Results

In the Customer Centric Organisation, Should the CFO Report to the CMO?

In the Customer Centric Organisation, Should the CFO Report to the CMO?

1

It is very difficult to spend a day without finding new research from HBR, McKinsey, IBM IBV and a myriad of other sources reinforcing the changing role of the CMO (and most other C-Suite Colleagues) and the need for organisations to evolve rapidly to genuinely become a customer centric and customer engaged organisation. This shift has many proud parents, including analytics and Big Data, social media, brand shifting,  the rise of the Middle Class in emerging markets amongst many factors.

If companies and government entities are to embrace this, and approach the full potential, radical change is critical. Of course the required challenge to orthodox behaviour will be both transformative and uncomfortable to existing ways of managing.

One of the most important ways in which orthodoxy is going to be disrupted is the organisational structure. Simply capioIT asks the question

Should the CFO Report to the CMO?

If the customer is truly the fulcrum of the future organisation, then it is an imperative that the role “owning” the customer engagement has the direct and strongest ear of the CEO alongside the customer. Currently for the overwhelming number of organisations the CFO sits closest to the CEO.

This must change and customer engagement has to lead the organisational process not the financial or administrative functions (This is not an attempt to diminish the importance of this capability). The benefits, at least in practice, allow for much deeper alignment of long term goals, as (I admit generalising), strategic marketing is largely less caught up in the quarterly reporting cycle that has, and continues to, cripple so many organisations.

Up front it would need to be acknowledged that one of the traditional criticisms of marketing by CEO’s, CFO’s and other organisational roles is that it is not metric or ROI driven. In the 1990’s when I was first involved in marketing organisations, that was a fair opinion. The core metric was usually what time did lunch finish on a Friday.  

In 2013, and beyond the wealth of customer data on everything from customer satisfaction, online engagement, social media etc. results in an environment where metrics, data and insight are in fact overwhelming for the average C-suite resident, including marketing.

From an industry perspective, whilst the consumer driven industries, (Retail, FMCG, Online) are the most obvious candidates, the customer of the Natural Resources, manufacturing or logistics firm is still the central pivot for the organisation. The idea of customer engagement and customer centricity applies across every organisation that has a customer in every market.

This transition of the organisation to a customer centric firm will be disruptive for a very large number of firms. Part of the disruption has to be to change the core and traditional structure of the organisation itself. Doing this early allows for innovators to align to the customer ahead of the competition, and assuming execution at, or near potential, increased financial performance.

I am interested to see if there are any organisations that have taken this approach, let me know if you work, or have worked in an environment whereby Marketing is ahead of Finance in the organisational hierarchy. If we are serious about becoming a customer centric organisation then this is a strong position from which the transition must start.

If you require further information, please contact Phil Hassey,  Founder capioIT. capioIT is an advisory firm focused on helping organisations to understand emerging technology in emerging markets. Phil may be contacted by email or phone below,

 [email protected]

+61 (0) 422 231 793


Next-Generation Customer Experience Tech Optimization Innovation & Product-led Growth Chief Customer Officer Chief Executive Officer Chief Financial Officer Chief Information Officer

Disruptive Technology Companies: Speridian

Disruptive Technology Companies: Speridian

Speridian-660x330

Three large health plans have gone live with on Oracle Siebel thorough a software-as-a-service SaaS company called benefitalign Benefitalign provides on-line health insurance market connecting more than a million consumers to health insurance plans. Three of its major customers include

  • AvMed Health Plans with 300,000 members in Florida; 
  • Optima Health, with 450,000 members in Virginia;
  • University of Arizona's Health Plans (UAHP) with 150,000 members.

Benefitalign, is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Speridian Technologies, a consulting firm specializing in Oracle Siebel.

"Our solution was developed at the right time, with the win-win of member-relations and cost-savings in mind," said Girish Panicker, Chairman and CEO of Speridian Technologies. 

Panicker, a native of India who grew up in Mumbai, has lived in the United States for many years and is now a U.S. citizen. Speridian has offices in Washington, DC, Albuquerque, NM and Irvine, CA in the United States and in India and Dubai.

Tech Optimization Innovation & Product-led Growth Future of Work SaaS PaaS IaaS Cloud Digital Transformation Disruptive Technology Enterprise IT Enterprise Acceleration Enterprise Software Next Gen Apps IoT Blockchain CRM ERP CCaaS UCaaS Collaboration Enterprise Service Chief Information Officer Chief Technology Officer Chief Digital Officer Chief Data Officer Chief Analytics Officer Chief Information Security Officer Chief Executive Officer Chief Operating Officer

Coming Soon to a Google Ad -> You

Coming Soon to a Google Ad -> You

1

A couple of years back, Facebook changed their terms of service that allowed your images to start appearing in contextual advertisements offered across the social network. More recently, they announced plans to remove a feature that allows people to prevent their names being found in search results. This means that those using Facebook can now be found by strangers (or by past friends, lovers, enemies) simply by using Facebook’s internal search tool.

Facebook explained that this feature was only being used by a small percentage of people. However, it’s a part of what seems to be an ongoing test-and-learn experiment about how much private information its 1.1 billion users are willing to share. Earlier this year, Facebook’s Graph Search revealed just how big “big data” can be – with over 500 terabytes of new data being produced each day. And based on their recent earnings announcements, that big data/privacy play is paying off – with revenue up 53% over the previous year.

And now, Google are following a similar path, tapping into all your reviews, recommendations and endorsements in their search results and advertisements. You probably noticed that Google provided a top of screen notification about changes to their terms of service a couple of days ago. If you waved it away without investigating, here is the section most relevant to you:

We want to give you – and your friends and connections – the most useful information. Recommendations from people you know can really help. So your friends, family and others may see your Profile name and photo, and content like the reviews you share or the ads you +1’d. This only happens when you take an action (things like +1’ing, commenting or following) – and the only people who see it are the people you’ve chosen to share that content with.

This new policy that comes into effect on 11 November 2013 will show shared endorsements on Google sites and on more than two million sites that use the Google display advertising network. What will this look like? In the sample image below from the Google Support blog, your friend’s recommendations/ratings appear in Google places, search results and ads.

 

 

 

You can, however, opt out of this system, but there is a catch – you need to have a Google+ account.

Simply follow THIS LINK to Google Endorsements and uncheck the box and click the Save button.

This may well give Google+ membership a much needed shot in the arm. Or it may just increase the cynicism of the internet using public. But if the lessons from Facebook’s privacy test-and-learn approach is anything to go by, it will slip by largely unheeded and little understood – with Google claiming the benefits of your personal recommendations.

 

Marketing Transformation Matrix Commerce Future of Work Innovation & Product-led Growth New C-Suite Next-Generation Customer Experience Digital Safety, Privacy & Cybersecurity meta Google Marketing B2B B2C CX Customer Experience EX Employee Experience AI ML Generative AI Analytics Automation Cloud Digital Transformation Disruptive Technology Growth eCommerce Enterprise Software Next Gen Apps Social Customer Service Content Management Collaboration Chief Marketing Officer Chief Customer Officer Chief People Officer Chief Human Resources Officer

HR Tech 2013 Key Takeaways - 2 Races, Recruiting and more

HR Tech 2013 Key Takeaways - 2 Races, Recruiting and more

This year's HR Tech Conference in Las Vegas proved to be more than ever, that it is the key event of the HCM industry. With more vendors, more buyers and more buyers with imminent purchase needs - it was the largest event yet. And equally it was massive in terms of announcements, steps walked, parties etc.  

So what are the key takeaways?

 

Why is HCM so hot?

Needless to say, that the economy is doing better and that helps the enterprise software industry overall. Compared to two years ago this was a very different HR Tech conference though, with more vendors, a larger show floor, definitively more buzz - and with that a noticeable increase in hype.

But we are also in the aftermath of two multiple billion acquisitions by SAP and Oracle that have transformed the marketplace, moreover Workday has risen from a contender status to the vendor to beat status and finally we are witnessing a renaissance in the recruitment space.

All that happens with ICBMS unfolding with full force - and with that we do not mean the missiles, but Intelligence, Cloud, BigData, Mobile and Social, and they transform the way enterprises work. The leading vendors are at the forefront enabling these transformations with their respective best practices. And at the same time they prove more than an opportunity to disrupt the vendor landscape - more about that later.

The quest to obsolete integration

Integration has been a key capability and challenge at the same time since companies decided to automate more than just financial systems. Very much like the different functions of an enterprise work together, the different areas of an enterprise system need to work together. And the question is, if as a buyer of enterprise systems you buy the integration from the vendor or you decide to build and create the integration yourself.

And the enterprise software industry goes through phases - phases where there is a lot of innovation and best of breed vendors entice enterprises to shoulder the integration challenge themselves. Contrast that with the other type of phase, when the larger vendors provide that integration. But integration is not free and comes with a price - so seldom integrated systems provide leading edge best practices, but more well proven practices, that in turn are integrated. 

We are watching two races

What we see in the HCM market right now is two major races - the race for completion of the talent suites and the race for integrated talent and core HR systems.

In the first category are the traditional talent management vendors that are rushing to provide an end to end talent management system, in the second are the traditional ERP vendors (Oracle, SAP, Infor etc) and vendors like e.g. Ultimate, Workday and even talent vendors like e.g. SumTotal and SilkRoad as well as traditional payroll vendors like e.g. ADP and Ceridian. And maybe both races are actually coming together at one stage, as the prize for the winner of the pure talent management suite race could be questionable in regards of the overall integration race of talent and core HR. It will only be a prize if the pure talent management suite vendors manage to provide better best of breed practices that the vendors in the overall HCM integration race. The verdict of that is open and will remain open for a while.

In the meantime.... the recruiting race is on

And while the two larger, big ticket races are on the way, there is a separate race in the talent management space - around recruiting. Recruiting is unique inside the HCM automation space, as its users are uniquely competitive and at the same time the most performance scrutinized employees in the HR function. For an HR practitioner to get terminated for performance reasons is pretty unheard of - for recruiters it is happening every given day.

So not surprisingly in the arms race of recruiting talent, users are always looking for a leg up over the competition. And that fosters a flourishing ecosystems of vendors trying to pitch the next best way to give recruiters more success and with that ultimately give them better job security. This dynamic by itself gives the recruiting market a dynamic by itself that can only be compared with similar dynamics seen in the CRM market. And consequentially both markets show paralles in practices and vendor dynamics. It is not uncommon to see recruiters use separate systems from the rest of the HR department and the enterprise - even if these systems offer recruiting functionality - but if they are no longer deemed good enough to acquire the talent the enterprise wish to acquire – they won’t be used.

More than one vendor stated, that the key recruiting players Taleo and Kenexa having been respectively acquired by Oracle and IBM - are perceived to no longer innovate - a fact that is not true - but gives them hope to be able allow their investments into recruiting functionality to come more to fruition than say e.g. 2 years ago.  

So not surprisingly innovations like video and chat are being explored by vendors like HireVue and others like Jobvite are taking CRM best practices to the talent acquisition game. And similarly a vendor like Work4Labs with its Facebook centric functionality may provide a key weapon in the race for talent to both recruiters and enterprises. And not to forget SmartRecruiters with their overall potential to disrupt the economics how recruiting systems are being sold and licensed. 

Beware the false analytics - but welcome benchmarking

Not surprisingly the false analytics made their appearance in Las Vegas, too - and with that we refer to reporting, dashboarding et al clothed up as analytics. But real analytics are the ones that take a direct action or at least suggest one - and we didn't see much of that. 

With that said, it’s good to see, that there is a general overhaul of getting reporting and dash boarding upgraded. HR professionals and all enterprise users deserve to know what is going on in their enterprise and in general vendors have not been doing the best job of making information transparent. We are still far away from making that actionable (another buzzword that has worn down before its real meaning came to fruition in enterprise software and its implementations) - but at least we are seeing movement to improve things. If that starts with better visualization and making reports available on mobile devices - so be it.

The welcome new change was, that more and more vendors are talking about benchmarking. Vendors that have the data to benchmark are using it (e.g. ADP) or plan to use it (e.g. Equifax) and vendors that do not have it - license it and use it (e.g. Workday from Bersin / Deloitte). And with the next generation of visualization getting ready, it means that users of HCM systems will be able to not only relate data to internal standards - but understand better how their enterprise is doing in regards of its peers in the marketplace. 

And maybe something new...

An area that enterprises as well as vendors have been traditionally not paying attention to - is the dynamics of different personalities working with each other directly and even less how personality affects team productivity and success. So the foray of Halogen in combination with the CPP’s MyersBriggs is a good start to allow more of the well-established personal profile test results make it into HCM systems. Using such data in performance management, for team composition, succession etc. could be the start of something very valuable. Certainly it will be good to see more vendors understanding personality traits and incorporating them into HCM practices. 

Furthermore it looks like there is some traction from a new angle in the LMS market. It seems like all the MOOCs are trying to get a piece of the enterprise learning market – only that they have not figured out how. In the meantime there are a number of vendors who try to entice users to publish and create course content, e.g. Brave New Talent (and others), the traditionally root cause crux of LMS.

And some vendors come out of unexpected corners, e.g. Glassdoor keeps building out its corporate services and is becoming a key player in the recruiting space. And Vizier is taking a more analytical approach to workforce management than the existing vendors have taken. 

Finally on the everlasting struggle with providing a more contextual interaction with enterprise software - SumTotal has shown promising new functionality and user interface to address this challenging area of automation.

MyPOV

The HCM market is  more dynamic than ever. There are two mega races on the way as well as an ongoing recruitment race. It is and will remain interesting to watch and analyze. And plenty of encouraging innovation to disrupt these races. 

The good news is - it's all for the better of the HCM user, but vendor selection, technology and automation choices, execution and timing matter. 

New C-Suite Future of Work Tech Optimization Next-Generation Customer Experience Digital Safety, Privacy & Cybersecurity Data to Decisions Innovation & Product-led Growth Marketing Transformation Oracle infor SuccessFactors workday SAP AI Analytics Automation CX EX Employee Experience HCM Machine Learning ML SaaS PaaS Cloud Digital Transformation Enterprise Software Enterprise IT Leadership HR Chief People Officer Chief Information Officer Chief Customer Officer Chief Human Resources Officer Chief Technology Officer Chief Information Security Officer Chief Data Officer

The end is near…you were once great Blackberry

The end is near…you were once great Blackberry

No surprise, the vultures are already circling Blackberry and looking to recruit some of their top talent. The likes of Apple and Intel are starting to make overtures to Blackberry workers.

This cannot be a surprise to anyone. After the Waterloo based company

Back when it was the cool phone...

Back when it was the cool phone…

announced intentions to being acquired by Fairfax things have continued be out of sorts. With rumors that the financing might not be in place. There is talk of Blackberry heading to the chop shop and having their parts sold off. Something this blog has advocated to happen. Click here for post. It is interesting that the likes of SAP are looking into opportunities. If SAP were to get some of their enterprise assets it would be a very interesting asset for the package application giant. Being able to instantly have a powerful and secure mobile platform could be the catalyst for some of SAP’s solutions.  Something to watch.

It is sad to watch, but the end of days seem very close for the once powerful mobile player. I might need to dust off my old Blackberry, wonder what it will fetch on eBay from the collectors!


New C-Suite Tech Optimization Matrix Commerce Data to Decisions Innovation & Product-led Growth Supply Chain Automation Cloud Digital Transformation Disruptive Technology Enterprise IT Enterprise Acceleration Enterprise Software IoT Blockchain ERP Leadership Collaboration M&A Chief Customer Officer Chief Executive Officer Chief Financial Officer Chief Information Officer Chief Supply Chain Officer

News Analysis: Avangate Acquired By Francisco Partners For Matrix Commerce Capabilities

News Analysis: Avangate Acquired By Francisco Partners For Matrix Commerce Capabilities

Digital Distribution Leader Gains West Coast VC Backing

On October 7th, 2013, private equity firm, Francisco Partners acquired Avangate, a leader in digital commerce and subscription billing.  Avangate serves over 3,000 customers across more than 100 countries.  Avangate has experienced 70% year over year growth over the past six years.  The deal terms were not publicly disclosed and was led by My Le Nguyen.

Constellation sees this development significant for buyers and prospects because Avangate:

  • Gains critical west coast financial community backing. The acquisition of Francisco Partners supposedly includes a buy-out of existing investors.  My Le Ngueyn of Francisco Partners is also an investor and board member at GXS, EF Johnson Technologies, and WatchGuard Technologies.

    Point of View (POV): Avangate frees itself from the shackles of non-west coast investors who tend not to invest for high growth and lack the key networks of Silicon Valley based investors.  My Le is a rising star at Francisco and will help Avangate invest in future areas of growth.  The buy out of existing partners and shift to US-based ownership and technology ecosystem is critical to Avangate’s continued success trajectory.
  • Invests in key customer facing and product areas. Avangate provides what Constellation terms as a matrix commerce platform.  The product delivers a unfied online eCommerce, subscription billing, global payments, and reseller & affiliate management offering.  Avangate targets individual developers and large organizaitons such as FICO, Kaspersky, and Software AG.

    Point of View (POV): Constellation expects the management team to invest deeper in product development, sales, customer service, and marketing.  Recent customer successes requires Avangate to adequately support its growing vendor customer base with more engineering support, professional services, and product management resources.  Expect continued expansion of Avangate’s online commerce and subscription billing capabilities.
  • Expands geographically and through mergers. New investment round provides opportunities to grow in new digital commerce hot spots as well as fund additional technology and customer base acquisitions.

    Point of View (POV): Many opportunities exist in areas with high mobile penetration and digital commerce growth.  Avangate could build upon its international strength given its European founding to expand its presence more into India, Indonesia, and Latin America to support both vendors selling into, as well as exporting out of those rapidly growing markets.

The Bottom Line: Matrix Commerce Platforms Continue To Gain Traction With B2B and B2C Customers

Avangate was founded in 2006 after the first Internet bubble.  Many lessons learned from the first bubble now apply to matrix commerce as the shift to cloud, digital distribution, and the rise of mobility drive brands and publishers to explore integrated and cost effective approaches.  When commerce revolves around the buyer, channels, demand signals, supply chains, payment options, enablers, and big data converge into what Constellation describes as matrix commerce. Matrix Commerce spans across disciplines as people, process, and technologies continue to transform today's commerce models.  Matrix commerce addresses the fusing of demand signals and supply chains.  Customers now realize the need to move to unified solutions instead of integrating a patch work of point solutions.  Consequently, solutions such as Avangate are transforming how digital goods and software publishers distribute, expand, service, and bill for their IP.

Your POV.

Are you looking at new digital distribution options? Are you an Avangate customer?  What are your thoughts on the investment by Francisco Partners?  Add your comments to the blog or reach me via email: R (at) ConstellationR (dot) com or R (at) SoftwareInsider (dot) com.

Please let us know if you need help with your Matrix Commerce and Digital Business transformation efforts.  Here’s how we can assist:

  • Assessing matrix commerce readiness
  • Developing your digital business strategy
  • Vendor selection
  • Implementation partner selection
  • Connecting with other pioneers
  • Sharing best practices
  • Designing a next gen apps strategy
  • Providing contract negotiations and software licensing support
  • Demystifying software licensing

Related Resources

Reprints

Reprints can be purchased through Constellation Research, Inc. To request official reprints in PDF format, please contact Sales .

Disclosure

Although we work closely with many mega software vendors, we want you to trust us. For the full disclosure policy, stay tuned for the full client list on the Constellation Research website.

* Not responsible for any factual errors or omissions.  However, happy to correct any errors upon email receipt.

Copyright © 2001 – 2013 R Wang and Insider Associates, LLC All rights reserved.
Contact the Sales team to purchase this report on a a la carte basis or join the Constellation Customer Experience!

Matrix Commerce Tech Optimization New C-Suite Revenue & Growth Effectiveness Innovation & Product-led Growth Data to Decisions Future of Work Marketing Transformation Next-Generation Customer Experience SoftwareInsider ML Machine Learning LLMs Agentic AI Generative AI Robotics AI Analytics Automation B2B B2C CX EX Employee Experience HR HCM business Marketing Metaverse developer SaaS PaaS IaaS Supply Chain Quantum Computing Growth Cloud Digital Transformation Disruptive Technology eCommerce Enterprise IT Enterprise Acceleration Enterprise Software Next Gen Apps IoT Blockchain CRM ERP Leadership finance Social Healthcare VR CCaaS UCaaS Customer Service Content Management Collaboration M&A Enterprise Service Chief Customer Officer Chief Information Officer Chief Marketing Officer Chief Executive Officer Chief Technology Officer Chief Data Officer Chief Digital Officer Chief Analytics Officer Chief Financial Officer Chief Operating Officer Chief Revenue Officer Chief Information Security Officer Chief People Officer Chief Human Resources Officer Chief Experience Officer

Take the State of Siebel Survey - get free research

Take the State of Siebel Survey - get free research

Constellation's J. Bruce Daley is conducting a State of Siebel in 2013 user community survey. This survey is designed to provide a benchmark for Siebel customers to guage their implementations against their peers.

Take survey

Take the survey and get a bunch of goodies from Constellation and Siebel Observer:

The survey is comprised of 36 questions and should only take 10-15 minutes to complete. Questions include:

  • How many customer records does your Siebel implementation have currently?
  • How many custom fields were added?
  • How often does the business process change in your industry?
  • How long do you plan to run Siebel applications?

Take the State of Siebel survey here: https://www.surveymonkey.com/s/2013SiebelSurvey

Tech Optimization Marketing Transformation Data to Decisions Innovation & Product-led Growth Chief Information Officer

WebRTC Standards and Shipping Containers: An Analogy

WebRTC Standards and Shipping Containers: An Analogy

 

Many have wondered about why big players in the Internet, communications, and device industries would not quickly get on board with WebRTC and rapidly promote it is a standard since WebRTC has so many supposed benefits. We often hear about Apple’s lack of comment on WebRTC and Microsoft’s alternative approach called CU-RTC-Web. 

I learned a lesson about standards from an unusual source: “False Economy: A Surprising Economic History of the World”. This book, by Alan Beattie, discusses why countries, economies, and continents are the way they are: not because of predetermined courses, but by the choices they made.

In one section of this book there is a discussion of the now boring and dull shipping business. Before the mid-1950’s, most shipping involved “break-bulk” cargo in which every time the items being shipped crossed a border or a dock, they had to be unpacked, carted to a new location, and repacked in a different shipping container. This break-bulk method of cargo shipping accounted for at least 10% of the total cost of the items shipped in global commerce. Interestingly, about half of the cost of global shipping came in a 2/10ths mile stretch of the dock where the cargo was unloaded and reloaded.



 



Around 1956, some enterprising entrepreneurs decided that creating standardized shipping containers would help efficiency and drive down the costs of shipping. Consequently, several major shipping companies introduced their own version of a shipping container. One company standardized on a length of 35 feet for its container while another used 24 feet and still another used 17 feet containers.

But, there were still obstacles to using standardized containers. Stevedore at the docks fought tooth and nail against standardization because it threatened their livelihoods. In the early 1950’s, New York had over 290 docks controlled by unionized labor. To bypass New York’s labor unions, a new container port was built in New Jersey where ships could dock and containers could be taken off by crane and immediately placed on trucks for transportation to the final destination.

Although this new dock was helpful, it did not solve the standardization issue completely.  Competing shipping companies still had differing container sizes.

It was only when the U.S. military began specifying the dimensions of the standard shipping container shippers could use when transporting military item did everyone get in line with eight-by-eight feet containers in 10, 20, 30, or 40 foot lengths. It took someone big enough and with enough economic clout to cause everyone to adopt the new standard or go out of business. 

The Analogy with WebRTC

Today, we see many competing standards for video. Skype has its own. There is H.264, VP8, and a variety of other codecs. Some companies even have their own proprietary tweaks on “standards-based” codecs. Vidyo has its own version of the standard H.264 as does Microsoft, Polycom, Cisco, and others. 

Like the contents of shipping containers, when video comes to a border or boundary, it often has to be unpacked, transported, and re-encoded in a different format so that the video packets can arrive at their destinations properly. As occurred in the shipping industry, these small border segments along the entire path are where a significant amount of the cost for video occurs with the need to buy transcoding gateways and session border controllers, which have become the stevedores of the video industry. 

And, like the shipping industry, some enterprising vendors have bypassed the existing video players by creating their own dock, so to speak, in the form of a video protocol called WebRTC. As in the shipping world where standardized containers avoided the need unpack/repack steps, WebRTC eliminates the need to download a video client since the WebRTC protocol is built into the Google Chrome and Mozilla Firefox browsers.

Just like stevedores who fought against container standardization because it threatened their livelihoods, Microsoft and Apple are either fighting against or ignoring WebRTC because it threatens their particular interests. And so, we have at least two ports, in longshoreman parlance, one port or group supports the new WebRTC standard while the other port or group of companies does not. 

The moral of the analogy of WebRTC and the shipping container is this: even though the WebRTC standard is being promoted, and even though there are some places built where it can work, until there is someone big enough to enforce it (like the U.S. military did in container standardization) and there is economic penalty to those who do not adopt the standard, we will continue to see competing standards and efforts. As long as one or more of the major vendors believes it can make more money by not adopting the WebRTC standard there will be no universal implementation by all of the browser manufacturers.  

Beattie concludes his discussion of the shipping industry with these words, “Containerization didn’t just carry existing cargo more quickly and cheaply; it enabled a radical shift in the way that companies did business”. In like manner, WebRTC may enable a radical shift in the way companies do business, but we will only find out if WebRTC truly becomes a broadly accepted standard. Like the shipping industry, standardizing on WebRTC may take nudges from powerful organizations with enough clout to impact the economic wellbeing of those standing it its way. 

 

 
Future of Work Matrix Commerce New C-Suite Next-Generation Customer Experience cisco systems Microsoft Chief Customer Officer Chief Executive Officer Chief People Officer Chief Information Officer

Genesys Advances its Cloud Offerings with Echopass Acquisition

Genesys Advances its Cloud Offerings with Echopass Acquisition

1

Genesys a major provider of software for customer service and contact centers entered into a definitive agreement to acquire Echopass, a cloud contact center provider and will add 1,250 new customers to Genesys’ Cloud direct services.  Echopass currently partners with Genesys for its contact center Customer Engagement Platform and specializes in larger enterprise cloud contact center solutions.  This new acquisition will significantly expand Genesys’ installed base in the cloud.

Although Genesys has a sizable base for premise contact center solutions, it hopes to gain traction in directly supporting cross-channel cloud solutions for larger enterprises.  Currently, Genesys’ Cloud offers a standardize solution that appeals to SMB customers interested in a fast-to-deploy and uncomplicated solution.  Genesys currently directly markets its flagship product, Genesys Customer Engagement Platform, as a premise solution.   However, the shift to cloud based models offers a major opportunity for Genesys to provide its customers a scalable and flexible cloud solution for customer support.  A cloud solution appeals to many companies, as it lowers the cost of entry for acquiring and upgrading contact center software.  Additionally, for companies that do not want to rip and replace their entire infrastructure Genesys offers a hybrid-cloud model.

The rapid pace of technology change combined with the need for a scalable and secure solution will continue to drive the demand for cloud base contact center solutions.  The timing of the Echopass acquisition suggests that Genesys recognizes the uptick in cloud contact centers and plans to play an increasingly active role in delivering the cloud contact center solution directly to its customers.  Additionally, other recent acquisitions by Genesys including Angel and Soundbite have expanded its cloud services and ability to deliver a comprehensive offering.

Next-Generation Customer Experience Tech Optimization B2C CX SaaS PaaS IaaS Cloud Digital Transformation Disruptive Technology Enterprise IT Enterprise Acceleration Enterprise Software Next Gen Apps IoT Blockchain CRM ERP CCaaS UCaaS Collaboration Enterprise Service Chief Customer Officer Chief Information Officer Chief Technology Officer Chief Information Security Officer Chief Data Officer Chief Executive Officer

To Be Talked About Online, Be Hyper-real

To Be Talked About Online, Be Hyper-real

1

About a million years ago, when I studied theatre and movement, I was fascinated by what appeared “real” on stage and what looked like it was a person slouching across an open space. There was a real difference between an actor who was able to inhabit and own the stage and someone who seemed to shrink within its open space. For some actors, this ability comes naturally but many have to work on it. And it is these techniques that interested me the most.

For a while I studied with Leisa Shelton, a brilliant and patient teacher. We would spend hours in quiet, but intense, routines, learning to stretch our bodies, extend our arms from the shoulder to the fingertip, create difficult but beautiful arcs across our shoulders, and walking with fluidity. One of the core “figures” we’d work on was drinking a glass of water – amazingly technical and challenging to master.

Leisa had, herself, studied for years in Paris, working with Ecole de Mime Corporel Dramatique de Paris-technique Etienne Decroux (1983-89) and was a member of the Meryl Tankard Co (1990-93). As a result, she generously shared not just her abilities and experiences but her stories which brought her theory and theatre practice to life for us all.

But there was one particular story that has stayed with me. It was about the physical proportions of Rodin’s The Thinker. Taking into account the position of the viewer, Rodin had created his famous sculpture larger than “real life” in order for it to appear in-proportion from the audience’s point of view. Parts of the sculpture – especially across the shoulders and back, were significantly larger than they would be in real life. And the lesson for us in this, was to appear “real” on stage, we had to work to extend the appearance of our bodies on stage, not just to be seen, or for aesthetics, but to appear real.

The same principles apply in the digital world. In fact, we are seeing a greater blurring of the distinctions between the on and offline world – they are merging into what we call “life”. This is made ever easier by the five forces impacting the future of business – social media, mobility, big data, unified communications and cloud computing. As consumers we are ever more connected and connectable – and enterprises continue to struggle to keep pace with consumer expectation and business demand.

However, we DON’T need to be in all places at all times. We need to take a lesson from Leisa Shelton and Rodin. We need to be larger than life in the spaces that we do operate. We need to be hyper-real – 10-20% bigger than we are in real life. And now, more than ever, we need to be PRESENT. That means we must be hyper-real and IN LOCATION.

Take a look at this great video promoting the upcoming release of the movie Carrie. It’s 6 million+ views come not just from a great idea, but from brilliant execution. They captured a real world impact and amplified it into our digital lives. They put a physical experience into our consciousness through digital storytelling.


In a world where our experiences dominate our perceptions, businesses, governments and not-for-profits can no longer be satisfied with a DIGITAL ONLY presence. To be talked about online, you have to be remarkable in the real world. You must act with purpose. And serve with intention.

It’s time for leaders to step up and own the space.

The french mime Jyjou*Creative Commons License jyjou via Compfight

 

Marketing Transformation Next-Generation Customer Experience Chief Customer Officer Chief Marketing Officer