Results

The First of the CRM Providers to Integrate WebRTC

The First of the CRM Providers to Integrate WebRTC

A few months ago, I predicted that the low hanging fruit for WebRTC in the enterprise space would be in customer service and support applications, including e-commerce sites. This prediction turned out to be true when FreeCRM announced that it has already integrated WebRTC into its cloud-based CRM solution. In the initial offering, the agent is only able to make outbound calls to the PSTN. This fall, the company will enable inbound calls as well.

FreeCRM has not developed this capability alone. Rather, it has deployed an Asterisk PBX in its cloud that acts as a gateway to the PSTN. Asterisk announced support for WebRTC in its Version 11 release back in 

November of 2012. The company reports that the WebRTC audio is solid and that the solution works flawlessly. Also, because it is cloud-based, FreeCRM can aggregate the usage and get very low costs for PSTN calling.

FreeCRM works on a freemium model with “typical” freemium conversion rates (the WSJ reported these are 1% - 2%). FreeCRM’s CEO reports there are roughly 290,000 registered users, and if 2% of these are paying users, then the company has roughly 5,800 paid subscribers.


WebRTC outbound calling capability is only available in FreeCRM’s premium product branded VoiceCRM, which costs $39.95/user/month. However, for this price, users can make unlimited free WebRTC-based calls to any PSTN/mobile number within the United States. Fifty percent of the company’s users are based outside of the U.S., so FreeCRM is looking for solutions that can give these customers WebRTC-to-PSTN international calling plans that are economical.

 

FreeCRM is firing the first shot in the WebRTC CRM wars that are certainly heating up. Several other CRM vendors are working on WebRTC integration into their products. FreeCRM claims these solutions from traditional CRM vendors will likely cost 3x – 5x more per fully functional CRM seat than what FreeCRM charges.

Future of Work New C-Suite Next-Generation Customer Experience Tech Optimization Innovation & Product-led Growth AI ML Machine Learning LLMs Agentic AI Generative AI Robotics Analytics Automation Cloud SaaS PaaS IaaS Quantum Computing Digital Transformation Disruptive Technology Enterprise IT Enterprise Acceleration Enterprise Software Next Gen Apps IoT Blockchain CRM ERP CCaaS UCaaS Collaboration Enterprise Service developer Metaverse VR Healthcare Supply Chain Leadership Chief Customer Officer Chief Executive Officer Chief People Officer Chief Information Officer Chief Marketing Officer Chief Technology Officer Chief Information Security Officer Chief Data Officer Chief Digital Officer Chief Analytics Officer Chief Operating Officer

To HAVEn and have not - Or: HP bundles away

To HAVEn and have not - Or: HP bundles away

At this weeks HPDiscover conference in Las Vegas, HP announced a number of interesting new offerings, the one that caught my attention was the nicely crafted acronym of HAVEn, so let's understand what it is - and what it is not. And I hope the movie buffs pardon the name bungling in this post's title, but this one was too tempting. 


 

 

What is HAVEn

HAVEn is the bundling of a Hadoop based, Autonomy and Vertica encompassing, Enterprise securyity enabled platform that allow for the building of big data apps, lots of them, n to be precise. Got it? And for good measure HAVEn also includes ArcSight - another A if you want. The first HP application to be delivered on HAVEn is HP Operations Management, which is a very good showcase of big data capability for the platform. And is close to HP's home of helping IT, run IT better. 

 

From HP Presentation

 

The other good news for HP is, that given HP is bundling existing products, everything that has been built in the past using Vertica, Autonomy and ArcSight - will now also work on HAVEn. Only enriched with enterprise security and the availability of a Hadoop Storage system. Which will make any potential move to HAVEn even more attractive for existing applications. 

Proofpoint for Hadoop

As with many announcements, not too much specific could be gleaned on how HAVEn really will work, something to sort out in the weeks to come. But the usage of Hadoop is a great proof point for the maturity of this technology - and there are two options how HP may use Hadoop.

(1) Hadoop as another data source
This would be the low hanging fruit and a tacit admission that despite all the capability of Vertica and the sophisticated algorithms of Autonomy Idol - there is another key data source to get data from. Like many other BI / big data vendors HP may now admit to a co-existence scenario with Hadoop.

(2) Hadoop as the platform
This would be a much more ambitious approach than (1), making Hadoop the operating base and storage for all HAVEn data. And to some point the Autonomy announcement of allowing the Idol engine to run in a Hadoop kernel points in that direction. But it would still see HP operate the Vertica stores for high performance data.

As mentioned - we will see in the next weeks how HAVEn really will work - but regardless - a key validation of Hadoop as a viable platform and as a technology that has arrived to the enterprise - considering the uptake by HP something like the knighthood for Hadoop.

Clarification is needed

It's close to impossible to provide an assessment of HAVEn as a systems, since so little is known about it. HP will need to clarify a lot in the next weeks and I am wondering if HAVEn will be only a loose marketing term of bundled together products - or a true bigdata platform going former.

From HP Presentation

My hope for HAVEn is of course for it to be a true platform, that will not only enable HP itself, but also its extensive partner ecosystem to build the n applications on top that are part of the name. But for that to happen we would need the specs for HAVEn, what systems it runs on, how does it authenticate, access systems and data, move data etc - all things that need to be clarified.

The Services Dilemma

And like with all things HP this days, we get always reminded of the availability of HP professionals to help customers with these offerings. The irony for HP is, that by integrating the components of HAVEn better, it takes away some of the services revenue. 

But it's the right strategy since customers will not have too much of patience left to pay for integration of HP acquired products. At some point the integration will be simply expected between synergistic products. And that HP has a synergistic big data play across Autonomy, Arcsight and Vertica has just been proven by the HAVEn announcements.

Advice for HAVEn component customers

If you are using Arcsight, Autonomy or Vertica today, keep using them. You probably will end up with HAVEn automatically, as HP integrates these components. Try to understand early what HAVEn is though, so you don't pay for custom services for something that you will get from HP soon and likely for free. 

Advice for HAVEn prospects

It's too early to tell what HAVEn will be and even more far away from predicting any market success. But if you are to embark into a big data project, this is one of the more interesting platform announcements in the last quarters. So try to learn more and let HP explain this to you in detail.

Advice for HP competitors

If you have no bundling and integration plans for complimentary big data pieces you have acquired, HAVEn is your wake up call. If you are a single big data product player - evaluate partnerships asap - as more integrated big data product announcements are on the horizon.

Advice for HP

Provide a lot more information on HAVEn. Explain the role of Hadoop. Put real product integration investment behind this to leverage the 2 + 2 = 5 synergy benefits you can hope for. 

MyPOV

HP has an early mover advantage now by bundling the acquired big data pieces in its realm. The questions is, what took HP so long, but that's a consideration of the past. It will be interesting to see how bundles like HAVEn will change the dynamics of the big data market away from many products and many hands to fewer products and less hands to be successful with big data. 
But for now congrats to HP for a promising launch - execution needs to follow. 

Data to Decisions Tech Optimization Hadoop HP ML Machine Learning LLMs Agentic AI Generative AI AI Analytics Automation business Marketing SaaS PaaS IaaS Digital Transformation Disruptive Technology Enterprise IT Enterprise Acceleration Enterprise Software Next Gen Apps IoT Blockchain CRM ERP finance Healthcare Customer Service Content Management Collaboration Chief Information Officer Chief Technology Officer Chief Information Security Officer Chief Data Officer

Is Facebook the New Las Vegas?

Is Facebook the New Las Vegas?

1

You know how it goes at the international airport check-in counter.

  1. Greet customer: “Hello sir”
  2. Determine destination: “Where are you travelling to today?”
  3. Check passport, print boarding pass etc

It’s all pretty functional.

From time to time, there might be some off-script personality sneaking through, but it’s rare. Unless you are travelling to Vegas.

When I checked-in for my first ever trip to Las Vegas, the routine started as usual. But when we got to point 2 – and I explained where I was heading, the woman stopped and looked up.

Her eyes glistened and she smiled. She nodded and just said, “Veeeegaas”.

It was at this point that I knew that there was something special in store. The thing is, Vegas is a place whose story precedes it. It is a place where stories are born and where we can become wrapped in a story beyond our imaginings in the blink of a showgirl’s eye.

Now, it used to be said that what goes on in Vegas, stays in Vegas. But that was “back in the day” – which in Gen Y speak means about 2009. It was a time when being in a city in the middle of a desert afforded a certain isolation. It was a time before my nanna was on Facebook. And now, as we all know, what goes on in Vegas, lives forever on Facebook. Or Google. Or the computers in the NSA’s secret PRISM data centre.

And this means that the stories that are the lifeblood that is “Veeeegaas” … are no longer contained. Furthermore, those stories are amplified, hyper-real simulacra flashed across a variety of digital networks in multi-format content from pictures on Instagram to collections on Pinterest and videos on Vine and YouTube to collections on Storify.

But just as Vegas transformed itself from family destination to adult playground, it seems that Facebook too is experiencing this kind of shift. With teens and young adults starting feeling Facebook fatigue and dropping away from the social network, it’s leaving a hard core adult population to connect, share and engage. And with a revitalised MySpace and a plethora of low demand/high impact alternatives like Instagram and SnapChat it may well be that Facebook enters a new era of adult-focused engagement.

Perhaps.

But which ever way that dice rolls, one thing is for certain. Before posting a new photo to Facebook, ask yourself the hard question. Should I?

 

ShouldIUploadIt

Marketing Transformation Innovation & Product-led Growth Tech Optimization Future of Work AI ML Machine Learning LLMs Agentic AI Generative AI Robotics Analytics Automation Cloud SaaS PaaS IaaS Quantum Computing Digital Transformation Disruptive Technology Enterprise IT Enterprise Acceleration Enterprise Software Next Gen Apps IoT Blockchain CRM ERP CCaaS UCaaS Collaboration Enterprise Service developer Metaverse VR Healthcare Supply Chain Leadership Chief Marketing Officer Chief Information Officer Chief Technology Officer Chief Information Security Officer Chief Data Officer Chief Digital Officer Chief Analytics Officer Chief Executive Officer Chief Operating Officer

Java grows up to the enterprise

Java grows up to the enterprise

Today Oracle announced the availability of Java Enterprise Edition (EE) Version 7. This marks the first Java EE release under complete Oracle stewardship and is an important milestone to assess Oracle's stewardship of Java and its implications for the enterprise.

No doomsday here

There was a lot of concern in the Java community on how Oracle would handle the future of Java, that came under its control with the Sun acquisition. The majority of voices were critical, the father of Java, James Gosling, being one of the most critical ones. But criticism has calmed down over the years as Oracle has kept Java open and continued to develop it further - with the similar principle of primus inter pares like Sun did.

With involvement and contributions from co-opetitors like Google, IBM, SAP, Sybase, Tibco and VMware there certainly is trust in the Java EE community to work with Oracle. And about 9 million Java developers and 18 Java EE compliant application servers give credit to the wide adoptions and relevance of Java.


 

Screenshot from Webcast

Java remains competitive

With the Oracle investment, Java remains a competitive development language for enterprise applications, but despite the enormous amount of applications and systems running on Java, Java is playing catch up on some of the newer technologies. Take HTML5 support as an example, where we are already in the disillusionment of phase of HTML5 adoption with e.g. Facebook recently abandoning their HTML5 efforts for the sake of native mobile apps. 

So with HTML5 support now coming to Java EE 7, Oracle is playing catch up to a certain point, but the consumer application market seems to have been gone anyway - the question is, will this make Java more attractive for enterprise application development.

 

Screenshot from Webcast

 

 

On the core Java side, Oracle added support for JSON 1.0, something that could have been worked around before via library inclusion, but with support inside of the platform, it makes JSON usage easier and more robust. This also makes the creation of HTML5 applications much easier, which are connected through Websockets 1.0 and provide necessary life cycle methods for nature of the many HTML5 applications out there. And making the HTML5 markup easier from Java Server Faces 2.2 is an important productivity step when building HTML5 apps. 

I guess with the combination of the three above - for a user interface intensive enterprise application like e.g. employee self service on HTML5, you will save up to 10% of development effort and will achieve a much more robust application as a end product.

And the addition of simplified JMS, CDI as a core component model and bean validation on POJOs with improved default resources for JDBC / JPA and concurrency will help developer productivity further. It certainly does not vault Java into the productivity range of some of the popular scripting languages, but that comparison is not fair from the starting premise - Java is a fundamental programming language, not a scripting tool.

 

Key enterprise additions

Oracle addressed some key weaknesses of Java for enterprise processes with EE 7. Unfortunately there are a lot of long running processes in the enterprise, and Java was never the ideal choice to automate these - as the Java processes would be unreliable and seldom there when needed. With the the additions of batch applications this is being addressed and I am very curious to hear about success of the first batchlets out there.

Hand in hand go the extension of the concurrency utility APIs, with the addition of asynchronous capabilities - a new category of applications is now attainable with Java, that it was better not to use Java or before. How far this will get Java applications for multi-threaded concurrent tasks - we will see and hear in the months to come.

 

What was missed

The Java community had some hopes that Oracle would also address some of the caching challenges, but already a few months ago the new JCache was cut out of the release schedule for EE 7. Similar the high hopes for more PaaS support have been delayed towards EE 8, as known since fall last year.

Oracle did the right decision to not wait longer, as enough critical substance is in EE 7 and the community should not have been kept to wait longer for them.

 

After EE 7 is before EE 8

It will be key for Oracle to quickly increase the caching capabilities with JCache in EE 8, maybe even a major EE 7 dot release. A tender spot for Java applications for some time. The cloud / PaaS capabilities will be similarly critical. Though they give the ecosystem of PaaS vendors some more breathing room to differentiate their offerings and lead further - which helps Java overall. 

 

Screenshot from Webcast

 

Advice for enterprises - purchasers

Look for EE 7 adoption from vendors and first experiences before postulating it in RFPs. When promising and encouraging, do not hesitate to add to your requirements. Many benefits from EE 7 will make your enterprise application more attractive to end users and more stable on the backend side, so start the conversation with vendors early.

 

Advice for enterprises - builders

If you haven't - it's time to get your hands dirty with some lab installs and trials. Focus on the highest benefit drivers, probably focus on the batch and concurrency pieces first. And have a look at NetBeans 7.3.1 as well as Glassfish 4.0 

 

Advice for ISVs

If you are only looking at EE 8 now, you are behind already, time to catch up. If you haven't moved to HTML5 yet - this is a good evaluation project. Check your defects and support requests in regards of stability needs of background, long running processes. There may be some low hanging fruits there.

 

MyPOV

Oracle has shipped a solid and attractive release with EE 7. It now needs to maintain momentum to keep the install base and not loose more hearts and minds to the scripting languages. A roadmap and milestones for EE 8 coming out soon - will be the first step. But for now take a deep breath and enjoy Java EE 7. 

P.S. Many thanks to Oracle's Mike Lehmann and Claire Dessaux for a pre-launch briefing. 

New C-Suite Tech Optimization Data to Decisions Future of Work Innovation & Product-led Growth Oracle PaaS Chief Customer Officer Chief Executive Officer Chief Information Officer

Research Summary: Demystifying Social Business - Optimizing the Lead to Deal Process (Sales)

Research Summary: Demystifying Social Business - Optimizing the Lead to Deal Process (Sales)

Forward And Commentary

Constellation Research pioneered the complete set of front office and back office use cases for social business in 2010. This report provides insight into a key mega-area — lead to deal use cases. This best practices research report offers insight into two of Constellation’s primary research themes, the Next-Generation Customer Experience and the Consumerization of Information Technology/The New C-Suite.

A. Introduction

Social business initiatives have gained acceptance as a key driver in business innovation. Since 2010, organizations have experimented and successfully deployed social business initiatives across a variety of business processes. In Constellation’s recent 2013 survey of 237 social business adopters, more than a majority (57.8 percent) of the market leaders and fast follower respondents had moved from experimentation to scaling social business initiatives to match demand. This trend signifies the successful growth of social business across a number of use cases.

With over 50 use cases identified in the survey, organizations now have defined entry points to begin social business initiatives. Consequently, many businesses can learn from the experience of market leaders and fast followers. Constellation has curated eight mega-use cases for social business that cover key business processes such as:

  • Campaign to lead
  • Lead to deal
  • Incident to resolution
  • Kick off to delivery
  • Concept to production
  • Sourcing to acceptance
  • Hire to retire
  • Invoice to payment

This report focuses on the lead to deal mega-use case, which includes both traditional business-to-business (B2B) and business-to-consumer (B2C) situations such as territory management, collaborative selling, partner selling, crowdsourced intelligence, matrix commerce, save the deal and steal the deal. These use cases should provide a starting point for mapping out the sales journey.

B. Research Findings – As Adoption Progresses, Seven Major Use Cases Emerge for Sales Processes
The recent 2013 survey of 237 global social business adopters shows 57.8 percent of the market leaders and fast follower respondents scaling social business initiatives to match demand (see Figure 1). This shift from choosing the right go-forward platform in 2012 highlights a move from Level 3 (Evangelization) to Level 4 (Pervasiveness).  This first wave of people has started to see the benefits of social business initiatives and intends to scale them out throughout their organizations and value networks.  They have succeeded by finding executive sponsors, measuring metrics that matter and aligning with business processes.

Figure 1. Social Business Adoption Moves From Platform Consolidation to Scale

(right click to view image)

Seven Key Use Cases Emerge in Lead to Deal

The lead to deal use cases focus on how social business can improve sales team efficiency, reduce sales cycle time, foster collaboration and drive revenue. Lead to deal is a very popular place to begin social business initiatives as the management objectives for many organizations focus on operational efficiency and revenue growth. Constellation identifies seven use cases in lead to deal (see Figure 2):

  1. Territory assignment focuses on relationships not geographies.
  2. Collaborative selling taps into the entire organization’s network.
  3. Partner selling creates force multipliers in the sales force.
  4. Crowdsourced deal intelligence improves win rates.
  5. Matrix commerce creates a buyer-centric approach.
  6. Save the deal tracks customers through the sales funnel.
  7. Steal the deal uses influence to take deals from competitors.

Figure 2. Constellation’s Lead to Deal Social Business Use Cases

The Bottom Line: Social Business Is Here To Stay

The moniker “social business” will disappear over the next 24 months. However, the concepts underlying social business will provide the foundation for good business strategy. The new abilities to take social, mobile, cloud and Big Data will converge to create new opportunities. The result – social business is just good business strategy.

C. Report Links

See the objectives, metrics, and starting points market leaders and fast followers use to begin their social business initiatives in lead to deal.  Buy the full research report on the Constellation Research website.

Your POV.

Ready to test out social business for your lead to deal process? Have as success or failure story? Any advice from your experience?  Add your comments to the blog or send us a comment at R (at) SoftwareInsider (dot) org or R (at) ConstellationR (dot) com

Please let us know if you need help with your Social Business efforts.  Sign up for a Constellation Academy Workshop or let us assist with:

  • Assessing readiness
  • Developing your social business strategy
  • Vendor selection
  • Implementation partner selection
  • Connecting with other pioneers

Reprints

Reprints can be purchased through Constellation Research, Inc. To request official reprints in PDF format, please contact sales (at) ConstellationRG (dot) com.

Related Research:

Disclosure

Although we work closely with many mega software vendors, we want you to trust us. For the full disclosure policy, stay tuned for the full client list on the Constellation Research website.

Copyright © 2001 – 2013 R Wang and Insider Associates, LLC All rights reserved.

 

New C-Suite Future of Work Next-Generation Customer Experience Data to Decisions Innovation & Product-led Growth Tech Optimization Marketing Transformation Revenue & Growth Effectiveness SoftwareInsider ML Machine Learning LLMs Agentic AI Generative AI Robotics AI Analytics Automation B2B B2C CX EX Employee Experience HR HCM business Marketing Metaverse developer SaaS PaaS IaaS Supply Chain Quantum Computing Growth Cloud Digital Transformation Disruptive Technology eCommerce Enterprise IT Enterprise Acceleration Enterprise Software Next Gen Apps IoT Blockchain CRM ERP Leadership finance Social Healthcare VR CCaaS UCaaS Customer Service Content Management Collaboration M&A Enterprise Service Customer Experience Chief Customer Officer Chief Information Officer Chief Executive Officer Chief Technology Officer Chief Data Officer Chief Digital Officer Chief Analytics Officer Chief Financial Officer Chief Operating Officer Chief Marketing Officer Chief Revenue Officer Chief People Officer Chief Information Security Officer Chief Experience Officer

Cornerstone re-imagines Talent Management -- and itself

Cornerstone re-imagines Talent Management -- and itself

It’s all about - Re-imagine …

The new marketing tagline of Cornerstone is all around re-imagining the product offering. The area of imagination are centered on two directions – product functionality and user experience. In two keynotes presented by CEO Adam Miller, the company went at length and into detail to highlight the latest improvements in both directions. 

Picture from Twitter

 

Miller did a great job at explaining how the Millenials increasing labor force share changes the requests and demands for the enterprise and with that for its HCM and talent management systems. Equally the consumerization of IT requires vendors to upgrade their offerings to take account of easier to use systems, bring your own device (BYOD). And then work is changing itself, becoming more international, location and device independent, location agnostic and multicultural.

Re-imagine functionality

Cornerstone wants to re-imagine the functionality behind its key three automation areas – performance, learning and recruitment. Cornerstone has targeted specific new functionalities In each of the three automation areas, to bring them further, and closer to the new workforce’s needs. Not surprisingly there has been special attention on recruitment
 

Example Re-imagine Performance - Picture from Twitter

Re-imagine user experience

The other direction of the re-imagination project is around the user experience. Cornerstone rightfully realized about a year ago, that their product’s user experience was falling behind and has embarked into a brand new user interface with a much more 21st century tune, you may even say consumer grade user interface.

The overall acceptance of the new user interface was very positive by the attendees and I think Cornerstone has done a very good job creating a lightweight, easy to use interface experience with good cross platform consistency.

From ZDNet - June 4th 2013.

But it’s not only the user experience, the modern workforce also needs more modern collaboration tools, so Cornerstone rebuild the Connect product, consistent to the new user interface. At this point it is a powerful multifunctional feed function, that serves the collaborative usage needs well. The Connect product gets complemented by solid project and task management functionality.

My main concern on the new user interface paradigm is the scroll intensity and related downsides. The old user experience paradigm of the eyes are faster than the mouse comes to mind – when users need to scroll to get to information – it takes time and in the worst case – they may not even find the information, as they do not start scrolling. But overall the new Cornerstone user interface is a significant increase in usability and can rightfully claim to be consumer grade.

Public Sector, SMB and force

Cornerstone has expanded beyond being a pure horizontal vendor – with a focus on public sector and is adding (north American) functionality to make it a strong provider of talent management for this vertical. And while public sector organizations certainly can take help managing talent, it was a surprising choice of a vertical to me.

Equally Cornerstone has started to offer products for the small and medium size businesses (SMB) – mainly centered around the performance functionality of last year’s acquisition of New Zealand’s Sonar6. Sonar6 was a leader in the gamification trend for enterprise applications and it is good to see some of that DNA not only being preserved for the SMB offering (<500 employees is the cutoff) but that some of the Sonar6 acclaimed performance management functionality like the helicopter view have made it to the mainstream product.

And back in February Cornerstone released it’s Salesforce based product. Interesting enough the company operated a subsidiary in stealth mode for some time, let it build a product on force.com and sell it to over 70 customers, including Salesforce themselves. It’s a gamble not only on the salesforce ecosystem and partner sales activities, but also on the force.com platform as an alternative to the more Microsoft centric mainstream products.

Cornerstone Uniquenesses

The company has a few unique characteristics that are worth mentioning here. At the preceding analyst day it became clear, that the executive team has been working together for a long time, know each other well and is very consistent facing the questions of the analyst community. It’s remarkable that these executives were able to grow along with the company for the last years of very rapid growth, a living proof of hiring talent for growth.

Moreover Cornerstone is one of the very few enterprise vendors out there with a single platform, with all offerings being built on top of this platform. This not only ensures consistency for end users, but also a higher productivity for development resources. At the same time a single platform company needs to have an attentive eye on the time appropriateness of the platform, but Cornerstone seems to have a good eye on this. The user interface modernization being a good indicoator. Likewise the force.com based product seems to have been an alternative platform validation project, with the nice side effect to yield a separate product for the Salesforce ecosystem.

Then there is the location of the company, being headquartered in Santa Monica. And while there are more recent successes from Silicon Beach it remains an unusual location for an enterprise software company. But Cornerstone has reached a good critical size and attracts enough talent for their product development teams to allivieate this a concern. It could even be an advantage, as Cornerstone engineers come with a relocation extra price tag, should a competitor try to poach.

And finally a lot of respect has to go to Adam Miller – who is the driving force on product vision and direction. Few software companies today rely on their CEO to do this – and even fewer CEOs come to mind to have that capability. Even more remarkable is that Adam's background is not in the high tech industry – but in legal and investment banking. Talk about a wide talent profile.

Positive customers

We always like the opportunity to formally and informally chat with customers and partners at user conferences. And while the overall atmosphere is always giddy and excited at these events, we heard only very little negative and critical comments. Cornerstone’s customer base is positive on the company and products and is looking forward to get the upcoming Spring 2013 release to their users. 

Picture from Twitter

The road ahead

Like Workday, one of the few other single platform HCM vendor in the market today, Cornerstone has a year of execution tasks and challenges ahead of them. Once you have a great product you need to get it to customers and with little localization needs for talent management required – in comparison to core HR and payroll – the worldwide expansion is a key task for Cornerstone. Hiring, training and getting sales people to the first sell in many geographies outside North America will be critical. And then the ramp up of the following value chain with partners, consulting capability and delivery infrastructure to ensure customer viability and satisfaction. The latter has the most obvious need for investment – as the company does not have a data center in the APAC region yet – something that due to international networks latency is pretty much a necessity.

And while Cornerstone is hitting the right notes in terms of re-imagining their core products it needs to keep investing into them. Across performance, learning and recruitment the latter is probably the lightest in terms of functionality.  And while the weakening of Taleo in the marketplace due to the Oracle acquisition has helped some early customer successes, this situation won’t stay quiet as it is now for too many quarters to come. 

Not only will the Oracle / Taleo combo get its act together, but we will see also the Workday recruitment module in less than 12 months from now in the marketplace. This will transform the currently close partnership between Cornerstone and Workday into a coopetition at best.

So it’s time for Cornerstone to invest in distribution, delivery and products. The news of the planned 220M US$ debt offering is a good sign that Cornerstone is serious about the expansion needs and takes advantage of favorable conditions in the capital markets.

Advice for partners

Find a role in the upcoming expansion that Cornerstone needs partners to fill. Find a win / win area that you can invest and execute in and that allows you to setup for above average revenue growth in the next 12-18 months.

Advice for customers

You are in good hands with Cornerstone for learning and performance. The external enterprise functionality is a very good addition and value add.

  • If you look for recruitment, make sure it’s a good fit.

  • If you are in public sector understand the road map and make sure you get re-assurances for its timely delivery if your critical processes hinge on it.

  • If you are an SMB make sure the gamification nature of the product suits your employee base – and if it does – you have one of the most exciting talent management products at your disposal.

  • If you are on the force.com platform and want to run an integrated talent and sales / service system – Cornerstone is one of the more viable and capable vendors.

  • If you are based in APAC make sure you have sufficient re-assurance for onsite application performance.

MyPOV

A good event for Cornerstone with significant product innovation – not only on the business functionality but also the critical platform side. Cornerstone has positioned itself well and earned a very good market position that it now needs to execute to expand and solidify in the next 12-18 months all across the world. Exciting times for the company’s customers, its partners, investors and employees. And when well executed, it will not only re-imagine the products – but also the company. 

Future of Work Tech Optimization Next-Generation Customer Experience Digital Safety, Privacy & Cybersecurity Data to Decisions Innovation & Product-led Growth New C-Suite Marketing Transformation Oracle SuccessFactors workday SAP AI Analytics Automation CX EX Employee Experience HCM Machine Learning ML SaaS PaaS Cloud Digital Transformation Enterprise Software Enterprise IT Leadership HR LLMs Agentic AI Generative AI Robotics IaaS Quantum Computing Disruptive Technology Enterprise Acceleration Next Gen Apps IoT Blockchain CRM ERP CCaaS UCaaS Collaboration Enterprise Service developer Metaverse VR Healthcare Supply Chain Chief Financial Officer Chief Information Officer Chief Customer Officer Chief People Officer Chief Human Resources Officer Chief Technology Officer Chief Information Security Officer Chief Data Officer Chief Digital Officer Chief Analytics Officer Chief Executive Officer Chief Operating Officer

Meet the Connected Enterprise Speakers: Chris Meyer, Monitor Talent

Meet the Connected Enterprise Speakers: Chris Meyer, Monitor Talent

This is the second installment in a series of blog posts in which we will introduce you to this year's Connected Enterprise (#CCE2013) speakers. This year's list of speakers is comprised of a group of revolutionaries that will challenge you to reevaluate your approach to standing business models.  

Say hello to Chris Meyer, innovator, author, and founder of Monitor Talent.

Chris has dedicated his career to anticipating and shaping the future of business. And he's been pretty busy. Chris is the author of four books including Standing on the Sun, and Blur: The Speed of Change in the Connected Economy and Future Wealth, a BusinessWeek Best Seller. 

Reexamining capitalism

One of Chris' major areas of analysis is the changing dynamics of capitalism. The capitalism of today looks very different from the Adam Smith-style capitalism of 1776. As emerging economies gain power and mature, will they adopt the practices of the old guard? Or will they make their own way, and create the next prevailing version of capitalism? What new opportunities will that create for firms around the world?

Join us at Connected Enterprise and hear from Chris how:

  • The obsession with return on equity gives way to more broad-based measurements of success.
  • Adam Smith's invisible hand of the market is redeemed by the "invisible handshake" of collaborative networks.
  • Businesses take ownership of the impacts they now call "externalities."

Register for Connected Enterprise before June 30, and save up to $1000. 

Register here: http://connectedenterprise.ontrackevents.com/home.cfm

Media Name: chrismeyer_web_may2012.jpg
Data to Decisions Future of Work Marketing Transformation Matrix Commerce New C-Suite Next-Generation Customer Experience Tech Optimization Innovation & Product-led Growth AI ML Machine Learning LLMs Agentic AI Generative AI Robotics Analytics Automation Cloud SaaS PaaS IaaS Quantum Computing Digital Transformation Disruptive Technology Enterprise IT Enterprise Acceleration Enterprise Software Next Gen Apps IoT Blockchain CRM ERP CCaaS UCaaS Collaboration Enterprise Service developer Metaverse VR Healthcare Supply Chain Leadership Chief Customer Officer Chief Executive Officer Chief Financial Officer Chief Information Officer Chief Marketing Officer Chief People Officer Chief Procurement Officer Chief Supply Chain Officer Chief Technology Officer Chief Information Security Officer Chief Data Officer Chief Digital Officer Chief Analytics Officer Chief Operating Officer

How hard is it to install Office365? Or: The harsh reality of customer support

How hard is it to install Office365? Or: The harsh reality of customer support

The other day I went through a rather mundane challenge... I was running Office365 on one machine - but didn't like that machine, returned it and got another one, a new one. Well all I needed to do was re-install Office365, that I need to edit and see revisions of research reports.





Well - the process started by noon on Thursday, and I was finally done on Friday by close to 10 AM  - close to 24 hours. I don't want to dig into the details - but at some point I started tweeting about my progress and created this Storify if you want to visit some of the highlights you can find them here.






But what we can learn from this is, that the reality of customer support, even at a deep pocketed company like Microsoft, is ... pretty sad. Maybe I had a bad day, was just unlucky, had agents at the end of their shift etc... but I don't believe that - given the nature of the observations I was able to make.




Solid Products - less support

All issues seemed to be around downloading and installing the Office365 install files. I realize they are huge, but not larger than other downloads I do (development environments, legally purchased movies etc). This whole problem could have been avoided with a more solid, fault free download.

And typical, like many high tech companies - Microsoft tries to not eliminate the problem at the root - but implements workarounds... I was surprised Office comes with repair tools - a quick repair tool and a internet repair tool (which takes longer, not sure why the internet name would make it look like it take longer, but ok). And indeed these tools work, on the original machine one of the repairs helped me to install Office365. But how about instead making sure that the install files are not having issues in the first place? The leaner approach that certainly is.

Worse - Microsoft bends its own rules. At least the ones from the past when a Windows program needed to un-install again. I have seen plenty of bad and unclean uninstalls - but I never in my 20 or so years of using Windows (ok, dated myself Windows 2.1 was the first Windows I ever used) - had a program that would not un-install itself... but now I had Office from Microsoft themselves - and knew I was in trouble:





And finally I cannot prove it - there maybe an issues with authentication with Microsoft. Somewhere between Microsoft ID and Office email address there was a snafu. Can't pin point what it was, it surely wasn't solved by deleting browser properties - we tried this three times - but something in the back-end did not work (as I could not log in).





Confused about Microsoft ID - don't worry Microsoft is, too

In all three conversations I had with Microsoft 1st level support - they had me try to login with my Microsoft ID and alternatively with my new Office365 email ID. Well turns out - as confirmed by the last support agent who finally fixed my problem - it has always been and is only the Office365 ID you should use to login into Office365. Seems intuitive - but 3 support agents had me try another path. How and why it finally worked - I was not privy to the root cause.




Support best practices are... hard

Interesting enough - every of the 10 agents I talked to asked for a callback number in case we would get disconnected. Very good practice - only you need to call back when the line drops. In my case 3 times. So why ask for the number when you do not call back - or your agents do not have the capability to call back?

And of course you should have a knowledge base and trained support agents. I mentioned the confusion on the Microsoft vs Office365 ID. But we also went down dead ends like switching browsers, deleting cookies etc. At no point I had the impression the agents were working on a cohesive script.

Moreover you want to make sure your agents know where to transfer calls. All first level support agents knew I had a problem with Office365 - but I got routed twice to the wrong 2nd level support. No idea why. But frustrating for the customer and this costs Microsoft real money.

It was good to see, that I was a member of four personal, warm transfers, but I had to start from scratch every time. It does not look that the agents are working on one common system - as I had to re-answer same and similar questions again and again.

But on the downside there is always some signal and signal strength loss with every transfer in the VoIP ether - so two times the 3rd level agent could not hear me anymore... so obviously the signal boosting does not work well enough.

Lastly - global remote support is not an easy task. But you should be aware of the time zone where you client is in. One 2nd support agent told me that the next level of support is gone - because it was after 10 PM PST, but well it was 9:17 PM PST.

Needless to say every agent I talked to was friendly, patient, polished and professional.




Make your support agents life easier

Only the 9th agent logged a case and I got a service request number. But all other agents beyond 1st level always asked me for a service request number... so make it a practice to log a case and generate a number right away.

And anyone who came up with these order number format nncnccnn-nnnc-nnnn-nccn-nncnccnnncnn needs to call India and pass 10 order numbers across the line every day... it took me 2-3 minutes to get that monster across the phone line... so make it easier for the support situation.




Social practices are ... harder

I wasn't private about the problem anymore - used the Twitter hashtag #OfficeSaga and tweeted every step along the way. Some follow Twitter users re-tweeted. I addressed tweets to @Mircrosoft and @Office. But the social pickup came when it was all done... and typical social networks - a Twitter user replied - even before me (inside joke guess at #HANA speed):





Since then - nothing, nada, zilch... so when you engage in social relationship management - then you need to monitor earlier, be faster and round the interaction up.




Biggest Concern

The agent that managed to help me at the end of the day is working in a team, that is only available 9-5 PST. That is hardly enough coverage for software support in a country like the US. Yes - I had an option to continue to emergency and productions issue support - but that did not seem adequate for an Office install issue - I have been on the other end too many times to do this... but Office buyers and users deserve a better time coverage in my view. Unless Microsoft shows me, that I am the only one calling in in after hours... but empirically I doubt that - since I got the custom due to unexpected call volumes... message right at 8 AM. So plenty of backlog.




Advice

If you are in charge of support somewhere and reading this - hope your team does better. If not and you are aware of the weak points - then address them asap. If you think you are stellar - then pick up the phone and try a few warm transfers and see when the nth agent can't hear you anymore.
...




MyPOV

Maybe it was just bad luck. But it showed some systemic issues in customer support, that I would have thought a well funded, high tech company like Microsoft would solve better. Concerns me about the general support experience out there. Good luck next time you have to call 1-800...

New C-Suite Next-Generation Customer Experience Innovation & Product-led Growth Tech Optimization Future of Work Microsoft AI ML Machine Learning LLMs Agentic AI Generative AI Robotics Analytics Automation Cloud SaaS PaaS IaaS Quantum Computing Digital Transformation Disruptive Technology Enterprise IT Enterprise Acceleration Enterprise Software Next Gen Apps IoT Blockchain CRM ERP CCaaS UCaaS Collaboration Enterprise Service developer Metaverse VR Healthcare Supply Chain Leadership Chief Customer Officer Chief Executive Officer Chief Information Officer Chief Technology Officer Chief Information Security Officer Chief Data Officer Chief Digital Officer Chief Analytics Officer Chief Operating Officer

Constellation Demystifies Social Business with the First of Eight Actionable Reports

Constellation Demystifies Social Business with the First of Eight Actionable Reports

SAN FRANCISCO, CA – Constellation Research, Inc. the research and advisory firm focused on disruptive technologies, announced today the publication of "Demystifying Social Business: Optimizing the Lead to Deal Process (Sales)” by Constellation Principal Analyst and CEO, R “Ray” Wang. This research report provides pragmatic advice about how organizations should get started on their social business initiatives.

This report reveals:

  • How social business adoption has moved from experimentation to evangelization
  • Why use cases provide the entry point for successful social business adoption
  • Seven key use cases for sales in the lead-to-deal business processes
  • How to find your organization’s disruptive technology adoption style or ‘persona’
  • Four recommendations for the successful deployment of social business solutions

Constellation Research pioneered the complete set of front office and back office use cases for social business in 2010.  This report provides insight into a key –mega-area - lead to deal use cases.  Social business initiatives have gained acceptance as a key driver in business innovation.  Since 2010, organizations have experimented and successfully deployed social business initiatives across a variety of business processes.  In Constellation’s recent 2013 survey of 237 social business adopters, more than a majority (57.8 percent) of the market leaders and fast follower respondents had moved from experimenting with social business initiatives to scaling them to match demand. This trend signifies the successful growth of social business across a number of use cases.

With over 50 use cases identified in the survey, organizations now have defined entry points to begin social business initiatives.  Consequently, many businesses can learn from the experience of market leaders and fast followers.  

“After talking to 100’s of early adopters in social business, we felt it was time to put together the best practices to share with our clients.  What’s amazing is the correlation between social business success and alignment with business processes.  The result is this first of eight reports and the related workshops we’ll be offering in Constellation Academy” said  report author R “Ray” Wang.

This report fits into Constellation’s business-focused research themes: Next-Generation Customer Experience and Consumerization of IT &The New C-Suite.

THE REPORT
More information about "Demystifying Social Business: Optimizing the Lead to Deal Process (Sales)" can be found here: http://www.constellationr.com/research/demystifying-social-business-optimizing-lead-deal-process-sales

Download the report snapshot

ABOUT R "Ray" Wang
R "Ray" Wang is the Principal Analyst and CEO at Constellation Research, Inc.  He's also the author of the popular enterprise software blog "A Software Insider’s Point of View". Ray's a prominent keynote speaker and research analyst working with clients on innovation, business model design, engagement strategies, customer experience, matrix commerce, and big data.  He advises Global 2000 companies on business strategy and technology selection.

COORDINATES
Profile www.constellationr.com/users/rwang0
Twitter: @rwang0

Press Contacts:
Contact the Media and Influencers relations team at [email protected] for interviews with analysts.

Sales Contacts:
Contact our sales team at [email protected].

New C-Suite Next-Generation Customer Experience Innovation & Product-led Growth Tech Optimization Future of Work AI ML Machine Learning LLMs Agentic AI Generative AI Robotics Analytics Automation Cloud SaaS PaaS IaaS Quantum Computing Digital Transformation Disruptive Technology Enterprise IT Enterprise Acceleration Enterprise Software Next Gen Apps IoT Blockchain CRM ERP CCaaS UCaaS Collaboration Enterprise Service developer Metaverse VR Healthcare Supply Chain Leadership Chief Customer Officer Chief Executive Officer Chief Information Officer Chief Marketing Officer Chief Technology Officer Chief Information Security Officer Chief Data Officer Chief Digital Officer Chief Analytics Officer Chief Operating Officer

Why SAP acquired hybris Software

Why SAP acquired hybris Software

 


 

hybris Software

The company is a veteran of the e-commerce age, being founded back in 1997, which for e-commerce timelines is like centuries ago. But hybris has been able to grow by adding functionality way beyond the original e-commerce scope and expanding the enterprise.

Over time hybris has grown way beyond the original scope of e-commerce - out of the necessity to support the customer base. Customers were working on more channels, well that requires some MDM capability - which suits also to integrate with various ERP back ends.  Customers wanted mobile commerce - well that required hybris to support mobile shopping carts. Multiple channels and systems - here comes order orchestration... and so on.

hybris has shown long breath and staying power on the topic, no doubt. But it's recent success of close to 90% YoY growth was also aided by reduced competitive pressure from IBM's Sterling Commerce acquisition and even closer to home, Oracle's acquisition of ART technology. That left hybris as the only dedicated e-commerce vendor standing from the 2011 Gartner e-commerce leader's quadrant. A void into which hybris executed very well, so congrats to their management team on that.

 

SAP Whitespace

As stated before - SAP - like their competitors - are under enormous revenue pressure to produce the results expected by the markets. With a significant over-licensing situation - it's getting tougher to find new areas of business automation to sell to customers. And one area that was under-penetrated by SAP since the dot com boom and post the markets pseudo boom phase - has been e-commerce.

One ironic example of this has been the poster child customer on the call, Grainger, which sells office equipment in the US. Around 1999 already Grainger was the customer to demo for SAP as they had a great vision of selling micro-targeted and priced products and where a showcase for SAP on the back end (back then under the MRO hype mantle). And while they still use the SAP back end, their e-commerce automation had moved to... hybris.

So SAP has no good, complete electronic interaction and commerce platform for customers, especially consumers. And competitors like Oracle and salesforce are providing the front ends to the customer interactions where SAP provides the back ends  This should make scary late 90ies scenarios pop up in Walldorf, when SAP was in the same position, only it was Siebel that was getting big in the front office.

From all recent SAP acquisitions - hybris has the most white space from a SAP install base perspective. More SAP customers had Business Objects, Ariba and SuccessFactors than having hybris. The 80 or so common customers are a drop in the ocean for the 240k+ SAP customer pool. So most likely - this is the largest potential for SAP to address post an acquisition - ever.


Where will hybris go?

As standard by now - hybris will remain a separate entity - which on paper is always good to preserve culture and dynamics - but eventually unravels at SAP. Unusual for a 2B+ (speculated) acquisition, the hybris CEO does not become part of the board (as did John Schwartz, Lars Dalgaard and Bob Calderoni). Or maybe the co-CEOs thought it's not again time for a top level re-org (my take on the last re-org here).

This may even accelerate the integration of hybris further, as SAP will have to push looking for cross-sell opportunities into their install base. The big questions is - what appetite does the average SAP account manager have to sell e-commerce solutions - something the veterans got burned on - and more junior members of the salesforce may not see the sweet spot in. But then HANA based products are not directly around the corner either - so I would expect some account managers to do crash courses on how to sell e-commerce.


Integration matters

SAP knows by now, that when they acquire another vendor, SAP customers expect an integrated solution. This has been a steep learning curve recently, as Business Object as a BI vendor provided integration tools. Same for Ariba. This alleviate the need for newly created integration options.

But on the SuccessFactors acquisition it became clear, that the thin type integration SuccessFactor offered, was ok with customers when they bought from a separate company, but this would not work once SAP and SuccessFactors were a combined entity.

The challenge for SAP' is, that it does not have a viable integration platform. HANA Cloud Platform is too young and faces many other challenges. NetWeaver PI is coming around these quarters - but the main question is - where to integrate to - the Business Suite classic or any brand new HANA based products. 

On the press call there was even the hint that hybris maybe re-platformed on HANA. But putting hybris on HANA maybe straightforward for hybris - but will create even more integration needs for SAP - as the data to run a multi channel e-commerce system like hybris - will have to come out of the Business Suite. Which technically could run on HANA -- but even in that case data needs to be accessible for hybris, and not only will data flow to hybris, it ill also need to be written back. 

And I doubt the SAP salesforce will want to limit the cross-sell potential to customers only, that have based their Business Suite on HANA. Which creates additional integration work in regards of getting the relevant ERP content exchanged between hybris and Business Suite in classic deployment.

Last but not least - hybris announced their integration to SAP - only a short 3 weeks ago at Sapphire - and while it runs at Grainger, Levi's, Phonak etc - it seems to be a pretty new offering. 

The good news for SAP is - integration needs are so vast - that they may raise the bar for competitors to sell into the SAP install base, but only once SAP integrates well enough.

The (biggest) missing pieces

SAP still has a few missing piece for the overall B2B2C strategy - and that's the orchestration of customer relationships and business across channels. This job falls to market segmentation and relationship automation via campaign management. Both functionalitiey exist in the Marketing module of SAP CRM - but they are not up to 21st centrury best practices. 

Equally SAP lacks functionality for another key component in the consumer space, sentiment analysis. The former Business Object Inxight is doing text well - but cannot process the signals a consumer leaves as an electronic interaction trail. And the partnerhship with NetBase - well iyt is a partnership. Not enough to counter and compete salesforce's Radian and Oracle's Vitrue and Collective Intellect capabilities. 

So expect SAP to take out the checkbook soon again.

Implication for SAP customers

SAP customers that are thinking about their e-commerce presence and automation should pause their efforts and see what SAP will come up with in a reasonable timeframe. hybris capabilities are advanced enough to justify a reasonable timeout.

Implication for hybris only customers

You need to get assurance from SAP that you will be supported down the road. I just spoke to a customer of SAP today - who simply got forgotten because of being on a not go forward platform. Extract the concesssions in the next weeks when there is still attention from SAP top management on this matters.
 

Implication for SAP partners

This is good news for partners since most likely there will be a lot of time and labor to be spend - at least for a transition period - which will help SI revenues. If Bill McDermott is right, that CEOs want this - then except lucrative budgets. 

Increase your staff expertise on e-commerce in general and hybris in particular. Polish HANA skills and assess  likeliness of integration going towards HANA. Likewise for NetWeaver PI - it's new - get trained and get experience under your belt.
 

Implication for SAP

This is a very good acquisition for SAP, securing revenue potential for years to come and only creating insignificant product overlap questions, unlike the SuccessFactors buy. How many customers are still on the venerable SAP Store these days? I guess they will be happy to move to the hybris offering. But SAP will need to do a better job on communicating and executing the integration plans than recently with SuccessFactors.
 

Implication for competitors

Depending on how well SAP will address integration - there is a differently timed remaining window of opportunity. Most likely hybris will slow down with creating new leading functionality - even though no one from SAP and hybris would admit to this - so this creates an opportunity to claim functional leadership with hard to sell away differentiation points.
 

MyPOV

This acquisition makes much more sense for SAP than e.g. the SuccessFactors acquisition. Though both will alleviate / have alleviated competitive pressures, the hybris acquisition sees pretty much no functional overlap with existing SAP offerings - so much less explaining to do externally and internally. And  moving hybris to e.g. HANA is a simpler scope than  moving SuccessFactors. I bet if SAP wanted, hybris could run on HANA before SuccessFactors.
But SAP needs to address the integration roadmap quickly and execute on it. 

Once more like all things product at SAP these days - it's all about execution.

Matrix Commerce Tech Optimization Data to Decisions Digital Safety, Privacy & Cybersecurity Innovation & Product-led Growth Future of Work IBM SAP Oracle Chief Customer Officer Chief Information Officer Chief Procurement Officer Chief Supply Chain Officer Chief Technology Officer Chief Information Security Officer Chief Data Officer