Results

Avaya: Applying Big Data to Customer Engagement

Avaya: Applying Big Data to Customer Engagement

At the Avaya Evolutions event in Dallas (February 5/6, 2013) I had the opportunity to speak with Brett Shockley, Senior Vice President and General Manager, Avaya Applications and Emerging Technologies. The discussion focused around new technology Avaya is working on that will significantly impact and enhance contact center customer engagement: speech analytics and big data analytics. Both of these capabilities overlay two Avaya’s contact center products, Elite and the newer Avaya Aura Contact Center.  

The big data offering is based on grid computing in which hundreds or thousands of customer characteristics are kept resident in memory during a customer engagement session. In milliseconds, decisions about how to route a call are made based on the customer’s data. This data can include income level, product preferences, whether purchases are more likely to be made on a specific day of the week, where the customer lives, family size, etc. Decisions are made and then fed into the ACD which will route calls to contact center agents who are more successful at meeting the organization’s objectives with respect to that customer. In addition, the system can keep track of millions or billions of “events” that occur in the process of a customer engagement session, thus enabling additional analytics on huge amounts of data that otherwise would be discarded.

A second capability is speech analytics. Avaya has developed a speech analytics engine that can understand context as well as sentiment. Two examples were cited. In the first, contact center agents were given a new script to use with customers. For a variety of reasons, some of the agents resisted this new way to work with customers. The speech analytics engine was applied to the conversations. Whereas only 20% of the agents were diligently using the new script before analytics were applied, over 90% used it after the analytics engine was used because contact center management had an easy to tell not just that agents were using the right script, but they were also able to detect the sentiment with which the agent approached the customer.

In another example, a major broadcasting organization fed years of archived video footage into the speech analytics engine with the intent to make these video clips easily searchable using text phrases and tags. The accuracy of the tagging was surprisingly high, making it much easier to find a particular video clip.

As I listened to this explanation of big data and analytics, I recall one of my Constellation Research colleagues, Alan Lepofsky, suggesting that before organizations roll out social software or big data, they need to understand the “why”, meaning “why are they doing this”. Brett’s explanation of how big data will be used in the contact center and how it can impact outcomes was one of the most compelling approaches I've heard; it centered around this need for understanding the “why”. The way Avaya will sell big data and analytics to its customers will be to focus on the outcomes the CEO the chief customer experience officer want to have. Then, it will tune the analytics engine and the underlying contact center routing, operations, and rewards toward achieve those desired outcomes.

Data to Decisions Next-Generation Customer Experience Tech Optimization

News Analysis: New SAP Customers Face Maintenance Hike

News Analysis: New SAP Customers Face Maintenance Hike

SAP Plans A Standard Support Maintenance Fees Hike Of 5.5%For New Customers

For new customers, SAP announced its intent to raise its standard support maintenance fee from 18% to 19% effective July 15, 2013.  The standard support option was reintroduced in January 14, 2010, after much pressure from user groups.  A few key takeaways:

  • Price hike follows original plans. SAP has provided a six month advanced announcement to raise maintenance for new customers.  SAP has noted that “the adjustment does not apply to any existing maintenance contracts for SAP Standard Support closed before July 15, 2013?

    Point of View (POV): The announcement follows the original plan for existing customers to bring Standard Support in line with Enterprise Support by 2015 (see Figure 1).  SAP appears to be harmonizing the price increases for both existing and new customers.  While average support and service contracts are between 18 and 21% in the enterprise software world, SAP’s price increase will still keep it within the norm.
  • SAP raises maintenance rates under the guise of quality. SAP claims that the maintenance fee hike is related to “maintaining the same high level of quality support in the future.  Key features include access to support packages, new releases of standard support solutions, enhancement packages, technology updates, ABAP source code for SAP software applications, and software change management.  SAP also requires customers to use Solution Manager.

    (POV): SAP’s tried hard to justify the price increase by offering message handling, remote services, SAP Solution Manager Enterprise Edition, and access to SAP Service Marketplace as additional value added benefits.   Unfortunately, most customers find Solution Manager to be a mile wide and an inch deep, the remote services to be minorly useful, and the SAP Service Marketplace to be immature at best.   The result – customers are not getting much value for the price increase. (Fellow Constellation Analyst Frank Scavo provides a list of four questions every new SAP customer should ask.)

Figure 1. SAP Enterprise Support and SAP Standards Support Schedule circa 2010

screen-shot-2010-01-14-at-74603-am

The Bottom Line: SAP Wants To Eliminate Standard Support And Competitors to Solution Manager

The 5.5% increase in maintenance pricing will continue a string of increases that will make standard support less compelling than enterprise support over time.  SAP’s harmonization of the standard support rate for new customers with the existing customer rate is part of a longer term process to eliminate the standard support cost savings that customers could take advantage.  What was once seen as an advantage of selecting SAP for a dual maintenance option, will no longer serve as a market differentiator.

More importantly, the continued anti-competitive assault by the Solution Manager product team on SAP Optimization providers and partners such as Hayes Technology, Intellicorp, Panaya, Revelation Software, and WestTrax does not bode well for customers.  SAP’s made it very difficult for cost effective and pro-customer vendors to exhibit and build functionality that’s competitive to Solution Manager.  The strong arm tactics could mean customers pay more for an inferior product.

On the bright side, third party maintenance options from Rimini Street and Spinnaker will provide some leverage for customers during their maintenance contract negotiations.  In fact, business at Rimini Street is growing and will probably gain more traction as a result of this announcement.

Your POV

What do you think about SAP’s maintenance hike? Is it fair? Is it in line? Need help with your contract negotiations?  Tap into the experience of thousands of contract negotiations.  Have a story to share about SAP contracts? Please post or send on to rwang0 at gmail dot com and we’ll keep your anonymity.

* Not responsible for any factual errors or omissions.  However, happy to correct any errors upon email receipt.

Other Useful Software Contract Negotiations Links

Tuesday’s Tips: Five Simple Steps To Reduce Your Software Maintenance Costs

Tuesday’s Tip: Do Not Bundle Your Support and Maintenance Contracts!

Tuesday’s Tip: Software Licensing and Pricing – Do Not Give Away Your Third Party Maintenance And Access Rights

Tuesday’s Tip: 3 Approaches To Return Shelfware

Tuesday’s Tip: Software Licensing and Pricing – Now’s The Time To Remove “Gag Rule” Clauses In Your Software Contracts

Related Blogs, Press, and Links

MUST READ – 2010017 Irregular Enterprise – Dennis Howlett “SAP’s Maintenance Cost Sleight of Hand”

News Analysis: SAP Moves All Customers Onto More Expensive Enterprise Support

News Analysis: SAP and SUGEN Make Progress on Enterprise Support

20100115 SearchSAP.com/TechTarget – Courtney Bjorlin ” Choosing Standard or Enterprise support more difficult for SAP customers with no KPIs ”

20100114 IDC – Amy Konary at IDC “Guest Post: Back by Popular Demand, A Basic Maintenance Offering from SAP”

20100114 Forrester Blogs – Paul Hamerman “SAP’s Tiered Support Announcement Diffuses a Contentious Issue”

20100114 IDG News – Chris Kanaracus “SAP shakes up support structure, executive organization”

20100114 Enterprise System Spectator – Frank Scavo “Flash: SAP backs down on 22% maintenance fees”

20100114 Information Week – Doug Henschen “SAP Reintroduces Tiered Maintenance”

20100114 ComputerWorldUK – Mike Simons “Update: SAP does U-turn on Enterprise Support”

Reprints

Reprints can be purchased through Constellation Research, Inc. To request official reprints in PDF format, please contact Sales .

Disclosure

Although we work closely with many mega software vendors, we want you to trust us. For the full disclosure policy, stay tuned for the full client list on the Constellation Research website.

* Not responsible for any factual errors or omissions.  However, happy to correct any errors upon email receipt.

Copyright © 2001 – 2013 R Wang and Insider Associates, LLC All rights reserved.
Contact the Sales team to purchase this report on a a la carte basis or join the Constellation Customer Experience!

 

 

 

Tech Optimization Innovation & Product-led Growth Leadership Chief Experience Officer

SAP Goes Back to the Well for a Maintenance Fee Hike

SAP Goes Back to the Well for a Maintenance Fee Hike

Jarret Pazahanick alerted me to an email that went out this morning to SAP partners, announcing a unilateral price increase on standard support, for new maintenance contracts signed after July 15, 2013.

The email reads, in part,

To be able to provide the same level of support in the future, we will change the maintenance rate for new maintenance contracts with SAP Standard Support from 18% to 19%, effective July 15, 2013.

This moderate adjustment does not apply to any existing maintenance contracts for SAP Standard Support closed before July 15, 2013. We also want to be respectful about budgets being planned for 2013. Therefore, we encourage you to take advantage of the opportunity to place purchase orders with SAP Standard Support ahead of this change at the existing 18% rate until July 14, 2013.

I would point out that this is not a 1% increase in maintenance fees: it is a 5.5% increase (1/18 = 5.5%).

If I were an SAP customer, I would have four questions for SAP:

  1. What improvements in SAP support will SAP deliver to justify this 5.5% price increase? Can we expect our internal costs to drop by at least 5.5% as a result of SAP's improvements in its support program?

  2. What is the gross margin on SAP's maintenance business today, and how will that change after this increase is in effect? Maintenance is the most profitable segment in SAP's financial performance. Why should it become even more profitable? 

  3. How have SAP's cost of support increased to justify this increase in my maintenance fees? Normally the cost to support mature products decreases over time, as issues with the program code are resolved. Offshoring of application support and deflection of support activities to SAP's user and partner network also have introduced support efficiencies. Shouldn't SAP be considering a reduction in maintenance fees rather than an increase?

  4. Since SAP uses some of its maintenance revenue to fund development of new products as well as make acquisitions, will SAP provide these new products to customers at no charge? It seems SAP charges customers for new products twice: once, when it charges maintenance fees, and again when existing customers buy those new products. 

Several years ago, SAP customers fought back SAP's attempts to impose a maintenance fee increase by forcing all customers to move from standard support (at 18%) to enterprise support (at 22%). After a great deal of public outcry, SAP backed down.  Now SAP appears to be trying to impose a smaller price increase, with no apparent improvement in service, in hopes customers will not notice.

The only good news in this announcement is for providers of SAP third-party maintenance, such as Rimini Street.

Update: Chris Kanaracus at IDG News Service reports on the SAP maintenance fee hike. Larry Dignan at ZDnet also chimes in. Ray Wang provides more background and analysis.

Update, Feb 5: Dennis Howlett has a deeper dive, and he gets clarification from SAP on several issues. 

Related Posts

SAP backs down on 22% maintenance fees
Mad as hell: backlash brewing against SAP maintenance fee hike

Tech Optimization

Logos and the Psychology of Colour

Logos and the Psychology of Colour

In the process of building new brands, there are three steps that I love:
  1. Naming: The naming of your new brand can be fraught – but should be fun. Coming up with a name that is descriptive enough for your customers but imaginative enough to draw them in can take far longer than you can imagine. Then once you have a name, securing and registering it can take time and more than a little money. There are some agencies dedicated to naming, and if you have a big budget it would be fabulous to work with them … but if you’re running a startup, chances are you’ll be doing the naming over a few beers with your mates. Be sure to think through the various combinations of the name and how it will be used. After all, you don’t want to follow the example of promo pen company Pen Island.
  2. Planning: No surprise here – but I get quite a kick out of the planning process. From building out the communications architecture through to building out the business case, planning is an important step for any startup. You’ll be amazed what you can learn in a couple of days – and the research and analysis (not to mention the discipline) will hold you in good stead as you start to seek funding and build your core team.
  3. Visual design: Most people think that branding is about logos. A logo is just part of the branding process … but it does need to be given time and attention. And budget always helps. Even if you have budget, it still helps greatly to provide a solid brief to your designer – which is where your planning will help. Make sure you share your research and thinking – explain the various use cases and audiences that your new business will impact. Provide a list of “attributes” that describe your brand. Be clear about the vision you have for the future of your brand. All this information should soak into the appearance of your logo and the visual design of your band.

Now that you have a name, some understanding of the potential of your business and some ideas for your logo, take that list of attributes and find them in the list in this infographic from MuseDesign. Pay special attention to other logos that you see and that you admire. Think about how they are using colour to engage you emotionally. What can you learn from great logos? Which designs make your heart jump?

After all, if you want your brand to be memorable, you’ll need all the branding help you can get.

color-psychology-in-logo-design_5030f8bf7a1e7

 

Marketing Transformation

Mitigating Risk in Software Vendor Support

Mitigating Risk in Software Vendor Support

Credit: Ryan O'Connell

For implementation and ongoing support, most customers rely on their original vendors of major enterprise applications, such as ERP, CRM, and supply chain management (SCM). But what happens when the vendor is not up to the job? What steps can buyers take to mitigate the risk of vendor support failure and protect their investment?

These are questions that come to mind when reading about a recent lawsuit by a governmental agency in Puerto Rico against Infor, alleging that Infor "has been absolutely incapable of resolving serious problems" with the agency's implementation of an Infor product.

The Allegations

The agency, known the Municipal Revenue Collection Center (or, CRIM by its Spanish acronym) originally purchased a license for a computerized tax management system in 2006, prior to Infor acquiring its developer, Hansen, in 2007. Complicating matters, CRIM originally purchased its Hansen license through a Hansen partner, Rock Solid.

Reading the agency's lawsuit, CRIM appears to have done at least a partial implementation of Hansen starting in 2006. Then in 2009, CRIM negotiated and executed contracts with Infor totaling approximately $1.1M to provide services and support for its Hansen system.
Sometime after signing these agreements with Infor, things appear to have broken down.

The details of CRIM's complaint against Infor are summarized by Chris Kanaracus at IDG News Service. In summary, CRIM alleges that the original resources Hansen assigned to the project left Infor after the acquisition, and that Infor was unable to provide other resources that were up to the task. As a result, CRIM claims it has had to create patches and workarounds to keep the system active and working, a job which is made more difficult by not having access to Hansen source code. According to CRIM, serious problems remain unresolved.

Take Steps to Mitigate Risk

Although any legal complaint will, by definition, be one-sided, there are important lessons that buyers can learn, regardless of the outcome of this legal action. In fact, lawsuits of this type are often settled without disclosing the details, meaning we may never know who is at fault.

Therefore, it is more important to focus on what buyers can do, before entering into a vendor relationship, to mitigate the risk of getting into a situation similar to what CRIM claims. 

  1. Implementation success is ultimately the buyer's responsibility. By all means, reach out to the vendor, or a vendor's partner, for implementation and ongoing support. But recognize that you cannot delegate success. Ultimately, it is your implementation, and your responsibility to ensure you have support. 
     
  2. Every mission-critical system implementation plan needs a risk mitigation plan. It appears that CRIM's system was core to the agency's mission--to "collect, receive, and distribute public funds corresponding to municipalities." Inasmuch as its Hansen system supported that mission, the system is, by definition, mission-critical. Did CRIM have a risk mitigation plan? Did that plan identify the risk of losing key vendor support personnel? Apparently, not.
     
  3. Software product change of ownership introduces risk. Your risk mitigation plan should include a scenario where your software product changes ownership. In some cases, support actually improves under new ownership, especially if the new owner views the acquisition as strategic and the previous owner did not have the resources to deliver required levels of support. But in other cases, the vendor may be viewing the acquisition as simply an asset purchase and may be looking to drive support costs out of the business to improve profitability. Either way, a customer should pay close attention whenever a software product changes hands, and certainly before making new investments in that software, whether in purchasing additional licenses, or as in this case, in negotiating new service contracts.
     
  4. Avoid single point of support failure.  It is important for customers to always have alternative sources for support. The vendor does not need to be the only source. Sometimes local partners are a better source. Other times, third-party support may be available from organizations that are not vendor partners. Even individual consultants, if they have the right skills and experience, can be a good source, and an excellent value. A combination of vendor support and support from other sources can often be the best approach, to minimize risk and ensure continuity of service.  
     
  5. Secure access to source code. Finally, customers should negotiate access to source code as part of their initial license agreement, to allow the customer to take over its own support. If the vendor does not accommodate this need, then it often can be negotiated as a condition of a change in control, such as a buyout or acquisition of the vendor. In cases where the vendor goes out of business, a software escrow agreement can at least deliver original source code to the customer.

Commercial software is an attractive alternative to in-house custom system development, in part, because it relieves the customer of the need to provide its own ongoing support. Most of the time, vendors deliver their end of the arrangement. But customers should plan for the times when they don't.

Related Posts

Twenty Years of ERP Lessons Learned
SAP botching up support transition for Business Objects
Infor's opportunity: value in maintenance and support
Oracle applications customers: wedded bliss or battered wives?

Tech Optimization

Advertising in 2020 – Let’s Hope There’s Fire

Advertising in 2020 – Let’s Hope There’s Fire

John Willshire and Mark Earls make you think. They chisel and shape ideas until they are sharp enough to be carved into your mind.

As part of the Wharton Future of Advertising program, they put together this presentation that provokes a conversation around advertising and what it might look like in the year ahead. Take a look through, it’s quick and it will challenge you. Then read on below …

One of the things that caught my attention was a simple statement. “Make things people want [is greater than] Make people want things”.

This seems to be self-evident, but in practice it requires an alternative way of thinking. Almost all of our marketing theory and practice centres on the stimulation of desire. We deliberately create items, objects and experiences that are limited in their availability and then we amplify not only the fact of existence, but the fact of their scarcity.

And yet, we live in an age of abundance. We all know it. Yet we still play out this game of scarcity. I find it interesting. I find it fascinating that we are complicit in this form of cultural production that we call advertising. But I also predict a seachange ahead.

We are going to have to work a whole lot harder to generate the kind of engagement and interest that advertising once commanded. Our connected consumers have outflanked, outranked and even out-performed us. Mark and John are right. We will need marketing and advertising that is bolder than we have been in decades. And decidedly more primal. We’ll need to relinquish the calculator and the paperclip and step out from behind the mirrored glass and meet our customers face to face.

Big data may hold the answers – but we’re far from understanding the most basic of questions. Mark and John have lit a signal fire but it’s not off in the distance. Look down, it’s right under our arses.

 

Marketing Transformation

Multi-Channel Unified Agent Desktop Software Geared for Growth

Multi-Channel Unified Agent Desktop Software Geared for Growth

The rapid growth in smartphones, social media and video has created new channels — many of which are handled separately than the traditional call center, causing inconsistent customer experiences. Today’s customers, especially the digital natives, seek immediate response to issues and are no longer satisfied with slow service or delayed response.  They expect immediate connectivity and response to their questions and want consistent service and recognition regardless of the channels they choose. 

This more complex support environment often leads to mistakes as CSRs toggle back and forth among several applications to deliver an answer to a customer. Additionally, customers are often put on hold while waiting for the CSR to process a transaction. An intelligent unified desktop software greater reduces processing time and improves accuracy of CSRs. Customers enjoy faster and more accurate answers resulting in a positive experience.

Most existing unified desktop software supports only telephone transactions and neglects the rapidly emerging channels of social and mobile application support. Unified desktop software vendors include CRM vendors such as Salesforce and Amdocs that link to the core ACD software and provide customer information directly to agent desktops when a call is received.  Additionally, dedicated software, vendors such Pegasystems offers business process management and supports unified desktop software for handling complex business processes by automating programming and workflow. Pegasystems Business Process Management offers premise based and cloud solutions and is excellent tool for high-end complex customer support operations. It is one of the few vendors supporting multiple channels on their unified agent desktop.

LiveOps a cloud based customer service organization recently announced a new integrated agent desktop that supports all channels including social called LiveOps Engage.  All channels are visible on a single screen, which improves agent productivity and delivers a seamless customer experience. Importantly, LiveOps has built in quality control that allows managers to review agent’s messages on social and other channels before messages are posted publically.  LiveOps demonstrates solid innovation in this area that will attract more customers and help sustain its strong year- over- year growth in cloud customer service.

There is little doubt that for customer support operations to improve performance in today’s complex environment that a unified agent desktop is an essential tool.  It improves the customer experience, increases accuracy, supports more personalized interactions and reduces processing time.  I expect to see significant growth in unified desktop software for a multiple channel customer experience in 2013.

 

Next-Generation Customer Experience

Exit the vanity PC; enter the vanity iPad/tablet?

Exit the vanity PC; enter the vanity iPad/tablet?

According to the FT in its piece about the latest iPad upgrade (January 30, 2013), Philip Schiller, Apple’s SVP of Worldwide Marketing, said 120m iPad owners were using these “rather than their old PCs” to fulfil both “business and personal needs”.  The implication, at least according to Mr Schiller, seems that to be that the PC must be dead or dying because it is being supplanted by iPads.  This seems a dubious (except to Apple) proposition.

What may be true is something slightly different, and rather more plausible.  This is that the ‘vanity PC’ (or laptop) is being added to (but not replaced) by iPads (and potentially other tablets), which may or may not in turn be ‘vanity tablets’.

So what is a ‘vanity device’?   It is a device purchased for (or by) an executive more for show rather than serious use.  You think these do not exist?  If so, you are sadly mistaken.

The first ‘vanity device’ I encountered was when consulting for a significant UK company whose deputy chairman insisted that he must have a (what was then the new-fangled) PC in his office.  The limitations on his usage were best illustrated by this company’s IT Centre, located some 30 miles away from Head Office.  On more than one occasion an support specialist had to incur the corporate cost to drive to and from central London to put back the PC’s plug back into the electricity socket — because no one had worked out (the courage) how to ask him to check that the PC was plugged into the wall and the switch turned on. (It transpired that the cleaner used that same power point to clean his office, but never reconnected what she had pulled out).  Worse still he could not even log on for himself but insisted that the PC be left logged-in when he was not there…

Most recently I encountered a partner in a financial services company who has an laptop but who never edited (nevermind originated) a document (or spreadsheet or presentation).  His PA confirmed that that laptop was for receiving and reading information — and fair enough.  Nevertheless the laptop (in this case) was a smart one, both fashionable and overpowered as well as more than is necessary for the modest tasks being performed.

In the latter case, a 2012/2013-style tablet actually can make more sense than a laptop PC.  An iPad or Android tablet IS a great mobile content consumption device, even if it is not so good for content creation.  A tablet is also a great data access device, though not so good for data manipulation, and potentially excellent for enhancing workflow-based decision taking (as Workday, SAP and others are demonstrating).

Herein lies the issue that Mr. Schiller raised.  Are the alleged 120M iPads:

  • displacing working laptops/PCs?
  • displacing vanity laptops/PCs?
  • adding to the collection of ‘vanity devices’ that are minimally used by (especially) executives?
  • adding to the collection of working devices that are in constant use by other executives, managers and users?

At the December’s Dell World (in Austin) John Swainson (Dell’s head of software and ex-CEO of CA and more) stated that at one conference he had attended he had almost felt he was confessing when he owned up to carrying 5 devices, saying also that he was not the person carrying the most devices.  Equally I have to confess that, when business traveling, I rarely have less than 4 devices (at least 3 smartphones covering 3 countries/networks, possibly two tablets  – of different sizes and capabilities — and normally a laptop.  If he and I are even only mildly representative, many others will be adding to their device collection rather than displacing existing ones.

The core issue continues, therefore, to be about content creation.  Microsoft’s Office retains its premier position, not least because interchanging editable documents (spreadsheet, presentation or written document) matters.

Could Office 2013 change this, by enabling all to exchange and edit through the cloud?  Yes, possibly.  It will be interesting to see how creating and editing Office business documents in the cloud on an iPad or Android tablet will feel — and for that we will have to wait until late February.

As I, and many others, have argued, Office remains a significant key to tablets and their future in and between enterprises.  Thus far Windows 8 RT has proved to be a mixed bag — because Office is more than the sum of Word, Excel, PowerPoint, Outlook and more: Office represents a healthy ecosystem with enormous flexibility, choice and function coming from the largest development community (still).  Gainsaying this be difficult and full Office on full Win8 tablet is still an emerging arena (the first Win8 tablets have not really convinced).

Apple has a tradition of claiming much, while also being happy to omit sustaining detail.  Apple seems also to be suffering; its own personal computer sales are falling (despite refreshes).  Indeed, the closer that OS X and iOS become the easier it is for the Mac-world (especially those not using Office) to migrate to iPads, for the function is so much more similar.

2013 is likely to be a turning point in the PC/tablet evolution.  Office will likely be a major determinant of what emerges.  Even so, the ‘vanity device’ phenomenon will continue — and will include (rather than displace) vanity tablets as well as vanity laptops (especially of the super-sexy, brushed aluminium, high price variety).  It is not strange that those same executives who insist on cost reduction/containment/management also insist on the latest and best of something that all too many of them do not really use?  Yet the car precedent has been there for all to see for decades — as Audi, BMW, Lexus, Mercedes and others have and continue to enjoy.

New C-Suite Tech Optimization

IBM Sametime as Part of the Enterprise Infrastructure Fabric

IBM Sametime as Part of the Enterprise Infrastructure Fabric

At IBM Connect, Sametime has barely had any mention on the main stage. Furthermore, as one looks at the show program, there are only a couple of sessions on Sametime.

Yet, in some of the demos, the ability to see presence, send an instant message, or have an instant meeting was demoed or at least referenced as key parts of the solution functionality. It almost seems that in the minds of IBM's executives and managers, Sametime's capabilities have become part of the enterprise infrastructure fabric - almost a given that they are there.

Yet, in spite of the lack of executive mind share, the Sametime group still has revenue targets it must meet, which indeed must be challenging given the sales and marketing emphasis on other products, including IBM's social software solution, Connections, and its big data and analytics products. 

In one of the few sessions about Sametime, the Sametime roadmap was discussed within the context of Social Communications. In fact, the session title was "Social Collaboration Strategy and the IBM Sametime Roadmap". The presenter, who leads the Sametime group started the session with these words, "Communications is more powerful in a social business context."

Thus, it appears that collaboration and communications, while important building blocks, are becoming part of the fabric of the enterprise: always available, integrated with and within other solutions. This trend was predicted back in 2009 in an article on NoJitter.com in which I wrote, "It is clear that ... the table stakes now include some form of a UC client that includes integration with the PBX for click-to-call/click-to-conference, directory integration, presence/IM, and usually video. The more sophisticated UC solutions include integration with the email system, integration with standard office desktop software, and a much richer presence engine... UC concepts will ultimately become so commonplace in the market that people will cease to talk about it."

Another trend that may further hasten the inclusion of UC in general and Sametime in particular into the infrastructure fabric is WebRTC. WebRTC is a capability that introduces audio and video communications natively within HTML5 browsers. One can imagine in the very near future when every browser, whether it is running on a PC, smartphone, or tablet, is fully communications enabled. (I am co-chairing a full day conference-within-a-conference at Enterprise Connect 2013 on WebRTC.)

IBM has announced Sametime version 9.0 scheduled for release in mid-2013. Could this be the last "version" of Sametime as a separate product?
 

Future of Work Next-Generation Customer Experience Tech Optimization

IBM Connect 2013 First Take: Will Watson be the future of HCM?

IBM Connect 2013 First Take: Will Watson be the future of HCM?

The messages at this morning’s IBM Connect keynote event were clear: The future is “Social” and the new language of business is “Analytics”. Welcome to the future.

All morning these messages were evangelized and demonstrated, from IBM executives and their demo teams, to clients like Bosch, Caterpillar and Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, and even from a Hollywood star-slash-collaborative film development entrepreneur.  Each spoke on the transformational role that collaborative, social engagement is having in our business and personal lives, changing how we work, play, create, engage and in some cases even how we’re paid or rewarded for our efforts.

For me, one of the most intriguing aspects of the keynote came at the end, when Mike Rhodin, SVP IBM Software Solutions Group, spoke to the future and the intersection of social, analytics and people processes.  He spoke of cognitive systems like IBM’s Watson and its ability to filter through the terabytes of data created every day to see patterns, unlock the real truth about business, employees and customers, and to weave intelligence into every aspect of the fabric of a business.

Watson meets HCMFor example, Rhodin asked that we image a central “employee center” for global organizations – one which becomes a trusted career advisor from pre-hire through advanced roles in the organization through the continuous analysis of formal, informal, social and other inputs (structured and unstructured) to present a highly personalized, dynamic and guided  path for each individual. Not the static, pre-defined career paths of the past, but truly intelligent, contextual and adaptive guidance to the individual all throughout their career with a company.

Long term future vision?  Not as far off as might be imagined.  Today, Watson is being used in select healthcare use cases such as analyzing patient records and myriad information sources to surface recommended treatment protocols.  Applying similarly deep and broad analysis across the ‘big data’ of the enterprise, with a lens on employee success and value creation for the organization, makes complete sense.  Only big data analytics will be able to effectively interpret all the signals an enterprise may receive around its employees and drive meaningful insights and decision support – for managers and the employees alike.  Embedded cognitive systems are the necessary next step as we evolve our talent technologies and processes from transactional systems to systems of engagement and, ultimately, transform them to the experiential systems necessary to thrive in the future of work.

Of course – the answer isn’t just pure analytical power.  Human engagement and analysis will still be needed.  Even in the Watson-recommended healthcare protocols referenced above, the physician and other caregivers use the results to inform and guide their actions; ultimately the healthcare provider makes the final decision.  Likewise, in the career management and other employeee-oriented engagement scenarios, the cognitive system-delivered paths will serve as guides to inform individuals; Watson won’t replace the person-to-person conversations and analysis that will ultimately drive the employee’s action.  What’s transformational, however, is the richness of information that will inform those individual actions, that can make recommendations based on previously hidden patterns and connections, all because of the capabilities of real-time analysis of vast quantities of seemingly disparate information.

Many announcements are underway here at IBM Connect and the opportunities for the  HCM market are numerous; more to follow in upcoming days.  Meanwhile, let me know what you think about the idea of Watson and related systems and the opportunities for HCM.


Filed under: Analytics, Big Data, business effectiveness, Future of Work, Global HCM, HCM, IBM, Kenexa, Mobile/Social, NextGen Workforce, Social Tagged: analytics, Artificial intelligence, Big Data, future of work, HR, HR Tech, IBM, IBM Connect, Next Generation apps, Social, Social Enterprise, Trends, Watson, workforce analytics, yvette cameron

 

New C-Suite Data to Decisions Future of Work