Results

The Enterprise Cloud Buyer’s Bill of Rights - SaaS Applications

The Enterprise Cloud Buyer’s Bill of Rights - SaaS Applications Webinar. R "Ray" Wang. Originally aired December 5, 2012.

New C-Suite Tech Optimization Chief Information Officer On <iframe src="http://player.vimeo.com/video/55642826" width="500" height="281" frameborder="0" webkitAllowFullScreen mozallowfullscreen allowFullScreen></iframe>
Media Name: screenshotcr.png

Lessons Learned: Avoiding Failure in Mobile Deployment

Making Mobility Pay in Your Enterprise webinar 3 of 3. Charles Brett. Originally aired July 24, 2012.

New C-Suite Tech Optimization Chief Information Officer On <iframe src="http://player.vimeo.com/video/46326083" width="500" height="281" frameborder="0" webkitAllowFullScreen mozallowfullscreen allowFullScreen></iframe>
Media Name: coitthumb.png

How to Exploit, Not Fear, BYOD

Making Mobility Pay in Your Enterprise - webinar 2 of 3. Charles Brett. Originally aired July 17, 2012.

New C-Suite Tech Optimization Chief Information Officer On <iframe src="http://player.vimeo.com/video/46276798" width="500" height="281" frameborder="0" webkitAllowFullScreen mozallowfullscreen allowFullScreen></iframe>
Media Name: coitthumb.png

Why Enterprise Mobility is a Game Changer

Making Mobility Pay in Your Enterprise webinar 1 of 3. Why Enterprise Mobility is a Game Changer, Charles Brett. Originally aired July 10, 2012.

New C-Suite Tech Optimization Chief Executive Officer Chief Information Officer On <iframe src="http://player.vimeo.com/video/46274369" width="500" height="281" frameborder="0" webkitAllowFullScreen mozallowfullscreen allowFullScreen></iframe>
Media Name: screenshotmobilitygame.png

Why Reputation Matters

Keynote, Badgeville City Tour, New York City. October 17, 2012.

Future of Work Chief Customer Officer Chief Executive Officer Chief People Officer Chief Marketing Officer On <iframe src="http://player.vimeo.com/video/52711698?byline=0&amp;portrait=0" width="500" height="281" frameborder="0" webkitAllowFullScreen mozallowfullscreen allowFullScreen></iframe> <p><a href="http://vimeo.com/52711698">Keynote: Why Reputation Matters</a> from <a href="http://vimeo.com/badgeville">Badgeville</a> on <a href="http://vimeo.com">Vimeo</a>.</p>
Media Name: screenshotbadgeville.png

TCO in YOUR Next Gen Comms World

CAPEX, OPEX, and the true cost of comms webinar with E. Brent Kelly. Originally aired July 11, 2012

New C-Suite Tech Optimization Chief Information Officer On
Media Name: screenshotebkellweb1.png

Trends in Manufacturing ERP and How to Ensure Success

ERP Manufacturing Experience Keynote

Tech Optimization Chief Information Officer Chief Supply Chain Officer On <iframe src="http://player.vimeo.com/video/61423262" width="500" height="375" frameborder="0" webkitAllowFullScreen mozallowfullscreen allowFullScreen></iframe>
Media Name: scavo-thumb.jpg

DataGrok

For all the silliness surrounding Big Data and Data Science, all the hype and all the controversy, there are actually very innovative and disruptive technologies coming from this area, this new approach to data management and analytics [DMA]. How do we categorize the vendors or the technologies that have never existed before?

Predictives

One new area is Predictive Analytics, also called Predictive Intelligence. Since predictions are not analytics, as the term is used in BI, and certainly not the Intelligence used in BI, I don't like either, but prefer the simpler "Predictives". Four companies with which I've had briefings, fall into the Predictives category, but each of these companies have very different approaches and technologies for performing predictives. These companies are Opera Solutions, Alpine Data Labs, INRIX and Zementis. There are other companies that I'll include in a full report after receiving briefings, such as KXEN, Soft10 and Numenta. By the way, Numenta's product is named "Grok". Given their differences, do they really all belong in the same category?

Opera Solutions: Acting on petabytes of data, Opera Solutions provides a signal hub stack starting with data management, going through pattern matching in the signal layer, and, enhanced by their own Data Science teams, resulting in predictions and inferences for better decisions for enterprise advantage, understanding the "signal" is more important than the underlying technology, to actually create front line productivity through signals manifesting and adjusting "gut feel" where machines don't direct humans but do the heavy lifting.

Alpine Data Labs: Alpine Data Labs brings mathematical, statistical and machine learning predictive methods to the data in situ, no matter how small nor how big the data sets, within a variety of RDBMS technologies and Hadoop distributions. Alpine Data Labs helps data science teams address the data where it lays, across data types and functional areas, working with all the data to bring insight to bear on better decisions.

INRIX: INRIX data science teams and technology provides unique predictives using connected cars, connected devices and connected people.

Zementis: Zementis brings predictive modeling into decision management through their data science teams, Adapa product and strong commitment to the predictive markup modeling language [PMML]. Through partners and customers Zementis works with traditional and innovative data sources to provide decision management from predictives, data mining and machine learning for marketing solutions, financial services, predictive maintenance and energy/water sustainability.

DataGrok

One of the more interesting things to come out of data science is how do you really understand the data that is being gathered and presented. Two of the companies with which I've recently have had briefings, challenge the categories of Data Discovery or Data Exploration. However, each of these companies have different technologies, and different approaches to fully, deeply understanding your data, and to being able to draw conclusions from the data before doing other, more formal analytics. Over the past month, I've had the good fortune of having very in-depth, in-person briefings by both of these companies. Both of these companies are helping those who need it most to truly, fully, deeply, easily understand their data. These approaches, while very, very different, both constitute an entirely new category. Beyond data discovery, beyond data exploration, I call this new category Data Grokking.

"Grok" as I wrote in 2007, means to

"to fully and deeply understand"; [but to you need some background on the word's origins]. It's Martian and not from any Terran language at all. It comes from the fertile mind of Robert A. Heinlein, and was brought to Earth by Valentine Michael Smith in Heinlein's wonderful 1961 novel Stranger in a Strange Land.

 

One of these companies is still in stealth mode, and I won't mention their name here. The other is Ayasdi, and Ayasdi takes a very, very interesting approach to grokking your data.

These two very different technologies, based upon very different science and mathematics, do indeed allow us to fully and deeply understand our data. Much like the Martian ceremony, the DataGrok allows us to mentally ingest our data, to realize creative insights from our data sets, and to recognize the fundamental interweaving among the data, that, prior to these two innovative firms, could only come about through a long, arduous struggle with the data sets.

As I mentioned, the one company is still in stealth mode, so I'll write about Ayasdi here.

Ayasdi

Ayasdi comes out of the intersection of Topology and Computer Science, as brought together by two Stanford Professors, Gurjeet Singh and Gunnar Carlsson. The project started as a DARPA contract that has spanned more than four years, comptop. The CompTop project included Duke, Rutgers & Stanford nodes. Topological methods discover the structure of the data - this is somewhat analogous to, but not the same as the probabilistic or cummulative distribution or density functions [pdf, PDF, cdf or CDF].

Ayasdi is focused on four markets:

  1. Pharmaceuticals, Healthcare and Biotech
  2. Oil & gas
  3. Government
  4. Financial Services

From this, you can see that Ayasdi customers go after expensive data, i.e. expensive to collect, expensive to use. Iris is the front end to the Ayasdi Platform, and while available as a private cloud, their offering is primarily SaaS.

The analyst community is trying to figure out where to put Ayasdi, thus my category of DataGrok. Another area of confusion is "What is the right tool of each step of the process from DataGrok to inferences and predictions?" Some of this stems from mistrust of machines, but we need machines that do more than count and sort, we need machines that help us to find insight and improve performance.

Creative Commons License: Attribution, Non-Commercial, Share-AlikeExcept where otherwise noted, this content is
licensed under a Creative Commons License.
Data to Decisions Chief Customer Officer Chief Information Officer Chief Marketing Officer

Trends: Seven Priorities In The Shift From CMO to Chief Digital Officer

Shift From CMO to CDO Is In Progress

Today’s marketing strategies increasingly depend more on digital and on data than in the past.  With more data, marketers can measure against a new set of metrics that matter including:

  • calculating return on promotional investment (ROPI),
  • performing multivariable testing (beyond A/b)
  • driving conversion rates and optimizing efforts,
  • fine tuning customer segmentation, and
  • managing omni-channel diversity

Unfortunately the shift to digital requires a greater reliance on technology.  Historically, CMOs relied on IT for help on the database or CRM system or even the website.   However consumerization of technology and the cloud have now given marketers more control on their technology destiny.  In fact, a recent post by fellow analyst Gavin Heaton on “CMO to CIO, It’s time we talked” highlights many of these new challenges.

Expect Seven Strategies To Emerge In The Shift To CDO

Consequently, many marketing leaders are making the shift from CMO type roles to Chief Digital Officers as marketing leaders align technology closer with strategy. This shift from analog marketer to a Chief Digital Officer role will result in seven trends for 2013 (see Figure 1.)

Figure 1.  2013 Trends Signal Shift From Classical CMO to Digital CMOs or Chief Digital Officers

  1. Drive relevancy with context no content. Context trumps content as relevancy required to break channel fatigue.  Relevancy will improves engagement metrics.
  2. Move mobile strategies from campaign to commerce. With engagement moving to mobile first around the world, campaigns without commerce will result in wasted marketing efforts. Point of sale must be part of the strategy as we shift to a world of matrix commerce.
  3. Focus on conversion rate optimization. Conversion rate optimization takes center stage.  How catalysts are built to create the right offer should be tested, measured, and optimized.  This is the 8th C in the 9C’s of engagement.
  4. Design for people to people interaction models. B2B and B2C are dead.  With context, individuals play different roles. This move to engagement and experience will require design thinking in crafting the P2P models of the future.
  5. Use marketing automation to gain efficiencies. Repetitive processes should be rapidly automated and even given to the CIO for maintenance.  Scaling up with marketing automation is a key requirement for success.
  6. Address big and small data. Social and mobile provide great signals that can be used to make the shift from data to information.  Finding patterns in the information helps marketers identify insights and then make the appropriate decisions.  Marketers should focus on the business outcomes not the data.
  7. Expect more accountability in marketing budgets. With so much money flowing into marketing and digital efforts, expect a higher degree of scrutiny.  Marketers must be prepared to talk financial speak. Moving to digital will improve accountability and lead to data driven marketing that many have sought in the past.

The Bottom Line: Business and IT Must Stay Aligned But Not Tethered

The pace of business remains fierce.  Marketers must move quickly while IT teams have to provide the scale and standardization to keep costs in line.  Organizations should assess the persona or penchant for adopting disruptive technology before determining governance, organizational structure, and objectives as the CDO role emerges.  Market Leaders should choose to create a new role of CDO by bringing the best of CMO and CIO into a new area.  Fast Followers should bring IT and CMO closer together before creating this new role.  Cautious adopters and laggards should wait and see if there is a need for this position.

Your POV

Will you create a CDO position? Do you have a CDO position and how does it work. We’d love your feedback!  Add your comments to the blog or send us a comment at R (at) SoftwareInsider (dot) org or R (at) ConstellationRG (dot) com

Please let us know if you need help with your digital marketing efforts.  Sign up for a Constellation Academy Workshop or let us assist with:

  • Assessing readiness
  • Designing digital transformation strategy
  • Developing your transformation from CMO to CDO
  • Vendor selection
  • Connecting with other pioneers

Related Research

Reprints

Reprints can be purchased through Constellation Research, Inc. To request official reprints in PDF format, please contact Sales .

Disclosure

Although we work closely with many mega software vendors, we want you to trust us. For the full disclosure policy, stay tuned for the full client list on the Constellation Research website.

* Not responsible for any factual errors or omissions.  However, happy to correct any errors upon email receipt.

Copyright © 2001 – 2013 R Wang and Insider Associates, LLC All rights reserved.
Contact the Sales team to purchase this report on a a la carte basis or join the Constellation Customer Experience!

 

Marketing Transformation Innovation & Product-led Growth Leadership Chief Marketing Officer CXO

MWC2013: Mobile carriers and others self-delude – chasing the ever seductive OS siren call

MWC 2013 saw many OS announcements and commitments, but not from the usual culprits –  Microsoft (Windows 8, various forms), Apple (iOS, various forms) or Google (Android, with all its multiple bifurcations).  Instead a motley collection of desperate telephone carriers took the principle biscuit (committing to the Firefox OS); then there were Samsung (with Tizen), Canonical (with Ubuntu/Linux) and Jolla (with Sailfish, ex MeeGo). The only clear indicator amongst so muchOS enthusiasm was that these companies seem lured by the ever present siren call of owning your own OS, and to have forgotten the past.

Since the arrival of Windows back in the 1980s many have tried to build operating systems (with varying degrees of lack of success – think OS2) and then tried to establish a what is now referred to as an ecosystem– that collection of applications and developers and content platforms that combine to attract users (whether enterprise or consumer) who want to buy.  Arguably only two OSs have emerged since Windows that have attained widespread adoption:

  • iOS, a scaled down  derivative from OS X (which in turn still comes with a BSD open source UNIX licence)
  • Linux and with this its scaled-down protégé — Android.

In one case, iOS, the OS is tightly controlled and is almost an incidental in Apple’s successes of the past 10 years.  In the other, Linux succeeded and continues to succeeds because it is open and without overt licence fees.  When Google bought Andy Rubin’s Android Inc. it (Google) made a shrewd bet that an open OS for mobile devices could attract success — because it was not closed (like iOS) and yet was not punitively expensive (and elderly) like Windows Mobile and before this Windows CE.  Both Apple and Google have progressed, not least because of their huge investment in both OSs but also because they brought applicable marketing and an acute sense of what an ecosystem means to developers, content providers and users alike.

What MWC2013 saw was a group of largely second rate mobile voice carriers (Telefónica, KDD, Deutsche Telekom, Etisalat, Smart, Sprint Telcom Italia, Telenor, Qtel, Singtel, VimpelCom and more)  along with a miscellany of device manufacturers (Alcatel, Sony, ZTE and Huawei — placing bets every each way in the hope of winning some market share ) bellowing in envy at what Apple and Google commercially have achieved.  Not fair they cry: we want a slice of the monies Apple and Google are obtaining because of our networks.

Their answer they decided (or so it would seem from MWC013) is to try to replay the OS game yet again — quite failing to remember three fundamental factors:

  • OS development is hugely expensive and almost always requires more than anticipated
  • designing anything by committee invariably produces a multi-humped camel of dubious attraction
  • it is not just the OS which matters; equally important is attracting an ecosystem –  and that neither happens overnight nor without serious investment nor without patiience and good fortune.

For  enterprise’s interested in mobility Firefox OS should represents little more than a minor distraction.  That is emphasized by (say)  Telefónica’s avowed attitude — that the Firefoc OS is intended for low cost smartphones for Southern American markets.  It seems far more probable that low cost Android, and even WindowsPhone 8, devices will appeal more, because of their existing app base.

So what of the others:

  • Tizen is an open source system which seeks to provide a consistent user experience acrossmultipe  device types; it is based on Linux kernel and the WebKitruntime and may have Samsung’s Bada added to it; why the world needs another Linux-dervied OS is unclear, unless (perhaps) there is specific optimization (both technical and marketing) for oriental markets (which exceed N American and Europe combined by a long way).
  • Jolla’s Sailfish was formally launched at MWC 2013 and is the reinvention of Meego (ex-Nokia, Intel and the Linux Foundation) with a target of smartphones (no mention of tablets); it is, again a Linux derivative — so what is its appeal to an enterprise?
  • finally there is the Canonical approach to bring Ubuntu to smartphones and tablets and personal computers; Ubuntu is proven and the concept of a fully fledged Linux implementation consistent across all three form factors could have strong enterprise appeal — if the UI is good enough; the downside is that the timeframes for even seeing anything worthwhile are so long (into 2014 and beyond) that it may simply be left behind.

From the enterprise mobility viewpoint, MWC2013 offered four different Linux-based initiatives to add to Andoid.  Of these only one, that from Canonical, seems to have a real IT as well as consumer logic behind.  The other three are, at least for 2013 and 2014 and probably 2015, almost irrelevant — however much their proponents trumpet.  The killer, in each case is likely to be a mix of enterprise dissatisfaction combined with apathy as well as minimal app developer and content provider ecosystems.  But that does not stop the siren song of owning an OS attracting the foolish (which is why Odysseus had himself tied to the mast — something that many mobile carrier and device mnufacturer executices should have also copied).

Chief Information Officer