time analytic services (for scoring, loan approval and more) that the company can now offer to non-competing lenders.
  4. Document your work. How many analytics teams have models named after analysts that left the company years earlier? Or how often do you discover that you recreated work that was part of a previous project you didn’t know about? There were plenty of knowing smiles in the audience when DeCosmo posed these questions. To avoid do-over scenarios, DeCosmo advised teams to thoroughly document their work – analytical and otherwise. It’s a step that takes time and effort, but it pays dividends many times over as you can reuse IP, refine past work and avoid repeating mistakes.
  5. Focus on “decision-time” analytics. Real-time and streaming analytics are getting lots of attention, but keep the real decision time in mind, advised Bill Franks, CAO at Teradata. The IRS, for example, doesn’t worry about real-time because it has weeks to detect fraud before it cuts refund checks. Conversely, one bank found it had to rethink overnight-batch updates when analysis revealed that three customer contacts in short succession about a single issue, like a bank fee, signal a high likelihood to churn. So if a customer’s Web query is followed by a phone call and, later that day, a branch visit, the branch manager can’t be warned to save the account if customer-service records don’t get inter-day updates.
  6. Move from artisanal to automated. The science of analytics is moving into its industrial age, said Franks of Teradata, with automated options for choosing algorithms. The software-based, automated approaches may not yield a perfect model, but they’re probably good enough. “The point is to maximize the aggregate impact, not optimize every decision,” said Franks.
  7. It’s not man versus machine; think man plus machine. Be open to new tools and technologies, but keep in mind that machines need human reality checks, advised Gina Papush, chief analytics and data officer at insurer QBE North America. “You sometimes have to override the model based on your own business knowledge or feedback from the business,” she said. Fellow panelists chimed in with many examples of machines turning out bad results that business-savvy analysts spotted right away. Undoubtedly necessary business rules and data inputs were lacking, but machines don’t know the difference.
  8. Use more data to drive a deeper customer relationship. It’s always better to have more data and more data sources. DeCosmo of Enova said his firm added opt-in use of customer bank records to refine offers and give customers better terms. Samih Fadli, chief intelligence officer at digital agency Razorfish, encouraged attendees to enrich their first-party data to resolve to unique IDs, using third-party data and tracking of device IDs and Web cookies.
  9. Be one step away from chief strategy officer. Firms start using analytics tactically, and many organization are maturing to use analytics enterprisewide. To take it level deeper, DeCosmo encouraged fellow CAOs to “put analytics at the heard of everything you do.” The aspirational goal of the analytics team at QBE, said Papush, is not just to be part of the practice, but central to the practice of identifying strategic opportunities.
  10. Start with the top-five imperatives. Boiling down this advice to the basics, I’d say the imperatives for analytics leaders are to know the business, know the customer experience, use more data and test, test, test to get to superior results. Finally, and most importantly, the real challenge for analytics leaders is to sell the power of data-driven insights within the organization. “You can use the data, but you can’t hide behind it,” observed Anthony Canitano, general manager of advanced analytics at Delta Airlines. “You have to understand context of how the data can be applied in each area of the business.”


Data to Decisions Chief Customer Officer Chief Information Officer Chief Marketing Officer Chief Digital Officer

Event Report: A New Platform For The Digital Economy #Davos16 #WEF

Event Report: A New Platform For The Digital Economy #Davos16 #WEF

The Future of Digital Platforms Drive New Economies

While the regulatory pressures have not subsided for the financial sector, concerns mount legacy financial and insurance providers as fin tech startups disrupt the existing landscape.   The transformation of finance panel included insights from one mature disruptor among the panelists of traditional financial services providers (see Figure 1):

Figure 1. A New Platform For The Digital Economy

World Economic Forum Digital Economy

  • Jonathan Zittrain, Professor of Law and Professor of Computer Science of Harvard University
  • Nathan Blecharczyk, Co-founder and CTO of Airbnb, Inc.
  • Pierre Nanterme, Chairman and CEO of Accenture
  • Chuck Robbins, CEO of Cisco
  • Arun Sundararajan, Professor of Business, Rosen Faculty Fellow of New York University
  • Susan Wojcicki, CEO of YouTube, Inc.

Key takeaways from the panel include:

  1. Platforms enable democratization of digital access and content creation.  The growth of common technology platforms have emerge to facilitate the value exchange of content through networks among individuals and machines.
  2. Network effect drives platform adoption.   Nathan Blecharczyk shared how the new P2P models create a viral adoption and network effect by driving demand and fulfilling supply.  The platform enables any individual to use the services to deliver a room night.
  3. Community engagement powered by trust and authenticity. Trust and authenticity by each platform member play a key role in ensuring fidelity of the network.
  4. No longer B2B nor B2C, but P2P.  A blurring of business and consumer roles is inevitable.  Understanding context by role will be key to personalization of digital services
  5. Market will set standards instead of regulators. Platforms will adopt to member needs and requirements.  Unowned platforms such as the internet and the block chain will also play in the same market as member driven platforms such as SWIFT to owned platforms by governments and corporations.  However, the evolution of these platforms must come from the market and its members to succeed.

The Bottom Line: Digital Platforms Drive Democratization Of Digital And Provide Significant Opportunities For Individuals And Organizations

New model of organizing economic activity.  Somewhere between a firm and an individual.  The new winners of the digital era have built business models that aggregate components of network economies.  The three distinct components of the network economy include:

  1. Content (value):  whether a product, service, experience, outcome, or business model, the content is the value.  How that content’s value is exchanged is the core tenet of the business model.
  2. Network (sourcing and distribution):  how the content is sourced and distributed is the foundation of the network.  The network is only as strong as the content and the enablers.
  3. Arms dealer (enablers):  the technologies and enablers to reduce friction between content and network or improve the experience between content and network is the mission of the arms dealer.

Most organizations choose one of these components as the primary business models and partner with the others to create a network economy.  However over time, organizations realize they need to build business models that include two or even all three of these components.

In fact, successful winners of the digital era have created an asymmetrical advantage by taking over all three components.  For example, in the consumer world, four companies have the ability to deliver on these network economy: Apple, Amazon, Google, and Microsoft.  These companies have the content, the network, and the arms dealer capabilities to trade on trust and identity.  These are the new components of the digital monopolies.  Those who deliver on network economies will win when they open up their platforms for co-innovaiton and co-creation.

Your POV.

Where do you see the future of jobs?  Should we aim for decreasing populations to improve quality per capita? What are your questions from the report?

Add your comments to the blog or reach me via email: R (at) ConstellationR (dot) com or R (at) SoftwareInsider (dot) org.

Please let us know if you need help with your Digital Business transformation efforts. Here’s how we can assist:

  • Developing your digital business strategy
  • Connecting with other pioneers
  • Sharing best practices
  • Vendor selection
  • Implementation partner selection
  • Providing contract negotiations and software licensing support
  • Demystifying software licensing

Reprints

Reprints can be purchased through Constellation Research, Inc. To request official reprints in PDF format, please contact Sales .

Disclosure

Although we work closely with many mega software vendors, we want you to trust us. For the full disclosure policy,stay tuned for the full client list on the Constellation Research website.

* Not responsible for any factual errors or omissions.  However, happy to correct any errors upon email receipt.

Copyright © 2001 -2016 R Wang and Insider Associates, LLC All rights reserved.
Contact the Sales team to purchase this report on a a la carte basis or join the Constellation Customer Experience

The post Event Report: A New Platform For The Digital Economy #Davos16 #WEF appeared first on A Software Insider's Point of View.

Next-Generation Customer Experience Data to Decisions Digital Safety, Privacy & Cybersecurity Tech Optimization Innovation & Product-led Growth Revenue & Growth Effectiveness New C-Suite Future of Work World Economic Forum Event Report SoftwareInsider Leadership Innovation AI ML Machine Learning LLMs Agentic AI Generative AI Analytics Automation B2B B2C CX EX Employee Experience HR HCM business Marketing SaaS PaaS IaaS Supply Chain Growth Cloud Digital Transformation Disruptive Technology eCommerce Enterprise IT Enterprise Acceleration Enterprise Software Next Gen Apps IoT Blockchain CRM ERP finance Customer Service Content Management Collaboration M&A Enterprise Service Metaverse developer Quantum Computing Social Healthcare VR CCaaS UCaaS Executive Events Chief Customer Officer Chief Information Officer Chief Technology Officer Chief Digital Officer Chief Data Officer Chief Analytics Officer Chief Information Security Officer Chief Executive Officer Chief Operating Officer Chief Experience Officer

Event Report: The Transformation of Finance #Davos16 #WEF

Event Report: The Transformation of Finance #Davos16 #WEF

The Shift From Apologetic Regulatory To A FinTech Transformation

While the regulatory pressures have not subsided for the financial sector, concerns mount legacy financial and insurance providers as fin tech startups disrupt the existing landscape.   The transformation of finance panel included insights from one mature disruptor among the panelists of traditional financial services providers (see Figure 1):

Figure 1. The Transformation Of Finance Panel

World Economic Forum Fintech

  • John Cryan, Co-CEO, Deutsche Bank AG
  • James P. Gorman, Chairman and CEO of Morgan Stanley
  • Tom de Swaan, Chairman of the Board and Group CEO ad Interim of Zurich Insurance Group
  • Christine LaGarde, Managing Director of the International Monetary Fund
  • Dan Schulman, CEO of Paypal Inc.
  • Gillian R. Tett, Managing Editor in the US of Financial Times

Key takeaways from the panel include:

  1. Fintech startups will continue to drive innovation.   Traditional institutions must learn to embrace the innovation or face stiff disruption.  The goal should be to embrace the innovation to win and no just take a defensive stance.
  2. Block chain tech is nascent but has huge potential.  While the amount in crypto currencies is at $7B US dollars, this represents a fraction of the $12T of US dollars in the overall money supply (M2).  Block chain tech will emerge to encompass more than just payments and incorporate digital identity, orchestration, and security.
  3. Financial service firms still fighting the regulatory requirements war. Regulatory environments around the world remain overbearing.  Regulatory environments will dictate how banks behave and the amount of profits achieved.
  4. Panelists feel cash will be history in 10 years.  Bankers see cash as inefficient and untraceable.  Consumers will have to fight hard to ensure that an anonymous payment mechanism remains or face a trespass of privacy despite the digitization of money.
  5. Financial services institutions hoping to remove as much human interaction as possible.  Machine learning and artificial intelligence will play a role in automating human interactions.  Financial services firms seek a reduction in labor force while augmenting human decisions for those that remain.

The Bottom Line: Business Models Will Change As Legacy Institutions Face Challenges From New Disruptive Technologies

Despite the huge regulatory burden since the Lehman Brothers crisis, the financial services market shows signs of optimization among the innovations emerging from fintech startups.   The combination of IOT, robotics, artificial intelligence, and block chain tech provide the foundation for the next transformation in finance. (see Figure 2).  As digitization continues, expect the greatest changes to come from a shift in how regulators will approach innovations.  Sandboxes and consumer led disruptions may ultimately influence regulators.

Figure 2. Constellation’s 2016 Disruptive Technologies

Disruptive Technologies 2016

Your POV.

Where do you see the future of jobs?  Should we aim for decreasing populations to improve quality per capita? What are your questions from the report?

Add your comments to the blog or reach me via email: R (at) ConstellationR (dot) com or R (at) SoftwareInsider (dot) org.

Please let us know if you need help with your Digital Business transformation efforts. Here’s how we can assist:

  • Developing your digital business strategy
  • Connecting with other pioneers
  • Sharing best practices
  • Vendor selection
  • Implementation partner selection
  • Providing contract negotiations and software licensing support
  • Demystifying software licensing

 

Reprints

Reprints can be purchased through Constellation Research, Inc. To request official reprints in PDF format, please contact Sales .

Disclosure

Although we work closely with many mega software vendors, we want you to trust us. For the full disclosure policy,stay tuned for the full client list on the Constellation Research website.

* Not responsible for any factual errors or omissions.  However, happy to correct any errors upon email receipt.

Copyright © 2001 -2016 R Wang and Insider Associates, LLC All rights reserved.
Contact the Sales team to purchase this report on a a la carte basis or join the Constellation Customer Experience

The post Event Report: The Transformation of Finance #Davos16 #WEF appeared first on A Software Insider's Point of View.

Matrix Commerce Next-Generation Customer Experience Data to Decisions Digital Safety, Privacy & Cybersecurity Tech Optimization Innovation & Product-led Growth Revenue & Growth Effectiveness New C-Suite Future of Work World Economic Forum Event Report SoftwareInsider Leadership Innovation AI ML Machine Learning LLMs Agentic AI Generative AI Analytics Automation B2B B2C CX EX Employee Experience HR HCM business Marketing SaaS PaaS IaaS Supply Chain Growth Cloud Digital Transformation Disruptive Technology eCommerce Enterprise IT Enterprise Acceleration Enterprise Software Next Gen Apps IoT Blockchain CRM ERP finance Customer Service Content Management Collaboration M&A Enterprise Service Metaverse developer Quantum Computing Social Healthcare VR CCaaS UCaaS Executive Events Chief Customer Officer Chief Information Officer Chief Technology Officer Chief Digital Officer Chief Data Officer Chief Analytics Officer Chief Information Security Officer Chief Executive Officer Chief Operating Officer Chief Experience Officer

HighQ Raises $50M To Continue Growth In Social Business Market

HighQ Raises $50M To Continue Growth In Social Business Market

There was some big news today in the highly competitive enterprise social business market. By big, I mean $50 million big: 
HighQ completes $50 million growth financing round from One Peak Partners, Morgan Stanley Merchant Banking and Goldman Sachs Private Capital

You may not be familiar with London, UK based HighQ, but they are a leading vendor of collaboration software in the legal and financial services industries. With the money from today's funding round, they hope to expand their presence in North America and into several other industries.

Some of the strengths of the HighQ are:

  • Seamless integration of social networking, content creation (blogs and wikis), tasks, events and file sharing
  • Extremely granular permissions/security model including viewing, editing, printing, saving, even watermarking
  • iSheets, which is an online spreadsheet/database tool that enables people to easily create applications with structured, or organized data. So rather than just putting information into a document or wiki, you can create records, sort, filter, run reports, etc.
  • Very clean, modern design
  • Private messaging/chat

Areas I'd like to see HighQ improve:

  • Real time communication, including video chats/conferences and screensharing
  • Analytics to help both users and administrations gain insight into the content and conversations
  • Developer ecosystem for business add-ons and extensions
  • Deeper enterprise software integrations with products like Microsoft Office, Salesforce, ZenDesk, Workday, etc. 

To get a quick overview of one of their three products, HighQ Collaborate watch the following video. 

 

By the way all vendors should take note, this is how a product video should be done. It explains a problem and how HighQ solves it, shows the actual product (not just a fake animation), and it is just a few minutes long.  Well done.

 

HighQ is a Constellation Research customer. I look forward to continuing to advise them as they improve their platform and expand their customer base.  Congratulations on today's news, it is well deserved.

 

 

 

 

Future of Work Sales Marketing Next-Generation Customer Experience Revenue & Growth Effectiveness Data to Decisions Innovation & Product-led Growth New C-Suite Tech Optimization Chief Marketing Officer Chief People Officer Chief Revenue Officer Chief Experience Officer

Why Customers Get Frustrated and What You Can Do About It

Why Customers Get Frustrated and What You Can Do About It

Even though there is must talk about customer excellence in customer experience, many companies, according to customers don’t hit the mark. Intelliresponse identified 5 things brands need to do to make customer experience work. Here they are:

Screen Shot 2016-01-13 at 8.56.14 AM
Why? 87% of customers believe brands need to put more effort into seamless experiences.

Screen Shot 2016-01-13 at 8.59.23 AM

89% of customers get frustrated having to repeat when they called in and all the information about why they are calling.

Screen Shot 2016-01-13 at 9.00.51 AM

77% of strong omnichannel companies use data across customer channels, compared to 48% who do a poor job of using data across customer channels.

Screen Shot 2016-01-13 at 9.02.57 AM

 Customer say customer agent fail to answer questions 50% of the time.

Screen Shot 2016-01-13 at 9.04.13 AM

70% of customers would prefer to use a companies website if the self-service delivered on the promise and they could get their answers (Rather that using the phone or email.)

So as you can see, there’s a big difference between what customers think and brands think they are providing. What can close that gap? It’s really about putting customer experience at the top of the corporate priority list. CEO’s are you listening? It’s not Customer Service’s job any more! It’s everyone job to think like this. What will it take. A whole lot of change. The number one thing companies are competing is customer experience. Period. You are a customer. Think about it. When you have a bad experience, what does it feel like? What do you feel about the company after that? Do you tell your friends what an awful experience it was? Word of mouth matters. Zaps built a billion dollar business on word of mouth and great customer experiences. Just do it.

@Drnatalie, VP and Principal Analyst, Constellation Research

Covering Customer-facing Customer Experience Capabilities – People, Process and Technology

Next-Generation Customer Experience Chief Customer Officer

IOT; Creating Innovative Business Apps And capturing business requirements for Technology Deployments

IOT; Creating Innovative Business Apps And capturing business requirements for Technology Deployments

The first stage in any technology build and deploy project is to capture a well-structured business requirement to work from. The more innovative, and the higher the business value, the more difficult this becomes. Finding common ground between business and technology in respect of IoT based Smart Services deployments is particularly challenging.

When business values and technology capabilities are new and truly innovative market-disrupting moves are being sought then finding a method to focus ideas, capture and translate into technology requirements is difficult.

Many enterprises have been searching for methods to develop innovative ideas as the pressure for new revenues from Digital and Services products intensifies. Anyone who has taken part in such exercises will testify placing people in a room with the instruction to look for innovation does not guaranteed a World beating outcome. The normal result will be some good outcomes that increase the competitiveness, or effectiveness of current positioning.

A previous post on IoT deployments suggested obtaining focus by concentrating in turn on possibilities to Improve, Innovate, Partner or Disrupt. This blog post is concerned with creating and capturing prospective innovative business ideas for Improve and Innovate. The planned follow on blog post will examine how to achieve the more complex market impacts that Partner or Disrupt can provide.

Improve is always an easier option as the possible challenges to address are usually recognizable. In many cases IoT is needed to do little more than provide increased data on previously untracked aspects. New ideas to improve an existing capability should mean that an experienced business team will quickly be able to identify options to pursue. In this case the challenge will be to capture the options for a technology feasibility study.

To Innovate is always tough as, by definition, it means radically different activities from existing actions, therefore usually outside the direct experience of participants. In a workshop this challenges the basic knowledge and experience available to come up with innovative business valuable offerings. The degree to which this can challenge the accepted wisdom was the topic in the blog on Smart Cities and local government management.

The use of tools, or methods, that create, or drive the refinement, of Innovative ideas is an important aide. The recent blog post entitled executive summary of IoT functionality introduced some important elements that are common to IoT solutions, and can act as a focusing mechanism for developing ideas. The concept of three time frames, and four attributes, is a key principle in defining an IoT Smart Services Solution, but can equally be used to assist innovation creation and business requirement capture. This blog will not repeat the details of the Three by Four reference model again, but will add an example of mapping Uber to the model.

A three x four model provides up to 12 functionality points of definition for an IoT Smart Service. Said this way it seems to increase complications, but laid out in the table below as a worksheet it makes the point simply.

This worksheet can be used in two different ways; firstly to capture an idea for an IoT Smart Service, and then break down the idea into distinct requirements; Alternatively to populate boxes with recognizable existing enterprise, or market place capabilities, with the goal of stimulating ideas by reference to existing capabilities.

Innovative thinking is always difficult to ‘spark’ so a focusing method is important. Resulting Smart Services are usually easy to define in terms of the Business Proposition and value delivered, but notoriously difficult to define in terms of what Business Assets are required to make the idea possible.

The Constellation Research Report Implementing a Business Workshop on the Internet of Things how to develop and execute IoT focused workshops for researching market competition, defining enterprise resources, and to create strategic milestones for building a market disruption. The following is two snap shots examples rather than full explanations.

Without the rest of the report giving the broader context and explanation as well as significant material to build up the level of understanding this may be difficult to follow.  The intent is merely to illustrate that there are methods to focus thinking and develop truly innovative Smart Services using the full capabilities of IoT.

IoT based Smart Services use an entirely new set of technology capabilities that the World Economic Forum annual Davos meeting will debate, together with other issues, under the heading of the ‘The Fourth Industrial Age’.

Finding ways for your Enterprise to understand and re compete against new competitors in new markets makes developing tools and methods for an essential target for 2016.

Two Outline Examples

Outline example 1; Requirement to Improve;

Adding factory floor progress data to provide faster updates to an Enterprise Production Planning Application. Method; Populate the four headings in Transaction Time with the details of the Enterprise Production Planning Application and now consider if this requires quasi real time, or near time updating as an IoT requirement, before deciding exactly what is required under each of the four headings to provide the required inputs.

Outline example 2; Requirement to Innovate

By creating a new Smart Service. Method; Decide if the Smart Service is Quasi Real Time, or Near Time, then populate the four boxes with the necessary business functionalities required. It might sound complicated so perhaps using Uber Taxi Smart Service to illustrate might be helpful. Note there is no requirement for Quasi Real Time in this Smart Service Example

Media Name: Slide1.jpg
New C-Suite

Reputation Even Over a Resume: Why Personal Branding Matters in 2016

Reputation Even Over a Resume: Why Personal Branding Matters in 2016

1
 

Take a moment to look back over your career. Even if you are “new” to the workforce, you’re likely to see a hotchpotch of connected experiences. There will be paid and unpaid work, some volunteering maybe. You’ll have passion projects that took weeks or months of your time – like the time you decided to build your sister’s website to save her money, only to find that after it’s all up and working, she took a new job and was no longer interested in “going freelance”. There may even be whole folders of documents filled with words that one day will become your great business, breakthrough book.

Now, take a look at your LinkedIn profile and ask yourself – what’s the story it tells?

I have been saying this for years – but it’s a fact that grows stronger over time. Your resume is as dead as the tree it is written on.

In 2016, you are what you publish.

LinkedIn as an inbound channel for your personal brand

I used to think of LinkedIn as a place of business, connection and social selling. It was a vastly under-utilised space where a strong profile and a good network would help you stand out from the crowd. But a crowd it certainly is. It is the place where careers and connections collide.

In short, LinkedIn has become the “internet of careers” – the internet that we look at when we are looking to find a job, an employee or a customer.

But these days, LinkedIn has a broader agenda, transforming from a massive database of resumes to a business publishing platform and a social selling engine.  Every person with a profile can publish their thoughts, ideas and status updates just like Facebook. Or Twitter. Or Google’s Blogspot (remember that?!). And with the opening up of the LinkedIn Pulse publishing platform, there has literally been an explosion of content – some of it written by individuals and some of it written by ghost bloggers. Some is pure PR spin. Some is heartfelt and personal. There are even birthday notifications (as a side note, I find this mildly disconcerting).

And while this has made it more difficult for the average person to attract and engage potential business collaborators, clients or employers, there is still a great opportunity to use LinkedIn as an inbound channel for your personal brand. What does this look like?

  • Share the message, own the destination: Ever noticed how everyone’s profile on LinkedIn looks the same? Makes it hard to stand out, right? Like all good strategy, I suggest you share the message – post your insights, presentations, speeches and updates on LinkedIn by all means, but own the destination – have a website or a portfolio that keeps track of all you do. Use that destination to more fully contextualise your work, purpose and outcomes. I use gavinheaton.com as a catch-all for my activities and ServantOfChaos.com as a showcase. DisruptorsHandbook.com focuses marketing-led innovation and practical strategy. And everything that is posted on one of these sites is cross-posted to LinkedIn.
  • Treat your LinkedIn summary like an elevator pitch: Can you describe your job, best projects and outcomes in 30 seconds? Rather than writing a career summary for your LinkedIn profile, write a summary of how you can help clients, employers and business partners. Make it less about you and more about the value you create.
  • Write case studies on your best projects: Sure LinkedIn’s publishing platform is a hot mess of content, but every time you publish an article, it reaches into the feeds of your network. That means that people you know, or would like to know, are learning more about you. So give your networks something worth reading – warts and all case studies of the projects you’ve worked on. Include the passion projects, the skunkworks and even elements of your day job that is reasonable to share. Showcase not just the results, but the workings of how you delivered value. Connect the dots, tell the story and bring the dull parts to life with anecdotes, quotes and images.
  • Treat yourself like your #1 client: Imagine you are writing a brief for a client – except that client is you. Determine your value proposition, key message and proof points. Put your best storytelling foot forward and explain just why you are the best person for the job/project/collaboration. Just remember, it’s hard work. Keep refining your message. Get feedback. Listen honestly and always seek to improve.

For more great ideas on building your personal brand, take a look through this presentation from Leslie Bradshaw. It’s chock full of practical suggestions that can help you shift from being a “thought leader” to a “do leader”. And in a world where you are what you publish, it’s not about the what you say, it’s all about who believes it.

IBM Connect 2016 - A New Hope Awakens

IBM Connect 2016 - A New Hope Awakens

Next week IBM is holding their annual conference focused on collaboration software. However, this year things are going to be a bit different.

The conference’s roots date back to the early 1990s in what was originally called Lotusphere. That event focused on products like Lotus Notes/Domino, Sametime, Quickplace and others. Over the years as IBM evolved their collaboration portfolio the conference added sessions around the more “IBMish” technologies like WebSphere Portal and DB2. These additions did not resonate well with the faithful Lotus customers and business partners. In 2013 the event was renamed IBM Connect and added the IBM Kenexa portfolio of Human Resource and Learning Management products (which they combine under the term, Smarter Workforce). This change was also not met with universal acceptance. With market momentum shifting away from IBM to competitors like Microsoft, Google and Salesforce, many people believed that last year (2015) would be the final incarnation of the conference. The event was much smaller than previous years (down from several hotels to just one), but to the joy of the faithful, was much more focused on the core collaboration technologies that customers and partners wanted to hear about. Due to the success of the 2015 event, IBM Connect is back for 2016, but for the first time in 20 years will not be held at the Walt Disney Swan and Dolphin resort, instead taking place at the Orlando Hilton. 


In my opinion, the change is a good thing. It’s time to break the ties to the past. It’s time for a reboot. With that in mind, here are the main areas I’d like to hear about at IBM Connect 2016:


Vision - First and foremost, I want to sit in the audience and pretend I have no previous knowledge and see if I leave with a clear understanding of how IBM helps personal productivity and team collaboration (both internal and external). I want to hear how the IBM collaboration tools fit into the larger IBM vision, not just how other parts of IBM (like Watson and BlueMix) are helping collaboration. How does collaboration fit into cognitive computing? How does collaboration fit into application development? Not the other way around. Microsoft has made their vision clear, "Reinvent productivity and business process in this mobile-first, cloud-first world”. I’d like to see something like that from IBM.

UPDATE: I know IBM's company vision revolves around the Cognitive-era, so I expect we'll be hearing a lot about this at Connect.  I'd previously mentioned on Twitter that to make the keynote more fun, we should all take a shot each time IBM says Cognitive. :-)

Customers - I want to hear new customer references. Big ones. Name brands. Not upgrades. New customers. Nothing proves success like customers.

Business Partners - One of the keys to Microsoft, Google, Salesforce and even Slack’s success is size and momentum of their business partner ecosystems. These vendors have a large number of companies building add-ons and integrations for their tools. Those vendors each have robust application catalogs/stores/marketplaces that enable people to extend their products with a few simple clicks (and maybe a credit card). In almost every product briefing I am in new products support “Exchange and Gmail” or “work with Office365”, but I very rarely hear IBM mentioned. I’d like to learn if IBM Verse and/or Connections has made any progress in these areas.

Platform - Similar to the point above about add-ons, what is IBM doing to help developers build stand-alone collaborative applications? The IBM application platform is BlueMix, I hope to leave with a good understanding of how developers use it to build collaborative applications. Vice versa, what components of IBM collaboration can be embedded into other applications? What incentive do developers have to build on IBM technologies versus Salesforce1, AWS, Azure, etc?

Investments - IBM’s largest investments these days are around data and analytics. Their various acquisitions and partnerships with companies like Twitter (which they should buy now since the stock is so low), The Weather Company, and Box are all part of a strategy to get their hands (well algorithms) on as much data as possible. That data is then fed into IBM Watson to hopefully derive insights which can help improve business outcomes. I’d like to see IBM show similar commitment to analyzing the vast amounts of employee interactions that take place in email, calendar, contacts, social networking, etc. Google (with Google Now), Microsoft (with Delve Organization Analytics), and Salesforce (with SalesforceIQ) are far ahead of IBM in these areas. Microsoft is on a productivity/collaboration buying spree lately, having acquired Accompli, LiveLoop, Sunrise, Wanderlust, VoloMetrix, MileIQ and most recently Talko. I’d like to see IBM show some sign of investment in collaboration.

Business Outcomes - One of the strengths that SAP, Oracle, Salesforce, Microsoft and Infor have is that their social tools are deeply integrated with their business process software (such as CRM, HR, ERP, Finance, Legal, etc). IBM has done a good job integrating social into Kenexa, but what are they doing in the other areas? How does IBM’s collaboration software help a sales team close a deal or a supply chain discuss a shipment? Will IBM be partnering in any of these areas? Acquiring? Building? Will IBM provide any templates for specific business processes and/or integrations? Similarly, what about industry verticals? IBM has always had strong sales/services around verticals, so how about having tailored collaboration offerings for healthcare, manufacturing, energy, media, etc.?

Innovation - When I think back over the last decade or so of the tours I've had of IBM Research's Innovation Labs, I can’t think of anything that has made it into shipping software, or even into the hands of the public to look at. Microsoft on the other hand releases new “garage" products all the time. Microsoft is also rapidly adding new products such as Delve, Sway, Planner (beta) and GigJam (beta) that truly change the way people work. IBM Verse has done a nice job at integrating frequent contacts, email and calendar on a single screen, but it’s time to do more than just make a better email client. I’d like to see IBM redefine the way we create content, share information, connect with colleagues/prospects, plan/attend meetings, organize and execute projects, etc. I’ve not seen any improvement in calendar nor IBM Activities in many years. That needs to change. For more on this topic, see my report: Collaboration Vendors Shaping the Future of Work

Marketing - Is IBM still going to push â€œA New Way To Work”? I’ve been pretty vocal with my dislike for this phrase, as I’ve not yet seen anything from IBM that really changes the way people work. They have improved email (which is a good thing) but I have yet to see how they change the way employees do their jobs. This is tied into innovation above. I also don't like the conference theme "Make every moment count". That seems like the type of thing you say when you're worried about the future. Perhaps I'll change my mind when I see how it is used at the show.

Let's Get Personal - Let’s stop wishing IBM would have a consumer play. IBM is not good at consumer offerings. They do not have a web search engine, map/navigation, news, social network or file/photo sharing service that people use in their personal lives. They failed miserably at trying to provide a public version of Verse for email. It’s time to lay this hope to rest. The B in IBM is business, they should focus there.

 

UPDATE - I didn't mention IoT.  I wonder what role IBM sees IoT playing in the future of collaboration.


Moving On

Let’s all go into this event with an open mind, and accept that the days of Lotusphere are over. The show is going to be smaller than in the past. It will be more like a customer conference, not an industry event. That’s ok, IBM needs to keep their current clients happy, but I don’t think a lot of new client prospects will be in attendance. Also let’s try and not put too much focus on personnel changes. Yes of course they matter, but they are not telltale signs of the apocalypse. I look forward to this new rebooted IBM Connect. I believe it will pay homage to the past, while forcing an awakening for the future. I hope IBM addresses the things I’ve mentioned above. Finally, I hope to see you there.

 

Feedback Please

Are there areas I’ve missed? Are there things you disagree with? Do my thoughts echo your own? I’d love to hear from you in the comments.


 

Future of Work Sales Marketing Next-Generation Customer Experience Revenue & Growth Effectiveness Data to Decisions Innovation & Product-led Growth New C-Suite Digital Safety, Privacy & Cybersecurity Tech Optimization IBM Chief Marketing Officer Chief People Officer Chief Revenue Officer Chief Experience Officer

Workato’s Workbot cuts business users some slack with Slack integration

Workato’s Workbot cuts business users some slack with Slack integration

 
I have written about Workato before, the startup that makes it easier for business users to integrated business applications with each other – with no coding skills. But there is more than interfaces that connect systems with each other, there is also a need for business users to access information on an ad hoc, single transaction, atomic data level.

 

So let’s take a look what Workato just announced, the press release can be found here:

Today we see a new trend emerging how business is done. Instead of working with single, siloed information systems, most prominently email and enterprise solutions, business people are gravitating towards more ad hoc, informal ways of communicating, chat being one of the communication platforms of choice… one of them capturing a lot of mind and market share is Slack, which recently has passed two million users. One of the many things the Slack team has done right is to make the chat platform open and extensible for partners and third parties.

This openness has allowed Workato to build a ‘microservice to interfaces’ a workbot that operates on a single interface item level, e.g. a customer, a lead, an opportunity or a service request. Instead of the business user having to switch context – from the collaboration application (here Slack) to the business application (e.g. Expensify, Salesforce, ServiceNow, QuickBooks, Zendesk, etc.) – Workbot does that work for the business user, as part of the chat.

Take a look at the following example, where Workbot gathers more information to provide the business user a richer content in a more productive way:



 
Workato Constellation Enterprise Software Musings Holger Mueller


The above chat between Maddy and Workbot makes Maddy’s work life not only easier – but also more productive:


 
  • Alert Function – Workbot alerts Maddy of an event (from Zendesk).
  • Information Gathering – Workbot gathers more information as Maddy requests it (from Salesforce, Zendesk).
  • Action Support – Workbot adds information to the systems on Maddy’s request (into Github, Salesforce and Zendesk).
  • Collaboration Support – On Maddy’s request Workbot sends a SMS message to alert a colleague of the situation (using Twilio). 
Note that Maddy never had to leave Slack, staying in one and the same user interface, on one and the same platform. Assuming Maddy is a customer service representative and tuned to reasonable multi-tasking speeds, she will likely have 3-5 of these conversations open, but resolving them more efficiently thanks to Workbot.

As mentioned Workbot is built on top of the Workato integration platform, that build on user friendly recipes for integration. This is why how the first version of Workbot supports a substantial number of applications with Saleforce.com, Zendesk, Eventbrite, Expensify, ServiceNow, Intercom, QuickBooks Online, Jira, Github and Mailchimp.


 

Implications for the Future of Work

We already know that the enablement of the business end user is key for success of an enterprise. Central IT functions react too slow and often too late to support business users whose workday gets more and challenging year over year. More work needs to get done with less people and less time available, so business users are clamoring for any productivity gains they can get a hold of.

We recently took a look how Workato enables the integration of different business applications in an easy, no technology understanding requiring way (see here), now Workato uses the same technology, not only to transport data en masse, but to interface business information as the business user is ‘in flight’, in a business transaction or collaboration scenario.

At the end of the day this means


 
  • Information goes from bulk load to atomic data item – Interfaces become more granular, resolving latency and recency challenges as well as addressing performance and scalability questions.
     
  • Information finds the business user – not vice versa – Instead of switching context and searching for relevant information, information ‘finds’ the business user as needed.
     
  • Collaboration is where the work is done – At the end people solve business problems, to do so they need to collaborate. Breaking down traditional moats between e.g. enterprise applications and collaboration tools is a key move to make business users more productive.
     
  • Conversation becomes the new interface technology – Instead of thinking in IT dimensions such as interfaces, files and processes, the conversational query of data and creation of actions will make business users more effective than ever before. And different users are doing different things in an enterprise, use a different lingo, all things a conversational approach can reflect well.
     
  • The Robots are coming – and business users will love it – A lot has been said and abundant fear has been mongered about the arrival of robots. And concerns may be valid in the long run, in the short term robots like Workato’s Workbot will be highly welcomed by business users – making them more productive and allowing them to focus on what matters, their business’ success. The robot’s ability to learn and suggest actions will be highly welcomed – as long as they work as expected and delight the business user. 

MyPOV

Workato has created a new product, Workbot, effectively a smooth ‘scale down’ of its interface capabilities, with full re-use of platform, recipes etc. – while achieving what ultimately matters – making business users more productive and with that more successful. Workato can implement Workbot on other open chat platforms (e.g. the also popular HipChat) and bring more of its interface repertoire to the market in the near future.

Workato Workbot should do well in the market, as it makes every party a winner: Slack gets more actionable chats, more loads on its platform, Workato re-uses existing capabilities and gets more eyes on its software, partner apps of Workato find more usage beyond their traditional user interface and thus increase value for their customers, but most importantly business users win, as they become more productive. And it’s the latter that really matters. We will be watching… 



More on Workato


 
  • First Take - Apple wants to change the Future of Work. Works with cloud apps vendors and Workato - read here
 

More Musings Posts
  • Musings – Time to re-invent email – for real! - Read here
  • The Dilemma with Cloud Infrrastrcture updates - read here
  • Are we witnessing the Rise of the Enterprise Cloud? Read here
  • What are true Analytics - a Manifesto. Read here
  • Is TransBoarding the Future of Talent Management? Read here
  • How Technology Innovation fuels Recruiting and dsrupts the Laggards - read here
 
Find more coverage on the Constellation Research website here and checkout my magazine on Flipboard and my YouTube channel here.

Tech Optimization Innovation & Product-led Growth Data to Decisions Digital Safety, Privacy & Cybersecurity Future of Work New C-Suite Next-Generation Customer Experience ipaas PaaS SaaS IaaS Cloud Digital Transformation Disruptive Technology Enterprise IT Enterprise Acceleration Enterprise Software Next Gen Apps IoT Blockchain CRM ERP CCaaS UCaaS Collaboration Enterprise Service Chief Information Officer Chief Experience Officer Chief Technology Officer Chief Information Security Officer Chief Data Officer Chief Executive Officer

Unify makes progress, needs to close the circuit

Unify makes progress, needs to close the circuit

We had the opportunity to attend the Unify analyst summit, which happened this week in beautiful Bermuda (a surprisingly convenient location from NYC). Over 40 analyst were there to get updated on the state of transformation and product progress of Unify (the former Siemens Enterprise Communications, if you like go even more back to Rolm). 

 
 


Fellow colleague Alan Lepofsky joined me, and we recorded a short takeaway video, so take a peek:
 
;

No time to watch – here are my top 3 takeaways:

Unify transformation is WIP – After the launch as Unify, the vendor has gone through some difficult times to right-size the operation. Executives were surprisingly open on progress and challenges, based on the numbers shared it looks like the vendor has started to turn a corner. Customer references were all Avaya takeaways, so it is clear where Unify is trying to grow from going forward. The vendor claims around 30M seats and seems to be able to win business at usual call center attrition rate (5-8% p.a.), all key vital signs.

Unify is now Atos (but keeps operating under the Unify brand) – It was a first that an acquisition closed live during an analyst event – and so did the acquisition of Unify by Atos. It was good to see that Atos’ head of Managed Services, Eric Grall was in Bermuda, as the services part of the Unify business will report into him. Grall said that Atos intends to follow the same playbook as with the recent acquisition of Bull, separate the acquired vendor in services and the rest. It will be interesting to see how Atos will harmonize its portfolio e.g. with existing assets like BlueKiwi. If you haven’t seen it yet – take a look at my blog post on the acquisition here. Lastly Unify brings to Atos a key ability, channel savviness, which Atos needs for its Bull offering and does not have currently. Sure different partners are needed for call center vs hardware / security, but it makes Atos / Unify a more attractive partner, allowing for the capture of more share of wallet at customers. And keeping Unify’s channel capabilities intact will be key for Atos.

Circuit needs adoption – The Circuit product by now has all the ingredients to become a driver for more growth for Unify. Kudos to Unify for letting the analysts use the product during the event, and at first look it worked well. Behind the scenes capabilities are positive, too, the offering is Openstack based, uses Opensource offerings like e.g. Cassandra and operates (for now) in two data centers on both sides of the Atlantic. Unify has spent a lot of time to take cost out of the infrastructure, allowing the vendor to offer Circuit under a freemium model. The product is open and can be extended by developer, a must have capability for any collaboration player, given the ‘zoo’ of collaboration products out there.
Overall Circuit is offered under 4 different licenses. Now the product needs adoption, that 11+ months after launch has not yielded more than 1k users / month. Given a 30M install based even a subpar upsell / cross-sell effort. But Unify wants to do more with Circuit, so will be good to see what happens on the adoption side in the next quarters. Switching to a more viral marketing, ‘land & expand’ model as well as aggressively going after enterprise software ISVs who seek collaboration capabilities are potential strategies. 


 

MyPOV

A good event for Unify, but the vendor realistically now has to layer one more transformation on top of its own core business transformation. Both are important but the latter even featured prominently in the press release this week, so more challenges Unify executives have to rectify. As usual with acquisitions, one can expect executive changes, buffering the ripple effects of organizational change will be key for Atos. And while Atos is becoming more and more global, it is still a French company en coeur, and mixing that with the Teuton / American culture is an experiment that can up as well as not so well. The opportunity is there, as no player on the communications / collaboration space has offered one common, easy to use application and end user experience. Just look at the challenge of the average enterprise employees to launch and run a web collaboration challenge. While practice makes champions here as well, the industry has for too long offered disjointed user experiences, hard to run products (plug in anyone?) – leaving productivity behind. The synchronous capabilities (and to make phones ring) is a key differentiator for Unify, as when push comes to shove in the real world, people pick up phones. But till we see a unified communications and collaboration platform, seamlessly integrated to where business is done – the enterprise applications, with ease of use like the point solutions that are popular today, it will be still a while and is Unify’s (as competitors) opportunity to grab. We will be there to analyze.


More on Unify
  • Market Move - Atos completes acquisition of Unify - gets more into IP - read here
 
More Musings Posts
  • Musings – Time to re-invent email – for real! - Read here
  • The Dilemma with Cloud Infrrastrcture updates - read here
  • Are we witnessing the Rise of the Enterprise Cloud? Read here
  • What are true Analytics - a Manifesto. Read here
  • Is TransBoarding the Future of Talent Management? Read here
  • How Technology Innovation fuels Recruiting and dsrupts the Laggards - read here
 
Find more coverage on the Constellation Research website here and checkout my magazine on Flipboard and my YouTube channel here.

 
Tech Optimization Future of Work Innovation & Product-led Growth New C-Suite Sales Marketing Next-Generation Customer Experience Digital Safety, Privacy & Cybersecurity Revenue & Growth Effectiveness Data to Decisions Chief Information Officer Chief Marketing Officer Chief Customer Officer Chief People Officer Chief Human Resources Officer Chief Revenue Officer