Results

Thoughts On How Sharing Impacts Privacy And Equality

Thoughts On How Sharing Impacts Privacy And Equality

The following video is part 2 of 3 of my conversation with  BBC Click tech reporter Kate Russell on the BizCouch while at Oracle CloudWorld in London

Resisting Opportunity
0:10 - 2:39 - Points of view around privacy and collaboration. How much of my business life do I really want to share? Knowledge is power vs. sharing is power. What is the epiphany moment that makes people see the value in sharing.
2:40 - 4:10 - Can openness and sharing help equality? Will it make our future society more forgiving?

Part 1, You Need To Have A Strategy For Social Software (2:53 min)
Part 3, Understanding the Dynamic Cloud (5:09 min) will be coming out in a few weeks, so stay tuned.
 

New C-Suite Future of Work Next-Generation Customer Experience Innovation & Product-led Growth Tech Optimization AI ML Machine Learning LLMs Agentic AI Generative AI Robotics Analytics Automation Cloud SaaS PaaS IaaS Quantum Computing Digital Transformation Disruptive Technology Enterprise IT Enterprise Acceleration Enterprise Software Next Gen Apps IoT Blockchain CRM ERP CCaaS UCaaS Collaboration Enterprise Service developer Metaverse VR Healthcare Supply Chain Leadership Chief Customer Officer Chief Executive Officer Chief People Officer Chief Information Officer Chief Marketing Officer Chief Technology Officer Chief Information Security Officer Chief Data Officer Chief Digital Officer Chief Analytics Officer Chief Operating Officer

The Cloud Changes Everything: Why Oracle’s Alliances with Microsoft, Salesforce.com and NetSuite Transform the Market

The Cloud Changes Everything: Why Oracle’s Alliances with Microsoft, Salesforce.com and NetSuite Transform the Market

Constellation Research, Inc. the research and advisory firm focused how disruptive technologies transform business models announced the publication of ”The Cloud Changes Everything” by Constellation Vice President and Principal Analyst, Holger Mueller. This research report recaps the events of June 20 through June 27 in which Oracle entered into several strategic relationships with Microsoft, Salesforce, and Netsuite, and examines the implications of the Oracle alliances for the market, customers, partners and competitors.

Download the report snapshot

Report highlights:

  • The strategic alliances entered into by Oracle from 6/20-6/27
  • The drivers and benefits of the three alliances between Oracle and Microsoft, Salesforce.com and NetSuite
  • Implications for vendors and the market
  • Implications for customers and partners

“This series of Oracle alliances has created a lot of confusion in the market. This report sheds light on the recent movements of these giants, and provides insight on how these movements will affect the different players and the market in general,” said Holger Mueller, Vice President and Principal Analyst, Constellation Research.

 

ABOUT HOLGER MUELLER

Holger Mueller is Vice President and Principal Analyst covering [Technology Optimization and Future of Work. Holger’s current research focuses on [IaaS and PaaS with forays to SaaS, Analytics, BigData and mobile.

 

COORDINATES
Profile:
http://www.constellationr.com/users/hmueller
Twitter: @holgermu
Linkedinwww.linkedin.com/in/holgermueller/
Geo: San Diego, CA

 

THE REPORT
The Cloud Changes Everything can be found here: http://www.constellationr.com/research/cloud-changes-everything

Press Contacts:
Contact the Media and Influencers relations team at [email protected] for interviews with analysts.

Sales Contacts:
Contact our sales team at [email protected].

New C-Suite Tech Optimization Chief Executive Officer Chief Financial Officer Chief Information Officer Chief Supply Chain Officer

Reading between the lines... SAP Q2 Earnings - cloudy with potential structural challenges

Reading between the lines... SAP Q2 Earnings - cloudy with potential structural challenges

On July 18th SAP released their 2nd quarter 2013 results - you can see the results here and listen to the recording here.

 



Cloud and HANA saved SAP's Q2 - almost

For the first time in a long time, SAP did not grow their software license revenue.  In Q2, SAP recorded 982ME in license revenue, which is down 77M E less that quarter Year over Year. Instead of addressing the drop in new license growth, SAP emphasizes the overall growth of its software and cloud subscriptions revenue, a paltry 3% or 1.141ME.

Of the 982ME, in the overall software number,  102ME HANA revenue  is included.  Should we remove HANA - only 880ME would have been recorded in Q2 2013. In Q2 2012 SAP recorded 85 ME HANA revenue - bringing SAP's Q2 software number to 974 ME
.

Consequently,  it looks like the SAP core business is down by a ballpark of 10+%.



From SAP website.

The cloud subscriptions and support revenue grew from 52 to 159ME, a 206% increase, which is good news - at first glance. 

But let's dissect the cloud subscriptions and support revenue a  little further. This is revenue that comes from SAP home built SaaS applications (like byDesign or the SaaS CRM product) - but mainly from the former Successfactors and Ariba products. If we do a ceteris paribus and assume that the revenues of Successfactors and Ariba would remain constant - not withstanding the SAP acquisition - then these should contribute 76.6 MUS$ (Ariba) and Successfactors claimed 73.2 MUS$ - which is a total of - let's round up - 150 MUS$ - at today's exchange rate 107 ME (all based on calendar Q2 2011 data - as 2012 they were already acquired / being acquired). So the good news is, that there is growth in these numbers and SAP's homegrown SaaS products must be contributing - but not the stellar growth rate that SAP wants us to believe in. 



Why is SAP weak in core license sale?

The questions from the financial analysts unfortunately did not point into this area - so we can only speculate - and state to what we know. 

SAP is well licensed if not over licensed for most of their accounts in North America and Europe. So SAP needs to sell the business suite where it's not yet in the  market and there it is focusing on the BRIC countries  - and it seems to have done a very good job in Brazil. And it singled Mexiko out as well. But SAP - like all vendors - seems to have had issues in APAC. Basically SAP needs to execute very well in the BRIC countries to keep up core license sales, if these markets do not do well economically or if SAP blunders execution  - then SAP won't be able to keep up core license sales. If HANA would not be around - SAP would be a shrinking company on the license revenue side. 

And HANA is the product that SAP need to fill the missing revenue - but it looks like SAP was asking for too much from the just two year old in Q2 - as HANA revenues grew only by 20%. SAP said that HANA deals are year end loaded - which leads to the impression that SAP and their sales reps are using HANA to close the year well in Q4. Any missing sales could be filled with HANA licenses for running the Suite on it - starting a push in the fall. Always assuming customers have budget and SAP can convince them of a winning value proposition to move the Suite on HANA. 


 

If SAP is a cloud company...

Through the conference call both Bill McDermott and Jim Hagemann-Snabe referred multiple times to their view that the cloud age has started, customers are buying cloud products etc. - they should have been asked then, how they plan to convert their product portfolio from a mixed portfolio to a more and more cloud based product portfolio.

We all know, that SAP has a number of homegrown SaaS products and then the acquired entities like Successfactors, Ariba and hybris. But this is not a complete SaaS suite - so either SAP is missing out on bringing all its products to the cloud - or it's only a partial push to SaaS. This will be a vital area to watch as SAP does not have any SaaS offerings in Finance and Manufacturing, two key enterprise automation areas. 

 

 

Verticals to the rescue?

SAP seems to have gotten more focus on their vertical offerings recently. Certainly making Verticals Hagemann-Snabe main responsibility has helped the matter. And certainly SAP has significantly more potential on the vertical side than for its horizontal offering. Overall the market has been under penetrated and mostly been addressed with customization. But with the main focus being to move Suite customers on HANA - it may be tough to convince customers, who are not on HANA to move to an industry offering that may be improved or upgraded soon. SAP will need to explain how vertical investments can be used between the older conventional database platforms and the new HANA platform.

The larger challenge is that in the past SAP - like other enterprise automation vendors - has not been able to solve the vertical automation puzzle yet, for a variety of reasons (good for a whole other blog post). But that does not mean that SAP may not be able to address and solve this now for the first time. Assuming SAP will succeed - this will however not address the overall revenue challenge that SAP faces. The reason is that in most sales scenarios the vertical functionality is an add-on from a revenue portion - compared to the horizontal piece of the pie. And true - there is untapped potential - those enterprises that have not been conquered by standard software vendors yet - banking anyone? But these opportunities form the minority of the overall vertical enterprise automation market - so at the end of the day, even a very successful execution by SAP on the vertical opportunity - will only be able to address a smaller portion of the SAP revenue challenge that SAP faces. 

 

 

Can the sales force do it?

SAP has a formidable sales force - but it's an on premise enterprise application license sales force. Traditionally SAP succeeded to sell the integrated suite vision to the executives to who the overall working of the enterprises matters - to the CEO, CFO and CIO. But SaaS applications are often sold to the line of business executive - often against the establishment guidelines and standards. Sales reps need to setup a whole new set of relationships - that are even harder to develop since they sold SAP to these companies before - and that wasn't always a popular decision with the line of business executives. Many, many preferred products and installations that were used and preferred in a division or line of business - got replaced by SAP as the central, CxO mandated product. It's not only hard to change the comfort zone - but the SAP sales reps also need to re-invent themselves.

The other challenge we see for the salesforce is, that they are an enterprise application sales force that now needs to sell HANA technology. And while it should be still easy for an applications sales rep to sell the move from another database to HANA - after all SAP was always sold with a database - it's a different story to sell pure HANA technology opportunities. SAP recently told me - correctly - that of course SAP still has sales reps selling Sybase - but that salesforce does not have the reach and cannot generate the volume that SAP needs from HANA - which is around at least 1 BE in the next 4 quarters. 

So it's good news for the salesforce when we learnt - deep buried in the Q&A section of the earnings call - that SAP has made the sales of on premise vs on cloud commission neutral to the sales reps, which used to be one of the primary challenges of vendors transitioning from license to service products. But SAP will have to do a lot to re-train or hire a technology sales force that can sell north of 1 BE of HANA licenses year after year. 

The reason is that enterprise application sales reps are a different breed of sales reps than the enterprise technology sales reps. While an application sales rep is supposed to sell the standard automation as much as possible that  is supported in the product - the technology sales rep is supposed to chase non standard automation, that can be built on the technology's standard capabilities. Both skills are seldom combined in professionals, who even if they have them - need to build separate relationships and rapports with their customers and prospects. 



MyPOV

We are seeing some potential structural revenue challenges coming up on SAP's horizon. Emerging markets and HANA may not be enough revenue potential that SAP can exploit, to keep traditional license revenue growing. And SAP will need to have a lot of help from the new subscription based services to compensate for the reduced core license revenue. Or monetize other markets like mobile and social better.

We will see how the SAP co-CEOs will address this challenge going forward and wish them luck on the journey - as a strong and growing SAP is better for the market place and its customers 

And lastly I would have hoped my fellow financial analyst colleagues would have harped more on these questions in the Q&A section - but what hasn't happened - can still happen. 

Data to Decisions Tech Optimization Digital Safety, Privacy & Cybersecurity Innovation & Product-led Growth Future of Work SAP AI ML Machine Learning LLMs Agentic AI Generative AI Robotics Analytics Automation Cloud SaaS PaaS IaaS Quantum Computing Digital Transformation Disruptive Technology Enterprise IT Enterprise Acceleration Enterprise Software Next Gen Apps IoT Blockchain CRM ERP CCaaS UCaaS Collaboration Enterprise Service developer Metaverse VR Healthcare Supply Chain Leadership Chief Executive Officer Chief Information Officer Chief Technology Officer Chief Information Security Officer Chief Data Officer Chief Digital Officer Chief Analytics Officer Chief Operating Officer

SuperNova Award Deadline Extended

SuperNova Award Deadline Extended

New deadline August 7, 2013 #SNA2013

Good news! Due to OVERWHELMING demand, we've extended the deadline for SuperNova Award applications. The new deadline is August 7, 2013.

Revised timeline

  • July 22, 2013 August 7, 2013 last day for submissions.
  • August 22, 2013 finalists announced and invited to Connected Enterprise.
  • September 9, 2013 voting opens to the public
  • October 9, 2013 polls close
  • October 30, 2013 Winners announced, SuperNova Awards Gala Dinner at Connected Enterprise

We're searching for the rebels, catalysts, and innovators that are shaping the future of technology! If you have completed a project that produced a disruption within your company or industry we want to hear your story!

APPLY

2012 SuperNova Award winners:

Who can enter?

The awards are open to end users only. End users at vendor companies may enter the awards. We will disqualify any vendor applications.  Vendors may submit on their customer’s behalf but must enter their customer’s details and have their approval.

Categories

Award categories center around Constellation's business research themes. Award categories:

 

Awards Ceremony

The SuperNova Award Winners will be announced live, on stage, at the SuperNova Awards Gala Dinner on October 31, 2013 on the first night of Constellation’s Connected Enterprise.

Rewards
  • Finalists in each category will be awarded one complimentary ticket to Constellation’s Connected Enterprise.
  • Winners in each category will win a one-year subscription to Constellation’s Research Library.

NOMINATE SOMEONE SPECIAL

Media Name: SuperNova-Awards-logo-2013.jpg
Data to Decisions Future of Work Marketing Transformation Matrix Commerce New C-Suite Next-Generation Customer Experience Tech Optimization Innovation & Product-led Growth AI ML Machine Learning LLMs Agentic AI Generative AI Robotics Analytics Automation Cloud SaaS PaaS IaaS Quantum Computing Digital Transformation Disruptive Technology Enterprise IT Enterprise Acceleration Enterprise Software Next Gen Apps IoT Blockchain CRM ERP CCaaS UCaaS Collaboration Enterprise Service developer Metaverse VR Healthcare Supply Chain Leadership Chief Customer Officer Chief Executive Officer Chief Financial Officer Chief Information Officer Chief Marketing Officer Chief People Officer Chief Procurement Officer Chief Supply Chain Officer Chief Technology Officer Chief Information Security Officer Chief Data Officer Chief Digital Officer Chief Analytics Officer Chief Operating Officer

Vibewire’s #fastBREAK – Take Action

Vibewire’s #fastBREAK – Take Action

1

On the last Friday of every month, Vibewire in partnership with the Powerhouse Museum, hosts fastBREAK. Now in its third year, fastBREAK has become an essential part of the Australian creative industries scene – providing a vital showcase for young innovators, artists, creatives and entrepreneurs. The event attracts an eclectic audience, with artists mixing with business people, ballerinas rubbing shoulders with bankers and social entrepreneurs sharing breakfast with venture capitalists and investors. And most importantly of all, it is an event that encourages cross-generational conversations – where people of all ages are inspired to network and engage, fuelled by powerful ideas, great coffee and a creative breakfast from the Black Star Pastry.


Join us for fastBREAK: Technicolour

The next event is scheduled for 26 July and will have the theme “technicolour”. It promises to be provocative and stimulating:

Since the invention of Technicolor in 1916, the world of cinema and television have been brought to life with vivid contrasts and saturated colours, infusing both life and character into the film reel and captivating the imaginations of both adults and children around the world.

By injecting their own character and perspective into real life scenarios, some have been able to bring more colour into the lives of others. Now, that same passion and imagination is being brought back to life through the efforts of this month’s fastBREAK speakers.

You can pick up your tickets here – it’s the best $10 you’ll spend in Sydney.

 

New C-Suite Marketing Transformation Innovation & Product-led Growth Tech Optimization Future of Work AI ML Machine Learning LLMs Agentic AI Generative AI Robotics Analytics Automation Cloud SaaS PaaS IaaS Quantum Computing Digital Transformation Disruptive Technology Enterprise IT Enterprise Acceleration Enterprise Software Next Gen Apps IoT Blockchain CRM ERP CCaaS UCaaS Collaboration Enterprise Service developer Metaverse VR Healthcare Supply Chain Leadership Chief Customer Officer Chief Executive Officer Chief Marketing Officer Chief Information Officer Chief Technology Officer Chief Information Security Officer Chief Data Officer Chief Digital Officer Chief Analytics Officer Chief Operating Officer

NGA executes - but what's the ultimate positioning?

NGA executes - but what's the ultimate positioning?

NGA (NorthgateArinso) had their analyst day on July 16th, and it was well attended and provided an update where the company is standing and where it plans to go in the coming years.

 

Corporate and Executive Changes

It was a good opportunity to get to know the new CEO, Adel Al-Saleh, who previously was the Group CEO of Northgate. After the divestiture of the Northgate the Managed Services divisions, Al-Saleh took over for Mike Ettling as the NGA CEO. Al-Saleh has a long tenured background with IBM and IMS Health.


 

Good FY13

NGA comes out of a good financial year, growing on the sales side and increasing TCV by 36%. With the launch of a Japan office, NGA is now present in this key economy. The company keeps evolving its strategic partnerships with Workday and SuccessFactors and has an opportunity in South Africa / Africa with a joint venture with local SI powerhouse BCX, just named NGA Africa (and not discusses on the call, happened a day later).

On the operations side NGA keeps improving service readiness and focuses on scaling up in what it has designated its strategic delivery centers. On the products side the euHReka releases 12 & 13 have centered on deeper localization functionality and customer driven enhancements. The MoorepayHR launch for SMB companies in the UK seems to be going well and the company delivered the connectors to run payroll for Workday and Successfactors clients. These connectors and more have been bundled to the new offering the company named Payroll Exchange.

Recently NGA was named by Gartner (with ADP, Ceridian and Talent2) a member of the leader's quadrant of the 2013 Magic Quadrant for Payroll BPO Services.


 

NGA's Strategic Agenda

The company describes itself as a IP led HR services company, with its core business being the automation of administrative HR processes encompassing the employee life cycle, with a focus on global enterprises - all running on the euHReka product / platform.  Talent Management (NGA calls it Administration) is an Add-on the company equally offers, but depends on the sales scenario and partnerships that are in play.

 

                                            Screenshot from Webcast

Where NGA has a SMB offering with products like ResourceLink and Preceda, it plays in the these markets additionally, which are the UK and Ireland, South Africa (with BCX) and Australia / New Zealand.

And NGA believes it can differentiate itself by its exclusive focus on HR, it's flexible service delivery portfolio and it's advanced technology platforms and applications. The company takes an opportunistic view in the cloud religious wars, offering its products both on premise and in the cloud.


 

NGA FY 14 Priorities

In the upcoming financial year NGA will focus on the further evolution of its client centric coverage model, drive more maturity into global delivery capability and further investment into the key products (euHReka, Preceda, ResourceLink and Moorepay), the new Payroll Exchange and service center tools and utilities.

Obviously the company will focus to extend its partnership with Oracle - next to the existing partnerships with Workday and SAP / SuccessFactors.


 

Still doing BPO? Yes...

To my surprise the company never used the term BPO - Business Process Outsourcing, something that NGA provides for their customers and does pretty well. That's where key internal initiatives of standardizing support centers and making not only the service side of the business, but the overall company more customer centric. With no doubt both initiatives will be beneficial for existing and future NGA customers.

The company now operates over 3000 agents in 8 key strategic delivery centers that are spread over Europe, Brazil, India, Philippines and China.


 

Product direction 

Not surprisingly NGA plans to expand payroll capabilities further, and since the company does a large part of the implementation work in house, there is a focus to reduce implementation times and with that the related service costs.

NGA's flagship product euHReka has its release 14 right now in testing and release 15 will focus on learning and recruitment capabilities.

The big ambition on the product side is to standardize APIs internally to work with the new Payroll Exchange product - and to enable this product to automate extensive employee life cycle services not only for the NGA products but equally for other vendor's products.


 

Screenshot from Webcast

 

With a lack of industry standards and an industry wide interest to keep these APIs close to each vendor's chest, coupled with NGA's iterative approach to the challenge, Constellation Research foresees this to be quite a challenge going forward, but the company merits respect and encouragement for having embarked in the effort.


 

NGA and Talent Management - multifaceted

At this point NGA has a unique strategy in regards talent management functionality- while it de-emphasizes talent management in meetings like the analyst meeting, focusing on what it calls employee life cycle services and payroll, NGA is at the same time adding learning and recruitment capabilities to upcoming euHReka releases. And we expect this effort to continue at least for the near future. 

In case NGA may decide to end work on talent management - it will find itself in a unique position - as all competitors providing HRMS / payroll and talent management products are scrambling to build offerings in all three markets. 

But that decision has not been made as we learnt and so NGA keeps both options open - partner for talent management or build some themselves.

 

The positioning challenge

NGA has a unique combination of services and product IP that does not fit the mold that is usually applied by both financial and industry analysts. Being KKR owned there is no financial analyst scrutiny at this point, but as the the question of my esteemed colleague Brian Sommer showed - it's tough to make out NGA. Take a look at the blog post of my former colleague Amy Wilson from the NGA analyst summit in April 2011 - and the challenge for the analyst community is clear.
But the onus should not be on the company - but on the analyst community to better understand NGA's unique capabilities and the accompanying challenges.

The problem we see with the IP led services positioning is, that today all services business are trying to differentiate themselves through differently functional and capable IP offerings - and NGA has more with software IP assets and a global BPO delivery organization. Together with ADP, NGA is the only player for large enterprise to run their multi country payroll and HR systems.


 

Advice for partners

Make sure your service offering is in a stable area that NGA has no interest to cover. If you are partnering with NGA for international payroll services that NGA is not covering, you are probably in good hands, as you can expect NGA to be more flexible than ADP - for better or worse.


 

Advice for customers

We see four scenarios where euHReka customers and prospects may find themselves these days:


 

  • You are most likely using and or planning to use NGA for multi country payroll services, maybe a international HR system, potentially a BPO play. NGA is well positioned to aid you with both, make sure you exercise the customary best practice provisions on the SLAs and penalties side.

  • If you are looking for NGA's talent management for the unified user experience, make sure you keep NGA committed to provide and strive for best practices (or at least good enough support) of future talent management trends that matter to your enterprise.

  • If you are having a 3rd party talent management system but want to use NGA's HR system and payroll offerings, make sure to get commitments to keep supporting your talent management system through robust interfaces for the usage time frame you see.

  • Finally - if you use one of the talent management vendors that NGA partners with (as of today Workday and Successfactors) then make sure that both vendors reassure you to support the interface for the lifetime you expect to use them or the maximum you can negotiate. You will need to not only understand NGA's road map - but equally Workday's or Successfactor's road map and realize where they may encroach on each other and how to insulate your enterprise against that possible event. 

 

MyPOV

NGA is making good progress on many good housekeeping initiatives. Rationalizing products, consolidating centers, standardizing services, making employees more customer centric are all good initiatives - but other vendors are doing the same or at least similar initiatives. The winner will be who out-executes the others.

What I missed was some visionary and leadership pieces, something NGA showed in the recent past with the idea of a BPaaS (Business Process as a Service) idea and plan. 

The other key aspect will be for the executive team to position NGA's unique product and services capabilities in an easy understandable manner that reflects these capabilities of NGA and at the same time allows analysts and influencers to apprehend and correctly position these capabilities. 

Not only execution, but also positioning will be key for NGA in the next 12 months. 


-----
You can find NGA's Storify here and  mine here.

[Disclosure: I had the honor and pleasure to run Products for NGA from Summer 2010 till Spring 2012]

Media Name: NGA Official.png
Media Name: NGA Payroll Exchange N.PNG
Future of Work Tech Optimization Data to Decisions Innovation & Product-led Growth New C-Suite Marketing Transformation Next-Generation Customer Experience Digital Safety, Privacy & Cybersecurity SuccessFactors workday SAP AI Analytics Automation CX EX Employee Experience HCM Machine Learning ML SaaS PaaS Cloud Digital Transformation Enterprise Software Enterprise IT Leadership HR LLMs Agentic AI Generative AI Robotics IaaS Quantum Computing Disruptive Technology Enterprise Acceleration Next Gen Apps IoT Blockchain CRM ERP CCaaS UCaaS Collaboration Enterprise Service developer Metaverse VR Healthcare Supply Chain Chief Executive Officer Chief People Officer Chief Information Officer Chief Technology Officer Chief Customer Officer Chief Human Resources Officer Chief Digital Officer Chief Data Officer Chief Analytics Officer Chief Information Security Officer Chief Operating Officer

IBM Reports 22% Growth In Social Workforce Solutions, the Former Lotus Division

IBM Reports 22% Growth In Social Workforce Solutions, the Former Lotus Division

Earlier today IBM announced Q2 2013 financial results.  

The number of most interest to me is a 22% year over year increase in revenue in the Social Workforce Solutions (formerly Lotus ) division.

In August of 2012 IBM acquired Human Resources vendor Kenexa for ~$1.3B. That company is now part of Social Workforce Solutions. Accord to Kenexa's Q2 2012 financial report revenue for that period was $86M. Assuming that Kenexa's revenue has remained at approximately that level, then an added ~$90M would account for a large percentage of the 22% YoY increase.

Since IBM does not report product specific numbers, it's not possible to determine the gain or loss of specific products like Notes/Domino, Connections, Sametime, or others.



 

Future of Work Innovation & Product-led Growth Tech Optimization AI ML Machine Learning LLMs Agentic AI Generative AI Robotics Analytics Automation Cloud SaaS PaaS IaaS Quantum Computing Digital Transformation Disruptive Technology Enterprise IT Enterprise Acceleration Enterprise Software Next Gen Apps IoT Blockchain CRM ERP CCaaS UCaaS Collaboration Enterprise Service developer Metaverse VR Healthcare Supply Chain Leadership Chief Executive Officer Chief People Officer Chief Information Officer Chief Technology Officer Chief Information Security Officer Chief Data Officer Chief Digital Officer Chief Analytics Officer Chief Operating Officer

How to determine if a technology is disruptive

How to determine if a technology is disruptive

[VIDEO] The rapid pace in which new technologies develop combined with the speed of change of the technology market makes determining the 'disruptiveness' of a technology difficult. I'd like to share with you my methodology for determining if a technology is truly disruptive or merely a sustaining innovation.
 
I'll demonstrate this methodology by evaluating WebRTC.
 
WebRTC is a technology that enables voice and video communication directly via a web browser such as Chrome and Firefox.
 
There are two opinions regarding the disruptiveness of WebRTC:
Camp 1. WebRTC is just hype
Camp 2. WebRTC will completely change the communications industry
 
Watch this short video as I use the Innovator's Dilemma litmus tests to determine the disruptiveness of WebRTC.

 
This methodology can be used to evaluate the disruptiveness of other new technologies coming to market.
 
Share your experience with us. If you've used the Innovator's Dilemma litmus tests leave a comment, and let us know how they worked for you. 

Future of Work Marketing Transformation Matrix Commerce New C-Suite Next-Generation Customer Experience Innovation & Product-led Growth Tech Optimization AI ML Machine Learning LLMs Agentic AI Generative AI Robotics Analytics Automation Cloud SaaS PaaS IaaS Quantum Computing Digital Transformation Disruptive Technology Enterprise IT Enterprise Acceleration Enterprise Software Next Gen Apps IoT Blockchain CRM ERP CCaaS UCaaS Collaboration Enterprise Service developer Metaverse VR Healthcare Supply Chain Leadership Chief Customer Officer Chief Executive Officer Chief People Officer Chief Marketing Officer Chief Procurement Officer Chief Supply Chain Officer Chief Information Officer Chief Technology Officer Chief Information Security Officer Chief Data Officer Chief Digital Officer Chief Analytics Officer Chief Operating Officer

Netflix Is the New Apple

Netflix Is the New Apple

1

Orange is the New Black, the latest in its offering of original programming, will be renewed for a second season. This really isn't extraordinary news, except that the decision and announcement were made before the premiere of season one was aired.

Commissioning the second season of a television series in advance of the airing of a season one premiere is the latest in a slew of industry-altering decisions made by Netflix (NFLX), turning ripples into waves throughout media and investor communities. Netflix has emerged from a somewhat troubled startup to become the unconventional bellwether for what is to come in the digital media world. In fact, I'd go so far as to draw parallels between Netflix Inc. and Apple Inc.

When the public's appetite for the video store rental model began showing signs of fatigue, Netflix emerged as an alternative by offering DVDs and Blu-ray discs through a monthly subscription. For one price, you'd get to pick from a catalogue of movies that would be mailed to your door, complete with return envelope for when you were done, no time limits, no late penalties. As with other business models that buck conventional wisdom and "me-too thinking," critics were plenty; however, they were quieted down when in February, 2007 the company reported its billionth DVD delivery.

While critics were busy reporting what was wrong with the model, Netflix was planning its next evolution: on-demand digital subscription service for movies and television programming. Like Apple, Netflix didn't see limits to its model, nor would its growth strategy be dictated by conventional business practices. Why limit yourself to renting licensed material when you can capture greater wallet share by producing and streaming your own content?

Netflix was never really a video rental business. It was a media channel and, in its own eyes, no different than any network or cable channel.

It wasn't long before original content was being produced and distributed to compete with other traditional entertainment channels. Yet even here Netflix understood that the manner in which people consumed episodic programming was different. When Netflix picked up the rights to exclusively produce and broadcast a new season of the network-canceled show Arrested Development, it decided to release the entire season on the same day, at the same time.

It quickly followed suit with a growing list of original programming such as Lilyhammer, The Problem Solverz, and the critically acclaimed House of Cards, in each case releasing entire seasons at one time. Social networks were buzzing with marathon "screening parties," which gathered friends online and in-person over a weekend to watch (or re-watch) an entire season in one sitting.

Ignoring Current Trends

If I told television executives in charge of programming just 16 months ago that it was a "best practice" to release full seasons at one time and offer renewals to series before the first episode aired, I'd have been laughed out of Hollywood, or their money-guys would have had me shot. Yet here we are and Netflix's prospects -- and stock price -- are soaring. Its investment in original programming is also on the rise; $100 million was offered to out-bid HBO and AMC for House of Cards and Arrested Development was re-introduced to loyal fans for millions more.

Not every series Netflix has produced is a critical hit. Hemlock Grove, the story of teens coming to grips with their role in a series of supernatural occurrences in their small town, was panned by most critics and, according to unconfirmed reports, watched by very few people. Despite the poor reviews, a second season was announced. Traditional network executives would tell you that if Nielsen reports strong viewership, the show is renewed. But there's the rub; Netflix doesn't report viewer numbers like traditional networks do.

What's also interesting to note is that network and cable channels often commission a pilot and maybe one to three episodes to test the waters before committing to a full season. Netflix is committing to full seasons and, more recently, second seasons before the series even airs! What does it know that other broadcast executives and media pundits don't?

Like Apple, Netflix does not take its cue from current trends, but from the trend currents. It predicts the changing patterns in how people interact with television content and, using the data captured from its current 29 million subscribers, proactively fulfils that need.

Netflix knows what critics don't: what content that legions of teen horror fans wish to view, in what format, and at what frequency. It knew House of Cards would be a hit based on patterns detected through clicks and viewership and cross-referenced to celebrities, directors, and producers. Emboldened, it made the decision to approve a second season of Orange is the New Black ahead of the first season's airing. So does it matter that critics panned Hemlock Grove? No. Data is driving Netflix's programming, not reviews. It's isn't trying to be the best player at the game; it's changing the rules of the game.

What are your thoughts? Is Netflix the next Apple? Share your arguments -- pro and con -- in the comments below.

Marketing Transformation Innovation & Product-led Growth Chief Marketing Officer

You Need To Have A Strategy For Social Software

You Need To Have A Strategy For Social Software

While at Oracle CloudWorld in London, I had the honour of speaking with BBC Click tech reporter Kate Russell on the BizCouch. The first of our three part interview is now available.

Improving Marketing Through Social Strategy (2:53 min)

  • 0:10-1:00, Customers at CloudWorld are asking a lot about how they can improve their brand marketing via social media
  • 1:00-2:45, You need to have a strategy around doing social, not just choose a tool. You have to have a reason why (specific use-cases), how and when social platforms should be used.

Parts Two (4:17 min) and Three (5:09 min) will be coming out over the next few weeks, so stay tuned.

 

Data to Decisions Future of Work Marketing Transformation Matrix Commerce New C-Suite Next-Generation Customer Experience Tech Optimization Innovation & Product-led Growth AI ML Machine Learning LLMs Agentic AI Generative AI Robotics Analytics Automation Cloud SaaS PaaS IaaS Quantum Computing Digital Transformation Disruptive Technology Enterprise IT Enterprise Acceleration Enterprise Software Next Gen Apps IoT Blockchain CRM ERP CCaaS UCaaS Collaboration Enterprise Service developer Metaverse VR Healthcare Supply Chain Leadership Chief Customer Officer Chief Executive Officer Chief Financial Officer Chief Information Officer Chief Marketing Officer Chief People Officer Chief Procurement Officer Chief Supply Chain Officer Chief Technology Officer Chief Information Security Officer Chief Data Officer Chief Digital Officer Chief Analytics Officer Chief Operating Officer